Ethnic variation in validity of classification of overweight and obesity using self-reported weight and height in American women and men: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Nutrition Journal

Christopher T Sempos¹  RF Gillum² 

[1] National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3146, Bethesda, Maryland, 20817, USA;Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 3311 Toledo Road, Room 6323, Hyattsville, Maryland, 20782, USA

关键词: Blacks;    Body weight;    Mexican Americans;    Hispanics;    Obesity;    Overweight;   

Others  :  1151260
DOI  :  10.1186/1475-2891-4-27

 received in 2005-07-19, accepted in 2005-10-06,  发布年份 2005

【 摘 要 】

Background

Few data have been published on the validity of classification of overweight and obesity based on self-reported weight in representative samples of Hispanic as compared to other American populations despite the wide use of such data.

Objective

To test the null hypothesis that ethnicity is unrelated to bias of mean body mass index (BMI) and to sensitivity of overweight or obesity (BMI >= 25 kg/m²) derived from self-reported (SR) versus measured weight and height using measured BMI as the gold standard.

Design

Cross-sectional survey of a large national sample, the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) conducted in 1988–1994.

Participants

American men and women aged 20 years and over (n = 15,025).

Measurements

SR height, weight, cigarette smoking, health status, and socio-demographic variables from home interview and measured weight and height.

Results

In women and Mexican American (MA) men SR BMI underestimated true prevalence rates of overweight or obesity. For other men, no consistent difference was seen. Sensitivity of SR was similar in non-Hispanic European Americans (EA) and non-Hispanic African Americans (AA) but much lower in MA. Prevalence of obesity (BMI >= 30 kg/m²) is consistently underestimated by self-report, the gap being greater for MA than for other women, but similar for MA and other men. The mean difference between self-reported and measured BMI was greater in MA (men -0.37, women -0.76 kg/m²) than in non-Hispanic EA (men -0.22, women -0.62 kg/m²). In a regression model with the difference between self-reported and measured BMI as the dependent variable, MA ethnicity was a significant (p < 0.01) predictor of the difference in men and in women. The effect of MA ethnicity could not be explained by socio-demographic variables, smoking or health status.

Conclusion

Under-estimation of the prevalence of overweight or obesity based on height and weight self-reported at interview varied significantly among ethnic groups independent of other variables.

