ECG-based gating in ultra high field cardiovascular magnetic resonance using an independent component analysis approach

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Julien Oster¹  Gari D Clifford¹  Georg Rose²  Johannes W Krug² 

[1] Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK;Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany

关键词: VCG;    MHD;    Independent component analysis;    Gating;    ECG;    CMR;    Cardiovascular magnetic resonance;   

Others  :  802115
DOI  :  10.1186/1532-429X-15-104

 received in 2013-05-21, accepted in 2013-10-16,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

In Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR), the synchronization of image acquisition with heart motion is performed in clinical practice by processing the electrocardiogram (ECG). The ECG-based synchronization is well established for MR scanners with magnetic fields up to 3 T. However, this technique is prone to errors in ultra high field environments, e.g. in 7 T MR scanners as used in research applications. The high magnetic fields cause severe magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) effects which disturb the ECG signal. Image synchronization is thus less reliable and yields artefacts in CMR images.

Methods

A strategy based on Independent Component Analysis (ICA) was pursued in this work to enhance the ECG contribution and attenuate the MHD effect. ICA was applied to 12-lead ECG signals recorded inside a 7 T MR scanner. An automatic source identification procedure was proposed to identify an independent component (IC) dominated by the ECG signal. The identified IC was then used for detecting the R-peaks. The presented ICA-based method was compared to other R-peak detection methods using 1) the raw ECG signal, 2) the raw vectorcardiogram (VCG), 3) the state-of-the-art gating technique based on the VCG, 4) an updated version of the VCG-based approach and 5) the ICA of the VCG.

Results

ECG signals from eight volunteers were recorded inside the MR scanner. Recordings with an overall length of 87 min accounting for 5457 QRS complexes were available for the analysis. The records were divided into a training and a test dataset. In terms of R-peak detection within the test dataset, the proposed ICA-based algorithm achieved a detection performance with an average sensitivity (Se) of 99.2%, a positive predictive value (+P) of 99.1%, with an average trigger delay and jitter of 5.8 ms and 5.0 ms, respectively. Long term stability of the demixing matrix was shown based on two measurements of the same subject, each being separated by one year, whereas an averaged detection performance of Se = 99.4% and +P = 99.7% was achieved.

Compared to the state-of-the-art VCG-based gating technique at 7 T, the proposed method increased the sensitivity and positive predictive value within the test dataset by 27.1% and 42.7%, respectively.

