期刊论文详细信息
Particle and Fibre Toxicology
The effectiveness of permethrin-treated deer stations for control of the Lyme disease vector Ixodes scapularis on Cape Cod and the islands: a five-year experiment
Montira Pongsiri4  Larry Dapsis2  Robert Hillger1  Bart Hoskins1  Robert Koethe1  Jason S Grear3 
[1]U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, New England (Region 1), 5 Post Office Square - Suite 100, Boston, MA 02109, USA
[2]Cape Cod Cooperative Extension Service, Barnstable, MA 02630, USA
[3]U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, 27 Tarzwell Dr., Narragansett, RI 02882, USA
[4]U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W., Mail Code 8105R, Washington, DC 20450, USA
关键词: Blacklegged tick;    White-tailed deer;    Odocoileus virginianus;    Borrelia burgdorferi;    Lyme disease;    Host-targeted control;    Feeding station;    4-poster;    Permethrin;    Tick;    Ixodes scapularis;   
Others  :  819479
DOI  :  10.1186/1756-3305-7-292
 received in 2014-01-24, accepted in 2014-06-17,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

The use of animal host-targeted pesticide application to control blacklegged ticks, which transmit the Lyme disease bacterium between wildlife hosts and humans, is receiving increased attention as an approach to Lyme disease risk management. Included among the attractive features of host-targeted approaches is the reduced need for broad-scale pesticide usage. In the eastern USA, one of the best-known of these approaches is the corn-baited “4-poster” deer feeding station, so named because of the four pesticide-treated rollers that surround the bait troughs. Wildlife visitors to these devices receive an automatic topical application of acaricide, which kills attached ticks before they can reproduce. We conducted a 5-year controlled experiment to estimate the effects of 4-poster stations on tick populations in southeastern Massachusetts, where the incidence of Lyme disease is among the highest in the USA.

Methods

We deployed a total of forty-two 4-posters among seven treatment sites and sampled for nymph and adult ticks at these sites and at seven untreated control sites during each year of the study. Study sites were distributed among Cape Cod, Martha’s Vineyard, and Nantucket. The density of 4-poster deployment was lower than in previous 4-poster studies and resembled or possibly exceeded the levels of effort considered by county experts to be feasible for Lyme disease risk managers.

Results

Relative to controls, blacklegged tick abundance at treated sites was reduced by approximately 8.4%, which is considerably less than in previous 4-poster studies.

