Wounding, insect chewing and phloem sap feeding differentially alter the leaf proteome of potato, Solanum tuberosum L.

Proteome Science

Dominique Michaud¹  Conrad Cloutier²  Marc-Olivier Duceppe¹ 

[1] Département de phytologie/Centre de recherche en horticulture, Pavillon des services (INAF), Université Laval, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada;Département de biologie/Centre de recherche en horticulture, Pavillon Alexandre-Vachon, Université Laval, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada

关键词: Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.);    Insect herbivory;    Stress responses;    Leaf proteome;   

Others  :  817105
DOI  :  10.1186/1477-5956-10-73

 received in 2012-08-07, accepted in 2012-12-22,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Various factors shape the response of plants to herbivorous insects, including wounding patterns, specific chemical effectors and feeding habits of the attacking herbivore. Here we performed a comparative proteomic analysis of the plant's response to wounding and herbivory, using as a model potato plants (Solanum tuberosum L.) subjected to mechanical wounding, defoliation by the Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say, or phloem sap feeding by the potato aphid Macrosiphum euphorbiae Thomas.

Results

Out of ~500 leaf proteins monitored by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE), 31 were up- or downregulated by at least one stress treatment compared to healthy control plants. Of these proteins, 29 were regulated by beetle chewing, 8 by wounding and 8 by aphid feeding. Some proteins were up- or downregulated by two different treatments, while others showed diverging expression patterns in response to different treatments. A number of modulated proteins identified by mass spectrometry were typical defense proteins, including wound-inducible protease inhibitors and pathogenesis-related proteins. Proteins involved in photosynthesis were also modulated, notably by potato beetle feeding inducing a strong decrease of some photosystem I proteins. Quantitative RT PCR assays were performed with nucleotide primers for photosynthesis-related proteins to assess the impact of wounding and herbivory at the gene level. Whereas different, sometimes divergent, responses were observed at the proteome level in response to wounding and potato beetle feeding, downregulating effects were systematically observed for both treatments at the transcriptional level.

