期刊论文详细信息
Particle and Fibre Toxicology
Diagnosis and incidence risk of clinical canine monocytic ehrlichiosis under field conditions in Southern Europe
Lénaïg Halos2  Luc Chabanne4  David Abrial3  Christian Ducrot3  Karine Chalvet-Monfray1  Stefania Badavelli2  Ana Leal2  Marta Leon2  Raphaël Massot4  Jeanne Chêne4  Isabelle Lebert3  Magalie René-Martellet3 
[1] VetAgro Sup campus vétérinaire de Lyon, 1 avenue Bourgelat, Marcy l’Etoile, 69280, France;Merial S.A.S, 29 avenue Tony Garnier, Lyon, 69007, France;INRA, UR 346 Epidémiologie Animale, Saint-Genès-Champanelle, 63122, France;Université de Lyon, VetAgro Sup Campus vétérinaire de Lyon, Jeune équipe Hémopathogènes vectorisés, 1 avenue Bourgelat, Marcy L’Etoile, 69280, France
关键词: Incidence risk;    Dog;    Vector-borne diseases;    Italy;    Portugal;    Spain;    Clinical canine monocytic ehrlichiosis;    Ehrlichia canis;   
Others  :  1148183
DOI  :  10.1186/s13071-014-0613-4
 received in 2014-10-01, accepted in 2014-12-18,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Canine Monocytic Ehrlichiosis (CME), due to the bacterium Ehrlichia canis and transmitted by the brown dog tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus, is a major tick-borne disease in southern Europe. In this area, infections with other vector-borne pathogens (VBP) are also described and result in similar clinical expression. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the incidence risk of clinical CME in those endemic areas and to assess the potential involvement of other VBP in the occurrence of clinical and/or biological signs evocative of the disease.

Methods

The study was conducted from April to November 2011 in veterinary clinics across Italy, Spain and Portugal. Sick animals were included when fitting at least three clinical and/or biological criteria compatible with ehrlichiosis. Serological tests (SNAP®4Dx, SNAP®Leish tests, Idexx, USA) and diagnostic PCR for E. canis, Anaplasma platys, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Babesia spp, Hepatozoon canis and Leishmania infantum detection were performed to identify the etiological agents. Ehrlichiosis was considered when three clinical and/or biological suggestive signs were associated with at least one positive paraclinical test (serology or PCR). The annual incidence risk was calculated and data were geo-referenced for map construction. The probabilities of CME and other vector-borne diseases when facing clinical and/or biological signs suggestive of CME were then evaluated.

Results

A total of 366 dogs from 78 veterinary clinics were enrolled in the survey. Among them, 99 (27%) were confirmed CME cases, which allowed an estimation of the average annual incidence risk of CME amongst the investigated dog population to be 0.08%. Maps showed an increasing gradient of CME incidence risk from northern towards southern areas, in particular in Italy. It also suggested the existence of hot-spots of infections by VBP in Portugal. In addition, the detection of other VBP in the samples was common and the study demonstrated that a dog with clinical signs evocative of CME is as likely to be positive to Ehrlichia canis as to another VBP.

