| Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology | |
| Comparison of the biopsy and cytobrush techniques for diagnosis of subclinical endometritis in mares | |
| Marta J Siemieniuch1  Zdzisław Staroniewicz3  Andrzej Raś2  Marcin Nowak3  Roland Kozdrowski3  Justyna Buczkowska3  | |
| [1] Department of Reproductive Immunology and Pathology, Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Olsztyn, Poland;Department and Clinic of Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland;Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland | |
| 关键词: Cytology; Cytobrush; Biopsy; Endometritis; Mare; | |
| Others : 804445 DOI : 10.1186/1477-7827-12-27 |
|
| received in 2014-01-15, accepted in 2014-03-31, 发布年份 2014 | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
Background
Endometritis is a major cause of infertility in the mare. Therefore, the diagnosis of this disease is very important in veterinary practice. The objective of this study was to compare bacteriological and cytological results obtained from the mare uterus using biopsy (EB) and cytobrush (CB) techniques and relating these findings to the presence of polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs) in endometrial tissue as the gold standard for detection of endometritis. In particular, we tested the hypothesis that endometrial cytology and microbiology data obtained from material collected using the EB and CB techniques are similar, so that the CB technique could preferentially be used to detect subclinical endometritis in clinical practice.
Methods
A total of 69 mares suspected of subclinical endometritis because of previous reproductive history and 15 maiden mares were enrolled in this study. Material collected from both EB and CB was smeared on sterile glass slides for cytological examinations and on culture media for microbiological examinations. Bacteriological cultures and cytological samples were classified as negative (no growth or mixed cultures of more than three microorganisms; <2% PMNs) or positive (pure growth of microorganisms; >2% PMNs) for endometritis.
Results
Positive growth was observed in 43% of CB samples and in 54% of EB samples (difference not significant). The growth of β-hemolytic streptococci was always connected with positive cytology. This relationship was not observed for growth of E. coli or for non-pathogenic flora. The sensitivity of bacterial growth and cytology from EB was 0.63 and 0.73 respectively. The sensitivities of bacterial growth and cytology from CB were 0.50 and 0.71 respectively.
Conclusion
Microbiological and cytological results obtained from CB are similar to those obtained from EB and based on these findings the CB technique may be recommended for collection of materials from the mare’s uterus in clinical practice.
【 授权许可】
2014 Buczkowska et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140708061903660.pdf | 258KB | ||
| Figure 1. | 49KB | Image |
【 图 表 】
Figure 1.
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Card C: Post-breeding inflammation and endometrial cytology in mares. Theriogenology 2005, 64:580-588.
- [2]Defontis M, Vaillancourt D, Grand FX: Comparison of three methods of sampling for endometrial cytology in the mare. Tierarztl Prax 2011, 39:171-175.
- [3]LeBlanc MM, Causey RC: Clinical and subclinical endometritis in the mare: both threats to fertility. Reprod Domest Anim 2009, 44:10-22.
- [4]Liu IKM, Troedsson MHT: Diagnosis and treatment of endometritis in the mare: yesterday and today. Theriogenology 2008, 70:415-420.
- [5]Riddle WT, LeBlanc MM, Stromberg AJ: Relationships between uterine culture, cytology and pregnancy rates in a Thoroughbred practice. Theriogenology 2007, 68:395-402.
- [6]Cocchia N, Paciello O, Auletta L, Uccello V, Silvestro L, Mallardo K, Paraggio G, Pasolini MP: Comparison of the cytobrush, cottonswab and low-volume uterine flush techniques to evaluate endometrial cytology for diagnosing endometritis in chronically infertile mares. Theriogenology 2012, 77:89-98.
- [7]Overbeck W, Witte TS, Heuwieser W: Comparison of three diagnostic methods to identify subclinical endometritis in mares. Theriogenology 2011, 75:1311-1318.
- [8]Kenney RM: Cyclic and pathologic changes of the mare endometrium as detected by biopsy, with a note on early embryonic death. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1978, 172:241-262.
- [9]LeBlanc MM: Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic infectious and post-mating-induced endometritis in the mare. Reprod Domest Anim 2010, 45:21-27.
- [10]Digby NJW: The technique and clinical application of endometrial cytology in mares. Equine Vet J 1978, 10:167-170.
- [11]Nielsen JM: Endometritis in the mare: a diagnostic study comparing cultures from swab and biopsy. Theriogenology 2005, 64:510-518.
- [12]Nielsen JM, Troedsson MH, Pedersen MR, Lehen-Jensen H: Diagnosis of endometritis in the mare based on bacteriological and cytological examinations of the endometrium. Comparison of results obtained by swabs and biopsies. J Equine Vet Sci 2010, 30:27-30.
- [13]Kozdrowski R, Gumienna J, Sikora M, Andrzejewski K, Nowak M: Comparison of the cytology brush and cotton swab in the cytological evaluation of the endometrium in mares with regard to fertility. J Equine Vet Sci 2013, 33:1008-1011.
- [14]Bourke M, Mills JN, Barnes AL: Collection of endometrial cells in the mare. Aust Vet J 1997, 75:755-758.
- [15]Walter J, Neuberg KP, Failing K, Wehrend A: Cytological diagnosis of endometritis in the mare: investigations of sampling techniques and relation to bacteriological results. Anim Reprod Sci 2012, 132:178-186.
- [16]Reiswig JD, Threlfall WR, Rosol TJ: A comparison of endometrial biopsy, culture and cytology during oestrus and dioestrus in the horse. Equine Vet J 1993, 25:240-241.
- [17]LeBlanc MM, Magsig J, Stromberg J: Use of a low-volume uterine flush for diagnosing endometritis in chronically infertile mares. Theriogenology 2007, 68:403-412.
- [18]Ricketts SW, Barrelet A: A retrospective review of the histopathological features seen in series of 4241 endometrial biopsy samples collected from UK Thoroughbred mares over a 25 year period. Pferdeheilkunde 1997, 13:525-530.
- [19]Snider TA, Sepoy C, Holyoak GR: Equine endometrial biopsy reviewed: observation, interpretation and application of histopathologic data. Theriogenology 2011, 75:1567-1581.
- [20]Ball BA, Shin SJ, Pattern VH, Lein DH, Woods GL: Use of a low-volume uterine flush for microbiologic and cytologic examination of the mares endometrium. Theriogenology 1988, 29:1269-1283.
- [21]Ricketts SW, Alonso S: Assessment of the breeding prognosis of mares using paired endometrial biopsy techniques. Equine Vet J 1991, 23:185-188.
- [22]Albihn A, Båverud V, Magnusson U: Uterine microbiology and antimicrobial susceptibility in isolated bacteria from mares with fertility problems. Acta Vet Scand 2003, 44:121-129. BioMed Central Full Text
- [23]Frontoso R, De Carlo E, Pasolini MP, van der Meulen K, Pagnini U, Iovane G, De Martino L: Retrospective study of bacterial isolates and their antimicrobial susceptibilities in equine uteri during fertility problems. Res Vet Sci 2008, 84:1-6.
PDF