Reported municipal costs from outdoor smoke-free by-laws-experience from Ontario, Canada

Tobacco Induced Diseases

Scott T Leatherdale¹  Stephanie Filsinger²  Dana Zummach²  Ryan David Kennedy³ 

[1] School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada;Propel Centre for Population Health Impact, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada;Department of Health, Behavior & Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Institute for Global Tobacco Control, 2213 McElderry Street, 4th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA

关键词: Economic impact;    Policy evaluation;    Outdoor smoking;    Municipal by-law;   

Others  :  866975
DOI  :  10.1186/1617-9625-12-4

 received in 2014-01-06, accepted in 2014-02-24,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

In 2006, enclosed public and workplaces in Ontario were made smoke-free by the Smoke-free Ontario Act (SFOA). Numerous area municipalities across the province have since developed local by-laws that are more restrictive than the SFOA and ban smoking in outdoor environments including parks, beaches, and patios. The current study measured reported costs associated with the implementation and enforcement of smoke-free outdoor municipal by-laws including materials and staffing costs. The study also assessed the number of warnings or tickets issued to smokers. Ontario communities with a by-law in force for at least 2 years were included in the sample (n = 42). The study was completed by 88% of area municipalities (n = 37). Municipal staff and managers completed a survey by telephone between June-September 2012.

Findings

No area municipality surveyed reported that they hired additional enforcement staff as a result of their community’s smoke-free by-law. Most municipalities (95%) posted signage to support awareness of their by-law; signs costs ranged from $40-$150/sign with most municipalities reporting signs were made in-house. Most communities reported actively enforcing the by-law; six communities reported they had issued tickets to people not in compliance with outdoor smoking restrictions.

Conclusions

The implementation, promotion, and enforcement of outdoor smoke-free by-laws have required municipal staff time and in most cases have promotional costs, but these have come from existing budgets and using existing staff. Outdoor smoke-free by-laws have not created significant burdens on municipal enforcement staff or on municipal budgets.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Kennedy et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Reid JL, Hammond D, Burkhalter R, Rynard VL, Ahmed R: Tobacco Use in Canada: Patterns and Trends. 2013 edition. Waterloo, ON: Propel Centre for Population Health Impact, University of Waterloo; 2013.
• [2]Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care [http://www.mhp.gov.on.ca/en/smoke-free/legislation/default.asp webcite]
• [3]Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing: Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. [http://www.mah.gov.on.ca/Page1591.aspx webcite]
• [4]Simcoe and Muskoka Health Unit (Ontario): Local Bylaws Designate Smoke-Free Outdoor Spaces. [http://www.simcoemuskokahealth.org/topics/tobacco/LawsonTobaccoUse/LocalBylawsBanSmokingOutdoors.aspx webcite]
• [5]Klepeis NE, Ott WR, Switzer P: Real-time measurement of outdoor tobacco smoke particles. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 2007, 57:522-534.
• [6]Physicians for a Smoke-Free Canada [http://www.smoke-free.ca/pdf_1/Smokefree%20outdoor%20spaces%20advocacy%20-sept2010.pdf webcite]
• [7]Program Training and Consultation Centre (PTCC) [http://www.ptcc-cfc.on.ca/cms/one.aspx?pageId=100773 webcite]
• [8]Non-Smokers’ Rights Association (NSRA): NSRA's Smoke-Free Laws Database. [http://www.nsra-adnf.ca/cms/smoke-free-laws-database.html webcite]