Universal health care and equity: evidence of maternal health based on an analysis of demographic and household survey data

International Journal for Equity in Health

Jane Falkingham¹  Sarah Carter²  Andrew Amos Channon²  Sarah Neal² 

[1]ESRC Centre for Population Change, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK

[2]Department of Social Statistics and Demography, University of Southampton, Building 58, Highfield Campus, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK

关键词: Inequity;    Monitoring;    Sustainable development goals;    Universal health coverage;    Maternal health;   

Others  :  1222813
DOI  :  10.1186/s12939-015-0184-9

 received in 2015-03-12, accepted in 2015-05-14,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Introduction

The drive toward universal health coverage (UHC) is central to the post 2015 agenda, and is incorporated as a target in the new Sustainable Development Goals. However, it is recognised that an equity dimension needs to be included when progress to this goal is monitored. WHO have developed a monitoring framework which proposes a target of 80 % coverage for all populations regardless of income and place of residence by 2030, and this paper examines the feasibility of this target in relation to antenatal care and skilled care at delivery.

Methodology

We analyse the coverage gap between the poorest and richest groups within the population for antenatal care and presence of a skilled attendant at birth for countries grouped by overall coverage of each maternal health service. Average annual rates of improvement needed for each grouping (disaggregated by wealth quintile and urban/rural residence) to reach the goal are also calculated, alongside rates of progress over the past decades for comparative purposes.

Findings

Marked inequities are seen in all groups except in countries where overall coverage is high. As the monitoring framework has an absolute target countries with currently very low coverage are required to make rapid and sustained progress, in particular for the poorest and those living in rural areas. The rate of past progress will need to be accelerated markedly in most countries if the target is to be achieved, although several countries have demonstrated the rate of progress required is feasible both for the population as a whole and for the poorest.

Conclusions

For countries with currently low coverage the target of 80 % essential coverage for all populations will be challenging. Lessons should be drawn from countries who have achieved rapid and equitable progress in the past.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Neal et al.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 7.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Vega J. Universal health coverage: the post-2015 development agenda. Lancet. 2013; 381:179-180.
• [2]Monitoring progress towards universal health coverage at country and global levels: framework, measures and targets. WHO, Geneva; 2014.
• [3]Making fair choices on the path to universal health coverage: final report of the WHO consultative group on equity and universal health coverage. 2014.
• [4]Gwatkin DR. Who would gain most from efforts to reach the Millennium Development Goals for health? An inquiry into the possibility of progress that fails to reach the poor. 2002.
• [5]UN High Level Panel. A new global partnership. Eradicate poverty and transform economies through sustainable development. Final Report of the UN High-Level Panel of Eminent Persons on the Post-2015 Development Agenda. 2013.
• [6]Quick J, Jay J, Langer A. Improving women’s health through universal health coverage. PLoS Med. 2014; 11:e1001580.
• [7]Channon A, Neal S, Matthews Z, Falkingham J. Maternal health inequalities over time: is there a common pathway? background paper for “addressing inequalities the heart of the post-2015 development agenda and the future we want for all global thematic consultation". 2013.
• [8]Tudor Hart J. The inverse care law. Lancet. 1971; 297:405-412.
• [9]Victora C, Barros F, Huttley S, Teixeira A, Vaughan JP. Early childhood mortality in a Brazilian cohort: the roles of birthweight and socioeconomic status. Int J Epidemiol. 1992; 21:911-915.
• [10]Barros AJD, Ronsmans C, Axelson H, Loaiza E, Bertoldi AD, França GVA, Bryce J, Boerma JT, Victora CG. Equity in maternal, newborn, and child health interventions in Countdown to 2015: a retrospective review of survey data from 54 countries. Lancet. 2012; 379:1225-1233.
• [11]Molina HF, Nakamura K, Kizuki M, Seino K. Reduction in inequality in antenatal-care use and persistence of inequality in skilled birth attendance in the Philippines from 1993 to 2008. BMJ open. 2013; 3.
• [12]Houweling TA, Ronsmans C, Campbell OM, Kunst AE. Huge poor-rich inequalities in maternity care: an international comparative study of maternity and child care in developing countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2007; 85:745-754.
• [13]Demographic and Health Surveys. www. dhsprogram.com webcite
• [14]Carey G, Crammond B. A glossary of policy frameworks: the many forms of ‘universalism’and policy ‘targeting’. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014.
• [15]Gwatkin DR, Ergo A. Universal health coverage: friend or foe of health equity? Lancet. 2011; 377:2160-2161.
• [16]Moreno-Serra R, Smith PC. Does progress towards universal health coverage improve population health? Lancet. 2012; 380:917-923.
• [17]Barros AJ, Victora CG, Cesar JA, Neumann NA, Bertoldi AD, Gwatkin D, Wagstaff A, Yazbeck A. Brazil: are health and nutrition programs reaching the neediest?: World bank; 2005.
• [18]Frenk J, González-Pier E, Gómez-Dantés O, Lezana MA, Knaul FM. Comprehensive reform to improve health system performance in Mexico. Lancet. 2006; 368:1524-1534.
• [19]Victora CG, Barros AJ, Axelson H, Bhutta ZA, Chopra M, França GV, Kerber K, Kirkwood BR, Newby H, Ronsmans C. How changes in coverage affect equity in maternal and child health interventions in 35 Countdown to 2015 countries: an analysis of national surveys. Lancet. 2012; 380:1149-1156.
• [20]Asante FA, Chikwama C, Daniels A, Armar-klemesu M. Evaluating the economic outcomes of the policy of fee exemption for maternal delivery care in Ghana. Ghana Med J. 2007;41.
• [21]Ahmed S, Khan MM. Is demand-side financing equity enhancing? Lessons from a maternal health voucher scheme in Bangladesh. Soc Sci Med. 2011; 72:1704-1710.
• [22]Målqvist M, Yuan B, Trygg N, Selling K, Thomsen S. Targeted interventions for improved equity in maternal and child health in low-and middle-income settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8:e66453.
• [23]Brazier E, Andrzejewski C, Perkins ME, Themmen EM, Knight RJ, Bassane B. Improving poor women’s access to maternity care: Findings from a primary care intervention in Burkina Faso. Soc Sci Med. 2009; 69:682-690.
• [24]Quayyum Z, Khan MNU, Quayyum T, Nasreen HE, Chowdhury M, Ensor T. “Can community level interventions have an impact on equity and utilization of maternal health care”–Evidence from rural Bangladesh. Int J Equity Health. 2013; 12:22. BioMed Central Full Text
• [25]Hatt L, Stanton C, Makowiecka K, Adisasmita A, Achadi E, Ronsmans C. Did the strategy of skilled attendance at birth reach the poor in Indonesia? Bull World Health Organ. 2007; 85:774-782.
• [26]Midhet F, Becker S. Impact of community-based interventions on maternal and neonatal health indicators: Results from a community randomized trial in rural Balochistan, Pakistan. Reprod Health. 2010; 7:1-31. BioMed Central Full Text
• [27]Hussein J, Hundley V, Bell J, Abbey M, Asare GQ, Graham W. How do women identify health professionals at birth in Ghana? Midwifery. 2005; 21:36-43.
• [28]Making pregnancy safer: the critical role of the skilled attendant: A joint statement by WHO ICM and FIGO. 2004.
• [29]Harvey SA, Blandón YCW, McCaw-Binns A, Sandino I, Urbina L, Rodríguez C, Gómez I, Ayabaca P, Djibrina S. Are skilled birth attendants really skilled? A measurement method, some disturbing results and a potential way forward. Bull World Health Organ. 2007; 85:783-790.