期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Suture fixation of migrated septal occluder device to prevent further migration: a simple surgical technique
Aron F Popov1  Anton Sabashnikov2  Pravin P Kulkarni2  Shrirang D Ranade2  Sachin A Kuthe2  Prashant N Mohite3 
[1] Department of Thoracic Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Göttingen, Robert-Koch- Strasse 40, 37099, Göttingen, Germany;Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular surgery, Postgraduation Institute of Medical Research and Education, Sector- 12, Chandigarh 160012, India;Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Mechanical Support, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, Hill End Road, UB9 6JH, London, UK
关键词: Migration of occlude device;    Transcatheter closure;    Septal occlude device;    Atrial septal defect;   
Others  :  829478
DOI  :  10.1186/1749-8090-8-10
 received in 2012-08-21, accepted in 2013-01-11,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

As the use of percutaneous intervention is increasing for the closure of the atrial septal defect, the procedure related complications are also on rise, migration of the device being most common. The migrated devices with failed percutaneous retrieval must be removed surgically under cardiopulmonary bypass. During establishment of cardiopulmonary bypass, the handling of heart may cause further migration of the device into other chambers of heart which leads to difficulty in finding and retrieval of the device. The authors propose a simple and unique technique to prevent further migration of the septal occluder device.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Mohite et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140714071201840.pdf 403KB PDF download
Figure 1. 50KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]King TD, Thompson SL, Steiner C, Mills NL: Secundum atrial septal defects: nonoperative closure during cardiac catheterization. JAMA 1976, 235:2506-2509.
  • [2]Post MC, Suttorp MJ, Jaarsma W, et al.: Comparison of outcome and complications using different types of devices for percutaneous closure of a secundum atrial septal defect in adults:a single center experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006, 67:438-443.
  • [3]Butera G, Carminati M, Chessa M, et al.: Percutaneous versus surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defect: comparison of early results and complications. Am Heart J 2006, 151:228-234.
  • [4]Thanopoulos BD, Laskari CV, Tsaousis GS, et al.: Closure of atrial septal defects with the Amplatzer occlusion device: preliminary results. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998, 31:1110-1116.
  • [5]Chessa M, Carminati M, Bufera G, Bini RM, Drago M, Rosti L, Giamberti A, Pome G, Bossone E, Frigiola A: Early and late complications associated with transcatheter occlusion of secundum atrial septal defect. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002, 39:1061-1065.
  • [6]Berger F, Vogel M, Alexi-Meskishvili V, et al.: Comparison of results and complications of surgical and Amplatzer device closure of atrial septal defects. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999, 118:674-680.
  • [7]Agarwal SK, Ghosh P, Mittal P: Failure of devices used for closure of atrial septal defects: mechanisms and management. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996, 112:21-26.
  • [8]Balbi M, Pongiglione G, Bezante GP: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. Percutaneous rescue of left ventricular embolized amplatzer septal occluder device 2008, 72(4):559-562.
  • [9]Berdat PA, Chatterjee T, Pfammatter JP, Windecker S, Meier B, Carrel T: Surgical management of complications after transcatheter closure of an atrial septal defect or patent foramen ovale. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000, 120:1034-1039.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:14次 浏览次数:12次