Conclusions

In addition to the longer duration and greater replication in our study compared to others, possible but still incomplete explanations for the smaller impact we observed include the lower density of 4-poster deployment as well as landscape and mammalian community characteristics that may complicate the ecological relationship between white-tailed deer and blacklegged tick populations.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Grear et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140712004846407.pdf 990KB PDF download
Figure 4. 17KB Image download
Figure 3. 42KB Image download
Figure 2. 53KB Image download
Figure 1. 64KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Barbour AG, Fish D: The biological and social phenomenon of Lyme disease. Science 1993, 260:1610-1616.
  • [2]Ostfeld RS: Lyme disease: The ecology of a complex system. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2011.
  • [3]Spielman A, Wilson ML, Levine JF, Piesman J: Ecology of Ixodes dammini-borne human babesiosis and Lyme disease. Annu Rev Entomol 1985, 30:439-460.
  • [4]Massachusetts Department of Fish and Game: Massachusettes fish and wildlife guide to hunting, freshwater fishing and trapping. Williamstown, MA: JF Griffin Publishing; 2011.
  • [5]Cote SD, Rooney TP, Tremblay J-P, Dussault C, Waller DM: Ecological impacts of deer overabundance. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 2004, 35:113-147.
  • [6]Brown TL, Decker DJ, Riley SJ, Enck JW, Lauber TB: The future of hunting as a mechanism to control white-tailed deer populations. Wildl Soc Bull 2000, 28:797-807.
  • [7]Porter WF, Underwood HB: Of elephants and blind men: Deer management in the U.S. national parks. Ecol Appl 1999, 9:3-9.
  • [8]Pound JM, Miller JA, George JE, LeMeilleur CA: The "4-poster" passive topical treatment device to apply acaricide for controlling ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) feeding on white-tailed deer. J Med Entomol 2000, 37:588-594.
  • [9]Carroll JF, Hill DE, Allen PC, Young KW, Miramontes E, Kramer M, Pound JM, Miller JA, George JE: The impact of 4-poster deer self-treatment devices at three locations in Maryland. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2009, 9:407-U464.
  • [10]Daniels TJ, Falco RC, McHugh EE, Vellozzi J, Boccia T, Denicola AJ, Pound JM, Miller JA, George JE, Fish D: Acaricidal treatment of white-tailed deer to control ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) in a New York Lyme disease-endemic community. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2009, 9:381-387.
  • [11]Pound JM, Miller JA, George JE, Fish D, Carroll JF, Schulze TL, Daniels TJ, Falco RC, Stafford KC III, Mather TN: The United States department of agriculture’s Northeast area-wide tick control project: summary and conclusions. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2009, 9:439-448.
  • [12]Brei B, Brownstein JS, George JE, Pound JM, Miller JA, Daniels TJ, Falco RC, Stafford KC III, Schulze TL, Mather TN, Carroll JF, Fish D: Evaluation of the United States department of agriculture Northeast area-wide tick control project by meta-analysis. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2009, 9:423-430.
  • [13]Stafford KC III, Denicola AJ, Pound JM, Miller JA, George JE: Topical treatment of white-tailed deer with an acaricide for the control of Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) in a connecticut lyme borreliosis hyperendemic community. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2009, 9:371-379.
  • [14]CDC: Morbidity and mortality weekly report: surveillance for lyme disease - United States, 1992–2006. 57http://www.r-project.org/ webcite: Centers for Disease Control; 2008
  • [15]Williams SC, DeNicola AJ: Spatial movements in response to baiting female whitetailed deer. In Proceedings of the 9 th Wildlife Damage Management Conference; 5–8 October 2000. Edited by Brittingham MC, Kays J, McPeake R. State College, PA; 2000:206-224.
  • [16]Falco RC, Fish D: A comparison of methods for sampling the deer tick, Ixodes dammini, in a Lyme disease endemic area. Exp Appl Acarol 1992, 14:165-173.
  • [17]Dobson AD: Ticks in the wrong boxes: assessing error in blanket-drag studies due to occasional sampling. Parasit Vectors 2013, 6:344.
  • [18]Fournier DA, Skaug HJ, Ancheta J, Ianelli J, Magnusson A, Maunder MN, Nielsen A, Sibert J: AD Model Builder: using automatic differentiation for statistical inference of highly parameterized complex nonlinear models. Optim Methods Softw 2012, 27:233-249.
  • [19]R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2.15.0 edition. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012.
  • [20]Burnham KP, Anderson DR: Model selection and multimodel inference. New York, NY: Springer; 2002.
  • [21]Abbott WS: A method for computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol 1925, 18:265-267.
  • [22]Smith WP: Odocoileus virginianus. Mammalian Species 1991, 388:1-13.
  • [23]Tierson WC, Mattfeld GF, Richard W, Sage J, Behrend DF: Seasonal movements and home ranges of white-tailed deer in the Adirondacks. J Wildl Manage 1985, 49:760-769.
  • [24]Burridge MJ, Peter TF, Allan SA, Mahan SM: Evaluation of safety and efficacy of acaricides for control of the african tortoise tick (Amblyomma marmoreum) on leopard tortoises (Geochelone pardalis). J Zoo Wildl Med 2002, 33:52-57.
  • [25]Burridge MJ, Simmons L-A, Allan SA: Efficacy of acaricides for control of four tick species of agricultural and public health significance in the United States. J Agric Urban Entomol 2003, 20:207-219.
  • [26]Massachusetts Division of Fish and Wildlife: Deer management overview. State of Massachusetts; 2014. http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/dfg/dfw/fish-wildlife-plants/mammals/deer-management.html webcite.
  • [27]Stafford KC III: Reduced abundance of Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) with exclusion of deer by electric fencing. J Med Entomol 1993, 20:986-996.
  • [28]Wilson ML, Telford SR III, Piesman J, Spielman A: Reduced abundance of Ixodes dammini (Acari: Ixodidae) following elimination of deer. J Med Entomol 1988, 25:224-228.
  • [29]Wilson ML, Levine JF, Spielman A: Effect of deer reduction on abundance of the deer tick (Ixodes dammini). Yale J Biol Med 1984, 57:697-705.
  • [30]Perkins SE, Cattadori IM, Tagliapietra V, Rizzoli AP, Hudson PJ: Localized deer absence leads to tick amplification. Ecology 2006, 87:1981-1986.
  • [31]Telford SR III, Mather TN, Moore SIW, Wilson ML, Spielman A: Incompetence of deer as reservoirs of the Lyme disease spirochete. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1988, 39:105-109.
  • [32]VanBuskirk J, Ostfeld RS: Controlling Lyme disease by modifying the density and species composition of tick hosts. Ecol Appl 1995, 5:1133-1140.
  • [33]Johnson PTJ, Thieltges DW: Diversity, decoys and the dilution effect: how ecological communities affect disease risk. Journal of Exp Biol 2010, 213:961-970.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:30次 浏览次数:25次