Direct comparison of MRI and X-ray CT technologies for 3D imaging of root systems in soil: potential and challenges for root trait quantification

Plant Methods

Siegfried Jahnke²  Norman Uhlmann¹  Ulrich Schurr²  Stefan Gerth¹  Daniel Pflugfelder²  Dagmar van Dusschoten²  Anja Eggert¹  Ralf Metzner² 

[1] Development Center X-Ray Technology EZRT, Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Systems IIS, Flugplatzstraße 75, Fürth, 90768, Germany;Institute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Wilhelm-Jonen- Str., Jülich, 52425, Germany

关键词: Non-destructive;    Roots in soil;    Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) 3D imaging;    Root system architecture;    Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI);    X-ray Computed Tomography (CT);   

Others  :  1174977
DOI  :  10.1186/s13007-015-0060-z

 received in 2014-11-28, accepted in 2015-02-23,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Roots are vital to plants for soil exploration and uptake of water and nutrients. Root performance is critical for growth and yield of plants, in particular when resources are limited. Since roots develop in strong interaction with the soil matrix, tools are required that can visualize and quantify root growth in opaque soil at best in 3D. Two modalities that are suited for such investigations are X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Due to the different physical principles they are based on, these modalities have their specific potentials and challenges for root phenotyping. We compared the two methods by imaging the same root systems grown in 3 different pot sizes with inner diameters of 34 mm, 56 mm or 81 mm.

Results

Both methods successfully visualized roots of two weeks old bean plants in all three pot sizes. Similar root images and almost the same root length were obtained for roots grown in the small pot, while more root details showed up in the CT images compared to MRI. For the medium sized pot, MRI showed more roots and higher root lengths whereas at some spots thin roots were only found by CT and the high water content apparently affected CT more than MRI. For the large pot, MRI detected much more roots including some laterals than CT.

