Mapping biomass with remote sensing: a comparison of methods for the case study of Uganda

Carbon Balance and Management

Christiane Schmullius³  Matieu Henry¹  Martin Herold²  Valerio Avitabile³ 

[1] AgroParisTech-ENGREF, GEEFT, 648 rue Jean-François Breton, BP 7355 - 34086 Montpellier Cedex 4, France;Department of Environmental Science, Wageningen University, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands;Institute of Geography, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Grietgasse 6, 07743 Jena, Germany

关键词: bio-energy;    MODIS;    Landsat;    Land Cover;    sub-Saharan Africa;    REDD+;    carbon;    global change;    forestry;   

Others  :  792603
DOI  :  10.1186/1750-0680-6-7

 received in 2011-03-20, accepted in 2011-10-07,  发布年份 2011

【 摘 要 】

Background

Assessing biomass is gaining increasing interest mainly for bioenergy, climate change research and mitigation activities, such as reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries (REDD+). In response to these needs, a number of biomass/carbon maps have been recently produced using different approaches but the lack of comparable reference data limits their proper validation. The objectives of this study are to compare the available maps for Uganda and to understand the sources of variability in the estimation. Uganda was chosen as a case-study because it presents a reliable national biomass reference dataset.

Results

The comparison of the biomass/carbon maps show strong disagreement between the products, with estimates of total aboveground biomass of Uganda ranging from 343 to 2201 Tg and different spatial distribution patterns. Compared to the reference map based on country-specific field data and a national Land Cover (LC) dataset (estimating 468 Tg), maps based on biome-average biomass values, such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) default values, and global LC datasets tend to strongly overestimate biomass availability of Uganda (ranging from 578 to 2201 Tg), while maps based on satellite data and regression models provide conservative estimates (ranging from 343 to 443 Tg). The comparison of the maps predictions with field data, upscaled to map resolution using LC data, is in accordance with the above findings. This study also demonstrates that the biomass estimates are primarily driven by the biomass reference data while the type of spatial maps used for their stratification has a smaller, but not negligible, impact. The differences in format, resolution and biomass definition used by the maps, as well as the fact that some datasets are not independent from the reference data to which they are compared, are considered in the interpretation of the results.

Conclusions

The strong disagreement between existing products and the large impact of biomass reference data on the estimates indicate that the first, critical step to improve the accuracy of the biomass maps consists of the collection of accurate biomass field data for all relevant vegetation types. However, detailed and accurate spatial datasets are crucial to obtain accurate estimates at specific locations.

