期刊论文详细信息
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
Perceptions of neighborhood social environment and drug dependence among incarcerated women and men: a cross-sectional analysis
Patricia J Kelly2  Kimber Richter1  Chin-I Cheng3  Megha Ramaswamy1  Jessica D Rogers1 
[1] Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA;School of Nursing, University of Missouri-Kansas City, 2464 Charlotte Street, Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA;Department of Mathematics, Central Michigan University, Pearce Hall 214, Mount Pleasant, MI, 48859, USA
关键词: Incarceration;    Drug dependence;    Neighborhood;   
Others  :  834473
DOI  :  10.1186/1747-597X-7-39
 received in 2012-06-01, accepted in 2012-08-27,  发布年份 2012
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Perception of neighborhood social environment can influence an individual’s susceptibility to drug dependence. However, this has never been examined with a jailed sample, where frequent transitions between local jails and disadvantaged neighborhoods are common. Understanding these associations could aid in the design of targeted programs to decrease drug dependence and recidivism among the incarcerated.

Methods

For this study, 596 women and men from three Kansas City jails were surveyed over the course of six months in 2010. Drug dependence was assessed with DSM-IV criteria. Independent variables included fear of one’s neighborhood, perceived level of neighborhood violence, and social capital. All data were self-reported and were analyzed using logistic regression.

