Fast IMRT by increasing the beam number and reducing the number of segments

Radiation Oncology

Michael Flentje¹  Mark B Gainey¹  Klaus Bratengeier¹ 

[1] University of Würzburg, Department of Radiation Oncology, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany

关键词: Optimization;    VMAT;    Step and Shoot IMRT;    IMAT;   

Others  :  1160928
DOI  :  10.1186/1748-717X-6-170

 received in 2011-06-30, accepted in 2011-12-09,  发布年份 2011

【 摘 要 】

Purpose

The purpose of this work is to develop fast deliverable step and shoot IMRT technique. A reduction in the number of segments should theoretically be possible, whilst simultaneously maintaining plan quality, provided that the reduction is accompanied by an increased number of gantry angles. A benefit of this method is that the segment shaping could be performed during gantry motion, thereby reducing the delivery time. The aim was to find classes of such solutions whose plan quality can compete with conventional IMRT.

Materials/Methods

A planning study was performed. Step and shoot IMRT plans were created using direct machine parameter optimization (DMPO) as a reference. DMPO plans were compared to an IMRT variant having only one segment per angle ("2-Step Fast"). 2-Step Fast is based on a geometrical analysis of the topology of the planning target volume (PTV) and the organs at risk (OAR). A prostate/rectum case, spine metastasis/spinal cord, breast/lung and an artificial PTV/OAR combination of the ESTRO-Quasimodo phantom were used for the study. The composite objective value (COV), a quality score, and plan delivery time were compared. The delivery time for the DMPO reference plan and the 2-Step Fast IMRT technique was measured and calculated for two different linacs, a twelve year old Siemens Primus™ ("old" linac) and two Elekta Synergy™ "S" linacs ("new" linacs).

Results

2-Step Fast had comparable or better quality than the reference DMPO plan. The number of segments was smaller than for the reference plan, the number of gantry angles was between 23 and 34. For the modern linac the delivery time was always smaller than that for the reference plan. The calculated (measured) values showed a mean delivery time reduction of 21% (21%) for the new linac, and of 7% (3%) for the old linac compared to the respective DMPO reference plans. For the old linac, the data handling time per beam was the limiting factor for the treatment time reduction.

Conclusions

2-Step Fast plans are suited to reduce the delivery time, especially if the data handling time per beam is short. The plan quality can be retained or even increased for fewer segments provided more gantry angles are used.