【 授权许可】

   
2011 Avitabile et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Masera O, Ghilardi A, Drigo R, Trossero MA: WISDOM: A GIS-based supply demand mapping tool for woodfuel management. Biomass & Bioenergy 2006, 30:618-637.
• [2]Houghton RA: Aboveground forest biomass and the global carbon balance. Global Change Biology 2005, 11:945-958.
• [3]Le Quere C, Raupach MR, Canadell JG, Marland G, Bopp L, Ciais P, Conway TJ, Doney SC, Feely RA, Foster P, Friedlingstein P, Gurney K, Houghton RA, House JI, Huntingford C, Levy PE, Lomas MR, Majkut J, Metzl N, Ometto JP, Peters GP, Prentice IC, Randerson JT, Running SW, Sarmiento JL, Schuster U, Sitch S, Takahashi T, Viovy N, van der Werf GR, Woodward FI: Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Nature Geoscience 2009, 2:831-836.
• [4]Henry M: Carbon stocks and dynamics in Sub Saharan Africa. [http:/ / www5.montpellier.inra.fr/ ecosols/ Recherche/ these_et_hdr/ these_de_matieu_henry ] webcitePhD Thesis University of Tuscia, AgroParisTech/ENGREF; 2010.
• [5]UNFCCC: Draft decision -/CP.16 Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention--policy approaches and positive incentives on issues relating to reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries; and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries. 2010.
• [6]Herold M, Skutsch M: Monitoring, reporting and verification for national REDD+ programmes: two proposals. Environmental Research Letters 2011., 6
• [7]Henry M, Maniatis D, Gitz V, Huberman D, Valentini R: Implementation of REDD plus in sub-Saharan Africa: state of knowledge, challenges and opportunities. Environment and Development Economics 2011, 16:381-404.
• [8]Houghton RA, Hackler JL: Emissions of carbon from land use change in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Geophysical Research-Biogeosciences 2006., 111
• [9]Waggoner PE: Forest Inventories: Discrepancies and Uncertainties "The World's Forests: Design and Implementation of Effective Measurement and Monitoring". Washington, DC: Resources for the Future; 2009.
• [10]Goetz SJ, Baccini A, Laporte NT, Johns T, Walker W, Kellndorfer J, Houghton RA, Sun M: Mapping and monitoring carbon stocks with satellite observations: a comparison of methods. Carbon Balance Management 2009, 4:2. BioMed Central Full Text
• [11]Gibbs HK, Brown S, Niles JO, Foley JA: Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: making REDD a reality. Environmental Research Letters 2007., 2
• [12]Drigo R: WISDOM - East Africa. Woodfuel Integrated Supply/Demand Overview Mapping (WISDOM) Methodology. Spatial woodfuel production and consumption analysis of selected African countries. [http://www.fao.org/docrep/009/j8227e/j8227e00.HTM] webciteWood Energy Working Paper: FAO Forestry Department 2006.
• [13]Saatchi SS, Houghton RA, Alvala R, Soares JV, Yu Y: Distribution of aboveground live biomass in the Amazon basin. Global Change Biology 2007, 13:816-837.
• [14]Gibbs HK, Brown S: Geographical Distribution of Woody Biomass Carbon in Tropical Africa: An Updated Database for 2000. Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Carbon Dioxide Information Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 2007.
• [15]Baccini A, Laporte N, Goetz SJ, Sun M, Dong H: A first map of tropical Africa's above-ground biomass derived from satellite imagery. Environmental Research Letters 2008, 3:045011.
• [16]Gibbs HK: Olson's Major World Ecosytem Complexes Ranked by Carbon in Live Vegetation: An Updated Database Using the GLC2000 Land Cover Product. Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Carbon Dioxide Information Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 2006.
• [17]Ruesch A, Gibbs HK: New IPCC Tier-1 Global Biomass Carbon Map For the Year 2000. Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 2008.
• [18]Kindermann GE, McAllum I, Fritz S, Obersteiner M: A global forest growing stock, biomass and carbon map based on FAO statistics. Silva Fennica 2008, 42:387-396.
• [19]Le Toan T, Ulander L, Dubois-Fernandez P, Papathanassiou K, Rocca F, Davidson M: Retrieval of forest biomass from P-band SAR data: Prospects for the future BIOMASS mission. In Proceedings ESA Living Planet Symposium 2010. Bergen, Norway; 2010.
• [20]Drichi P: National Biomass Study, Technical Report. Forestry Department, Ministry of Water, Lands & Environment; PO Box 1613, Kampala, Uganda; 2003.
• [21]Avitabile V, Baccini A, Friedl M, Schmullius C: Capabilities and limitations of Landsat and land cover data for aboveground woody biomass estimation of Uganda. Remote Sensing of Environment, in press.
