Improving access to skilled facility-based delivery services: Women’s beliefs on facilitators and barriers to the utilisation of maternity waiting homes in rural Zambia

Reproductive Health

Robert A. C. Ruiter³  Davidson H. Hamer²  Elisa Maria Kirch¹  Marit S. G. van der Pijl¹  Karlijn Massar³  Cephas Sialubanje³ 

[1] Department of Global Health, Maastricht University, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Science, Maastricht, The Netherlands;Department of International Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Crosstown 3rd floor, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, Boston 02118, MA, USA;Department of Work and Social Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

关键词: Zambia;    Kalomo;    Maternity waiting home;    Facility-based delivery services;    Maternal health;   

Others  :  1219157
DOI  :  10.1186/s12978-015-0051-6

 received in 2015-01-20, accepted in 2015-06-25,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Maternity waiting homes (MWHs) are aimed at improving access to facility-based skilled delivery services in rural areas. This study explored women’s experiences and beliefs concerning utilisation of MWHs in rural Zambia. Insight is needed into women’s experiences and beliefs to provide starting points for the design of public health interventions that focus on promoting access to and utilisation of MWHs and skilled birth attendance services in rural Zambia.

Methods

We conducted 32 in-depth interviews with women of reproductive age (15–45 years) from nine health centre catchment areas. A total of twenty–two in-depth interviews were conducted at a health care facility with a MWH and 10 were conducted at a health care facility without MWHs. Women’s perspectives on MWHs, the decision-making process regarding the use of MWHs, and factors affecting utilisation of MWHs were explored.

Results

Most women appreciated the important role MWHs play in improving access to skilled birth attendance and improving maternal health outcomes. However several factors such as women’s lack of decision-making autonomy, prevalent gender inequalities, low socioeconomic status and socio-cultural norms prevent them from utilising these services. Moreover, non availability of funds to buy the requirements for the baby and mother to use during labour at the clinic, concerns about a relative to remain at home and take care of the children and concerns about the poor state and lack of basic social and healthcare needs in the MWHs − such as adequate sleeping space, beddings, water and sanitary services, food and cooking facilities as well as failure by nurses and midwives to visit the mothers staying in the MWHs to ensure their safety prevent women from using MWHs.

