期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
Evaluation of the degree of mycophilia-mycophobia among highland and lowland inhabitants from Chiapas, Mexico
Roberto Garibay-Orijel2  Alma Rosa González-Esquinca3  Joaquín Cifuentes1  Carlos Martorell1  Javier Caballero2  Felipe Ruan-Soto3 
[1] Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México D.F., Mexico;Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México D.F., Mexico;Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas, Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Mexico
关键词: Mycophilia-mycophobia;    Edible mushrooms;    Local mycological knowledge;    Ethnobiology;    Ethnomycology;   
Others  :  862392
DOI  :  10.1186/1746-4269-9-36
 received in 2013-01-26, accepted in 2013-05-22,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Mushrooms generate strong and contrasting feelings ranging from extreme aversion to intense liking. To categorize these attitudes, Wasson and Wasson coined the dichotomic terms “mycophilia” and “mycophobia” in 1957. In Mesoamerica these categories have been associated to ecological regions. Highland peoples are viewed as mycophiles, whereas lowland inhabitants are considered mycophobes. However, this division is based on little empirical evidence and few indicators. This study questioned whether mycophilia and mycophobia are indeed related to ecological regions through the evaluation of 19 indicators tested in the highlands and lowlands of Chiapas, Mexico.

Methods

The heterogeneity of attitudes toward mushrooms was explored in terms of ecological region and sociocultural variables. Information was obtained through structured interviews in 10 communities in Los Altos de Chiapas (highlands) and the Selva Lacandona (lowlands). We analyzed indicators separately through χ2 tests and multivariate techniques. The Mycophilia-Mycophobia Index was also used in the analysis. To assess which factors better explain the distribution of attitudes, we built 11 models using the Beta probability-density function and compared them with the Akaike Information Criterion.

Results

Most people had positive attitudes in both ecological regions. The classification and ordination analyses found two large groups comprising both highland and lowland towns. Contrary to expectation if mycophilia and mycophobia were mutually exclusive, all the fitted probability distributions were bell-shaped; indicating these attitudes behave as a continuous variable. The model best supported by data included occupation and ethnicity. Indigenous peasants had the highest degree of mycophilia.

Discussion

Results suggest the studied populations tend to be mycophilic and that their attitudes are not dichotomic, but rather a gradient. Most people occupied intermediate degrees of mycophilia. Despite the remarkable similarity in the degree of mycophilia between ecological regions, the Principle-Coordinates Analysis shows differences in the specific way in which people from either region establishes a cultural relationship with mushrooms. The comparison of models suggests that sociocultural variables explains the differences better than ecological regions do. The obtained results are evidence of mycophilia among lowlands inhabitants in the Mayan region and of the fact that the mycophilia-mycophobia phenomenon is not expressed as a bimodal frequency distribution.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Ruan-Soto et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140725013707938.pdf 2244KB PDF download
115KB Image download
32KB Image download
19KB Image download
72KB Image download
24KB Image download
32KB Image download
【 图 表 】

