Early embryonic determination of the sexual dimorphism in segment number in geophilomorph centipedes

EvoDevo

Michael Akam¹  Jack Green¹  Carlo Brena¹ 

[1] Laboratory for Development and Evolution, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK

关键词: Molecular sexing assay;    Strigamia maritima;    Intraspecific variability;    Sex determination;    Segmentation;   

Others  :  806361
DOI  :  10.1186/2041-9139-4-22

 received in 2013-05-02, accepted in 2013-07-02,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Most geophilomorph centipedes show intraspecific variability in the number of leg-bearing segments. This intraspecific variability generally has a component that is related to sex, with females having on average more segments than males. Neither the developmental basis nor the adaptive role of this dimorphism is known.

Results

To determine when this sexual dimorphism in segment number is established, we have followed the development of Strigamia maritima embryos from the onset of segmentation to the first post-embryonic stage where we could determine the sex morphologically. We find that males and females differ in segment number by Stage 6.1, a point during embryogenesis when segment addition pauses while the embryo undergoes large-scale movements. We have confirmed this pattern by establishing a molecular method to determine the sex of single embryos, utilising duplex PCR amplification for Y chromosomal and autosomal sequences. This confirms that male embryos have a modal number of 43 segments visible at Stage 6, while females have 45. In our Strigamia population, adult males have a modal number of 47 leg-bearing segments, and females have 49. This implies that the sexual dimorphism in segment number is determined before the addition of the last leg-bearing segments and the terminal genital segments.

Conclusions

Sexual dimorphism in segment number is not associated with terminal segment differentiation, but must instead be related to some earlier process during segment patterning. The dimorphism may be associated with a difference in the rate and/or duration of segment addition during the main phase of rapid segment addition that precedes embryonic Stage 6. This suggests that the adaptive role, if any, of the dimorphism is likely to be related to segment number per se, and not to sexual differentiation of the terminal region.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Brena et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Minelli A, Foddai D, Pereira LA, Lewis JGE: The evolution of segmentation of centipede trunk and appendages. J Zool Sys Evol Res 2000, 38:103-117.
• [2]Arthur W: Variable segment number in centipedes: population genetics meets evolutionary developmental biology. Evol Dev 1999, 1:62-69.
• [3]Kettle C, Arthur W: Latitudinal cline in segment number in an arthropod species. Strigamia maritima. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 2000, 267:1393-1397.
• [4]Vedel V, Chipman AD, Akam M, Arthur W: Temperature-dependent plasticity of segment number in an arthropod species: the centipede Strigamia maritima. Evol Dev 2008, 10:487-492.
• [5]Vedel V, Apostolou Z, Arthur W, Akam M, Brena C: An early temperature-sensitive period for the plasticity of segment number in the centipede Strigamia maritima. Evol Dev 2010, 12:347-352.
• [6]Vedel V, Brena C, Arthur W: Demonstration of a heritable component of the variation in segment number in the centipede Strigamia maritima. Evol Dev 2009, 11:434-440.
• [7]Minelli A, Bortoletto S: Myriapod metamerism and arthropod segmentation. Biol J Linnean Soc 1988, 33:323-343.
• [8]Bonato L, Foddai D, Minelli A: Evolutionary trends and patterns in centipede segment number based on a cladistic analysis of Mecistocephalidae (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha). Syst Entomol 2003, 28:539-579.
• [9]Wang W, Kidd BJ, Carroll SB, Yoder JH: Sexually dimorphic regulation of the Wingless morphogen controls sex-specific segment number in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011, 108:11139-11144.
• [10]Foronda D, Martin P, Sanchez-Herrero E: Drosophila Hox and sex-determination genes control segment elimination through EGFR and extramacrochetae activity. Plos Genet 2012, 8:e1002874.
• [11]Brena C, Akam M: The embryonic development of the centipede Strigamia maritima. Dev Biol 2012, 363:290-307.
• [12]Chipman AD, Arthur W, Akam M: A double segment periodicity underlies segment generation in centipede development. Curr Biol 2004, 14:1250-1255.
• [13]Chipman AD, Akam M: The segmentation cascade in the centipede Strigamia maritima: involvement of the Notch pathway and pair-rule gene homologues. Dev Biol 2008, 319:160-169.
• [14]Ortega-Hernandez J, Brena C: Ancestral patterning of tergite formation in a centipede suggests derived mode of trunk segmentation in trilobites. PloS One 2012, 7:e52623.
• [15]Lewis JGE: The Biology of Centipedes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1981.
• [16]Truett GE, Heeger P, Mynatt RL, Truett AA, Walker JA, Warman ML: Preparation of PCR-quality mouse genomic DNA with hot sodium hydroxide and tris (HotSHOT). Biotechniques 2000, 29:52-54.
• [17]Smar Genome Assembly 1.0. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/322118/ webcite
• [18]Manu , Ludwig MZ, Kreitman M: Sex-specific pattern formation during early Drosophila development. Genetics 2013, 194:163-173.
• [19]Bonato L, Foddai D, Minelli A: Increase by duplication and loss of invariance of segment number in the centipede Mecistocephalus microporus (Chilopoda, Geophilomorpha, Mecistocephalidae). Ital J Zool 2001, 68:345-352.
• [20]Uliana M, Bonato L, Minelli A: The Mecistocephalidae of the Japanese and Taiwanese islands (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha). Zootaxa 2007, 1396:1-84.