Particle and Fibre Toxicology | |
Identifying biotic interactions which drive the spatial distribution of a mosquito community | |
Bethan V Purse2  Miles A Nunn2  Nick Golding1  | |
[1] Spatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK;Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, UK | |
关键词: Ecological interactions; Species distribution modelling; Ecology; Mosquito; | |
Others : 1222232 DOI : 10.1186/s13071-015-0915-1 |
|
received in 2015-02-16, accepted in 2015-05-23, 发布年份 2015 | |
【 摘 要 】
Background
Spatial variation in the risk of many mosquito-borne pathogens is strongly influenced by the distribution of communities of suitable vector mosquitoes. The spatial distributions of such communities have been linked to the abiotic habitat requirements of each constituent mosquito species, but the biotic interactions between mosquitoes and other species are less well understood. Determining which fauna restrict the presence and abundance of key mosquito species in vector communities may identify species which could be employed as natural biological control agents. Whilst biotic interactions have been studied in the laboratory, a lack of appropriate statistical methods has prohibited the identification of key interactions which influence mosquito distributions in the field. Joint species distribution models (JSDMs) have recently been developed to identify biotic interactions influencing the distributions of species from empirical data.
Methods
We apply a JSDM to field data on the spatial distribution of mosquitoes in a UK wetland to identify both abiotic factors and biotic interactions driving the composition of the community.
Results
As expected, mosquito larval distributions in this wetland habitat are strongly driven by environmental covariates including water depth, temperature and oxidation-reduction potential. By factoring out these environmental variables, we are able to identify species (ditch shrimp of the genus Palaemonetes and fish) as predators which appear to restrict mosquito distributions.
Conclusions
JSDMs offer vector ecologists a way to identify potentially important biotic interactions influencing the distributions of disease vectors from widely available field data. This information is crucial to understand the likely effects of habitat management for vector control and to identify species with the potential for use in biological control programmes. We provide an R package BayesComm to enable the wider application of these models.
【 授权许可】
2015 Golding et al.
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
20150805124851836.pdf | 890KB | download | |
Fig. 5. | 44KB | Image | download |
Fig. 4. | 38KB | Image | download |
Fig. 3. | 28KB | Image | download |
Fig. 2. | 31KB | Image | download |
Fig. 1. | 24KB | Image | download |
【 图 表 】
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Reisen WK. Landscape epidemiology of vector-borne diseases. Ann Rev Entomol. 2010; 55:461-83.
- [2]Becker N, Petric D, Zgomba M, Boase C, Madon M, Dahl C et al.. Mosquitoes and Their Control. Springer Verlag, Berlin; 2010.
- [3]Hay SI, Sinka ME, Okara RM, Kabaria CW, Mbithi PM, Tago CC et al.. Developing global maps of the dominant anopheles vectors of human malaria. PLoS Med. 2010; 7(2):e1000209.
- [4]Ferguson HM, Dornhaus A, Beeche A, Borgemeister C, Gottlieb M, Mulla MS et al.. Ecology: A Prerequisite for Malaria Elimination and Eradication. PLoS Med. 2010; 7(8):e1000303.
- [5]Bunning M, Bowen R. Experimental infection of horses with West Nile virus and their potential to infect mosquitoes and serve as amplifying hosts. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001; 951(1):338-9.
- [6]Durand B, Balança G, Baldet T, Chevalier V. A metapopulation model to simulate West Nile virus circulation in Western Africa, Southern Europe and the Mediterranean basin. Vet Res. 2010; 41(3):32.
- [7]Sinka ME, Bangs MJ, Manguin S, Coetzee M, Mbogo CM, Hemingway J et al.. The dominant Anopheles vectors of human malaria in Africa, Europe and the Middle East: occurrence data, distribution maps and bionomic precis. Parasites & Vectors. 2010; 3(1):117. BioMed Central Full Text
- [8]Diuk-Wasser MA, Brown HE, Andreadis TG, Fish D. Modeling the spatial distribution of mosquito vectors for West Nile Virus in Connecticut, USA. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2006; 6(3):283-95.
