The association between objective walkability, neighborhood socio-economic status, and physical activity in Belgian children

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Greet Cardon¹  Benedicte Deforche³  Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij¹  Delfien Van Dyck²  Sara D’Haese² 

[1]Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, Ghent 9000, Belgium

[2]Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Egmontstraat 5, Brussels 1000, Belgium

[3]Department of Human Biometrics and Biomechanics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium

关键词: Activity;    Children;    Neighborhood;    Cycling;    Walking;    Youth;    Physical environment;    Exercise;    GIS;   

Others  :  1146370
DOI  :  10.1186/s12966-014-0104-1

 received in 2014-01-29, accepted in 2014-08-08,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Objective walkability is an important correlate of adults’ physical activity. Studies investigating the relation between walkability and children’s physical activity are scarce. However, in order to develop effective environmental interventions, a profound investigation of this relation is needed in all age groups. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between objective walkability and different domains of children’s physical activity, and to investigate the moderating effect of neighborhood socio-economic status in this relation.

Methods

Data were collected between December 2011 and May 2013 as part of the Belgian Environmental Physical Activity Study in children. Children (9–12 years old; n = 606) were recruited from 18 elementary schools in Ghent (Belgium). Children together with one of their parents completed the Flemish Physical Activity Questionnaire and wore an accelerometer for 7 consecutive days. Children’s neighborhood walkability was calculated using geographical information systems. Multilevel cross-classified modeling was used to determine the relationship between children’s PA and objectively measured walkability and the moderating effect of neighborhood SES in this relation.

Results

In low SES neighborhoods walkability was positively related to walking for transportation during leisure time (β = 0.381 ± 0.124; 95% CI = 0.138, 0.624) and was negatively related to sports during leisure time (β = −0.245 ± 0.121; 95% CI = −0.482, −0.008). In high socio-economic status neighborhoods, walkability was unrelated to children’s physical activity. No relations of neighborhood walkability and neighborhood socio-economic status with cycling during leisure time, active commuting to school and objectively measured moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity were found.