Conclusions

Both techniques performed equally well for pots with small diameters which are best suited to monitor root development of seedlings. To investigate specific root details or finely graduated root diameters of thin roots, CT was advantageous as it provided the higher spatial resolution. For larger pot diameters, MRI delivered higher fractions of the root systems than CT, most likely because of the strong root-to-soil contrast achievable by MRI. Since complementary information can be gathered with CT and MRI, a combination of the two modalities could open a whole range of additional possibilities like analysis of root system traits in different soil structures or under varying soil moisture.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Metzner et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Gregory PJ. Plant roots. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK; 2006.
• [2]Gregory PJ, Bengough AG, Grinev D, Schmidt S, Thomas WTB, Wojciechowski T et al.. Root phenomics of crops: opportunities and challenges. Funct Plant Biol. 2009; 36:922-9.
• [3]Mooney SJ, Pridmore TP, Helliwell J, Bennett MJ. Developing X-ray computed tomography to non-invasively image 3-D root systems architecture in soil. Plant Soil. 2012; 352:1-22.
• [4]Giehl RFH, von Wirén N. Root nutrient foraging. Plant Physiol. 2014; 166:509-17.
• [5]Trachsel S, Kaeppler SM, Brown KM, Lynch JP. Shovelomics: high throughput phenotyping of maize (Zea mays L.) root architecture in the field. Plant Soil. 2011; 341:75-87.
• [6]Lynch JP. Root phenes for enhanced soil exploration and phosphorus acquisition: tools for future crops. Plant Physiol. 2011; 156:1041-9.
• [7]Eshel A. Plant roots: the hidden half. 4th ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA; 2013.
• [8]Iyer-Pascuzzi AS, Symonova O, Mileyko Y, Hao YL, Belcher H, Harer J et al.. Imaging and analysis platform for automatic phenotyping and trait ranking of plant root systems. Plant Physiol. 2010; 152:1148-57.
• [9]Downie H, Holden N, Otten W, Spiers AJ, Valentine TA, Dupuy LX. Transparent soil for imaging the rhizosphere. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e44276.
• [10]Nagel KA, Kastenholz B, Jahnke S, Van Dusschoten D, Aach T, Muhlich M et al.. Temperature responses of roots: impact on growth, root system architecture and implications for phenotyping. Funct Plant Biol. 2009; 36:947-59.
• [11]Neumann G, George TS, Plassard C. Strategies and methods for studying the rhizosphere-the plant science toolbox. Plant Soil. 2009; 321:431-56.
• [12]Blümler P, Windt CW, Van Dusschoten D. Magnetic resonance in plants. Nova Acta Leopoldina. 2009; 357:17-30.
• [13]Jahnke S, Menzel MI, van Dusschoten D, Roeb GW, Bühler J, Minwuyelet S et al.. Combined MRI-PET dissects dynamic changes in plant structures and functions. Plant J. 2009; 59:634-44.
• [14]Rogers HH, Bottomley PA. In situ Nuclear Magnetic Resonance imaging of roots - Influence of soil type, ferromagnetic particle content and soil water. Agron J. 1987; 79:957-65.
• [15]Metzner R, van Dusschoten D, Bühler J, Schurr U, Jahnke S. Belowground plant development measured with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): exploiting the potential for non-invasive trait quantification using sugar beet as a proxy. Front Plant Sci. 2014; 5:469.
• [16]Tumlinson LG, Liu HY, Silk WK, Hopmans JW. Thermal neutron computed tomography of soil water and plant roots. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2008; 72:1234-42.
• [17]Leitner D, Felderer B, Vontobel P, Schnepf A. Recovering root system traits using image analysis exemplified by two-dimensional neutron radiography images of lupine. Plant Physiol. 2014; 164:24-35.
• [18]Jenneson PM, Gilboy WB, Morton EJ, Gregory PJ. An X-ray micro-tomography system optimised for the low-dose study of living organisms. Appl Radiat Isot. 2003; 58:177-81.
• [19]Flavel RJ, Guppy CN, Tighe M, Watt M, McNeill A, Young IM. Non-destructive quantification of cereal roots in soil using high-resolution X-ray tomography. J Exp Bot. 2012; 63:2503-11.
• [20]Zhu JM, Ingram PA, Benfey PN, Elich T. From lab to field, new approaches to phenotyping root system architecture. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2011; 14:310-7.
• [21]Koebernick N, Weller U, Huber K, Schluter S, Vogel HJ, Jahn R et al.. In situ visualization and quantification of three-dimensional root system architecture and growth using X-Ray computed tomography. Vadose Zone J. 2014; 13:8.
• [22]Plews AG, Atkinson A, McGrane S. Discriminating structural characteristics of starch extrudates through X-ray micro-tomography using a 3-D watershed algorithm. Int J Food Eng. 2009; 5:11.
• [23]Hanke R, Fuchs T, Uhlmann N. X-ray based methods for non-destructive testing and material characterization. Nucl Instrum Meth A. 2008; 591:14-8.
• [24]Salvo L, Cloetens P, Maire E, Zabler S, Blandin JJ, Buffiere JY et al.. X-ray micro-tomography an attractive characterisation technique in materials science. Nucl Instrum Meth B. 2003; 200:273-86.
• [25]Kalender WA. Computed tomography: fundamentals, system technology, image quality, applications. vth ed. Publicis Publ, Erlangen, Germany; 2011.
• [26]Bao Y, Aggarwal P, Robbins NE, Sturrock CJ, Thompson MC, Tan HQ et al.. Plant roots use a patterning mechanism to position lateral root branches toward available water. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111:9319-24.
• [27]Tracy SR, Black CR, Roberts JA, Sturrock C, Mairhofer S, Craigon J et al.. Quantifying the impact of soil compaction on root system architecture in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) by X-ray micro-computed tomography. Ann Bot (London). 2012; 110:511-9.