Conclusions

These observations illustrate the differential impacts of wounding and insect herbivory on defense- and photosynthesis-related components of the potato leaf proteome, likely associated with the perception of distinct physical and chemical cues in planta.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Duceppe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]de Bruxelles GL, Roberts MR: Signals regulating multiple responses to wounding and herbivory. Crit Rev Plant Sci 2001, 20:487-521.
• [2]Kessler A, Baldwin IT: Plant responses to insect herbivory: the emerging molecular analysis. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2002, 53:299-328.
• [3]Hilker M, Meiners T: How do plants "notice" attack by herbivorous arthropods? Biol Rev 2010, 85:267-280.
• [4]Howe GA, Jander G: Plant immunity to insect herbivores. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2008, 59:41-66.
• [5]Zheng S-J, Dicke M: Ecological genomics of plant-insect interactions: from gene to community. Plant Physiol 2008, 146:812-817.
• [6]Korth KL, Dixon RA: Evidence for chewing insect-specific molecular events distinct from a general wound response in leaves. Plant Physiol 1997, 115:1299-1305.
• [7]Reymond P, Weber H, Damond M, Farmer EE: Differential gene expression in response to mechanical wounding and insect feeding in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2000, 12:707-719.
• [8]Felton GW, Tumlinson JH: Plant-insect dialogs: complex interactions at the plant-insect interface. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2008, 11:457-463.
• [9]Mithöfer A, Boland W: Recognition of herbivory-associated molecular patterns. Plant Physiol 2008, 146:825-831.
• [10]McCloud ES, Baldwin IT: Herbivory and caterpillar regurgitants amplify the wound-induced increases in jasmonic acid but not nicotine in Nicotiana sylvestris. Planta 1997, 203:430-435.
• [11]Schmelz EA, Engelberth J, Alborn HT, Tumlinson JH, Teal PEA: Phytohormone-based activity mapping of insect herbivore-produced elicitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106:653-657.
• [12]Schäfer M, Fischer C, Meldau S, Seebald E, Oelmüller R, Baldwin IT: Lipase activity in insect oral secretions mediates defense responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2011, 156:1520-1534.
• [13]Mattiacci L, Dicke M, Posthumus MA: beta-Glucosidase: an elicitor of herbivore-induced plant odor that attracts host-searching parasitic wasps. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995, 92:2036-2040.
• [14]Schmelz EA, Carroll MJ, LeClere S, Phipps SM, Meredith J, Chourey PS, Alborn HT, Teal PE: Fragments of ATP synthase mediate plant perception of insect attack. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103:8894-8899.
• [15]Schmelz EA, LeClere S, Carroll MJ, Alborn HT, Teal PE: Cowpea chloroplastic ATP synthase is the source of multiple plant defense elicitors during insect herbivory. Plant Physiol 2007, 144:793-805.
• [16]Alborn T, Turlings TCJ, Jones TH, Stenhagen G, Loughrin JH, Tumlinson JH: An elicitor of plant volatiles from beet armyworm oral secretion. Science 1997, 276:945-949.
• [17]Turlings TCJ, Alborn HT, Loughrin JH, Tumlinson JH: Volicitin, an elicitor of maize volatiles in oral secretion of Spodoptera exigua: isolation and bioactivity. J Chem Ecol 2000, 26:189-202.
• [18]Halitschke R, Schittko U, Pohnert G, Boland W, Baldwin IT: Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. III. Fatty acid-amino acid conjugates in herbivore oral secretions are necessary and sufficient for herbivore-specific plant responses. Plant Physiol 2001, 125:711-717.
• [19]Mithöfer A, Wanner G, Boland W: Effects of feeding Spodoptera littoralis on lima bean leaves. II. Continuous mechanical wounding resembling insect feeding is sufficient to elicit herbivory-related volatile emission. Plant Physiol 2005, 137:1160-1168.
• [20]Bricchi I, Leitner M, Foti M, Mithöfer A, Boland W, Maffei ME: Robotic mechanical wounding (MecWorm) versus herbivore-induced responses: early signaling and volatile emission in Lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.). Planta 2010, 232:719-729.
• [21]Voelckel C, Weisser WW, Baldwin IT: An analysis of plant-aphid interactions by different microarray hybridization strategies. Mol Ecol 2004, 13:3187-3195.
