Use of the Airtraq® device for airway management in the prehospital setting – a retrospective study

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

Dan Gryth¹  Christer H Svensén²  Agneta Larsson¹  Mikael Gellerfors² 

[1] Falck Ambulance, Emergency Dispatch unit, Stockholm, Sweden;Department of Clinical Science and Education, Section of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm South General Hospital, 118 83 Stockholm, Sweden

关键词: Patient safety;    Airtraq®;    Complications (MeSH);    Difficult endotracheal intubation;    Endotracheal intubation (MeSH);    Airway management (MeSH);    Critical care (MeSH);    Helicopter emergency medical service;    Emergency medical services (MeSH);    Prehospital emergency care (MeSH);    Out-of-hospital;    Pre-hospital;   

Others  :  810349
DOI  :  10.1186/1757-7241-22-10

 received in 2013-08-06, accepted in 2014-01-31,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Difficulties with prehospital intubations have encouraged the development of indirect laryngoscopy techniques, facilitating laryngeal visualization. Airtraq® is a relatively new single-use indirect laryngoscope. The Airtraq® has been evaluated in several prehospital mannequin intubation trials. However, prehospital clinical experience with the device is limited.

Methods

A retrospective medical chart review was performed for patients who underwent prehospital endotracheal intubation in the Stockholm County between January 2008 and December 2012. Both anaesthesiologists and nurse anaesthetists performed prehospital intubations during the study period. All Airtraq® intubations during this period were included in the analysis. The objective was to estimate the success rate of Airtraq® used in a prehospital setting.