Conclusions

No univocal relation between neighborhood walkability and physical activity was found in 9–12 year old children. Results from international adult studies cannot be generalized to children. There is a need in future research to determine the key environmental correlates of children’s physical activity.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 D'Haese et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Janssen I, Leblanc AG: Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010, 7:40. BioMed Central Full Text
• [2]Verloigne M, Van Lippevelde W, Maes L, Yildirim M, Chinapaw M, Manios Y, Androutsos O, Kovacs E, Bringolf-Isler B, Brug J, De Bourdeaudhuij I: Levels of physical activity and sedentary time among 10- to 12-year-old boys and girls across 5 European countries using accelerometers: an observational study within the ENERGY-project. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2012, 9:34. BioMed Central Full Text
• [3]Baranowski T, Anderson C, Carmack C: Mediating variable framework in physical activity interventions. How are we doing? How might we do better? Am J Prev Med 1998, 15:266-297.
• [4]Sallis JF, Owen N, Fisher EB: Ecological Models of Health Behavior. In Health Behavior and Health Education. 4th edition. Edited by Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. John Wiley and Sons, United States of America; 2008:465-485.
• [5]Kremers SP, de Bruijn GJ, Visscher TL, Van MW, de Vries NK, Brug J: Environmental influences on energy balance-related behaviors: a dual-process view. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2006, 3:9. BioMed Central Full Text
• [6]Grasser G, Van DD, Titze S, Stronegger W: Objectively measured walkability and active transport and weight-related outcomes in adults: a systematic review. Int J Public Health 2013, 58:615-625.
• [7]Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD: Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Ann Behav Med 2003, 25:80-91.
• [8]Sallis JF, Saelens BE, Frank LD, Conway TL, Slymen DJ, Cain KL, Chapman JE, Kerr J: Neighborhood built environment and income: examining multiple health outcomes. Soc Sci Med 2009, 68:1285-1293.
• [9]Van Dyck D, Cardon G, Deforche B, Sallis JF, Owen N, De Bourdeaudhuij I: Neighborhood SES and walkability are related to physical activity behavior in Belgian adults. Prev Med 2010, 50(1):S74-S79.
• [10]Owen N, Cerin E, Leslie E, DuToit L, Coffee N, Frank LD, Bauman AE, Hugo G, Saelens BE, Sallis JF: Neighborhood walkability and the walking behavior of Australian adults. Am J Prev Med 2007, 33:387-395.
• [11]Sundquist K, Eriksson U, Kawakami N, Skog L, Ohlsson H, Arvidsson D: Neighborhood walkability, physical activity, and walking behavior: the Swedish Neighborhood and Physical Activity (SNAP) study. Soc Sci Med 2011, 72:1266-1273.
• [12]Winkleby MA, Jatulis DE, Frank E, Fortmann SP: Socioeconomic status and health: how education, income, and occupation contribute to risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Am J Public Health 1992, 82:816-820.
• [13]Van Holle V, Van Cauwenberg J, Van Dyck D, Deforche B, Van de Weghe N, De Bourdeaudhuij I: Relationship between neighborhood walkability and older adults’ physical activity: results from the Belgian Environmental Physical Activity Study in Seniors (BEPAS Seniors). International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2014, 11:110. BioMed Central Full Text
• [14]De Meester F, Van Dyck D, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Deforche B, Sallis JF, Cardon G: Active living neighborhoods: is neighborhood walkability a key element for Belgian adolescents? BMC Public Health 2012, 12:7. BioMed Central Full Text
• [15]Christiansen LB, Toftager M, Schipperijn J, Ersboll AK, Giles-Corti B, Troelsen J: School site walkability and active school transport − association, mediation and moderation. J Transp Geogr 2014, 34:7-15.
• [16]Trapp GS, Giles-Corti B, Christian HE, Bulsara M, Timperio AF, McCormack GR, Villaneuva KP: On your bike! a cross-sectional study of the individual, social and environmental correlates of cycling to school. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011, 8:123. BioMed Central Full Text
• [17]Giles-Corti B, Wood G, Pikora T, Learnihan V, Bulsara M, Van NK, Timperio A, McCormack G, Villanueva K: School site and the potential to walk to school: the impact of street connectivity and traffic exposure in school neighborhoods. Health Place 2011, 17:545-550.
• [18]Holt NL, Spence JC, Sehn ZL, Cutumisu N: Neighborhood and developmental differences in children’s perceptions of opportunities for play and physical activity. Health Place 2008, 14:2-14.
• [19]Kerr J, Rosenberg D, Sallis JF, Saelens BE, Frank LD, Conway TL: Active commuting to school: Associations with environment and parental concerns. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006, 38:787-794.
• [20]Shavers VL: Measurement of socioeconomic status in health disparities research. J Natl Med Assoc 2007, 99:1013-1023.
• [21]Verstraete S, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Cardon G: Validation of a physical activity questionnaire for children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003, 5:S337.
• [22]Robusto KM, Trost SG: Comparison of three generations of ActiGraph activity monitors in children and adolescents. J Sports Sci 2012, 30:1429-1435.
• [23]De Meester F, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Deforche B, Ottevaere C, Cardon G: Measuring physical activity using accelerometry in 13-15-year-old adolescents: the importance of including non-wear activities. Public Health Nutr 2011, 14:2124-2133.
• [24]Evenson KR, Catellier DJ, Gill K, Ondrak KS, McMurray RG: Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children. J Sports Sci 2008, 26:1557-1565.
• [25]Trost SG, Loprinzi PD, Moore R, Pfeiffer KA: Comparison of accelerometer cut points for predicting activity intensity in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011, 43:1360-1368.
• [26]Mattocks C, Ness A, Leary S, Tilling K, Blair SN, Shield J, Deere K, Saunders J, Kirkby J, Smith GD, Wells J, Wareham N, Reilly J, Riddoch C: Use of accelerometers in a large field-based study of children: protocols, design issues, and effects on precision. J Phys Act Health 2008, 5(Suppl 1):S98-111.
• [27]Frank LD, Sallis JF, Saelens BE, Leary L, Cain K, Conway TL, Hess PM: The development of a walkability index: application to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study. Br J Sports Med 2010, 44:924-933.
• [28][http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/software/mlwin/refs.html] webcite Browne WJ: MCMC Estimation in MLwiN v2.26. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol. 2012. .
• [29]Twisk J: Applied Multilevel Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 2006.
• [30]D'Haese S, De Meester F, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Deforche B, Cardon G: Criterion distances and environmental correlates of active commuting to school in children. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011, 8:88. BioMed Central Full Text
• [31]Vandendriessche JB, Vandorpe BF, Vaeyens R, Malina RM, Lefevre J, Lenoir M, Philippaerts RM: Variation in sport participation, fitness and motor coordination with socioeconomic status among Flemish children. Pediatr Exerc Sci 2012, 24:113-128.
• [32]Sallis JF, Zakarian JM, Hovell MF, Hofstetter CR: Ethnic, socioeconomic, and sex differences in physical activity among adolescents. J Clin Epidemiol 1996, 49:125-134.
• [33]Veitch J, Salmon J, Ball K: Individual, social and physical environmental correlates of children’s active free-play: a cross-sectional study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010, 7:11. BioMed Central Full Text
• [34]Tappe KA, Glanz K, Sallis JF, Zhou C, Saelens BE: Children’s physical activity and parents’ perception of the neighborhood environment: neighborhood impact on kids study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2013, 10:39. BioMed Central Full Text
• [35]Mecredy G, Janssen I, Pickett W: Neighbourhood street connectivity and injury in youth: a national study of built environments in Canada. Inj Prev 2012, 18:81-87.
• [36]Giles-Corti B, Timperio A, Bull F, Pikora T: Understanding physical activity environmental correlates: increased specificity for ecological models. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2005, 33:175-181.
• [37]Panter JR, Jones AP, van Sluijs EM: Environmental determinants of active travel in youth: a review and framework for future research. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2008, 5:34. BioMed Central Full Text
• [38]Ding D, Sallis JF, Kerr J, Lee S, Rosenberg DE: Neighborhood environment and physical activity among youth a review. Am J Prev Med 2011, 41:442-455.