A universal harm-minimisation approach to preventing psychostimulant and cannabis use in adolescents: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy

Maree Teesson¹  Katrina Elizabeth Champion¹  Nicola Clare Newton¹  Laura Elise Vogl² 

[1] National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in Mental Health and Substance Use, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, 22-32 King Street, Randwick 2031, New South Wales, Australia;National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, 22-32 King Street, Randwick 2031, New South Wales, Australia

关键词: Prevention;    Cannabis;    Psychostimulant;    Universal;    Computer-based;    Harm-minimisation;    School;   

Others  :  833209
DOI  :  10.1186/1747-597X-9-24

 received in 2014-01-07, accepted in 2014-06-13,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Psychostimulants and cannabis are two of the three most commonly used illicit drugs by young Australians. As such, it is important to deliver prevention for these substances to prevent their misuse and to reduce associated harms. The present study aims to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the universal computer-based Climate Schools: Psychostimulant and Cannabis Module.

Methods

A cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted with 1734 Year 10 students (mean age = 15.44 years; SD = 0.41) from 21 secondary schools in Australia. Schools were randomised to receive either the six lesson computer-based Climate Schools program or their usual health classes, including drug education, over the year.

Results

The Climate Schools program was shown to increase knowledge of cannabis and psychostimulants and decrease pro-drug attitudes. In the short-term the program was effective in subduing the uptake and plateauing the frequency of ecstasy use, however there were no changes in meth/amphetamine use. In addition, females who received the program used cannabis significantly less frequently than students who received drug education as usual. Finally, the Climate Schools program was related to decreasing students’ intentions to use meth/amphetamine and ecstasy in the future, however these effects did not last over time.

Conclusions

These findings provide support for the use of a harm-minimisation approach and computer technology as an innovative platform for the delivery of prevention education for illicit drugs in schools. The current study indicated that teachers and students enjoyed the program and that it is feasible to extend the successful Climate Schools model to the prevention of other drugs, namely cannabis and psychostimulants.