Conclusions

The study confirms the endemicity of CME in southern Europe and highlights the difficulties encountered by veterinarians to differentiate CME from other vector-borne diseases under field conditions.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 René-Martellet et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150404101616186.pdf 1424KB PDF download
Figure 3. 47KB Image download
Figure 2. 50KB Image download
Figure 1. 33KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Beugnet F, Marié J-L. Emerging arthropod-borne diseases of companion animals in Europe. Vet Parasitol. 2009; 163:298-305.
  • [2]Nicholson WL, Allen KE, McQuiston JH, Breitschwerdt EB, Little SE. The increasing recognition of rickettsial pathogens in dogs and people. Trends Parasitol. 2010; 26:205-212.
  • [3]De Caprariis D, Dantas-Torres F, Capelli G, Mencke N, Stanneck D, Breitschwerdt EB, Otranto D. Evolution of clinical, haematological and biochemical findings in young dogs naturally infected by vector-borne pathogens. Vet Microbiol. 2011; 149:206-212.
  • [4]De Tommasi AS, Otranto D, Dantas-Torres F, Capelli G, Breitschwerdt EB, de Caprariis D. Are vector-borne pathogen co-infections complicating the clinical presentation in dogs? Parasit Vectors. 2013; 6:97. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [5]Klag AR, Dunbar LE, Girard CA. Concurrent ehrlichiosis and babesiosis in a dog. Can Vet J. 1991; 32:305-307.
  • [6]Little SE. Ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis in dogs and cats. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2010; 40:1121-1140.
  • [7]Baneth G, Bourdeau P, Bourdoiseau G, Bowman D, Breitschwerdt E, Capelli G, Cardoso L, Dantas-Torres F, Day M, Dedet J-P, Dobler G, Ferrer L, Irwin P, Kempf V, Kohn B, Lappin M, Little S, Maggi R, Miro G, Naucke T, Oliva G, Otranto D, Penzhorn B, Pfeffer M, Roura X, Sainz A, Shaw S, Shin S, Solano-Gallego L, Straubinger R et al.. Vector-Borne Diseases - constant challenge for practicing veterinarians: recommendations from the CVBD World Forum. Parasit Vectors. 2012; 5:55. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [8]Neer TM, Breitschwerdt EB, Greene RT, Lappin MR. Consensus statement on ehrlichial disease of small animals from the infectious disease study group of the ACVIM. American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine. J Vet Intern Med. 2002; 16:309-315.
  • [9]Trotz-Williams LA, Trees AJ. Systematic review of the distribution of the major vector-borne parasitic infections in dogs and cats in Europe. Vet Rec. 2003; 152:97-105.
  • [10]René M, Chêne J, Beaufils JP, Valiente Moro C, Bourdoiseau G, Mavingui P, Chabanne L. First evidence and molecular characterization of Babesia vogeli in naturally infected dogs and Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks in southern France. Vet Parasitol. 2012; 187:399-407.
  • [11]Criado-Fornelio A, Martinez-Marcos A, Buling-Saraña A, Barba-Carretero JC. Molecular studies on Babesia, Theileria and Hepatozoon in southern Europe. Part I. Epizootiological aspects. Vet Parasitol. 2003; 113:189-201.
  • [12]Carret C, Walas F, Carcy B, Grande N, Précigout É, Moubri K, Schetters TP, Gorenflot A. Babesia canis canis, Babesia canis vogeli, Babesia canis rossi: differentiation of the three subspecies by a restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis on amplified small subunit ribosomal RNA genes. J Eurkaryotic Microbiol. 1999; 46:298-301.
  • [13]Solano-Gallego L, Trotta M, Carli E, Carcy B, Caldin M, Furlanello T. Babesia canis canis and Babesia canis vogeli clinicopathological findings and DNA detection by means of PCR-RFLP in blood from Italian dogs suspected of tick-borne disease. Vet Parasitol. 2008; 157:211-221.
  • [14]Criado-Fornelio A, Martinez-Marcos A, Buling-Saraña A, Barba-Carretero JC. Molecular studies on Babesia, Theileria and Hepatozoon in southern Europe. Part II. Phylogenetic analysis and evolutionary history. Vet Parasitol. 2003; 114:173-194.
  • [15]Kledmanee K, Suwanpakdee S, Krajangwong S, Chatsiriwech J, Suksai P, Suwannachat P, Sariya L, Buddhirongawatr R, Charoonrut P, Chaichoun K. Development of multiplex polymerase chain reaction for detection of Ehrlichia canis, Babesia spp and Hepatozoon canis in canine blood. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2009; 40:35-39.
  • [16]Beall MJ, Chandrashekar R, Eberts MD, Cyr KE, Diniz PPVP, Mainville C, Hegarty BC, Crawford JM, Breitschwerdt EB. Serological and molecular prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, and Ehrlichia species in dogs from Minnesota. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008; 8:455-464.
  • [17]Inokuma H, Okuda M, Ohno K, Shimoda K, Onishi T. Analysis of the 18S rRNA gene sequence of a Hepatozoon detected in two Japanese dogs. Vet Parasitol. 2002; 106:265-271.
  • [18]Van Eys GJ, Schoone GJ, Kroon NC, Ebeling SB. Sequence analysis of small subunit ribosomal RNA genes and its use for detection and identification of Leishmania parasites. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1992; 51:133-142.
  • [19]Halos L, Lebert I, Abrial D, Danlois F, Garzik K, Rodes D, Schillmeier M, Ducrot C, Guillot J. Questionnaire-based survey on the distribution and incidence of canine babesiosis in countries of Western Europe. Parasite. 2014; 21:13.
  • [20]R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2011. http://www.r-project.org/. Accessed 20 Jan 2014.
  • [21]Cardoso L, Mendão C, de Carvalho LM. Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis, Ehrlichia canis, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Anaplasma spp. and Leishmania infantum in apparently healthy and CVBD-suspect dogs in Portugal - a national serological study. Parasit Vectors. 2012; 5:62. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [22]Miró G, Montoya A, Roura X, Gálvez R, Sainz A. Seropositivity rates for agents of canine vector-borne diseases in Spain: a multicentre study. Parasit Vectors. 2013; 6:117. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [23]Otranto D, Dantas-Torres F. Canine and feline vector-borne diseases in Italy: current situation and perspectives. Parasit Vectors. 2010; 3:2. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [24]Moreno JM, Pineda FD, Rivas-Martinez S. Climate and vegetation at the Eurosiberian-Mediterranean boundary in the Iberian Peninsula. J Veg Sci. 1990; 1:233-244.
  • [25]Beugnet F, Kolasinski M, Michelangeli PA, Vienne J, Loukos H. Mathematical modelling of the impact of climatic conditions in France on Rhipicephalus sanguineus tick activity and density since 1960. Geospatial Health. 2011; 5:255-263.
  • [26]Estrada-Peña A, Farkas R, Jaenson TGT, Koenen F, Madder M, Pascucci I, Salman M, Tarrés-Call J, Jongejan F. Association of environmental traits with the geographic ranges of ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) of medical and veterinary importance in the western Palearctic. A digital data set. Exp Appl Acarol. 2013; 59:351-66.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:64次 浏览次数:35次