| Scoliosis | |
| Brace treatment in juvenile idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective study in accordance with the SRS criteria for bracing studies - SOSORT award 2013 winner | |
| Lorenzo Aulisa1  Francesco Falciglia3  Marco Giordano3  Emanuele Marzetti1  Vincenzo Guzzanti2  Angelo G Aulisa3  | |
| [1] Department of Orthopedics, University Hospital "Agostino Gemelli", Catholic University of the Sacred Heart School of Medicine, Rome 00168, Italy;University of Cassino, Cassino, FR 03043, Italy;U.O.C. of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Children’s Hospital Bambino Gesù, Institute of Scientific Research, P.zza S. Onofrio 4, 00165 Rome, Italy | |
| 关键词: Conservative treatment; SOSORT guidelines; Lyon brace; PASB brace; Scoliosis research society criteria (SRS); Juvenile idiopathic scoliosis; | |
| Others : 791107 DOI : 10.1186/1748-7161-9-3 |
|
| received in 2014-02-09, accepted in 2014-04-11, 发布年份 2014 | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
Background
The Juvenile idiopathic scoliosis by age of onset, severity and evolutivity is source of great doubts concerning the purpose and use of conservative treatment. The different clinical experiences leave unsolved the question that arises in applying a conservative treatment when the patients are effectively forward a long growing period, in scoliosis characterized by inevitable evolutivity. The purpose of the present prospective study was to determine the effectiveness of conservative treatment in Juvenile idiopathic scoliosis.
Methods
From 1238 patients treated for idiopathic scoliosis between 1995 and 2012 fulfill the inclusion criteria 163 patients treated with PASB, Lyon brace and Milwaukee. Of these, 113 patients had a definite outcome, 27 have abandoned treatment e 23 are still in treatment. The minimum follow-up was 24 months. Radiographs were used to estimate the curve magnitude (CM) and the torsion of the apical vertebra (TA) at 5 time points: beginning (t1), 6 months after the beginning (t2), intermediate time between t1 and t4 (t3), end of weaning (t4), 2-years minimum follow-up (t5). Three outcomes were distinguished in agreement with SRS criteria: correction, stabilization and progression.
Results
The results from our study showed that of the 113 patients with a definite outcome CM mean value was 29.6 ± 7.5 SD at t1 and 16.9 ± 11.1 SD at t5. TA was 13.5 ± 5.4 SD at t1 and 8.5 ± 5.6 at t5. The variations between CM t5-t1 and TA t5-t1 were statistically significantly different. Curve correction was accomplished in 88 patients (77.8%), stabilization was obtained in 18 patients (15.9%). 7 patients (6.19%) have a progression and 4 of these were recommended for surgery. Of 26 patients who abandoned the treatment, at the time of abandonment (12.5 age) have achieved curve correction in 19 cases (70.0%), stabilization in 5 cases (19%) and progression in 3 cases (11%). Of these patients, reviewed at the end of growing, four have been operated on.
Conclusions
Our study confirmed that conservative treatment with brace is highly effective in treating juvenile idiopathic scoliosis, in particular most patients reaching a complete curve correction and only 4.9% of patients need surgery.
【 授权许可】
2014 Aulisa et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140705010540967.pdf | 1217KB | ||
| Figure 4. | 42KB | Image | |
| Figure 3. | 43KB | Image | |
| Figure 2. | 60KB | Image | |
| Figure 1. | 61KB | Image |
【 图 表 】
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Ponseti IV, Friedman B: Prognosis in idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1950, 32:381-395.
- [2]James JIP: Idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 1954, 36-B:36-49.
- [3]James JIP: The etiology of scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1970, 52:410-419.
- [4]Goldstein LA, Waugh TR: Classification and terminology of scoliosis. Clin Orthop 1973, 93:10-22.
- [5]Scoliosis Research Society: Juvenile scoliosis. 2010. http://www.srs.org/professionals/conditions_and_treatment/juvenile_scoliosis/index.htm webcite
- [6]Wynne-Davies R: Familial (idiopathic) scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 1968, 50-B:24-30.
- [7]Moe JH, Kettleson DN: Idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 1970, 52-A:1509-1533.
- [8]Riseborough EJ, Wynne-Davies R: A genetic survey of idiopathic scoliosis in Boston, Massachusetts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973, 55:974-982.
- [9]Keiser RP, Shufflebarger HL: The Milwaukee brace in idiopathic scoliosis: evaluation of 123 completed cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976, 118:19-24.
- [10]McMaster MJ: Infantile idiopathic scoliosis: can it be prevented? J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1983, 65(5):612-617.
- [11]Cotrel Y, Morel G, Rey JC: Idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop Belg 1965, 31(5):795-810.
- [12]Duval-Beaupère G, Dubousset J, Queneau P, Grossiord A: Pour une théorie unique de l’évolution des scolioses. Press Méd 1970, 78:1141-1146.
- [13]Mannherz RE, Betz RR, Clancy M, Steel HH: Juvenile idiopathic scoliosis followed to skeletal maturity. Spine 1988, 13:1087-1090.
- [14]Winter RB: Spinal deformity. Disorders of the pediatric spine. New York: Raven Press; 1995:309-348.
- [15]Charles YP Daures JP, De Rosa V, Diméglio A: Progression risk of idiopathic juvenile scoliosis during pubertal growth. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006, 31(17):1933-1942.