Results

During the 5-year period (January 2008- December 2012), 2453 tracheal intubations were performed. Airtraq® was used in 28 cases (1%). The overall Airtraq® intubation success rate was 68%. Among patients with anticipated or unexpected difficult airway (23/28) the Airtraq® success rate was 61% (14/23). Among patients who underwent drug facilitated or rapid-sequence intubation protocols 4/5 (80%) were successfully intubated with Airtraq®.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this retrospective study showed a higher Airtraq® success rate than previous prospective prehospital trials. However, compared to other prehospital direct and indirect intubation methods the Airtraq success rate is low. Further clinical trials are necessary to evaluate the role of Airtraq® in the prehospital airway management.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Gellerfors et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Timmermann A, Eich C, Braun U, et al.: Prehospital airway management: a prospective evaluation of anaesthesia trained emergency physicians. Resuscitation 2006, 70(2):179-185.
• [2]Deakin CD, Nolan JP, Soar J, Sunde K, Koster RW, Smith GB, Perkins GD: European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 4. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation 2010, 81:1305-1352.
• [3]Chesters A, Keefe N, Mauger J, Lockey D: Prehospital anaesthesia performed in a rural and suburban air ambulance service staffed by a physician and paramedic: a 16-month review of practice. Emerg Med J 2013, 00:1-4.
• [4]Hubble MW, Wilfong DA, Benner RW: A meta-analysis of prehospital airway control techniques part II: alternative airway devices and cricothyrotomy success rates. Prehosp Emerg Care 2010, 14(4):515-530.
• [5]Hubble MW, Brown L, Wilfong DA, Hertelendy A, Benner RW, Richards ME: A meta-analysis of prehospital airway control techniques part I: orotracheal and nasotracheal intubation success rates. Prehosp Emerg Care 2010, 14(3):377-401.
• [6]Cobas MA, De la Pen˜ AMA, Manning R, et al.: Prehospital intubations and mortality: a level 1 trauma center perspective. Anesth Analg 2009, 109:489-493.
• [7]Davis DP, Peay J, Sise MJ, et al.: The impact of prehospital endotracheal intubation on outcome in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 2005, 58:933-939.
• [8]Stiell IG, Nesbitt LP, Pickett W, et al.: The OPALS major trauma study: impact of advanced life-support on survival and morbidity. CMAJ 2008, 178:1141-1152.
• [9]Tawfic QA, Burad J: The GlideScope for tracheal intubation in patients with grade IV modified Cormack and Lehane. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010, 27(7):668-670.
• [10]Brar MS: Airway management in a bleeding adult following tonsillectomy: a case report. AANA J 2009, 77(6):428-430.
• [11]Arslan ZI, Yildiz T, Baykara ZN, et al.: Tracheal intubation in patients with rigid collar immobilisation of the cervical spine: a comparison of Airtraq and LMA CTrach devices. Anaesthesia 2009, 64:1332-1336.
• [12]Maharaj CH, Costello JF, Harte BH, et al.: Evaluation of the Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients at increased risk for difficult tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 2008, 63:182-188.
• [13]Lu Y, Jiang H, Zhu YS: Airtraq laryngoscope versus conventional Macintosh laryngoscope: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia 2011, 66(12):1160-1167.
• [14]Woollard M, Lighton D, Smyth M: Airtraq vs standard laryngoscopy by student paramedics and experienced prehospital laryngoscopists managing a model of difficult intubation. Anaesthesia 2008, 63(1):26-31.
• [15]Wetsch WA, Carlitscheck M, Hinkelbein J: Success rates and endotracheal tube insertion times of experienced emergency physicians using five video laryngoscopes: a randomised trial in a simulated trapped car accident victim. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011, 28(12):849-858.
• [16]Amathieu R, Sudrial J, Dhonneur G: Simulating face-to-face tracheal intubation of a trapped patient: a randomized comparison of the LMA Fastrach, the GlideScope, and the Airtraq laryngoscope. Br J Anaesth 2012, 108(1):140-145.
• [17]Russi CS, Myers LA, Berns KS, et al.: The Airtraq optical Laryngoscope in helicopter emergency medical services: a pilot trial. Air Med J 2013, 32(2):88-92.
• [18]Trimmel H, Kreutziger J, Voelckel WG: Use of the Airtraq laryngoscope for emergency intubation in the prehospital setting: a randomized control trial. Crit Care Med 2011, 39(3):489-493.
• [19]Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Blitt CD, Connis RT, Nickinovich DG, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Benumof JL, Berry FA, Blitt CD, Bode RH, Cheney FW, Connis RT, Guidry OF, Nickinovich DG, Ovassapian A, American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway: Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2013, 118(2):251-270.
• [20]Rognås L, Hansen TM, Kirkegaard H, Tønnesen E: Pre-hospital advanced airway management by experienced anaesthesiologists: a prospective descriptive study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2013, 21:58. BioMed Central Full Text
• [21]Nakstad AR, Heimdal HJ, Strand T, Sandberg M: Incidence of desaturation during prehospital rapid sequence intubation in a physician-based helicopter emergency service. Am J Emerg Med 2011, 29(6):639-644.
• [22]Newton A, Ratchford A, Khan I: Incidence of adverse events during prehospital rapid sequence intubation: a review of one year on the London helicopter emergency medical service. J Trauma 2008, 64(2):487-492.
• [23]Von Vopelius-Feldt J, Benger JR: Prehospital anaesthesia by a physician and paramedic critical care team in Southwest England. Eur J Emerg Med 2012, 20(6):382-386.
• [24]Helm M, Hossfeld B, Schafer S, Hoitz J, Lampl L: Factors influencing emergency intubation in the pre-hospital setting–a multicentre study in the German helicopter emergency medical service. Br J Anaesth 2006, 96(1):67-71.
• [25]Lossius HM, Roislien J, Lockey DJ: Patient safety in pre-hospital emergency tracheal intubation: a comprehensive meta-analysis of the intubation success rates of EMS providers. Crit Care 2012, 16(1):R24. BioMed Central Full Text
• [26]Breckwoldt J, Klemstein S, Brunne B, Schnitzer L, Arntz HR, Mochmann HC: Expertise in prehospital endotracheal intubation by emergency medicine physicians-comparing ‘proficient performers’ and ‘experts’. Resuscitation 2012, 83(4):434-439.
• [27]Helm M, Kremers G, Lampl L, Hossfeld B: Incidence of transient hypoxia during pre-hospital rapid sequence intubation by anaesthesiologists. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2013, 57(2):199-205.
• [28]Harris T, Lockey D: Success in physician prehospital rapid sequence intubation: what is the effect of base speciality and length of anaesthetic training? Emerg Med J 2011, 28(3):225-229.
• [29]Roberts K, Jewkes F, Whalley H, Hopkins D, Porter K: A review of emergency equipment carried and procedures performed by UK front line paramedics on paediatric patients. Emerg Med J 2005, 22(8):572-576.
• [30]Schmid MC, Deisenberg M, Strauss H, Schüttler J, Birkholz T: Equipment of a land-based emergency medical service in Bavaria: a questionnaire. Anaesthesist 2006, 55(10):1051-1057.
• [31]Schmid M, Schüttler J, Ey K, Reichenbach M, Trimmel H, Mang H: Equipment for pre-hospital airway management on helicopter emergency medical system helicopters in central Europe. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2011, 55(5):583-587.
• [32]Berlac P, Hyldmo PK, Kongstad P, Kurola J, Nakstad AR, Sandberg M: Scandinavian Society for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. Pre-hospital airway management: guidelines from a task force from the Scandinavian Society for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008, 52(7):897-907.
• [33]Wang HE, Yealy DM: How many attempts are required to accomplish out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation? Acad Emerg Med 2006, 13:372-377.
• [34]Adnet F, Jouriles NJ, Le Toumelin P, et al.: Survey of out-of-hospital emergency intubations in the French prehospital medical system: a multicenter study. Ann Emerg Med 1998, 32:454-460.
• [35]Choi HJ, Kang HG, Lim TH, et al.: Endotracheal intubation using a GlideScope video laryngoscope by emergency physicians: a multicentre analysis of 345 attempts in adult patients. Emerg Med J 2010, 27:380-382.
• [36]Wayne MA, McDonnell M: Comparison of traditional versus video laryngoscopy in out-of-hospital tracheal intubation. Prehosp Emerg Care 2010, 14(2):278-282.
• [37]van Zundert A, Maassen R, Wiepking M, et al.: A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways. Anesth Analg 2009, 109:825-831.
• [38]Shippey B, Ray D, McKeown D: Case series: the McGrath videolaryngoscope-an initial clinical evaluation. Can J Anaesth 2007, 54:307-313.
• [39]Jones PM, Turkstra TP, Harle CC, et al.: Effect of stylet angulation and endotracheal tube camber on time to intubation with the GlideScope. Can J Anaesth 2007, 54:21-27.
• [40]Di Marco P, Scattoni L, Reale C: Learning curves of the Airtraq and the Macintosh laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation by novice laryngoscopists: a clinical study. Anesth Analg 2011, 112(1):122-125.
• [41]Maharaj CH, Costello JF, Higgins BD, et al.: Learning and performance of tracheal intubation by novice personnel: a comparison of the Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscope. Anaesthesia 2006, 61:671-677.
• [42]Woollard M, Mannion W, Lighton D, et al.: Use of the Airtraq laryngoscope in a model of difficult intubation by prehospital providers not previously trained in laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 2007, 62:1061-1065.
• [43]Heath KJ: The effect of laryngoscopy of different cervical spine immobilisation techniques. Anaesthesia 1994, 49:843-845.