【 授权许可】

   
2011 Bratengeier et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Bewes JM, Suchowerska N, Jackson M, Zhang M, McKenzie DR: The radiobiological effect of intra-fraction dose-rate modulation in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Phys Med Biol 2008, 53:3567-3578.
• [2]Bortfeld T, Burkelbach J, Boesecke R, Schlegel W: Methods of image reconstruction from projections applied to conformation radiotherapy. PhysMedBiol 1990, 35:1423-1434.
• [3]Yu CX: Intensity-modulated arc therapy with dynamic multileaf collimation: an alternative to tomotherapy. PhysMedBiol 1995, 40:1435-1449.
• [4]Brahme A, Roos JE, Lax I: Solution of an integral equation encountered in rotation therapy. PhysMedBiol 1982, 27:1221-1229.
• [5]Otto K: Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. Med Phys 2008, 35:310-317.
• [6]Alvarez Moret J, Kolbl O, Bogner L: Quasi-IMAT Study with Conventional Equipment to Show High Plan Quality with a Single Gantry Arc. Strahlenther Onkol 2009, 185:41-48.
• [7]Bzdusek K, Friberger H, Eriksson K, Hardemark B, Robinson D, Kaus M: Development and evaluation of an efficient approach to volumetric arc therapy planning. Med Phys 2009, 36:2328-2339.
• [8]Earl MA, Shepard DM, Naqvi S, Li XA, Yu CX: Inverse planning for intensity-modulated arc therapy using direct aperture optimization. Phys Med Biol 2003, 48:1075-1089.
• [9]Webb S: Optimisation of conformal radiotherapy dose distributions by simulated annealing [published erratum appears in Phys Med Biol 1990 Feb;35(2):297]. PhysMedBiol 1989, 34:1349-1370.
• [10]Cameron C: Sweeping-window arc therapy: an implementation of rotational IMRT with automatic beam-weight calculation. Phys Med Biol 2005, 50:4317-4336.
• [11]Broderick M, Leech M, Coffey M: Direct aperture optimization as a means of reducing the complexity of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy plans. Radiat Oncol 2009, 4:8. BioMed Central Full Text
• [12]Bratengeier K: Applications of two-step intensity modulated arc therapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2001, 177:394-403.
• [13]De Gersem W, Claus F, De Wagter C, De Neve W: An anatomy-based beam segmentation tool for intensity-modulated radiation therapy and its application to head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001, 51:849-859.
• [14]De Neve W, De Gersem W, Derycke S, De Meerleer G, Moerman M, Bate MT, Van Duyse B, Vakaet L, De Deene Y, Mersseman B, De Wagter C: Clinical delivery of intensity modulated conformal radiotherapy for relapsed or second-primary head and neck cancer using a multileaf collimator with dynamic control. Radiother Oncol 1999, 50:301-314.
• [15]De Wagter C, Colle CO, Fortan LG, Van Duyse BB, Van-den Berge DL, De Neve WJ: 3D conformal intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning: interactive optimization by constrained matrix inversion. RadiotherOncol 1998, 47:69-76.
• [16]Bratengeier K, Meyer J, Flentje M: Pre-segmented 2-Step IMRT with subsequent direct machine parameter optimisation - a planning study. Radiat Oncol 2008, 3:38. BioMed Central Full Text
• [17]Bratengeier K, Polat B, Gainey M, Grewenig P, Meyer J, Flentje M: Is ad-hoc plan adaptation based on 2-Step IMRT feasible? Radiother Oncol 2009, 93:266-272.
• [18]Bratengeier K, Gainey M, Sauer OA, Richter A, Flentje M: Fast intensity modulated arc therapy based on 2-Step beam-segmentation. Med Phys 2011., 38
• [19]Löf J, Rehbinder H: Inverse Planning Optimization with RayOptimizer in Pinnacle3. RaySearch White Paper 2002.
• [20]Bratengeier K: 2-Step IMAT and 2-Step IMRT: A geometrical approach. Med Phys 2005, 32:777-785.
• [21]Bratengeier K: 2-Step IMAT and 2-Step IMRT in three dimensions. Med Phys 2005, 32:3849-3861.
• [22]Bratengeier K, Guckenberger M, Meyer J, Mueller G, Pfreundner L, Schwab F, Flentje M: A comparison between 2-Step IMRT and conventional IMRT planning. RadiotherOncol 2007, 84:298-306.
• [23]Bohsung J, Gillis S, Arrans R, Bakai A, De Wagter C, Knoos T, Mijnheer BJ, Paiusco M, Perrin BA, Welleweerd H, Williams P: IMRT treatment planning:- a comparative inter-system and inter-centre planning exercise of the ESTRO QUASIMODO group. Radiother Oncol 2005, 76:354-361.
• [24]Bortfeld T: The number of beams in IMRT--theoretical investigations and implications for single-arc IMRT. Phys Med Biol 55:83-97.
• [25]Guckenberger M, Flentje M: Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) of Localized Prostate Cancer: A Review and Future Perspectives. Strahlenther Onkol 2007, 183:57-62.
• [26]Guckenberger M, Flentje M: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for the treatment of pelvic lymph nodes in prostate cancer. Future Oncol 2007, 3:43-47.
• [27]Mohan R, Wu Q, Manning M, Schmidt-Ullrich R: Radiobiological considerations in the design of fractionation strategies for intensity-modulated radiation therapy of head and neck cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000, 46:619-630.
• [28]Fogliata A, Nicolini G, Alber M, Asell M, Dobler B, El-Haddad M, Hardemark B, Jelen U, Kania A, Larsson M, et al.: IMRT for breast. a planning study. Radiother Oncol 2005, 76:300-310.