- [16]Aulisa AG, Guzzanti V, Galli M, Perisano C, Falciglia F, Aulisa L: Treatment of thoraco-lumbar curves in adolescent females affected by idiopathic scoliosis with a progressive action short brace (PASB): assessment ofresults according to the SRS committee on bracing and non operative management standardization criteria. Scoliosis 2009, 4:21. BioMed Central Full Text
- [17]Negrini S, Atanasio S, Fusco C, Zaina F: Effectiveness of complete conservative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (bracing andexercises) based on SOSORT management criteria: results according to the SRS criteria for bracing studies - SOSORT award 2009 winner. Scoliosis 2009, 4:19. BioMed Central Full Text
- [18]Negrini S, Minozzi S, Bettany-Saltikov J, Zaina F, Chockalingam N, Grivas TB, Kotwicki T, Maruyama T, Romano M, Vasiliadis ES: Braces for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010, 35(13):1285-1293.
- [19]Aulisa AG, Guzzanti V, Perisano C, Marzetti E, Menghi A, Giordano M, Aulisa L: Correlation between hump dimensions and curve severity in idiopathic scoliosis before and after conservative treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011., 8
- [20]Lange JE, Steen H, Gunderson R, Brox JI: Long-term results after Boston brace treatment in late-onset juvenile and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis 2011, 6:18. BioMed Central Full Text
- [21]Negrini S, Negrini F, Fusco C, Zaina F: Idiopathic scoliosis patients with curves more than 45 Cobb degrees refusing surgery can be effectively treated through bracing with curve improvements. Spine J 2011, 11(5):369-380.
- [22]Aulisa AG, Guzzanti V, Perisano C, Marzetti E, Falciglia F, Aulisa L: Treatment of lumbar curves in scoliotic adolescent females with progressive action short brace: a case series based on the scoliosis research society committee criteria. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012, 37(13):786-791.
- [23]Lee CS, Hwang CJ, Kim DJ, Kim JH, Kim YT, Lee MY, Yoon SJ, Lee DH: Effectiveness of the Charleston night-time bending brace in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2012, 32(4):368-372.
- [24]Negrini S, Aulisa AG, Aulisa L, Circo AB, De Mauroy JC, Durmala J, Grivas TB, Knott P, Kotwicki T, Maruyama T, Minozzi S, O’Brien JP, Padopoulos D, Rigo M, Rivard CH, Romano M, Wynne JH, Villagrasa M, Weiss HR, Zaina F: 2011 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis 2012, 7(1):3. BioMed Central Full Text
- [25]Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Wright JG, Dobbs MB: Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. N Engl J Med 2013, 369(16):1512-1521.
- [26]Ceballos T, Ferrer-Torrelles M, Castillo F, Fernandez-Paredese E: Prognosis in infantile idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 1980, 62-A:863-875.
- [27]Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC, Kehl D, Cowie GH: Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990, 72(3):320-327.
- [28]Scott JC, TH E m: The natural history and prognosis of infantile idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 1955, 37- B:400-413.
- [29]Walker GF: An evaluation of an external splint for idiopathic structural scoliosis in infancy. J Bone Joint Surg 1965, 47-B:524-525.
- [30]Wynne-davies R: infantile idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 1975, 57-b:138-141.
- [31]MCmaster MJ, Macnicol MF E: the management of progressive infantile idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 1979, 61-b:36-42.
- [32]Jarvis J, Garbedian S, Swamy G: Juvenile idiopathic scoliosis: the effectiveness of part-time bracing. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008, 33(10):1074-1078.
- [33]Coillard C, Circo AB, Rivard CH: SpineCor treatment for Juvenile Idiopathic Scoliosis: SOSORT award 2010 winner. Scoliosis 2010, 5:25. BioMed Central Full Text
- [34]Richards BS, Bernstein RM, D’Amato CR, Thompson CH: Standardization of criteria for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis brace studies: SRS committee on bracing and nonoperative management. Spine 2005, 30:2068Y2075.
- [35]Bick EM, Copel JW: The ring apophysis of the human vertebra; contribution to human osteogeny. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1951, 33-A(3):783-787.
- [36]Kahanovitz N, Levine DB, Lardone J: The part-time Milwaukee brace treatment of juvenile idiopathic scoliosis. Long term follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1982, 167:145-151.
- [37]Tolo VT, Gillespie R: The characteristics of juvenile idiopathic scoliosis and results of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1978, 60:181-188.
- [38]Dabney KW, Browen JR: Juvenile idiopathic scoliosis. Semin Spine Surg 1991, 3:524-530.
- [39]Figueiredo UM, James JI: Juvenile idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1981, 63-B(1):61-66.
- [40]Vinciguerra A, Di Benedetto A, Aulisa L: Sulla determinazione delle caratteristiche elastiche del rachide toracolombare. Minerva Ortop Traumatol 1984, 35:133-138.
- [41]Aulisa L, Vinciguerra A, Tamburrelli F, Lupparelli S, Di Legge V: Biomechanical analysis of the elastic behaviour of the spine with aging. In Research into spinal deformities 1. Edited by SevastiK JA, Diab KM. IOS Press: Amsterdam; 1997:229-231.
- [42]Leone A, Aulisa A, Perisano C, Re T, Galli M: Advantages of a two-step procedure for school-based scoliosis screening. Radiol Med 2010, 115(2):238-245.
- [43]Labelle H, Richards SB, De Kleuver M, Grivas TB, Luk KDK, Wong H, Thometz J, Beauséjour M, Turgeon I, Fong DYT: Screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an information statement by the scoliosis research society international task force. Scoliosis 2013, 8:17. BioMed Central Full Text
PDF