Selective episiotomy vs. implementation of a non episiotomy protocol: a randomized clinical trial

Reproductive Health

Melania Maria Amorim¹  Isabela Coutinho²  Leila Katz²  Inês Melo² 

[1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Federal University of Campina Grande, Campina Grande, PB, Brazil;Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira, Recife, PE, Brazil

关键词: Randomized controlled trial;    Perineum;    Vaginal delivery;    Episiotomy;   

Others  :  1132344
DOI  :  10.1186/1742-4755-11-66

 received in 2014-07-28, accepted in 2014-08-04,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that the episiotomy rate should be around 10%, which is already a reality in many European countries. Currently the use of episiotomy should be restricted and physicians are encouraged to use their clinical judgment to decide when the procedure is necessary. There is no clinical evidence corroborating any indication of episiotomy, so until the present moment it is not yet known whether episiotomy is indeed necessary in any context of obstetric practice.

Objectives

To compare maternal and perinatal outcomes in women undergoing a protocol of not performing episiotomy versus selective episiotomy.

Methods/Design

An open label randomized clinical trial will be conducted including laboring women with term pregnancy, maximum dilation of 8 cm, live fetus in cephalic vertex presentation. Women with bleeding disorders of pregnancy, indication for caesarean section and those without capacity to consent and without legal guardians will be excluded. Primary outcomes will be frequency of episiotomy, delivery duration, frequency of spontaneous lacerations and perineal trauma, frequency of instrumental delivery, postpartum blood loss, need for perineal suturing, number of sutures, Apgar scores at one and five minutes, need for neonatal resuscitation and pH in cord blood. As secondary outcomes frequency complications of perineal suturing, postpartum perineal pain, maternal satisfaction, neonatal morbidity and admission newborn in NICU will be assessed. Women will be invited to participate and those who agree will sign the consent form and will be then assigned to a protocol of not conducting episiotomy (experimental group) or to a group that episiotomy is performed selectively according to the judgment of the provider of care delivery (control Group). The present study was approved by IMIP’s Research Ethics Committee.

Trial Registration

Clinical Trials Register under the number and was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov under the number NCT02178111.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Melo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]de Amorim MMR, Katz L: O papel da episiotomia na obstetrícia moderna. Femina 2008, 36:47-54.
• [2]American College of Obstetricians-Gynecologists (ACOG): Practice Bulletin. Episiotomy. Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Number 71, April 2006. Obstet Gynecol 2006, 107:957-962.
• [3]World Health Organization Division of Family Health Maternal Health and Safe Motherhood: Care in normal birth: a practical guide. Report of a technical working group. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1996.
• [4]Sleep J, Grant A, Garcia J, Elbourne D, Spencer J, Chalmers I: West Berkshire perineal management trial. Br Med J (ClinRes Ed) 1984, 289:587-590.
• [5]Carroli G, Mignini L: Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Cochrane Library (6) Art. No. CD000081. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub2
• [6]Helewa ME: Episiotomy and severe perinal trauma: of science and fiction. Can Med Assoc J 1997, 156:811-813.
• [7]Scott JR: Episiotomy and vaginal trauma. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2005, 32:307-321.
• [8]Steiner N, Weintraub AY, Wiznitzer A, Sergienko R, Sheiner E: Episiotomy: the final cut? Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012, 286:1369-1373.
• [9]Amorim MM, Franca-Neto AH, Leal NV, Melo FO, Maia SB, Alves JN: Is it possible to never perform episiotomy during vaginal delivery? Obstet Gynecol 2014, 123(Suppl 1):38S.
• [10]Leal NV, Amorim MM, Franca-Neto AH, Leite DF, Melo FO, Alves JN: Factors associated with perineal lacerations requiring suture in vaginal births without episiotomy. Obstet Gynecol 2014, 123(Suppl 1):63S-64S.
• [11]Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, for the CONSORT Group: CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. BMJ 2010, 340:c332.
• [12]Myers-Helfgott MG, Helfgott AW: Routine use of episiotomy in modern obstetrics. Should it be performed? Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1999, 26:305-325.
• [13]Nascer no Brasil: Inquérito Nacional sobre Parto e Nascimento. Brasil: Sumário Executivo Temático da Pesquisa; 2014. Available in URL: http://www.ensp.fiocruz.br webcite
• [14]Pérez D’GR: Obstetric violence: A new legal term introduced in Venezuela. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2010, 111:201-202.
• [15]Carroli G, Belizan J: Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007. 4, CD000081