【 授权许可】

   
2005 Gillum and Sempos; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Bray GA: An atlas of obesity and weight control. Boca Raton, Parthenon Pub. Group; 2003.
• [2]Racette SB, Deusinger SS, Deusinger RH: Obesity: overview of prevalence, etiology, and treatment. Phys Ther 2003, 83:276-88.
• [3]Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Johnson CL: Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2000. JAMA 2002, 288:1723-7.
• [4]Pawson IG, Martorelli R, Mendoza FE: Prevalence of overweight and obesity in US Hispanic populations. Am J Clin Nutr 1991, 1522S-8S.
• [5]National Center for Health Statistics: Health United States 2003 with chartbook on trends in the health of Americans. Hyattsville, Maryland; 2003:26-31.
• [6]Wing RR: Obesity and related eating and exercise behaviors in women. Ann Behav Med 1993, 15:124-134.
• [7]Najjar MF, Rowland M: Anthropometric reference data and prevalence of overweight, United States, 1976–80. Vital Health Stat 1987, 11(238):1-73.
• [8]Kuczmarski MF, Kuczmarski RJ, Najjar M: Effects of age on validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. J Am Diet Assoc 2001, 101(1):28-34.
• [9]Rowland ML: Self-reported weight and height. Am J Clin Nutr 1990, 52:1125-1133.
• [10]Bolton-Smith C, Woodward M, Tunstall-Pedoe H, Morrison C: Accuracy of the estimated prevalence of obesity from self reported height and weight in an adult Scottish population. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000, 54(2):143-8.
• [11]Schmidt MI, Duncan BB, Tavares M, Polanczyk CA, Pellanda L, Zimmer PM: Validity of self-reported weight – a study of urban Brazilian adults. Rev Saude Publica 1993, 27(4):271-6. Epub 2003 Nov 03
• [12]Kuskowska-Wolk A, Karlsson P, Stolt M, Rossner S: The predictive validity of body mass index on self-reported weight and height. Int J Obes 1989, 13:441-453.
• [13]Nieto-Garcia FJ, Bush TL, Keyl PM: Body mass definitions of obesity: sensitivity and specificity using self-reported weight and height. Epidemiology 1990, 1:146-152.
• [14]Brener ND, Mcmanus T, Galuska DA, Lowry R, Wechsler H: Reliability and validity of self-reported height and weight among high school students. J Adolesc Health 2003, 32(4):281-7.
• [15]Roberts RJ: Can self-reported data accurately describe the prevalence of overweight? Public Health 1995, 109(4):275-84.
• [16]Spencer EA, Appleby PN, Davey GK, Key TJ: Validity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 EPIC-Oxford participants. Public Health Nutr 2002, 5(4):561-5.
• [17]Niedhammer I, Bugel I, Bonenfant S, Goldberg M, Leclerc A: Validity of self-reported weight and height in the French GAZEL cohort. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000, 24(9):1111-8.
• [18]Flood V, Webb K, Lazarus R, Pang G: Use of self-report to monitor overweight and obesity in populations: some issues for consideration. Aust N Z J Public Health 2000, 24(1):96-9.
• [19]Willet W: Nutritional epidemiology. Edited by 2. New York, Oxford University Press; 1998:244-272.
• [20]Vargas CM, Burt VL, Gillum RF, Pamuk ER: Validity of self-reported hypertension in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III, 1988–1991. Prev Med 1997, 26:678-685.
• [21]Plan and operation of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–94 National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 1994, 1(32):27.
• [22]Westat Inc: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. Body Measurements (Anthropometry). National Center for Health Statistics 1996.
• [23]Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kuczmarski RJ, Johnson CL: Overweight and obesity in the United States: prevalence and trends, 1960–1994. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998, 22:39-47.
• [24]Flegal KM, Troiano RP: Changes in the distribution of body mass index of adults and children in the US population. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000, 24(7):807-18.
• [25]Kuczmarski RJ, Carroll MD, Flegal KM, Troiano RP: Varying body mass index cutoff points to describe overweight prevalence among U.S. adults: NHANES III (1988 to 1994). Obes Res 1997, 5(6):542-8.
• [26]Kuczmarski RJ, Flegal KM, Campbell SM, Johnson CL: Increasing prevalence of overweight among US adults. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1960 to 1991. JAMA 272(3):205-11. 1994 Jul 20
• [27]SAT/STAT software: changes and enhancements, release 8.2 Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 2001:1-324.
• [28]Spector PE: SAS programming for researchers and social scientists. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 2001:1-231.
• [29]Freund RJ: SAS system for regression. 3rd edition. Edited by Rudolf J, Freund, Ramon C Littell. Cary NC: SAS Institute Inc; 2000:1-236.
• [30]Kleinbaum DG, Kupfer LL, Muller KE, Nizam A: Applied regression analysis and other multivariate methods. Pacific Grove, California, Brooks/Cole Publishing Company; 1998.
• [31]Shah BV, Barnwell BG, Bieler GS: SUDAAN Software for the Statistical Analysis of Correlated Data User's Manual Release 7.0. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina: Research Triangle Institute; 1996.
• [32]McGinnis JM, Foege WH: Actual causes of death in the United States. JAMA 1993, 270:2207-12.
• [33]James PT, Leach R, Kalamara E, Shayeghi M: The worldwide obesity epidemic. Obes Res 2001, 9(Suppl 4):228S-233S.
• [34]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Declining prevalence of no known major risk factors for heart disease and stroke among adults – United States, 1991–2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 53(1):4-7. 2004 Jan 16
• [35]Wallace RB: Screening for early and asymptomatic conditions. In Public Health and Preventive Medicine. 14th edition. Edited by Wallace RB. New York, Appleton and Lange; 1998.
• [36]Anderson LA, Eyler AA, Galuska DA, Brown DR, Brownson RC: Relationship of satisfaction with body size and trying to lose weight in a national survey of overweight and obese women aged 40 and older, United States. Prev Med 2002, 35(4):390-6.
• [37]Kuchler F, Variyam JN: Mistakes were made: misperception as a barrier to reducing overweight. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003, 27(7):856-61.
• [38]Cachelin FM, Rebeck RM, Chung GH, Pelayo E: Does ethnicity influence body-size preference? A comparison of body image and body size. Obes Res 2002, 10:158-66.
• [39]Fitzgibbon ML, Blackman LR, Avellone ME: The relationship between body image discrepancy and body mass index across ethnic groups. Obes Res 2000, 8:582-9.
• [40]Plankey MW, Stevens J, Flegal KM, Rust PF: Prediction equations do not eliminate systematic error in self-reported body mass index. Obes Res 1997, 5:308-14.
• [41]Santillan AA, Camargo CA: Body mass index and asthma among Mexican adults: the effect of using self-reported vs measured weight and height. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003, 27:1430-3.
• [42]Mohadjer L, Bell B, Waksberg J: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. Accounting for item nonresponse bias. Rockville, MD, WESTAT, Inc; 1996.