- [9]Tran A, Ponçon N, Toty C, Linard C, Guis H et al.. Using remote sensing to map larval and adult populations of Anopheles hyrcanus (Diptera: Culicidae) a potential malaria vector in Southern France. Int J Health Geogr. 2008; 7:9. BioMed Central Full Text
- [10]Beketov MA, Yurchenko YA, Belevich OE, Liess M. What environmental factors are important determinants of structure, species richness, and abundance of mosquito assemblages? J Med Entomol. 2010; 47(2):129-39.
- [11]Steiger D, Johnson P, Hilbert D, Ritchie S, Jones D, Laurance S et al.. Effects of landscape disturbance on mosquito community composition in tropical Australia. J Vector Ecol. 2012; 37(1):69-76.
- [12]Schäfer ML, Lundström JO, Pfeffer M, Lundkvist E, Landin J. Biological diversity versus risk for mosquito nuisance and disease transmission in constructed wetlands in southern Sweden. Med Vet Entomol. 2004; 18(3):256-67.
- [13]Brown HE, Diuk-Wasser MA, Andreadis TG, Fish D. Remotely-sensed vegetation indices identify mosquito clusters of West Nile virus vectors in an urban landscape in the northeastern United States. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008; 8(2):197-206.
- [14]Blaustein L, Chase JM. Interactions between mosquito larvae and species that share the same trophic level. Ann Rev Entomol. 2007; 52:489-507.
- [15]Mukabana WR, Kannady K, Kiama GM, Ijumba JN, Mathenge EM, Kiche I et al.. Ecologists can enable communities to implement malaria vector control in Africa. Malar J. 2006; 5:9. BioMed Central Full Text
- [16]Juliano SA. Species interactions among larval mosquitoes: context dependence across habitat gradients. Ann Rev Entomol. 2009; 54:37-56.
- [17]Medlock JM, Snow KR. Natural predators and parasites of British mosquitoes - a review. European Mosquito Bull. 2008; 25:1-11.
- [18]Wisz MS, Pottier J, Kissling WD, Pellissier L, Lenoir J, Damgaard CF et al.. The role of biotic interactions in shaping distributions and realised assemblages of species: implications for species distribution modelling. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2013; 88(1):15-30.
- [19]Kissling WD, Dormann CF, Groeneveld J, Hickler T, Kühn I, McInerny GJ et al.. Towards novel approaches to modelling biotic interactions in multispecies assemblages at large spatial extents. J Biogeogr. 2011; 39(12):2163-78.
- [20]Ovaskainen O, Hottola J, Siitonen J. Modeling species co-occurrence by multivariate logistic regression generates new hypotheses on fungal interactions. Ecology. 2010; 91(9):2514-21.
- [21]Pollock LJ, Tingley R, Morris WK, Golding N, Hara RBO, Parris KM et al.. Understanding co-occurrence by modelling species simultaneously with a Joint Species Distribution Model (JSDM). Methods Ecol Evol. 2014; 5(5):397-406.
- [22]Snow KR. Mosquitoes (Naturalists’ Handbooks 14). Richmond Publishing Company, London; 1990.
- [23]Cranston PS, Ramsdale CD, Snow KR, White GB. Adults, Larvae, and Pupae of British Mosquitoes (Culicidae) A Key. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside; 1987.
- [24]Croft PS. A key to the major groups of British freshwater invertebrates. Field Studies Council, Telford; 1986.
- [25]Rose F, O’Reilly C. The Wild Flower Key. Warne, London; 2006.
- [26]Press JR, Gibbons B. Wild Flowers of Britain and EuropePhotographic Field Guide Series. New Holland, London; 2002.
- [27]Rose F. Colour identification guide to the grasses, sedges, rushes and ferns of the British Isles and north-western Europe. Viking, London; 1989.
- [28]Akaike H. Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Information Theory. Petrov BN, Caski F, editors. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest; 1973.
- [29]Albert JH, Chib S. Bayesian Analysis of Binary and Polychotomous Response Data. J Am Stat Assocs. 1993; 88(422):669-79.
- [30]Chib S, Greenberg E. Analysis of multivariate probit models. Biometrika. 1998; 85(2):347-61.
- [31]Edwards Y, Allenby G. Multivariate analysis of multiple response data. J Mark Res. 2003; 40(3):321-34.
