期刊论文详细信息
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Sublobectomy versus Lobectomy for stage IA (T1a) non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis study
Shanqing Li2  Yeye Chen1  Hongsheng Liu1  Cheng Huang1  Yaxin Liu2 
[1] Department of Thoracic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Shuaifuyuan No.1 Dongcheng District, Beijing 100730, China;Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1 Dongcheng District, Beijing 100730, China
关键词: Overall Survival (OS);    Meta-analysis;    Non-Small-Cell lung Cancer;    Lobectomy;    Sublobectomy;   
Others  :  811951
DOI  :  10.1186/1477-7819-12-138
 received in 2013-10-31, accepted in 2014-04-11,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Although lobectomy is considered the standard surgical treatment for the majority of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the operation project for patients with stage IA NSCLC (T1a, tumor diameter ≤2 cm) remains controversial. Sublobectomy is appropriate only in certain patients as many doctors consider it to be overtreatment. We evaluated the five-year overall survival rate of sublobectomy and lobectomy for stage IA NSCLC (T1a, tumor diameter ≤2 cm) through a meta-analysis.

Methods

The five-year overall survival rate (OS) of stage IA (T1a) NSCLC after sublobectomy (including wedge resection and segmentectomy) and lobectomy were compared. We also compared the OS of stage IA (T1a) NSCLC after segmentectomy and lobectomy. The log (hazard ratio, ln (HR)) and its standard error (SE) were used as the outcome measure for data combining.

Results

There were 12 eligible studies published between 1994 and 2013 in which the total number of participants was 18,720. When compared to lobectomy, there was a statistically significant difference of sublobectomy on OS of stage IA (T1a) NSCLC patients (HR 1.38; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.19 to 1.61; P <0.0001). For the comparison between segmentectomy and lobectomy, there was also a statistically significant difference of segmentectomy alone on OS of stage IA (T1a) NSCLC patients (HR 1.48; 95% CI: 1.27 to 1.73; P <0.00001)