Results

Controlling for gender and age, fear of neighborhood violence was associated with increased odds of having drug dependence (OR = 1.27, CI 1.02, 1.58) and a higher level of social capital prior to incarceration was associated with lower odds of drug dependence (OR = 0.65, CI 0.44, 0.96). Mental health problem diagnosis and past year intimate partner violence were significant mediating factors. Gender and race/ethnicity were significant moderating factors between neighborhood disadvantage and drug dependence.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that drug dependence programs for women and men who cycle between jails and communities require both individual- and community-level interventions. To be most effective, programs at the community-level should focus on helping specific groups navigate their communities, as well as address individual health needs associated with drug dependence.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Rogers et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140715072358845.pdf 504KB PDF download
Figure 4. 40KB Image download
Figure 3. 38KB Image download
Figure 2. 41KB Image download
Figure 1. 41KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]James D: Profile of jail inmates, 2002. Bureau of Justice Statistics Publication No. NCJ 201932. U.S: Department of Justice; 2004.
  • [2]Re-entry Policy Council: Report of the Re-Entry Policy Council: Charting the Safe and Successful Return of Prisoners to the Community. New York: The Council of State Governments; 2005.
  • [3]Freudenberg N, Daniels J, Crum M, Perkins T, Richie BE: Coming home from jail: the social and health consequences of community reentry for women, male adolescents, and their families and communities. Am J Public Health 2008, 98:S191-S202.
  • [4]New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene: Inmates in custody at least five days and released to NYC: Home residences. City of New York: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; 2002.
  • [5]Taxman FS, Byrne JM, Pattavina A: Racial disparity and the legitimacy of the criminal justice system: exploring consequences for deterrence. J Health Care Poor Unders 2005, 16:57-77.
  • [6]Dumont DM, Brockmann B, Dickman S, Alexander N, Rich JD: Public Health and the Epidemic of Incarceration. Annu Rev Public Health 2011, 33:325-39.
  • [7]Fazel S, Bains P, Doll H: Substance abuse and dependence in prisoners: a systematic review. Addict 2006, 101:181-191.
  • [8]Fazel S, Baillargeon J: The health of prisoners. Lancet 2011, 377:956-965.
  • [9]Iguchi MY, London JA, Forge NG, Hickman L, Fain T, Riehman K: Elements of well-being affected by criminalizing the drug user. Public Health Rep 2002, 117(Suppl 1):S146-50.
  • [10]Kadushin C, Reber E, Saxe L, Livert D: The substance use system: social and neighborhood environments associated with substance use and misuse. Subst Use Misuse 1998, 33:1681-1710.
  • [11]Brady KT, Randall CL: Gender differences in substance use disorders. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1999, 22:241-252.
  • [12]Wilson HW, Widom CS: Predictors of drug-use patterns in maltreated children and matched controls followed up into middle adulthood. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2010, 71:801-809.
  • [13]Lambert SF, Brown TL, Phillips CM, Ialongo NS: The relationship between perceptions of neighborhood characteristics and substance use among urban African American adolescents. Am J Community Psychol 2004, 34:205-218.
  • [14]Zule WA, Morgan-Lopez AA, Lam WK, Wechsberg WM, Luseno WK, Young SK: Perceived neighborhood safety and depressive symptoms among African American crack users. Subst Use Misuse 2008, 43:445-468.
  • [15]Nurco DN, Kinlock T, O'Grady K, Lerner M, Hanlon TE: Perceptions of social pathology in the neighborhood and the etiology of narcotic addiction. a retrospective study. J Nerv Ment Dis 1996, 184:35-42.
  • [16]Dembo R, Blount WR, Schmeidler J, Burgos W: Perceived environmental drug use risk and the correlates of early drug use or nonuse among inner-city youths: the motivated actor. Int J Addict 1986, 21:977-1000.
  • [17]Dahlberg LL, Krug EG: Violence-a global public health problem. In World Report on Violence and Health. Edited by Krug E, Dahlberg LL, Mercy JA, Zwi AB, Lozano R. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002:1-56.
  • [18]McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K: An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q 1988, 15:351-377.
  • [19]Clear TR: Imprisoning Communities: How Mass Incarceration Makes Disadvantaged Neighborhoods Worse. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.; 2007.
  • [20]Chein I: Psychological, social, and epidemiological factors in juvenile drug use. NIDA Res Monogr 1980, 30:76-82.
  • [21]Leventhal T, Brooks-Gunn J: The neighborhoods they live in: the effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychol Bull 2000, 126:309-337.
  • [22]Laudet AB, Magura S, Vogel HS, Knight E: Recovery challenges among dually diagnosed individuals. J Subst Abuse Treat 2000, 18:321-329.
  • [23]Curry A, Latkin C, Davey-Rothwell M: Pathways to depression: the impact of neighborhood violent crime on inner-city residents in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Soc Sci Med 2008, 67:23-30.
  • [24]Gilbert L, El-Bassel N, Chang M, Wu E, Roy L: Substance use and partner violence among urban women seeking emergency care. Psychol Addict Behav 2012, 26(2):226-35.
  • [25]Peters EN, Khondkaryan E, Sullivan TP: Associations between expectancies of alcohol and drug use, severity of partner violence, and posttraumatic stress among women. Interpers Violence 2012, 27(11):2108-27.
  • [26]Cunradi CB: Drinking level, neighborhood social disorder, and mutual intimate partner violence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2007, 31:1012-1019.
  • [27]Richie B: Challenges incarcerated women face as they return to their communities: findings from life history interviews. Crime Delinq 2001, 47(3):368-389.
  • [28]Freudenberg N, Moseley J, Labriola M, Daniels J, Murrill C: Characteristics of people leaving New York City jails by age, gender, and race/ethnicity: implications for public health interventions. Public Health Rep 2007, 122:733-743.
  • [29]Gonnerman J: Life on the Outside: The Prison Odyssey of Elaine Bartlett. New York: Picador; 2004.
  • [30]Wacquant L: Three pernicious premises in the study of the American ghetto. Int J Urban Regional 1997, 21(2):341-353.
  • [31]Molina KM, Alegría M, Chen CN: Neighborhood context and substance use disorders: a comparative analysis of racial and ethnic groups in the United States. Drug Alcohol Depend 2012, 125(Supplement 1):S35-S43.
  • [32]Kansas City Police Department: KCPD statement on 2008 homicides. Kansas City Star: Crime Scene KC; 2008.
  • [33]Missouri Census Data Center: Demographic profiles. http://mcdc2.missouri.edu/websas/dp3_2k.usage_notes.shtml webcite
  • [34]Rizzo T: Murder Factory, Part 1: 64130, the ZIP code of notoriety in Missouri. Kansas City Star: Kansas City, MO; 2009.
  • [35]Ramaswamy M, Kelly PJ, Koblitz A, Kimminau KS, Engelman KK: Understanding the role of violence in incarcerated women's cervical cancer screening and history. Women Health 2011, 51:423-441.
  • [36]Compton WM, Grant BF, Colliver JD, Glantz MD, Stinson FS: Prevalence of marijuana use disorders in the United States: 1991–1992 and 2001–2002. JAMA 2004, 291:2114-2121.
  • [37]Wright RJ, Mitchell H, Visness CM, Cohen S, Stout J, Evans R, Gold DR: Community violence and asthma morbidity: the Inner-City asthma study. Am J Public Health 2004, 94:625-632.
  • [38]Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F: Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 1997, 277:918-924.
  • [39]Hjollund L, Tinggaard Svendsen G: Social capital: a standard method of measurement. http://www.hha.dk/nat/WPER/00-9_gts.pdf webcite
  • [40]Sherin KM, Sinacore JM, Li XQ, Zitter RE, Shakil A: HITS: a short domestic violence screening tool for use in a family practice setting. Fam Med 1998, 30:508-512.
  • [41]Baron RM, Kenny DA: The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986, 51:1173-1182.
  • [42]Frazier P, Tix A, Barron K: Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. J Counsel Psychol 2004, 51:115-134.
  • [43]Sobel ME: Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In Sociological Methodology. Edited by Leinhardt S. Washington DC: American Sociological Association; 1982:290-312.
  • [44]Friedman SR, Mateu-Gelabert P, Curtis R, Maslow C, Boylard M, Sandoval M, Flom PL: Social apital or networks, negotiations, and norms? a neighborhood case study. Am J Prev Med 2007, 32(6S):S160-S170.
  • [45]Kandel DB, Huang FY, Davies M: Comorbidity between patterns of substance use dependence and psychiatric syndromes. Drug Alcohol Depend 2001, 64:233-241.
  • [46]Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Koretz D, Merikangas KR, Rush AJ, Walters EE, Wang PS: The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). JAMA 2003, 289:3095-3105.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:6次 浏览次数:6次