• [22]Voelckel C, Baldwin IT: Herbivore-induced plant vaccination. Part II. Array-studies reveal the transience of herbivore-specific transcriptional imprints and a distinct imprint from stress combinations. Plant J 2004, 38:650-663.
• [23]De Vos M, Van Oosten VR, Van Poecke RMP, Van Pelt JA, Pozo MJ, Mueller MJ, Buchala AJ, Métraux J-P, Van Loon LC, Dicke M, Pieterse CMJ: Signal signature and transcriptome changes of Arabidopsis during pathogen and insect attack. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2005, 18:923-937.
• [24]Mewis I, Tokuhisa JG, Schultz JC, Appel HM, Ulrichs C, Gershenzon J: Gene expression and glucosinolate accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana in response to generalist and specialist herbivores of different feeding guilds and the role of defense signaling pathways. Phytochemistry 2006, 67:2450-2462.
• [25]Walling LL: The myriad plant responses to herbivores. J Plant Growth Regul 2000, 19:195-216.
• [26]Tjallingii WF, Hogen Esch T: Fine structure of aphid stylet routes in plant tissues in correlation with EPG signals. Physiol Entomol 1993, 18:317-328.
• [27]Miles PW: Aphid saliva. Biol Rev 1999, 74:41-85.
• [28]Moran PJ, Thompson GA: Molecular responses to aphid feeding in Arabidopsis in relation to plant defense pathways. Plant Physiol 2001, 125:1074-1085.
• [29]Li Q, Xie QG, Smith-Becker J, Navarre DA, Kaloshian I: Mi-1-Mediated aphid resistance involves salicylic acid and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling cascades. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2006, 19:655-664.
• [30]Shulaev V, Cortes D, Miller G, Mittler R: Metabolomics for plant stress response. Physiol Plant 2008, 132:199-208.
• [31]Yuan JS, Galbraith DW, Dai SY, Griffin P, Stewart CN Jr: Plant systems biology comes of age. Trends Plant Sci 2008, 13:165-171.
• [32]Hirayama T, Shinozaki K: Research on plant abiotic stress responses in the post-genome era: past, present and future. Plant J 2010, 61:1041-1052.
• [33]Urano K, Kurihara Y, Seki M, Shinozaki K: 'Omics' analyses of regulatory networks in plant abiotic stress responses. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2010, 13:132-138.
• [34]Chevalier F: Highlights on the capacities of "Gel-based" proteomics. Proteome Sci 2010, 8:23. BioMed Central Full Text
• [35]Giri AP, Wunsche H, Mitra S, Zavala JA, Muck A, Svatos A, Baldwin IT: Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. VII. Changes in the plant's proteome. Plant Physiol 2006, 142:1621-1641.
• [36]Chen H, Gonzales-Vigil E, Wilkerson CG, Howe GA: Stability of plant defense proteins in the gut of insect herbivores. Plant Physiol 2007, 143:1954-1967.
• [37]Nguyen TTA, Michaud D, Cloutier C: Proteomic profiling of aphid Macrosiphum euphorbiae responses to host-plant-mediated stress induced by defoliation and water deficit. J Insect Physiol 2007, 53:601-611.
• [38]Philippe RN, Ralph SG, Kulheim C, Jancsik SI, Bohlmann J: Poplar defense against insects: genome analysis, full-length cDNA cloning, and transcriptome and protein analysis of the poplar Kunitz-type protease inhibitor family. New Phytol 2009, 184:865-884.
• [39]Wei Z, Hu W, Lin Q, Cheng X, Tong M, Zhu L, Chen R, He G: Understanding rice plant resistance to the Brown Planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens): a proteomic approach. Proteomics 2009, 9:2798-2808.
• [40]Francis F, Guillonneau F, Leprince P, De Pauw E, Haubruge E, Jia L, Goggin FL: Tritrophic interactions among Macrosiphum euphorbiae aphids, their host plants and endosymbionts: investigation by a proteomic approach. J Insect Physiol 2010, 56:575-585.
• [41]Kruzmane D, Jankevica L, Ievinsh G: Effect of regurgitant from Leptinotarsa decemlineata on wound responses in Solanum tuberosum and Phaseolus vulgaris. Physiol Plant 2002, 115:577-584.
• [42]Lawrence SD, Novak NG, Ju CJ, Cooke JE: Potato, Solanum tuberosum, defense against Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say): microarray gene expression profiling of potato by Colorado potato beetle regurgitant treatment of wounded leaves. J Chem Ecol 2008, 34:1013-1025.
• [43]Lawrence SD, Novak NG, Blackburn MB: Inhibition of proteinase inhibitor transcripts by Leptinotarsa decemlineata regurgitant in Solanum lycopersicum. J Chem Ecol 2007, 33:1041-1048.
