Women’s experiences of ovulation testing: a qualitative analysis

Reproductive Health

William L. Ledger¹  Sarah Johnson²  Sarah Weddell²  Jill Carlton³  Georgina Jones³ 

[1] Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, NSW, Australia;Scientific and Medical Affairs, SPD Development Company Limited, Clearblue Innovation Centre, Priory Business Park, Bedford, UK;Health Economics and Decision Science (HEDS), School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK

关键词: Telephone interviews;    Conception;    Qualitative methods;    Infertility;    Ovulation testing;   

Others  :  1235021
DOI  :  10.1186/s12978-015-0103-y

 received in 2015-01-20, accepted in 2015-12-03,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

The introduction of home digital ovulation tests (OTs) has provided a simple solution for women wishing to optimise the timing of intercourse when trying to conceive. However, despite this, very little is understood about women’s experiences of using these tests.

Methods

We carried out qualitative, semi-structured telephone interviews with women who were seeking to conceive (not actively undergoing clinical investigation/fertility treatment) from the general UK population. The interviews were conducted following participation in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in which participants were either provided with digital home OTs to assist in timing intercourse (n = 18) or advised to have intercourse every 2–3 days (n = 18). The interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and then analysed using Framework analysis to identify the themes.

Results

Data saturation was reached after 36 interviews. The use of the OT appeared to elicit 10 key themes, which could be described within the context of three overarching issues: 1) a positive impact (understanding the menstrual cycle, confirming when ovulating, emotional support, improving the relationship), 2) a negative impact (changing sex life and relationship with their partner, the emotional consequences of prolonged use, questions and uncertainty about what their results mean for them) and 3) the experiences of trying to conceive in general (use of clinical guidance and emotional experience).

Conclusions

Overall, the use of home OTs were found to affect women’s thoughts and feelings in multiple ways during attempts to conceive. Although some women reported a range of negative experiences when using OTs, they also reported similar negative experiences when trying to conceive without using the tests. However, there were many positive themes associated with OT use, including an increased understanding of the menstrual cycle, confirmation of ovulation timing and providing a source of help and support when trying to conceive. Overall, when women are trying to conceive, ensuring they have access to high-quality information, including use of OT, may be of benefit to help address some of the questions and uncertainties that were raised by the participants in this study.

Trial registration number

NCT01084304

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Jones et al.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Bernstein J, Brill M, Levin S, Seibel M. Coping with infertility: a new nursing perspective. NAACOGS Clin Issu Perinat Womens Health Nurs. 1992; 3:335-42.
• [2]van Balen F, Trimbos-Kemper TC. Long term infertile couples: a study of their well-being. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1993; 14 Suppl:53-60.
• [3]Severy LJ, Robinson J, Findley-Klein C, McNulty J. Acceptability of a home monitor used to aid in conception: psychosocial factors and couple dynamics. Contraception. 2006; 73:65-71.
• [4]Wilcox AJ, Dunson D, Baird DD. The timing of the “fertile window” in the menstrual cycle: day specific estimates from a prospective study. BMJ. 2000; 321:1259-62.
• [5]Stanford JB, White GL, Hatasaka H. Timing intercourse to achieve pregnancy: current evidence. Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 100:1333-41.
• [6]Robinson JE, Ellis JE. Mistiming of intercourse as a primary cause of failure to conceive: results of a survey on use of a home-use fertility monitor. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007; 23:301-6.
• [7]Robinson JE, Wakelin M, Ellis JE. Increased pregnancy rate with use of the Clearblue easy fertility monitor. Fertil Steril. 2007; 87:329-34.
• [8]Zinaman M, Johnson S, Ellis J, Ledger W. Accuracy of perception of ovulation day in women trying to conceive. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012; 28:749-54.
• [9]Brezina PR, Haberl E, Wallach E. At home testing: optimizing management for the infertility physician. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95:1867-78.
• [10]Kopitzke EJ, Berg BJ, Wilson JF, Owens D. Physical and emotional stress associated with components of the infertility investigation: perspectives of professionals and patients. Fertil Steril. 1991; 55:1137-43.
• [11]Tiplady S, Jones G, Campbell M, Johnson S, Ledger W. Home ovulation tests and stress in women trying to conceive: a randomised controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28:138-51.
• [12]Ritchie J, Spencer L, O’Connor W. Carrying out qualitative analysis. In: Qualitative Research Practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. 1st ed. Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. SAGE Publications Ltd, London; 2003: p.220-62.
• [13]Johnson SR, Miro F, Barrett S, Ellis JE. Levels of urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) following conception and variability of menstrual cycle length in a cohort of women attempting to conceive. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009; 25:741-8.
• [14]Creinin MD, Keverline S, Meyn LA. How regular is regular? An analysis of menstrual cycle regularity. Contraception. 2004; 70:289-92.
• [15]Office for National Statistics (ONS). Vital Statistics: Population and health reference tables (November 2013 update): annual time series data. 2013. Available at: www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/re-reference-tables.html. [Accessed 19 May 2014].
• [16]Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC. Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors. JAMA. 1999; 281:537-44.
• [17]Schmidt L, Sobotka T, Bentzen G, Nyboe Andersen A. ESHRE Reproduction and Society Task Force. Demographic and medical consequences of the postponement of parenthood. Hum Reprod Update. 2012; 18:29-43.
• [18]Hambridge HL, Mumford SL, Mattison DR, Ye A, Pollack AZ, Bloom MS et al.. The incidence of sporadic anovulation on hormone levels in ovulatory cycles. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28:1687-94.
• [19]Holbrook AL, Green MC, Krosnick JA. Telephone versus face-to-face interviewing of national probability samples with long questionnaires: comparisons of respondent satisficing and social desirability response bias. Public Opin Q. 2007; 67:79-125.
• [20]Shuy RW. In-person versus telephone interviewing. In: Handbook of interview research: context and method. Gubrium JF, Holstein JA, editors. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA; 2002: p.175-94.