Introduction of male circumcision for HIV prevention in Uganda: analysis of the policy process

Health Research Policy and Systems

Moses Tetui⁴  Joseph Mumba Zulu³  Racheal Ankunda²  Kenneth Kabali⁵  Walter Denis Odoch¹ 

[1] African Centre for Health System Strengthening Innovations (Afri-CHEST), Kampala, Uganda;Ernest Cook Ultrasound Research Education Institute, Sir Albert Cook Building, Mengo Hospital, Kampala, Uganda;Umeå International School of Public Health (UISPH), Umeå University, Umeå, SE 90185, Sweden;Makerere University School of Public Health, New Mulago Hospital Complex, Kampala, Uganda;Uganda Protestant Medical Bureau, Plot 877, Balintuma Road, Kampala, Uganda

关键词: Uganda;    Policy process;    Policy analysis;    Male circumcision;    HIV prevention;    Context;   

Others  :  1217373
DOI  :  10.1186/s12961-015-0020-0

 received in 2015-01-16, accepted in 2015-05-29,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Health policy analysis is important for all health policies especially in fields with ever changing evidence-based interventions such as HIV prevention. However, there are few published reports of health policy analysis in sub-Saharan Africa in this field. This study explored the policy process of the introduction of male circumcision (MC) for HIV prevention in Uganda in order to inform the development processes of similar health policies.

Methodology

Desk review of relevant documents was conducted between March and May 2012. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Conceptual frameworks that demonstrate the interrelationship within the policy development processes and influence of actors in the policy development processes guided the analysis.

Results

Following the introduction of MC on the national policy agenda in 2007, negotiation and policy formulation preceded its communication and implementation. Policy proponents included academic researchers in the early 2000s and development partners around 2007. Favourable contextual factors that supported the development of the policy included the rising HIV prevalence, adoption of MC for HIV prevention in other sub-Saharan African countries, and expertise on MC. Additionally, the networking capability of proponents facilitated the change in position of non-supportive or neutral actors. Non-supportive and neutral actors in the initial stages of the policy development process included the Ministry of Health, traditional and Muslim leaders, and the Republican President. Using political authority, legitimacy, and charisma, actors who opposed the policy tried to block the policy development process. Researchers’ initial disregard of the Ministry of Health in the research process of MC and the missing civil society advocacy arm contributed to delays in the policy development process.