• [44]Fidantsef AL, Bostock RM: Characterization of potato tuber lipoxygenase cDNAs and lipoxygenase expression in potato tubers and leaves. Physiol Plant 1998, 102:257-271.
• [45]Fidantsef AL, Stout MJ, Thaler JS, Duffey SS, Bostock RM: Signal interactions in pathogen and insect attack: expression of lipoxygenase, proteinase inhibitor II, and pathogenesis-related protein P4 in the tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 1999, 54:97-114.
• [46]Rivard D, Cloutier C, Michaud D: Colorado potato beetles show differential digestive compensatory responses to host plants expressing distinct sets of defense proteins. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 2004, 55:114-123.
• [47]Girard C, Rivard D, Kiggundu A, Kunert K, Gleddie SC, Cloutier C, Michaud D: A multicomponent, elicitor-inducible cystatin complex in tomato, Solanum lycopersicum. New Phytol 2007, 173:841-851.
• [48]Badri MA, Rivard D, Coenen K, Michaud D: Unintended molecular interactions in transgenic plants expressing clinically useful proteins: the case of bovine aprotinin traveling the potato leaf cell secretory pathway. Proteomics 2009, 9:746-756.
• [49]Goulet C, Benchabane M, Anguenot R, Brunelle F, Khalf M, Michaud D: A companion protease inhibitor for the protection of cytosol-targeted recombinant proteins in plants. Plant Biotechnol J 2010, 8:142-154.
• [50]Delaney KJ, Haile FJ, Peterson RKD, Higley LG: Impairment of leaf photosynthesis after insect herbivory or mechanical injury on common milkweed, Asclepias syriaca. Environ Entomol 2008, 37:1332-1343.
• [51]Nabity PD, Zavala JA, DeLucia EH: Indirect suppression of photosynthesis on individual leaves by arthropod herbivory. Ann Bot 2009, 103:655-663.
• [52]Bilgin DD, Zavala JA, Zhu J, Clough SJ, Ort DR, DeLucia EH: Biotic stress globally downregulates photosynthesis genes. Plant Cell Environ 2010, 33:1597-1613.
• [53]Schenk PM, Kazan K, Wilson I, Anderson JP, Richmond T, Somerville SC, Manners JM: Coordinated plant defense responses in Arabidopsis revealed by microarray analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000, 97:11655-11660.
• [54]Moran PJ, Cheng Y, Cassell JL, Thompson GA: Gene expression profiling of Arabidopsis thaliana in compatible plant-aphid interactions. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 2000, 51:182-203.
• [55]Halitschke R, Gase K, Hui D, Schmidt DD, Baldwin IT: Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. VI. Microarray analysis reveals that most herbivore-specific transcriptional changes are mediated by fatty acid-amino acid conjugates. Plant Physiol 2003, 131:1894-1902.
• [56]Consales F, Schweizer F, Erb M, Gouhier-Darimont C, Bodenhausen N, Bruessow F, Sobhy I, Reynond P: Insect oral secretions suppress wound-induced responses in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot 2012, 63:727-737.
• [57]Baldwin IT, Zhang ZP, Diab N, Ohnmeiss TE, McCloud ES, Lynds GY, Schmelz EA: Quantification, correlations and manipulations of wound-induced changes in jasmonic acid and nicotine in Nicotiana sylvestris. Planta 1997, 201:397-404.
• [58]Voelckel C, Baldwin IT: Detecting herbivore-specific transcriptional responses in plants with multiple DDRT-PCR and substractive library procedures. Physiol Plant 2003, 118:240-252.
• [59]Thompson GA, Goggin FL: Transcriptomics and functional genomics of plant defence induction by phloem-feeding insects. J Exp Bot 2006, 57:755-766.
• [60]Howe GA: Jasmonates as signals in the wound response. J Plant Growth Regul 2004, 23:223-237.
• [61]Lawrence SD, Novak NG, Chelsea J-T, Cooke JEK: Examining the molecular interactions between potato (Solanum tuberosum) and Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Botany 2008, 86:1080-1091.
• [62]Kreft S, Ravnikar M, Mesko P, Pungercar J, Umek A, Kregar I, Strukelj B: Jasmonic acid inducible aspartic proteinase inhibitors from potato. Phytochemistry 1997, 44:1001-1006.
• [63]Brunelle F, Nguyen-Quoc B, Cloutier C, Michaud D: Protein hydrolysis by Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata, digestive proteases: the catalytic role of cathepsin D. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 1999, 42:88-98.