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Santos-Fita D, Costa-Neto E, Cano-Contreras EJ: El quehacer de la etnozoología. In Manual de Etnozoología. Edited by Costa-Neto E, Santos-Fita D, Vargas-Clavijo M. Valencia: Tundra; 2009:23-44.
  • [2]Arora D, Shepard GH: Mushrooms and economic botany. Econ Bot 2008, 62(3):207-213.
  • [3]Wasson RG, Kramrisch S, Ott J, Ruck CA: La Búsqueda de Perséfone. Los enteógenos y los orígenes de la religión. Fondo de Cultura Económica: México D.F.; 1992.
  • [4]Wasson V, Wasson RG: Mushroom, Russia and History. New York: Pantheon Books; 1957.
  • [5]Fericgla JM: El Hongo y la génesis de las culturas. Barcelona: La Liebre de Marzo; 1994.
  • [6]Goes-Neto A, Bandeira FP: A review of the Etnomycology of indigenous People in Brazil and its relevance to Ethnomycologycal investigation in Latin America. Rev Mex Mic 2003, 17:11-16.
  • [7]Arora D: Wild mushroom harvest. Econ Bot 2008, 62(3):392-403.
  • [8]Ellen R: Ethnomycology among the Nuaulu of the Moluccas: Putting Berlin’s “General Principles” of Ethnobiological classification to the test. Econ Bot 2008, 62(3):483-496.
  • [9]Yamin-Paternak S: From disgust to desire: changing attitudes toward Beringian Mushrooms. Econ Bot 2008, 62(3):214-222.
  • [10]Fidalgo O: Conhecimento micologico dos indios brasileiros. Rickia 1965, 2:1-10.
  • [11]Guzmán G: Distribución y etnomicología de Pseudofistulina radicata en mesoamérica, con nuevas localidades en México y su primer registro en Guatemala. Rev Mex Mic 1987, 3:29-38.
  • [12]Mapes C, Bandeira FP, Caballero J, Goes-Neto A: Mycophobic or Mycophilic? a comparative Etnomycological study between Amazonia and Mesoamerica. In Ethnobiology and Biocultural Diversity. Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Ethnobiology: 23–27 October 2000; Athens. Edited by Stepp JR, Wyndham FS, Zarger RK. Athens: University of Georgia Press; 2002:180-188.
  • [13]Garibay-Orijel R, Cifuentes J, Estrada-Torres A, Caballero J: People using macro-fungal diversity in Oaxaca, Mexico. Fungal Divers 2006, 21:41-67.
  • [14]Montoya A, Hernández N, Mapes C, Kong A, Estrada-Torres A: The Collection and Sale of Wild Mushrooms in a Community of Tlaxcala, Mexico. Econ Bot 2008, 62(3):413-424.
  • [15]Shepard GH, Arora D, Lampman A: The Grace of the flood: classification and use of wild mushrooms among the highland Maya of Chiapas. Econ Bot 2008, 62(3):437-470.
  • [16]Ruan-Soto F, Cifuentes J, Mariaca R, Limón F, Pérez-Ramírez L, Sierra S: Uso y manejo de hongos silvestres en dos comunidades de la Selva Lacandona, Chiapas, México. Rev Mex Mic 2009, 29:61-72.
  • [17]Van Dijk H, Awana-Onguene N, Kuyper TW: Knowledge and utilization of edible mushrooms by local populations of the rain forest of South Cameroon. Ambio 2003, 32(1):19-23.
  • [18]Vasco-Palacios AM, Suaza SC, Castaño-Betancur M, Franco-Molano AE: Conocimiento etnoecológico de los hongos entre los indígenas Uitoto, Muinane y Andoke de la Amazonía Colombiana. Acta Amaz 2008, 38(1):17-30.
  • [19]Zent EL, Zent S, Iturriaga T: Knowledge and use of fungi by a mycophilic society of the Venezuelan Amazon. Econ Bot 2004, 58(2):214-226.
  • [20]Nesheim I, Dhillion S, Stølen K: What happens to traditional knowledge and use of natural resources when people migrate? Hum Ecol 2006, 34(1):99-131.
  • [21]Toledo VM: Biodiversity and indigenous peoples. In Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. Edited by Levin S. New Jersey: Academic; 2001:1181-1197.
  • [22]Tuñón E: Género y medio ambiente. México D.F.: Plaza y Valdés; 2003.
  • [23]Castillo-Campos G, Nareve H: Contribución al conocimiento de la vegetación de la Reserva de la Biosfera Montes Azules, Selva Lacandona, Chiapas, México. In Reserva de la Biosfera Montes Azules, Selva Lacandona: Investigación para su conservación. Edited by Vazquez-Sanchez MA, Ramos MA. México D.F: Publicación Ecosfera; 1992:51-85.
  • [24]INEGI: Censo general de población y vivienda. México D.F: INEGI; 2010.
  • [25]Ochoa-Gaona S, González-Espinosa M: Land use and deforestation in the high land of Chiapas, Mexico. Appl Geogr 2000, 20:17-42.
  • [26]Garibay-Orijel R, Caballero J, Estrada-Torres A, Cifuentes J: Understanding cultural significance, the edible mushrooms case. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 2007, 3:4. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [27]Mapes C, Guzmán G, Caballero J: Elements of the Purepecha Mycologycal Classification. J Ethnobiol 1981, 1(2):231-237.
  • [28]Montoya A, Kong A, Estrada-Torres A, Cifuentes J, Caballero J: Useful wild fungi of La Malinche National Park. Fungal Divers 2004, 17:115-143.
  • [29]Oso BA: Mushrooms and the Yoruba people of Nigeria. Mycologia 1975, 67:311-319.
  • [30]Valadez R, Moreno-Fuentes A, Gómez G: Cujtlacochi, El Huitlacoche. México D.F.: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México-Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas; 2011.
  • [31]Alavez-Vargas M: Conocimiento micológico tradicional en San Miguel Cerezo, Pachuca, Hidalgo: el caso de Boletaceae sensu Chevalier. Tesis de Licenciatura. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Ciencias; 2006.
  • [32]Ruan-Soto F, Mariaca R, Cifuentes J, Limón F, Pérez-Ramírez L, Sierra S: Nomenclatura, clasificación y percepciones locales acerca de los hongos en dos comunidades de la Selva Lacandona, Chiapas, México. Etnobiología 2007, 5:1-20.
  • [33]Estrada-Torres A, Aroche RM: Acervo etnomicológico en tres localidades del Municipio de Acambay, Estado de México. Rev Mex Mic 1987, 3:109-131.
  • [34]Montoya A, Estrada-Torres A, Kong A, Juárez-Sánchez L: Commercialization of wild mushrooms during market days of Tlaxcala, Mexico. Mic Apl Int 2001, 3(1):31-41.
  • [35]Ruan-Soto F, Garibay-Orijel R, Cifuentes J: Conocimiento Micológico Tradicional en la Planicie Costera del Golfo de México. Rev Mex Mic 2004, 19:57-70.
  • [36]Valencia-Flores I: Uso tradicional de los hongos silvestres en San Pedro Nexapa, Estado de México. Tesis de Licenciatura. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Ciencias; 2006.
  • [37]Bernard R: Research Methods in Anthropology. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press; 1995.
  • [38]Rohlf FJ: NTSYS-pc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, Version 2.2. New York: Exeter Software; 2005.
  • [39]Krishnamoorthy K: Handbook of Statistical Distributions with Applications. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press; 2006.
  • [40]Burnham K, Anderson DR: Model Selection and Multi-Model Inference. New York: Springer; 2002.
  • [41]Ruan-Soto F, Mariaca R, Alvarado R: Intoxicaciones mortales por consumo de hongos silvestres: una cadena de errores. Ecofronteras 2012, 44:12-14.
  • [42]Rapoport E, Ladio A: Los bosques andino-patagonicos como fuentes de alimento. Bosque 1999, 20(2):55-64.
  • [43]Ruan-Soto F, Garibay-Orijel R, Cifuentes J: Process and dynamics of traditional selling wild edible mushrooms in tropical Mexico. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 2006, 2:3. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [44]Garibay-Orijel R, Ramírez-Terrazo A, Ordaz-Velázquez M: Women care about local knowledge, experiences from ethnomycology. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 2012, 8:25. BioMed Central Full Text
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:36次 浏览次数:3次