Trial registration

Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613000492752.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Vogl et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: 2010 National Drug Strategy Household Survey report. AIHW: Drug statistics series no 25 Cat no PHE 145 Canberra; 2011.
• [2]White V, Bariola E: Australian secondary school students’ use of tobacco, alcohol, and over-the-counter and illicit substances in 2011. In. Drug Strategy Branch, Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing.: Canberra; 2012.
• [3]McLaren J, Mattick RP: Cannabis in Australia: Use, supply, harms, and response. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing: Prepared by National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre for the Drug Strategy Branch; 2007.
• [4]Copeland J, Swift W: Cannabis use disorder: epidemiology and management. Int Rev Psychiatry 2009, 21:96-103.
• [5]McLaren J, Lemon J, Robins L, Mattick RP: Cannabis and Mental Health: Put into Context. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing: Prepared by the National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre for the National Drug Strategy; 2008.
• [6]Botvin GJ: Preventing drug abuse in schools: Social and competence enhancement approaches targeting individual-level etiologic factors. Addict Behav 2000, 25(6):887-897.
• [7]Shin HS: A review of school-based drug prevention program evaluations in the 1990's. Am J Health Educ 2001, 32(3):139-147.
• [8]Wenter DL, Ennett ST, Ribisl KM, Vincus AA, Rohrbach L, Ringwalt CL, Jones SM: Comprehensiveness of substance use prevention programs in US middle schools. J Adolesc Health 2002, 30(6):455-462.
• [9]Midford R, McBride N, Munro G: Harm reduction in school drug education: Developing an Australian approach. Drug Alcohol Rev 1998, 17(3):319-327.
• [10]Cuijpers P: Three decades of drug prevention research. Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy 2003, 10(1):7-20.
• [11]Dusenbury L, Brannigan R, Falco M, Hansen W: A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Educ Res Theory Pract 2003, 18(2):237-256.
• [12]Kaftarian S, Robinson E, Compton W, Watts Davis B, Valkow N: Blending prevention research and practice in schools: Critical issues and suggestions. Prev Sci 2004, 5(1):1-3.
• [13]Ringwalt C, Ennett S, Vincus A, Thorne J, Rohrbach LA, Simons-Rudolph A: The prevalence of effective substance use prevention curricula in U.S. middle schools. Prev Sci 2002, 3(4):257-265.
• [14]Rohrbach L, Graham J, Hansen W: Diffusion of a school-based substance abuse prevention program: Predictors of program implementation. Prev Med 1993, 22(2):237-260.
• [15]Backer TE: Finding the balance: Program fidelity and adaptation in substance abuse prevention: a state of the art review. Rockville: In. Edited by Center for Substance Abuse Prevention SAaMHSA; 2001.
• [16]Pankratz MM, Jackson-Newsom J, Giles SM, Ringwalt CL, Bliss K, Bell ML: Implementation fidelity in a teacher-led alcohol use prevention curriculum. J Drug Educ 2006, 36(4):317-333.
• [17]Vogl LE, Teesson M, Newton NC, Andrews G: Developing a school-based drug prevention program to overcome barriers to effective program implementation: The CLIMATE Schools: Alcohol Module. Open J Prev Med 2012, 2(3):410-422.
• [18]Newton NC, Vogl LE, Teesson M, Andrews G: CLIMATE Schools: alcohol module: cross-validation of a school-based prevention programme for alcohol misuse. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2009, 43(3):201-207.
• [19]Vogl L, Teesson M, Andrews G, Bird K, Steadman B, Dillon P: A computerized harm minimization prevention program for alcohol misuse and related harms: randomized controlled trial. Addiction 2009, 104(4):564-575.
• [20]Newton NC, Andrews G, Teesson M, Vogl LE: Delivering prevention for alcohol and cannabis using the Internet: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Prev Med 2009, 48(6):579-584.
• [21]Newton NC, Teesson M, Vogl LE, Andrews G: Internet-based prevention for alcohol and cannabis use: final results of the Climate Schools course. Addiction 2010, 105(4):749-759.
• [22]Hall W, Degenhardt L: Adverse health effects of non-medical cannabis use. Lancet 2009, 374:1383-1391.
• [23]Gowing LR, Henry-Edwards SM, Irvine RJ: The health effects of ecstasy: a literature review. Drug Alcohol Rev 2002, 21:53-63.
• [24]Botvin GJ: Preventing drug abuse in schools: social and competence enhancement approaches targeting individual-level etiologic factors. Addict Behav 2000, 25(6):887-897.
• [25]McBride N, Farringdon F, Muleners L, Midford R: School Health and Alcohol Harm Reduction Project: Details of intervention development and research procedures. In. Perth, W.A.: National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University of Technology; 2006.
• [26]National Health Promotion Association: LifeSkills. Life Skills Training Questionnaire - Instruction Guide; 2004.
• [27]AIHW: National Drug Strategy Household Survey. Drug Statistics Series No 13. Canberra: AIHW: First results; 2005.
• [28]Raudenbush S, Bryk A, Cheong YF, Congdon R, du Toit M: HLM6. Scientific Software International: Hierarchical Linear and Non-Linear Modeling. Lincolnwood: SSI; 2004.
• [29]Raudenbush S, Bryk AS: Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 2002.
• [30]Lee VE: Using hierarchical linear modeling to study social contexts: The case of school effects. Educational Psychologist 2000, 35(2):125-141.
• [31]Degenhardt L, Chiu W, Sampson N, Kessler RC, Anthony JC, Angermeyer M, Bruffaerts R, de Girolamo G, Gureje O, Huang Y, Karam A, Kostyuchenko S, Lepine J, Mora M, Neumark Y, Ormel JH, Pinto-Meza A, Posada-Villa J, Stein D, Takeshima T, Wells JE: Toward a global view of alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, and cocaine use: Findings from the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. PLoS Med 2008, 5(7):1053-1065.
• [32]Heo M, Leon AC: Sample size requirements to detect an intervention by time interaction in longitudinal cluster randomized clinical trials. Stat Med 2009, 28:1017-1027.
• [33]Teesson M, Newton NC, Barrett E: Australian school-based prevention programs for alcohol and other drugs: A systematic review. Drug Alcohol Rev 2012, 31(6):731-736.