Conclusions

This study underscores the importance of securing top political leadership as well as key implementing partners’ support in policy development processes. Equally important is the appreciation of the various forms of actors’ power and how such power shapes the policy agenda, development process, and content.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Odoch et al.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Alliance of Health Policy and Systems Research and World Health Organization. Health policy and systems research: a methodology reader. http://www. who.int/alliance-hpsr/resources/alliancehpsr_reader.pdf?ua=1 webcite
• [2]Zulu JM, Kinsman J, Michelo C, Hurtig AK. Developing the national community health assistant strategy in Zambia: a policy analysis. Health Res Policy Syst. 2013; 11:24. BioMed Central Full Text
• [3]Glassman A, Reich MR, Laserson K. Political analysis of health reform in the Dominican Republic. Health Policy Plan. 1999; 14(2):115-26.
• [4]Gilson L, Erasmus E, Borghi J, Macha J, Kamuzora P, Mtei G. Using stakeholder analysis to support moves towards universal coverage: lessons from the SHIELD project. Health Policy Plan. 2012; 27 Suppl 1:i64-76.
• [5]Gilson L, Raphaely N. The terrain of health policy analysis in low and middle income countries: a review of published literature 1994–2007. Health Policy Plan. 2008; 23(5):294-307.
• [6]Walt G, Gilson L. Reforming the health sector in developing countries: the central role of policy analysis. Health Policy Plan. 1994; 9(4):353-70.
• [7]Overseas Development Institute. How can the analysis of power and process in policy-making improve health outcomes? Moving the agenda forward: briefing paper 25. http://www. odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/478.pdf webcite
• [8]Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Sitta R, Puren A. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 Trial. PLoS Med. 2005; 2(11): Article ID e298
• [9]Bailey C, Moses S, Parker CB, Agot K, Maclean I, Krieger JN et al.. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2007; 369(9562):643-56.
• [10]Gray RH, Kigozi G, Serwadda D, Makumbi F, Watya S, Nalugoda F et al.. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2007; 369(9562):657-66.
• [11]World Health Organization. WHO and UNAIDS announce recommendations from expert consultation on male circumcision for HIV prevention. http://www. who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2007/pr10/en/ webcite
• [12]World Health Organization. New data on male circumcision and HIV prevention. Policy and programme implications – conclusions and recommendations. Geneva: WHO; 2007.
• [13]Uganda HIV/AIDS sero-behavioural survey 2004–2005. MoH, Kampala; 2006.
• [14]Green EC, Halperin DT, Nantulya V, Hogle JA. Uganda’s HIV prevention success: the role of sexual behavior change and the national response. AIDS Behav. 2006; 10(4):335-46.
• [15]Sabatier AP, Jenkins-Smith HC. Policy change and learning: advocacy coalition approach (theoretical lenses on public policy). Westview Press, Boulder; 1993.
• [16]Buse K, Mays N, Walt G. Making health policy. Open University Press, London; 2005.
• [17]Kingdon JW. Agendas, alternatives and public policies. Harper Collins College Publishers, New York; 1995.
• [18]Foucault M. The history of sexuality Volume 1A – introduction. Penguin, Middlesex; 1978.
• [19]Dahl RA. Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. Yale University Press, New Haven; 1961.
• [20]Weber M. From Max Weber: essays in sociology. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London; 1948.
• [21]Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006; 3:77-101.
• [22]Weiss HA, Quigley M, Hayes R. Male circumcision and risk of HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS. 2000; 14(15):2361-70.
• [23]Progress in scale-up of male circumcision for HIV prevention in Eastern and Southern Africa. Focus on service delivery. WHO, Geneva; 2011.
• [24]UNAIDS. United Nations Work Plan on Male Circumcision and HIV. http://data. unaids.org/pub/Report/2005/20050831_un_workplan_male_circumcision_en.pdf webcite
• [25]Safe male circumcision policy. MoH, Kampala; 2010.
• [26]Albert LM, Akol A, L’engle K, Tolley EE, Ramirez CB, Opio A et al.. Acceptability of male circumcision for prevention of HIV infection among men and women in Uganda. AIDS. 2011; 23(12):1578-85.
• [27]Bakyawa J. Circumcision to prevent HIV is giving people false information. http://allafrica. com/stories/200810150710.html webcite
• [28]Bugembe A, Komugisha L. Government drafts policy on male circumcision. 2012. http://allafrica. com/stories/200803260051.html webcite
• [29]Kakaire AK. Government explains policy delay on medical male circumcision. http://business. highbeam.com/3548/article-1G1-177037011/government-explains-policy-delay-medical-male-circumcision webcite
• [30]Boyle GJ, Hill G. Sub-Saharan Africa randomized clinical trials into male circumcision and HIV transmission: methodological, ethical and legal concerns. J Law Med. 2011; 19(2):316-34.
• [31]Nadutu A. Museveni scoffs at circumcision for HIV/AIDS. http://allafrica. com/stories/200702170370.html webcite
• [32]Olikira BS, Opio A, Tumwesigye NM, Thomsen S, Akol A. Situation analysis to determine the acceptability and feasibility of male circumcision promotion in Uganda. Ministry of Health Uganda, Kampala; 2008.
• [33]Government of Uganda: Constitution of the Republic of Uganda. Kampala; 1995.
• [34]Ssengooba F, Atuyambe L, Kiwanuka SN, Puvanachandra P, Glass N, Hyder AA. Research translation to inform national health policies: learning from multiple perspectives in Uganda. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2011; 11 Suppl 1:S13. BioMed Central Full Text
• [35]Educational perspectives on the impact of the HIV/AIDS pandemic on child labour in Uganda. ILO, Geneva; 2006.
• [36]Global AIDS response progress report; country progress report Uganda. UAC, Kampala; 2012.
• [37]Gray R, Kigozi G, Kong X, Ssempiija V, Makumbi F, Wattya S et al.. The effectiveness of male circumcision for HIV prevention and effects on risk behaviors in a post-trial follow-up study. AIDS. 2012; 26(5):609-15.
• [38]United States Agency for International Development. The potential cost and impact of expanding male circumcision in Uganda. http://pdf. usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADR404.pdf webcite
• [39]Nafula J, Bogere H. Government calls for mass male circumcision. The Daily Monitor, Kampala; 2009.
• [40]PRI’s The World. Circumcision and AIDS in Uganda. http://www. pri.org/stories/2008-07-31/circumcision-and-aids-uganda webcite
• [41]Ntozi J. The East African AIDS epidemic and the absence of male circumcision: what is the link? http://htc. anu.edu.au/pdfs/Forum5_1.pdf webcite
• [42]De Vincenzi I, Mertens T. Male circumcision: a role in HIV prevention? AIDS. 1994; 8(2):153-60.
• [43]Wakabi W. World report: Uganda steps up efforts to boost male circumcision. Lancet. 2010; 376(9743):757-8.
• [44]Group S. The survey report on the Social Political Economic & Cultural (SPEC) Barometer. Steadman Group, Kampala; 2007.
• [45]Uganda AIDS Commission. Uganda HIV prevention response and modes of transmission analysis. http://www-wds. worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2013/04/08/000442464_20130408120341/Rendered/PDF/764180WP0Ugand00Box374375B00PUBLIC0.pdf webcite
• [46]Uganda Media Centre. Circumcision does not stop AIDS. http://allafrica. com/stories/201408201338.html webcite
• [47]Tumushabe J. The Politics of HIV/AIDS in Uganda. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Geneva; 2006.
• [48]Mugasha C. Bishop against circumcision. http://www. newvision.co.ug/news/630298-bishop-against-circumcision.html webcite
• [49]National communication strategy for male circumcision. MoH, Kampala; 2010.
• [50]Musobya A, Opio SC. Mad rush for medical male circumcision. http://www. monitor.co.ug/News/National/-/688334/1284338/-/bg7aq5z/-/index.html webcite
• [51]Okudi M. Adjumani men ‘dodge’ the knife. 2011. http://www. monitor.co.ug/News/National/-/688334/1294302/-/bfkqwnz/-/index.html webcite
• [52]National HIV/AIDS strategic plan 2007/8–2011/12. Moving Toward Universal Access. UAC, Kampala; 2007.
• [53]Health sector strategic and investment plan 2011/12–2014/15. MoH, Kampala; 2011.
• [54]Annual health sector performance report 2010/2011. MoH, Kampala; 2011.
• [55]Amone J. Update on male circumcision in Uganda. Proceedings of the conference on regional update on the progress on male circumcision. Arusha, Tanzania. 2010.
• [56]Clearinghouse on Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention. www. malecircumcision.org webcite