Conclusions

We have concluded that in stage IA (T1a) patients sublobectomy, including segmentectomy and wedge resection, causes a lower survival rate than lobectomy.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Liu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140709074646231.pdf 584KB PDF download
Figure 4. 42KB Image download
Figure 3. 38KB Image download
Figure 2. 53KB Image download
Figure 1. 78KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Okada M, Nishio W, Sakamoto T, Uchino K, Yuki T, Nakagawa A, Tsubota N: Effect of tumor size on prognosis in patients with non–small cell lung cancer: the role of segmentectomy as a type of lesser resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005, 129:87-93.
  • [2]Bando T, Yamagihara K, Ohtake Y, Miyahara R, Tanaka F, Hasegawa S, Inui K, Wada H: A new method of segmental resection for primary lung cancer: intermediate results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002, 21:894-899.
  • [3]Lewis RJ: The role of video-assisted thoracic surgery for carcinoma of the lung: wedge resection to lobectomy by simultaneous individual stapling. Ann Thorac Surg 1993, 56:762-768.
  • [4]El-Sherif A, Gooding WE, Santos R, Pettiford B, Ferson PF, Fernando HC, Urda SJ, Luketich JD, Landreneau RJ: Outcomes of sublobar resection versus lobectomy for stage I non–small cell lung cancer: a 13-year analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2006, 82:408-416.
  • [5]Koike T, Yamato Y, Yoshiya K, Shimoyama T, Suzuki R: Intentional limited pulmonary resection for peripheral T1 N0 M0 small-sized lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003, 125:924-928.
  • [6]Ginsberg RJ, Rubinstein LV: Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 1995, 60:615-623.
  • [7]Landreneau RJ, Sugarbaker DJ, Mack MJ, Hazelrigg SR, Luketich JD, Fetterman L, Liptay MJ, Bartley S, Boley TM, Keenan RJ: Wedge resection versus lobectomy for stage I (T1 N0 M0) non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997, 113:691-700.
  • [8]Kodama K, Doi O, Higashiyama M, Yokouchi H: Intentional limited resection for selected patients with T1 N0 M0 non-small-cell lung cancer: a single-institution study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997, 114:347-353.
  • [9]Okada M, Koike T, Higashiyama M, Yamato Y, Kodama K, Tsubota N: Radical sublobar resection for small-sized non–small cell lung cancer: a multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006, 132:769-775.
  • [10]Nakamura H, Kawasaki N, Taguchi M, Kabasawa K: Survival following lobectomy vs limited resection for stage I lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2005, 92:1033-1037.
  • [11]Sugarbaker DJ, Strauss GM: Extent of surgery and survival in early lung carcinoma: implications for overdiagnosis in stage IA nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Cancer 2000, 89:2432-2437.
  • [12]Warren WH, Faber LP: Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in patients with stage I pulmonary carcinoma: five-year survival and patterns of intrathoracic recurrence. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994, 107:1087-1093. discussion 1093–1084
  • [13]Fan J, Wang L, Jiang GN, Gao W: Sublobectomy versus lobectomy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer, a meta-analysis of published studies. Ann Surg Oncol 2012, 19:661-668.
  • [14]Parmar MK, Torri V, Stewart L: Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Stat Med 1998, 17:2815-2834.
  • [15]Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, Burdett S, Sydes MR: Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials 2007, 8:16. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [16]Zhong C, Fang W, Mao T, Yao F, Chen W, Hu D: Comparison of thoracoscopic segmentectomy and thoracoscopic lobectomy for small-sized stage IA lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2012, 94:362-367.
  • [17]Yendamuri S, Sharma R, Demmy M, Groman A, Hennon M, Dexter E, Nwogu C, Miller A, Demmy T: Temporal trends in outcomes following sublobar and lobar resections for small (
  • [18]Wolf AS, Richards WG, Jaklitsch MT, Gill R, Chirieac LR, Colson YL, Mohiuddin K, Mentzer SJ, Bueno R, Sugarbaker DJ, Swanson SJ: Lobectomy versus sublobar resection for small (2 cm or less) non-small cell lung cancers. Ann Thorac Surg 2011, 92:1819-1823. discussion 1824–1815
  • [19]Wisnivesky JP, Yip R, Hanaoka T, Bauer T, Inderbitzi R, Ayer R, Kohman L, Sheppard B, Thurer R, Smith MV: Limited resection for the treatment of screen-detected stage ia lung cancer. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011, 183:A5394.
  • [20]Wisnivesky JP, Henschke CI, Swanson S, Yankelevitz DF, Zulueta J, Marcus S, Halm EA: Limited resection for the treatment of patients with stage IA lung cancer. Ann Surg 2010, 251:550-554.
  • [21]Whitson BA, Groth SS, Andrade RS, Maddaus MA, Habermann EB, D’Cunha J: Survival after lobectomy versus segmentectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a population-based analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2011, 92:1943-1950.
  • [22]Okami J, Ito Y, Higashiyama M, Nakayama T, Tokunaga T, Maeda J, Kodama K: Sublobar resection provides an equivalent survival after lobectomy in elderly patients with early lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2010, 90:1651-1656.
  • [23]Okada M, Yoshikawa K, Hatta T, Tsubota N: Is segmentectomy with lymph node assessment an alternative to lobectomy for non–small cell lung cancer of 2 cm or smaller? Ann Thorac Surg 2001, 71:956-960.
  • [24]Kates M, Swanson S, Wisnivesky JP: Survival following lobectomy and limited resection for the treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer ≤ 1 cm in SizeA review of SEER data. Chest J 2011, 139:491-496.
  • [25]Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C: Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997, 315:629-634.
  • [26]Nakamura K, Saji H, Nakajima R, Okada M, Asamura H, Shibata T, Nakamura S, Tada H, Tsuboi M: A phase III randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for small-sized peripheral non-small cell lung cancer (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L). Jap J Clin Oncol 2010, 40:271-274.
  • [27]Wang L, Shao Z-M: Cyclin e expression and prognosis in breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis of published studies. Cancer Invest 2006, 24:581-587.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:3次 浏览次数:3次