• [34]Nherera L, Jacklin P: A model to assess the cost-effectiveness of alcohol education developed for NICE public health guidance on personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education. In. London: National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health; 2009.
• [35]Hansen WB: School-based substance abuse prevention: A review of the state of the art in curriculum, 1980–1990. Health Educ Res 1992, 7(3):403-430.
• [36]Tobler NS, Stratton HH: Effectiveness of School-based drug prevention programs: A meta-analysis of the research. J Prim Prev 1997, 18(1):71-128.
• [37]Tobler NS, Roona MR, Ochshorn P, Marshall DG, Streke AV, Stackpole KM: School-based adolescent drug prevention programs: 1998 meta-analysis. J Prim Prev 2000, 20(4):275-336.
• [38]Botvin G, Griffin K: Drug abuse prevention curricula in schools. In Handbook of drug abuse prevention: Theory, science and practice. edn. Edited by Sloboda Z, Bukoski WJ. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2003.
• [39]Williams C, Perry C: Lessons from Project Northland: Preventing alcohol problems during adolescence. Alcohol Health Res World 1998, 22(2):107-116.
• [40]McBride N, Farringdon F, Midford R, Meuleners L, Phillips M, Hill L, Hamilton G, Roche A, Anderson P: Harm minimisation in school drug education: Final results of the School Health and Alcohol Harm Reduction Project (SHAHRP). Commentary. Addiction 2004, 99(3):278-298.
• [41]Newman I, Anderson C, Farrell K: Role rehearsal and efficacy: Two 15 month evaluations of a ninth grade alcohol education programme. J Drug Educ 1992, 22:55-67.
• [42]McBride N: A systematic review of school drug education. Health Educ Res 2003, 18(6):729-742.
• [43]Tobler NS: Meta-analysis of 143 adolescent drug prevention programs: Quantitative outcome results of program participants compared to a control or comparison group. Journal of Drug Issues 1986, 16(4):537-567.
• [44]Hansen W: Program evaluation strategies for substance abuse prevention. J Prim Prev 2002, 22(4):409-436.
• [45]Hingson RW, Heeren T, Winter MR: Age at drinking onset and alcohol dependence: Age at onset, duration and severity. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006, 160:739-746.
• [46]Behrendt S, Wittchen H, Hofler M, Lieb R, Beesdo K: Transitions from first substance use to substance use disorders in adolescence: Is early onset associated with a rapid escalation? Drug Alcohol Depend 2009, 99:68-78.
• [47]Swift W, Coffey C, Carlin JB, Degenhardt L, Calabria B, Patton G: Are adolescents who moderate their cannabis use at lower risk of later regular and dependent cannabis use? Addiction 2009, 104:806-814.
• [48]Rohrbach L, Milam J: Gender Issues in substance abuse prevention. In Handbook of Drug Abuse Prevention: Theory, Science and Practice. edn. Edited by Sloboda Z, Bukoski WJ. New York: Kluwer academic/Plenum Publishers; 2003.
• [49]von Sydow K, Lieb R, Pfister H, Hofler M, Sonntag H, Wittchen H: The natural course of cannabis use, abuse and dependence over four years: a longitudinal community study of adolescents and young adults. Drug Alcohol Depend 2001, 64:347-361.
• [50]Swift W, Coffey C, Carlin JB, Degenhardt L, Patton G: Adolescent cannabis users at 24 years: trajectories to regular weekly use and dependence in young adulthood. Addiction 2008, 103:1361-1370.
• [51]Nolen-Hoeksema S, Hilt L: Possible contributors to the gender differences in alcohol use problems. J Gen Psychol 2006, 133(4):357-374.
• [52]Swift W, Copeland J: Treatment needs and experiences of Australian women with alcohol and other drug problems. Drug Alcohol Depend 1996, 40:211-219.
• [53]Stoltenberg SC, Batien BD, Birgenheir DG: Does gender moderate associations among impulsivity and health-risk behaviours? Addict Behav 2008, 33:252-265.
• [54]K-Y LIANG, ZEGER SL: Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986, 73(1):13-22.
• [55]Twisk JW: Applied longitudinal data analysis for epidemiology: a practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
• [56]Botvin G, Griffin K, Diaz T, Ifill-Williams M: Preventing binge drinking during early adolescence: One- and two- year follow-up of a school-based preventive intervention. Behaviors Psychol Addict Behav 2001, 15(4):360-365.
• [57]McBride N, Farringdon F, Midford R, Meuleners L, Phillips M: Harm minimization in school drug education: Final results of the School Health and Alcohol Harm Reduction Project (SHAHRP). Addiction 2004, 99(3):278-291.
• [58]Biglan A, Steverson H, Ary D, Faller C, Gallison C, Thompson R, Glasgow R, Lichtenstein E: Do smoking prevention programs really work? Attrition and the internal and external validity of an evaluation of refusal skills training program. J Behav Med 1987, 10(2):159-171.
• [59]Ellickson PL, McCaffrey DF, Ghosh-Dastidar B, Longshore DL: New inroads in preventing adolescent drug use: Results from a large-scale trial of Project ALERT in middle schools. Am J Public Health 2003, 93(11):1830-1836.
• [60]Winters KC: Assessing adolescent substance use problems and other areas of functioning. In Adolescents, Alcohol and Substance Abuse: Reaching Teens through Brief Interventions. edn. Edited by Monti PM, Colby SM, O'Leary TA. New York: The Guilford Press; 2001.
• [61]Winters KC, Stinchfield RD, Henly GA, Schwartz R: Validity of adolescent self-report of alcohol and other drug involvement. Int J Addict 1990–1991, 25(11A):1379-1395.
• [62]Donaldson SI, Thomas CW, Graham JW, Au JG, Hansen WB: Verifying drug abuse prevention program effects using reciprocal best friend reports. J Behav Med 2000, 23(6):585-601.
• [63]Winchester L, Dobbinson S, Rissel C, Bauman A: Anonymous record linkage using respondent-generated identification codes - a tool for health promotion research. Health Promot J Austr 1996, 6(2):52-54.
• [64]Champion KE, Newton NC, Barrett EL, Teesson M: A systematic review of school-based alcohol and other drug prevention programs facilitated by computers or the Internet. Drug Alcohol Rev 2013, 32(2):115-123.
• [65]Conrod PJ, Castellanos N, Mackie C: Personality-targeted interventions delay the growth of adolescent drinking and binge drinking. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2008, 49(2):181-190.
• [66]Conrod PJ, Castellanos-Ryan N, Strang J: Brief, personality-targeted coping skills interventions and survival as a non-drug user over a 2-year period during adolescence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010, 67(1):85-93.