Conclusions

The presented ICA-based method allows the estimation and identification of an IC dominated by the ECG signal. R-peak detection based on this IC outperforms the state-of-the-art VCG-based technique in a 7 T MR scanner environment.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Krug et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Attili AK, Schuster A, Nagel E, Reiber JH, van der Geest RJtitle=Quantification in cardiac MRI: advances in image acquisition and processing. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010; 26:27-40.
• [2]Niendorf T, Sodickson DK, Krombach GA, Schulz-Menger J. Toward cardiovascular MRI at 7 T: clinical needs, technical solutions and research promises. Eur Radiol. 2010; 20(12):2806-16.
• [3]van Ooij P, Kleinloog R, Zwanenburg J, Visser F, Luijten P, Barker A, Markl M, Nederveen A, Majoie C, Regli L et al.. Improved depiction of hemodynamics in intracranial aneurysms by 4D flow MRI at 7T compared to 3T. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013; 15 Suppl 1:W12. BioMed Central Full Text
• [4]Scott A, Keegan J, Firmin D. Motion in cardiovascular MR imaging. Radiology. 2009; 250(2):331-51.
• [5]Fischer S, Wickline S, Lorenz C. Novel real-time R-wave detection algorithm based on the vectorcardiogram for accurate gated magnetic resonance acquisitions. Magnet Reson Med. 1999; 42(2):361-70.
• [6]Nacif M, Zavodni A, Kawel N, Choi E, Lima J, Bluemke D. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and its electrocardiographs (ECG): tips and tricks. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011; 28(6):1-11.
• [7]Rubin J, Brian Fowlkes J, Prince M, Rhee R, Chenevert T. Doppler US gating of cardiac MR imaging. Acad Radiol. 2000; 7(12):1116-22.
• [8]Nijm G, Sahakian A, Swiryn S, Carr J, Sheehan J, Larson A. Comparison of self-gated cine MRI retrospective cardiac synchronization algorithms. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008; 28(3):767-72.
• [9]Frauenrath T, Hezel F, Renz W, de Geyer dÓrth T, Dieringer M, von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Prothmann M, Schulz-Menger J, Niendorf T. Acoustic cardiac triggering: a practical solution for synchronization and gating of cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 7 Tesla. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010; 12(67):1-14.
• [10]Keltner JR, Roos MS, Brakeman PR, Budinger TF. Magnetohydrodynamics of Blood Flow. Magnet Reson Med. 1990; 16:139-49.
• [11]Kinouchi Y, Yamaguchi H, Tenforde TS. Theoretical analysis of magnetic field interactions with aortic blood flow. Bioelectromagnetics. 1996; 17:21-32. [ http://dx. doi.org/3.0.CO;2-8 webcite]
• [12]Martin V, Drochon A, Fokapu O, Gerbeau J. MagnetoHemoDynamics Effect on Electrocardiograms. FIMH, Lect Notes Comput Sc. 2011; 6666:325-32.
• [13]Chia J, Fischer S, Wickline S, Lorenz C. Performance of QRS detection for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with a novel vectorcardiographic triggering method. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000; 12(5):678-88.
• [14]Brandts A, Westenberg J, Versluis M, Kroft L, Smith N, Webb A, de Roos A. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular function in humans at 7 T. Magnet Reson Med. 2010; 64(5):1471-7.
• [15]Krug J, Rose G, Stucht D, Clifford G, Oster J. Limitations of VCG based gating methods in ultra high field cardiac MRI. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013; 15 Suppl 1:W19. BioMed Central Full Text
• [16]Hyvarinen A. Survey on independent component analysis. Neural Comput Surv. 1999; 2(4):94-128.
• [17]Comon P, Jutten C. Handbook of Blind Source Separation: Independent component analysis and applications. New York: Academic Press; 2010.
• [18]Sameni R, Jutten C, Shamsollahi MB. What ICA provides for ECG processing: Application to noninvasive fetal ECG extraction. In: Proc Int Symp Signal Process Inf Technol (ISSPIT). Canada: Vancouver; 2006: p.656-661.
• [19]He T, Clifford G, Tarassenko L. Application of ICA in Removing Artefacts from the ECG. Neural Comput Appl. 2006; 15(2):105-16.
• [20]Phlypo R, Zarzoso V, Comon P, Dasseler Y, Lemahieu I. Extraction of atrial activity from the ECG by spectrally constrained ICA based on kurtosis sign. Proc 7th Int Conf ICA, LNCS. 2007; 4666:641-8.
• [21]Oster J, Pietquin O, Abächerli R, Kraemer M, Felblinger J. Independent component analysis-based artefact reduction: application to the electrocardiogram for improved magnetic resonance imaging triggering. Physiol Meas. 2009; 30:1381-97.
• [22]Krug J, Rose G. Comput Cardiol. 2012; 38:769-72.
• [23]Hyvarinen A. Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 1999; 10(3):626-34.
• [24]Clifford GD. Signal processing methods for heart rate variability [Phd thesis]. England: University of Oxford; 2002
• [25]Lilliefors HW. On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown. J Am Stat Assoc. 1967; 62(318):399-402.
• [26]Edenbrandt L, Pahlm O. Vectorcardiogram synthesized from a 12-lead ECG: superiority of the inverse Dower matrix. J Electrocardiol. 1988; 21(4):361-367.
• [27]American National Standard. Testing and reporting performance results of cardiac rhythm and ST segment measurement algorithms. ANSI/AAMI/ISO EC57:1998/(R)2008. Arlington (VA), 1998
• [28]Krug J, Rose G, Stucht D, Clifford G, Oster J. Filtering the magnetohydrodynamic effect from 12-lead ECG signals using independent component analysis. Comput Cardiol. 2012; 39:590-93.
• [29]Lentner C. Geigy scientific tables: vol 5. Heart and circulation. West Caldwell (NJ): CIBA-Geigy AG; 1990.
• [30]Thompson RB, McVeigh ER. Flow-gated phase-contrast MRI using radial acquisitions. Magnet Reson Med. 2004; 52(3):598-604.
• [31]Kyriakou A, Neufeld E, Szczerba D, Kainz W, Luechinger R, Kozerke S, McGregor R, Kuster N. Patient-specific simulations and measurements of the magneto-hemodynamic effect in human primary vessels. Physiol Meas. 2012; 33:117-30.
• [32]Tse Z, Dumoulin C, Clifford G, Jerosch-Herald M, Kacher D, Kwong R, Stevenson W, Schmidt E. MRI-compatible 12-lead ECGs with MHD separation: application to cardiac MRI gating, physiological monitoring and noninvasive cardiac-output estimation. Stockholm: Sweden; 2010.
• [33]Tse Z, Dumoulin C, Clifford G, Schweitzer J, Qin L, Oster J, Jerosch-Herold M, Kwong R, Michaud G, Stevenson W, Schmidt E. A 1.5T MRI-conditional 12-lead electrocardiogram for MRI and intra-MR intervention. Magnet Reson Med. 2013. Epub ahead of print. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.24744 webcite
• [34]Felblinger J, Slotboom J, Kreis R, Jung B, Boesch C et al.. Restoration of electrophysiological signals distorted by inductive effects of magnetic field gradients during MR sequences. Magnet Reson Med. 1999; 41(4):715-21.
• [35]Oster J, Pietquin O, Kraemer M, Felblinger J. Nonlinear Bayesian filtering for denoising of electrocardiograms acquired in a magnetic resonance environment. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010; 57(7):1628-38.
• [36]Schmidt EJ, Clifford G, Jerosch-Herald M, Kwong RY, Epstein L, Kacher D, Dumoulin CL, Jolesz F. MRI-compatible 12-lead ECG: improved MHD suppression, ischemia monitoring, and non-invasive cardiac output. Hawaii: Honolulu; 2009.