• [22]Olson JS, Watts JA, Allison LJ: Major world ecosystem complexes ranked by carbon in live vegetation: A Database. Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Carbon Dioxide Information Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 1985.
• [23]Mitchard ETA, Saatchi SS, Woodhouse IH, Nangendo G, Ribeiro NS, Williams M, Ryan CM, Lewis SL, Feldpausch TR, Meir P: Using satellite radar backscatter to predict above-ground woody biomass: a consistent relationship across four different African landscapes. Geophysical Research Letters 2009., 36
• [24]IPCC: Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories - Volume 4 - Agriculture, Forestry and other Land Use. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Japan; 2006.
• [25]Gaston G, Brown S, Lorenzini M, Singh KD: State and change in carbon pools in the forests of tropical Africa. Global Change Biology 1998, 4:97-114.
• [26]Van Vliet J, Hagen-Zanker A, Engelen G, Hurkens J, Vanhout R, Uljee I: Map Comparison Kit 3: User Manual. Maastricht: Research Institute for Knowledge Systems; 2009.
• [27]Hagen-Zanker A: Comparing continuous valued raster data: A cross disciplinary literature scan. Maastricht: Research Institute for Knowledge Systems; 2006.
• [28]Woodcock CE, Strahler AH, Jupp DLB: The use of variograms in remote sensing: I. scene models and simulated images. Remote Sensing of Environment 1988, 25:323-348.
• [29]Woodcock CE, Strahler AH, Jupp DLB: The use of variograms in remote sensing: II. real digital images. Remote Sensing of Environment 1988, 25:349-379.
• [30]FAO: Global ecological zoning for the global forest resources assessment 2000. In FAO FRA Working Paper. Rome, Italy; 2001.
• [31]FAO: Global forest resources assessment 2000. In FAO Forestry Paper. Rome, Italy; 2001.
• [32]FAO: Global forest resources assessment 2005. In FAO Forestry Paper. Rome, Italy; 2006.
• [33]Brown S, Gaston G: Tropical Africa: Land Use, Biomass, and Carbon Estimates for 1980. Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Carbon Dioxide Information Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 1997.
• [34]Lefsky MA: A global forest canopy height map from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer and the Geoscience Laser Altimeter System. Geophysical Research Letters 2010., 37
• [35]Saatchi SS, Harris NL, Brown S, Lefsky M, Mitchard ETA, Salas W, Zutta BR, Buermann W, Lewis SL, Hagen S, Petrova S, White L, Silman M, Morel A: Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2011, 108:9899-9904.
• [36]FAO: Multipurpose Africover Databases on Environmental resources. [http://www.africover.org/index.htm] webcite
• [37]Mayaux P, Bartholome E, Fritz S, Belward A: A new land-cover map of Africa for the year 2000. Journal of Biogeography 2004, 31:861-877.
• [38]Arino O, Bicheron P, Achard F, Latham J, Witt R, Weber JL: GLOBCOVER The most detailed portrait of Earth. Esa Bulletin-European Space Agency 2008, 24-31.
• [39]Hansen MC, DeFries RS, Townshend JRG, Carroll M, Dimiceli C, Sohlberg RA: Global Percent Tree Cover at a Spatial Resolution of 500 Meters: First Results of the MODIS Vegetation Continuous Fields Algorithm. Earth Interactions 2003., 7
• [40]Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN) and Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT): Gridded Population of the World Version 3 (GPWv3): Population Density Grids. Palisades, NY: Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), Columbia University; 2005.
• [41]Bryant D, Nielsen D, Tangley L: The Last Frontier Forests: Ecosystems and Economies on the Edge. Washington DC: World Resources Institute; 1997:42.
• [42]Houghton RA: The annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use 1850-1990. Tellus Series B-Chemical and Physical Meteorology 1999, 51:298-313.
• [43]DeFries RS, Houghton RA, Hansen MC, Field CB, Skole D, Townshend J: Carbon emissions from tropical deforestation and regrowth based on satellite observations for the 1980s and 1990s. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2002, 99:14256-14261.
• [44]Brown S: Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests: a primer. In FAO Forestry Paper. Rome; 1997.
• [45]Achard F, Eva HD, Stibig HJ, Mayaux P, Gallego J, Richards T, Malingreau JP: Determination of deforestation rates of the world's humid tropical forests. Science 2002, 297:999-1002.
• [46]Achard F, Eva HD, Mayaux P, Stibig HJ, Belward A: Improved estimates of net carbon emissions from land cover change in the tropics for the 1990s. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 2004., 18
• [47]Olson JS, Watts JA, Allison LJ: Carbon in live vegetation of major world ecosystems. Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Carbon Dioxide Information Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 1983.