• [28]Zappala S, Mairhofer S, Tracy S, Sturrock CJ, Bennett M, Pridmore T et al.. Quantifying the effect of soil moisture content on segmenting root system architecture in X-ray computed tomography images. Plant Soil. 2013; 370:35-45.
• [29]Mairhofer S, Zappala S, Tracy S, Sturrock C, Bennett MJ, Mooney SJ et al.. Recovering complete plant root system architectures from soil via X-ray mu-Computed Tomography. Plant Methods. 2013; 9:1-7. BioMed Central Full Text
• [30]Haacke EM, Brown RW, Thompson MR, Venkatesan R. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA; 1999.
• [31]Callaghan PT. Principles of nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy. Oxford University Press, New York, USA; 1993.
• [32]Köckenberger W, De Panfilis C, Santoro D, Dahiya P, Rawsthorne S. High resolution NMR microscopy of plants and fungi. J Microsc. 2004; 214:182-9.
• [33]Van As H, Scheenen T, Vergeldt FJ. MRI of intact plants. Photosynth Res. 2009; 102:213-22.
• [34]Borisjuk L, Rolletschek H, Neuberger T. Surveying the plant’s world by magnetic resonance imaging. Plant J. 2012; 70:129-46.
• [35]Hillnhütter C, Sikora RA, Oerke EC, van Dusschoten D. Nuclear magnetic resonance: a tool for imaging belowground damage caused by Heterodera schachtii and Rhizoctonia solani on sugar beet. J Exp Bot. 2012; 63:319-27.
• [36]Gruwel MLH. In situ magnetic resonance imaging of plant roots. Vadose Zone J. 2014; 13:3.
• [37]MacFall JS, Johnson GA. Plants, seeds, roots, and soils as applications of magnetic resonance microscopy. Encyclopedia of magnetic resonance. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, New York, USA; 2012.
• [38]Lontoc-Roy M, Dutilleul P, Prasher SO, Han LW, Brouillet T, Smith DL. Advances in the acquisition and analysis of CT scan data to isolate a crop root system from the soil medium and quantify root system complexity in 3-D space. Geoderma. 2006; 137:231-41.
• [39]Poorter H, Bühler J, van Dusschoten D, Climent J, Postma JA. Pot size matters: a meta-analysis of the effects of rooting volume on plant growth. Funct Plant Biol. 2012; 39:839-50.
• [40]Schmidt S, Bengough AG, Gregory PJ, Grinev DV, Otten W. Estimating root-soil contact from 3D X-ray microtomographs. Eur J Soil Sci. 2012; 63:776-86.
• [41]Helliwell JR, Sturrock CJ, Grayling KM, Tracy SR, Flavel RJ, Young IM et al.. Applications of X-ray computed tomography for examining biophysical interactions and structural development in soil systems: a review. Eur J Soil Sci. 2013; 64:279-97.
• [42]Kaestner A, Schneebeli M, Graf F. Visualizing three-dimensional root networks using computed tomography. Geoderma. 2006; 136:459-69.
• [43]Mairhofer S, Zappala S, Tracy SR, Sturrock C, Bennett M, Mooney SJ et al.. RooTrak: automated recovery of three-dimensional plant root architecture in soil from X-ray microcomputed tomography images using visual tracking. Plant Physiol. 2012; 158:561-9.
• [44]Tracy SR, Roberts JA, Black CR, McNeill A, Davidson R, Mooney SJ. The X-factor: visualizing undisturbed root architecture in soils using X-ray computed tomography. J Exp Bot. 2010; 61:311-3.
• [45]Ohser J, Schladitz K. 3D images of materials structures: processing and analysis Weinheim. Wiley-VCH, Germany; 2009.
• [46]Rubio G, Lynch JP. Compensation among root classes in Phaseolus vulgaris L. Plant Soil. 2007; 290:307-21.
• [47]Wildenschild D, Hopmans JW, Vaz CMP, Rivers ML, Rikard D, Christensen BSB. Using X-ray computed tomography in hydrology: systems, resolutions, and limitations. J Hydrol. 2002; 267:285-97.
• [48]Perret JS, Al-Belushi ME, Deadman M. Non-destructive visualization and quantification of roots using computed tomography. Soil Biol Biochem. 2007; 39:391-9.
• [49]Baveye PC, Laba M, Otten W, Bouckaert L, Dello Sterpaio P, Goswami RR et al.. Observer-dependent variability of the thresholding step in the quantitative analysis of soil images and X-ray microtomography data. Geoderma. 2010; 157:51-63.
• [50]Bottomley PA, Rogers HH, Foster TH. NMR Imaging shows water distribution and transport in plant-root systems in situ. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986; 83:87-9.
• [51]Heeraman DA, Hopmans JW, Clausnitzer V. Three dimensional imaging of plant roots in situ with x-ray computed tomography. Plant Soil. 1997; 189:167-79.
• [52]Gregory PJ, Hutchison DJ, Read DB, Jenneson PM, Gilboy WB, Morton EJ. Non-invasive imaging of roots with high resolution X-ray micro-tomography. Plant Soil. 2003; 255:351-9.
• [53]Hargreaves CE, Gregory PJ, Bengough AG. Measuring root traits in barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp vulgare and ssp spontaneum) seedlings using gel chambers, soil sacs and X-ray microtomography. Plant Soil. 2009; 316:285-97.
• [54]Hochholdinger F, Tuberosa R. Genetic and genomic dissection of maize root development and architecture. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009; 12:172-7.
• [55]Lucas M, Swarup R, Paponov IA, Swarup K, Casimiro I, Lake D et al.. SHORT-ROOT Regulates Primary, Lateral, and Adventitious Root Development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2011; 155:384-98.
• [56]Jenkinson M, Smith S. A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med Image Anal. 2001; 5:143-56.
• [57]Schulz H, Postma J, Dusschoten D, Scharr H, Behnke S. Plant root system analysis from MRI images. In: Computer vision, imaging and computer graphics theory and application. Volume 359. Csurka G, Kraus M, Laramee R, Richard P, Braz J, editors. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg; 2013: p.411-25. Communications in Computer and Information Science
• [58]Dijkstra EW. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numer Math. 1959; 1:269-71.