Conclusion

These findings highlight important targets for interventions and suggest a need to provide women with skills and resources to ensure decision-making autonomy and address the prevalent gender and cultural norms that debase their social status. Moreover, there is need to consider provision of basic social and healthcare needs such as adequate sleeping space, beddings, water and sanitary services, food and cooking facilities, and ensuring that nurses and midwives conduct regular visits to the mothers staying in the MWHs.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Sialubanje et al.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]World Health Organisation. 2014. Maternal mortality Fact Sheet number 348, available on http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs348/en/index.html, accessed on 9th January, 2015.
• [2]World Health Organisation. 2014. Trends in maternal mortality 1990-2013, available at: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/monitoring/maternal-mortality-2013/en/, accessed on 9th January, 2015.
• [3]World Health Organisation.2005. The World Health Report 2005: make every mother and child count, available at: [http://www.who.int/whr/2005/en/], accessed on, 9th January, 2015.
• [4]Zambia Demographic and Health Survey Preliminary Report. ICF International Rockville, Maryland, USA; 2014.
• [5]Graham WJ, Bell JS, Bullough CH. Can skilled attendance at delivery reduce maternal mortality in developing countries. Safe Motherhood Strategies: a Rev evid. 2001; 17:97-130.
• [6]Gabrysch S, Cousens S, Cox J, Campbell OMR. The influence of distance and level of care on delivery place in Rural Zambia: a study of linked national data in geographic information system. PLoS Med. 2011; 8(1): Article ID e100394
• [7]Sialubanje C, Massar K, Hamer DH, Ruiter RAC. Understanding the psychosocial and environmental factors and barriers affecting utilization of maternal healthcare services in Kalomo, Zambia: a qualitative study. Health Educ Res. 2014; 29(3):521-32.
• [8]Sialubanje C, Massar K, Hamer DH, Ruiter RAC. Psychosocial and environmental predictors of the intention to use maternal healthcare services in Kalomo, Zambia. Health Educ Res. 2014; 29(6):1028-40.
• [9]Stekelenburg J, Kyanamina S, Mukelabai M, Wolffers I, Roosmalen Jv. Waiting too long: low use of maternal health services in Kalabo, Zambia. Trop Med Int Health. 2004;390–398.
• [10]United Nations. 2013. The Millennium Development Goals Report 2013. Avaialble at: http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/report-2013/mdg-report-2013-english.pdf, accessed on 9th January, 2015.
• [11]Walraven G, Telfer M, Rowley J, Ronsmans C. Maternal mortality in rural Gambia: levels, causes and contributing factors. Bull World Health Organ. 2000; 78(5):603-13.
• [12]Lohela TJ, Campbell OM, Gabrysch S. Distance to care, facility delivery and early neonatal mortality in Malawi and Zambia. PLoS One. 2012; 7(12): Article ID e52110
• [13]Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med. 1994; 38(8):1091-110.
• [14]Stekelenburg J, Lonkhuijzen LV, Spaans W, Roosmalen JV. Maternity waiting homes in rural districts in Africa; A cornerstone of safe motherhood? Current Women’s Health Rev. 2006; 2(4):235-8.
• [15]World Health Organisation. 1996. Maternity waiting homes: a review of experiences. Available on: [http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/MSM_96_21/en/], accessed on 11th January,2015.
• [16]Kelly J, Kohls E, Poovan P, Schiffer R, Redito A, Winter AH, et al. The role of a maternity waiting area (MWA) in reducing maternal mortality and stillbirths in high risk women in rural Ethiopia. BJOG: An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1179 2010;117(11):1377–83.
• [17]Millard P, Bailey J, Hanson J. Antenatal village stay and pregnancy outcome in rural Zimbabwe. Cent Afr J Med. 1991; 37(1):1-4.
• [18]Lori JR, Munro ML, Rominski S, Williams G, Dahn BT, Boyd CJ et al.. Maternity waiting homes and traditional midwives in rural Liberia. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2013; 123(2):114-8.
• [19]Andemichael G, Haile B, Kosia A, Mufunda J. Maternity waiting homes: a panacea for maternal/neonatal conundrums in Eritrea. J Eritrean Med Assoc. 2009; 4(1):18-21.
• [20]van Lonkhuijzen L, Stegeman M, Nyirongo R, van Roosmalen J. Use of maternity waiting home in rural Zambia. Afr J Reprod Health. 2003; 7(1):32-6.
• [21]Wilson J, Collison A, Richardson D, Kwofie G, Senah KA, Tinkorang EK et al.. The maternity waiting home concept: the Nsawam, Ghana experience. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1997; 59:S165-72.
• [22]Mramba L, Nassir FA, Ondieki C, Kimanga D. Reasons for low utilization of a maternity waiting home in rural Kenya. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2010; 108(2):152-3.
• [23]Central Statistics Office. 2010. Zambia 2010 Census of population and housing – Preliminary report. Available on: [http://www.zamstats.gov.zm/lcm.php], accessed, 15th January, 2015.
• [24]Central Statistics Office: Living Conditions: Poverty in Zambia 1991-2006. Available on: [http://www.zamstats.gov.zm/lcm.php], accessed on 11th January, 2015.
• [25]Hamer DH, Semrau K, Everett LL, Mazimba A, Seidenberg P, Goggin C et al.. Emergency Obstetrical and Neonatal Capacity and Health Center Access in Kalomo District. Paper presented at the Second Global Symposium on Health Systems Research, Zambia; 2012.
• [26]Ary D, Jacobs L, Sorensen C, Walker D. Introduction to research in education. 9th ed. Cengage Learning, Wadsworth, CA; 2013.
• [27]King N, Horrocks C. Interviews in Qualitative Research. 1st ed. SAGE Publications ltd, USA; 2010.
• [28]Armitage CJ. Implementation intentions and eating a low- fat diet: a randomised controltrial. Health Psychol. 2004; 23:319-23.
• [29]Sheeran P, Wbb TL, Gollwitzer PM. The interplay between goal intention and implementation intention. Personlaity Soc Psychol Bull. 2005; 31:87-98.
• [30]Sheeran P, Oebell S. Using implentation intention to increase attendance for cervical cancer screening. Health Psychol. 2000; 19:283-9.
• [31]Speizer IS, Story WT, Singh K. Factors associated with institutional delivery in Ghana: the role of decision-making autonomy and community norms. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14:398. BioMed Central Full Text
• [32]Story WT, Burgard SA. Couples’ reports of household decision-making and the utilization of maternal health services in Bangladesh. Soc Sci Med. 2012; 75:2403-11.
• [33]Moyer CA, Mustafa A. Drivers and deterrents of facility delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Reprod Health. 2013; 10:40. BioMed Central Full Text
• [34]Agbla F, Ergin A, Boris NW. Occupational working conditions as risk factors for preterm birth in Benin, West Africa. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2006; 54(2):157-65.