Exploring productivity and collaboration in Australian Indigenous health research, 1995–2008

Health Research Policy and Systems

Jenny M Lewis²  Brydie Purbrick³  Joan Cunningham¹  Alice R Rumbold¹ 

[1] Epidemiology and Health Systems Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, PO Box 41096, Darwin, NT 0811, Australia;School of Social and Political Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia;Robinson Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia

关键词: Research personnel;    Cooperative behaviour;    Australian;    Aborigines;   

Others  :  805056
DOI  :  10.1186/1478-4505-11-42

 received in 2013-08-02, accepted in 2013-10-23,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Building research capacity in Indigenous health has been recognised as integral in efforts to reduce the significant health disparities between Indigenous and other Australian populations. The past few decades have seen substantial changes in funding policy for Australian Indigenous health research, including increases in overall expenditure and a greater focus on collaborative and priority-driven research. However, whether these policy shifts have resulted in any change to the structure of the research workforce in this field is unclear. We examine research publications in Australian Indigenous health from 1995–2008 to explore trends in publication output, key themes investigated, and research collaborations.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was undertaken to identify research publications about Australian Indigenous health from 1995–2008. Abstracts of all publications identified were reviewed by two investigators for relevance. Eligible publications were classified according to key themes. Social network analyses of co-authorship patterns were used to examine collaboration in the periods 1995–1999, 2000–2004 and 2005–2008.

Results

Nine hundred and fifty three publications were identified. Over time, the number of publications per year increased, particularly after 2005, and there was a substantial increase in assessment of health service-related issues. Network analyses revealed a highly collaborative core group of authors responsible for the majority of outputs, in addition to a series of smaller separate groups. In the first two periods there was a small increase in the overall network size (from n = 583 to n = 642 authors) due to growth in collaborations around the core. In the last period, the network size increased considerably (n = 1,083), largely due to an increase in the number and size of separate groups. The general size of collaborations also increased in this period.

Conclusions

In the past few decades there has been substantial development of the research workforce in Indigenous health, characterised by an increase in authors and outputs, a greater focus on some identified priority areas and sustained growth in collaborations. This has occurred in conjunction with significant changes to funding policy for Indigenous health research, suggesting that both productivity and collaboration may be sensitive to reform, including the provision of dedicated funding.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Rumbold et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]National Health and Medical Research Council: The NHMRC Strategic Plan for 2010–2012. Canberra: Australian Government; 2010.
• [2]Humphery K: Dirty questions: Indigenous health and 'Western research'. Aust N Z J Public Health 2001, 25:197-202.
• [3]Henry J, Dunbar T, Arnott A, Scrimgeour M, Matthews S, Murakami-Gold L, Chamberlain A: Indigenous Research Reform Agenda: Positioning the Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal and Tropical Health. Darwin: Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal and Tropical Health; 2002.
• [4]National Health and Medical Research Council: Guidelines on Ethical Matters in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Research. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 1991.
• [5]National Health and Medical Research Council: Values and Ethics: Guidelines for Ethical Conduct in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Research. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2003.
• [6]Henry J, Dunbar T, Arnott A, Scrimgeour M, Matthews S, Murakami-Gold L, Chamberlain A: Indigenous Research Reform Agenda: Changing Institutions. Darwin: Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal and Tropical Health; 2002.
• [7]Dunbar T, Arnott A, Scrimgeour M, Henry J, Murakami-Gold L: CRCATH 1997–2002: Working Towards Change in Indigenous Health Research. Darwin: Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal and Tropical Health; 2003.
• [8]Henry J, Dunbar T, Arnott A, Scrimgeour M, Matthews S, Murakami-Gold L, Chamberlain A: Indigenous Research Reform Agenda: Rethinking Research Methodologies. Darwin: Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal and Tropical Health; 2002.
• [9]National Health and Medical Research Council: Road Map: A Strategic Framework for Improving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Through Research. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2002.
• [10]Leon De La Barra S, Redman S, Eades S: Health research policy: a case study of policy change in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health research. Aust N Z Health Policy 2009, 6:2. BioMed Central Full Text
• [11]Cunningham J, Rumbold A: Challenges in identifying and studying the research workforce in Indigenous health. Australas Epidemiol 2006, 13:6-8.
• [12]Rumbold AR, Cunningham J, Bailie RS, Hiller JE: Exploring the characteristics of the research workforce in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health. Aust N Z J Public Health 2008, 32:12-18.
• [13]Harris JK, Beatty KE, Lecy JD, Cyr JM, Shapiro RM II: Mapping the multidisciplinary field of public health services and systems research. Am J Prev Med 2011, 41:105-111.
• [14]Bales ME, Johnson SB, Keeling JW, Carley KM, Kunkel F, Merrill JA: Evolution of coauthorship in public health services and systems research. Am J Prev Med 2011, 41:112-117.
• [15]Wasserman S, Faust K: Social Network Analysis. Methods and Applications. Harvard: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
• [16]Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC: Ucinet 6 for Windows. Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard: Analytical Technologies; 2002.
• [17]National Health and Medical Research Council: The NHMRC Road Map II: A Strategic Framework for Improving the Health of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People through Research. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2010.
• [18]Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing: Primary Health Care Research, Evaluation and Development (PHCRED) Strategy Phase three: 2010–2014. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2010.
• [19]Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Performance Framework 2010: Detailed Analyses. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2011.
• [20]Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: The Health and Welfare of Australia's Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People: An Overview 2011, Cat. no. IHW 42. Canberra: AIHW; 2011.
• [21]Research Australia: Shaping Up: Trends and Statistics in Funding Health and Medical Research, Occasional Paper Series: Two. Melbourne: Research Australia; 2011.
• [22]Derrick GE, Hayen A, Chapman S, Haynes AS, Webster BM, Anderson I: A bibliometric analysis of research on Indigenous health in Australia, 1972–2008. Aust N Z J Public Health 2012, 36:269-273.
• [23]Monk JM, Rowley KG, Anderson IP: Setting and meeting priorities in Indigenous health research in Australia and its application in the Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health. Health Res Policy Syst 2009, 7:25. BioMed Central Full Text
• [24]Sanson-Fisher RW, Campbell EM, Perkins JJ, Blunden SV, Davis BB: Indigenous health research: a critical review of outputs over time. Med J Aust 2006, 184:502-505.
• [25]Leon De La Barra S, Redman S, Eades S, Lonsdale C: A decade of NHMRC People Support expenditure in review: is support for Indigenous health research increasing? Med J Aust 2009, 190:28-31.