- [32]Golding N. BayesComm: Bayesian community ecology analysis. 2013. R package version 0.1-0.
- [33]Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, van der Linde A. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol. 2002; 64(4):583-639.
- [34]Cliff AAD, Ord JK. Spatial Processes: Models & Applications. Pion, London; 1981.
- [35]Bivand R, Altman M, Anselin L, Assunção R, Berke O, Bernat A, et al. spdep: Spatial dependence: weighting schemes, statistics and models. 2011. R package version 0.5-43.
- [36]Bjornstad ON. ncf: spatial nonparametric covariance functions. 2012. R package version 1.1-4.
- [37]R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria; 2014. Available from:. http://www. R-project.org/ webcite
- [38]Linton YM, Lee A, Curtis C. Discovery of a third member of the Maculipennis group in SW England. European Mosquito Bulletin. 2005; 19:5-9.
- [39]Danabalan R, Monaghan MT, Ponsonby DJ, Linton YM. Occurrence and host preferences of Anopheles maculipennis group mosquitoes in England and Wales. Med Vet Entomol. 2014; 28(2):169-78.
- [40]Medlock JM, Snow KR, Leach S. Potential transmission of West Nile virus in the British Isles: An ecological review of candidate mosquito bridge vectors. Med Vet Entomol. 2005; 19:2-21.
- [41]Balenghien T, Vazeille M, Reiter P, Schaffner F, Zeller H, Bicout DJ. Evidence of Laboratory Vector Competence of Culex Modestus for West Nile Virus. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2007; 23(2):233-6.
- [42]Balenghien T, Vazeille M, Grandadam M, Schaffner F, Zeller H, Reiter P, et al. Vector competence of some French Culex and Aedes mosquitoes for West Nile virus. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008 Oct; 8(5):589–95. Available from:. http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18447623 webcite
- [43]Muñoz J, Ruiz S, Soriguer R, Alcaide M, Viana DS, Roiz D et al.. Feeding patterns of potential West Nile virus vectors in South-West Spain. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(6):e39549.
- [44]Golding N, Nunn MA, Medlock JM, Purse BV, Vaux AGC, Schäfer SM. West Nile virus vector Culex modestus established in southern England. Parasites & Vectors. 2012; 5(1):32. BioMed Central Full Text
- [45]Marshall JF. Records of Culex (Barraudius) modestus Ficalbi (Diptera, Culicidæ) obtained in the South of England. Nature. 1945; 156(3954):172-73.
- [46]Hutchinson RA. Mosquito Borne Diseases in England: past, present and future risks, with special reference to malaria in the Kent Marshes. PhD Thesis. University of Durham; 2004.
- [47]Marshall JF. The British Mosquitoes. British Museum, London; 1938.
- [48]Mouchet J, Rageau J, Chippaux A. Hibernation de Culex modestus Ficalbi (Diptera, Culicidae) en Camargue. Cahiers ORSTOM Serie Entomologie Medicale et Parasitologie. 1969; 7:35-37.
- [49]Mouchet J, Rageau J, Laumond C, Hannoun C, Beytout D, Oudar J et al.. Epidemiology of West Nile Virus: Study of a Focus in Camargue. V - The Vector: Culex modestus Ficalbi Diptera; Culicidae. Annales de L’Institut Pasteur. 1970; 118:839-55.
- [50]Onyeka JOA. Studies on the natural predators of Culex pipiens L. and C. torrentium Martini (Diptera: Culicidae) in England. Bull Entomological Res. 1983; 73:185-94.
- [51]Roberts G. Salt-marsh crustaceans, Gammarus duebeni and Palaemonetes varians as predators of mosquito larvae and their reaction to Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. Biocontrol Sci Tech. 1995; 5(3):37-41.
- [52]Jeffries M. Individual vulnerability to predation: the effect of alternative prey types. Freshw Biol. 1988; 19(1):49-56.
- [53]Jongman R, ter Braak CJF, Van Tongeren O. Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge; 1995.
- [54]Kaldhusdal A, Brandl R. Spatio-Phylogenetic Multi-Species Distribution Models. Methods Ecol Evol. 2014; 6(2):187-197.