• [64]Brunelle F, Cloutier C, Michaud D: Colorado potato beetles compensate for tomato cathepsin D inhibitor expressed in transgenic potato. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 2004, 55:103-113.
• [65]Heibges A, Glaczinski H, Ballvora A, Salamini F, Gebhardt C: Structural diversity and organization of three gene families for Kunitz-type enzyme inhibitors from potato tubers (Solanum tuberosum L.). Mol Genet Genom 2003, 269:526-534.
• [66]Thivierge K, Prado A, Driscoll BT, Bonneil É, Thibault P, Bede JC: Caterpillar- and salivary-specific modification of plant proteins. J Proteome Res 2010, 9:5887-5895.
• [67]Hermsmeier D, Schittko U, Baldwin IT: Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. I. Large-scale changes in the accumulation of growth- and defense-related plant mRNAs. Plant Physiol 2001, 125:683–-700.
• [68]Somssich IE, Hahlbrock K: Pathogen defense in plants - a paradigm of biological complexity. Trends Plant Sci 1998, 3:86-90.
• [69]Schwachtje J, Baldwin IT: Why does herbivore attack reconfigure primary metabolism? Plant Physiol 2008, 146:845-851.
• [70]Reinbothe S, Mollenhauer B, Reinbothe C: JIPs and RIPs: the regulation of plant gene expression by jasmonates in response to environmental cues and pathogens. Plant Cell 1994, 6:1197-1209.
• [71]Mitra S, Baldwin IT: Independently silencing two photosynthetic proteins in Nicotiana attenuata has different effects on herbivore resistance. Plant Physiol 2008, 148:1128-1138.
• [72]Felton GW, Eichenseer H: Herbivore saliva and its effects on plant defense against herbivores and pathogens. In Induced plant defenses against pathogens and herbivores. Edited by Agrawal AA, Tuzun S, Bent E. The American Phytopathological Society: Saint Paul MN; 1999:19-36.
• [73]Musser RO, Hum-Musser SM, Eichenseer H, Peiffer M, Ervin G, Murphy JB, Felton GW: Herbivory: caterpillar saliva beats plant defences. Nature 2002, 416:599-600.
• [74]Hui D, Iqbal J, Lehmann K, Gase K, Saluz HP, Baldwin IT: Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. V. Microarray analysis and further characterization of large-scale changes in herbivore-induced mRNAs. Plant Physiol 2003, 131:1877-1893.
• [75]Heil M: Damaged-self recognition in plant herbivore defence. Trends Plant Sci 2009, 14:356-363.
• [76]Gaquerel E, Weinhold A, Baldwin IT: Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphigidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. VIII. An unbiased GCxGC-ToFMS analysis of the plant's elicited volatile emissions. Plant Physiol 2009, 149:1408-1423.
• [77]Heil M, Ibarra-Laclette E, Adame-Alvarez RM, Martinez O, Ramirez-Chavez E, Molina-Torres J, Herrera-Estrella L: How plants sense wounds: damaged-self recognition is based on plant-derived elicitors and induces octadecanoid signaling. PLoS One 2012, 7:e30537.
• [78]Logemann J, Schell J, Willmitzer L: Improved method for the isolation of RNA from plant tissues. Anal Biochem 1987, 163:16-20.
• [79]Rivard D, Anguenot R, Brunelle F, Van Quy L, Vezina LP, Trepanier S, Michaud D: An in-built proteinase inhibitor system for the protection of recombinant proteins recovered from transgenic plants. Plant Biotechnol J 2006, 4:359-368.
• [80]Nicot N, Hausman JF, Hoffmann L, Evers D: Housekeeping gene selection for real-time RT-PCR normalization in potato during biotic and abiotic stress. J Exp Bot 2005, 56:2907-2914.
• [81]Damerval C, de Vienne D, Zivy M, Thiellement H: Technical improvements in two-dimensional electrophoresis increase the level of genetic variation detected in wheat-seedling proteins. Electrophoresis 1986, 7:52-54.
• [82]Ramagli LS, Rodriguez LV: Quantitation of microgram amounts of protein in two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis sample buffer. Electrophoresis 1985, 6:559-563.
• [83]Goulet C, Goulet C, Goulet MC, Michaud D: 2-DE proteome maps for the leaf apoplast of Nicotiana benthamiana. Proteomics 2010, 10:2536-2544.
• [84]Laemmli UK: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970, 227:680-685.
• [85]Eng JK, McCormack AL, Yates Iii JR: An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 1994, 5:976-989.
• [86]Perkins DN, Pappin DJ, Creasy DM, Cottrell JS: Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 1999, 20:3551-3567.