期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Clinical application of the paraspinal erector approach for spinal canal decompression in upper lumber burst fractures
Zhong-Liang Deng2  Lei Chu2  Yun Chen2  Fu Chen2  Zhen-Yong Ke2  Liang Chen2  Qing Ma1  Zheng-Jian Yan2  Xi-Yan Xu2 
[1]Department of Pharmacy Practice, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
[2]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, 76 Linjiang Road, Chongqing 400010, China
关键词: Upper lumber burst fractures;    Surgical approach;    Minimally invasive spine surgery;    Direct spinal canal decompression;    Erector spinae;   
Others  :  1151655
DOI  :  10.1186/s13018-014-0105-4
 received in 2014-05-07, accepted in 2014-10-21,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Objective

Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is commonly used for upper lumber burst fractures. The direct decompression remains challenging with this minimally invasive surgery. The objective was to evaluate a novel paraspinal erector approach for effective and direct decompression in patients with canal compromise and neurologic deficit.

Method

Patients (n?=?21) with neurological deficiency and Denis B type upper lumbar burst fracture were enrolled in the study, including 14 cases in the L1 and 7 cases in the L2. The patients underwent removal of bone fragments from the spinal canal through intervertebral foramen followed by short-segment fixation. Evaluations included surgery-related, such as duration of surgery and blood loss, and 12-month follow-up, such as the kyphotic angle, the height ratio of the anterior edge of the vertebra, the ratio of sagittal canal compromise, visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Frankel scores.

Results

All patients achieved direct spinal canal decompression using the paraspinal erector approach followed by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. The mean operation time (SD) was 173 (23) min, and the mean (SD) blood loss was 301 (104) ml. Significant improvement was noted in the kyphotic angle, 26.2?±?8.7 prior to operation versus 9.1?±?4.7 at 12 months after operation (p <0.05); the height ratio of the anterior edge of the injured vertebra, 60?±?16% versus 84?±?9% (p <0.05); and the ratio of sagittal canal compromise, 46.5?±?11.4% versus 4.3?±?3.6% (p <0.05). Significant improvements in VAS (7.3?±?1.2 vs. 1.9?±?0.7, p <0.05), ODI (86.7?±?5.8 vs. 16.7?±?5.1, p <0.05), and Frankel scores were also noted.

Conclusions

The paraspinal erector approach was effective for direct spinal canal decompression with minimal injury in the paraspinal muscles or spine. Significant improvements in spinal function and prognostics were achieved after the percutaneous pedicle screw fixation.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Xu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150406091622780.pdf 2479KB PDF download
Figure 13. 116KB Image download
Figure 12. 101KB Image download
Figure 11. 22KB Image download
Figure 10. 23KB Image download
Figure 9. 48KB Image download
Figure 8. 19KB Image download
Figure 7. 19KB Image download
Figure 6. 62KB Image download
Figure 5. 56KB Image download
Figure 4. 63KB Image download
Figure 3. 46KB Image download
Figure 2. 42KB Image download
Figure 1. 36KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

Figure 12.

Figure 13.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S: A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 1994, 3(4):184-201.
  • [2]Bartonicek J, Sprindrich J, Stehlík J: Radiodiagnosis of fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 1993, 60(6):358-367.
  • [3]Denis F: Spinal instability as defined by the three-column spine concept in acute spinal trauma. Clin Orthop 1984, 189:65-76.
  • [4]Alpantaki K, Bano A, Pasku D, Mavrogenis AF, Papagelopoulos PJ, Sapkas GS, Korres DS, Katonis P: Thoracolumbar burst fractures: a systematic review of management. Orthopedics 2010, 33(6):422-429.
  • [5]Benzel EC, Larson SJ: Functional recovery after decompressive operation for thoracic and lumbar spine fractures. Neurosurgery 1986, 19(5):772-778.
  • [6]Heary RF, Salas S, Bono CM, Kumar S: Complication avoidance: thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2006, 17(3):377-388.
  • [7]Marco RA, Kushwaha VP: Thoracolumbar burst fractures treated with posterior decompression and pedicle screw instrumentation supplemented with balloon-assisted vertebroplasty and calcium phosphate reconstruction. Bone Joint Surg Am 2009, 91(1):20-28.
  • [8]Xu X, Yan Z, Huang F, Qiu B, Deng Z: Applied anatomical study on approach next to erector spinae for spinal canal decompression through intervertebral foramen. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2013, 27(4):409-413.
  • [9]Denis F: The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine 1983, 8(8):817-831.
  • [10]Mikles MR, Stchur RP, Graziano GP: Posterior instrumentation for thoracolumbar fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2004, 12(6):424-435.
  • [11]Park Y, Ha JW: Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach. Spine 2007, 32(5):537-543.
  • [12]Arts MP, Kols NI, Onderwater SM, Peul WC: Clinical outcome of instrumented fusion for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome: a case series of 100 patients. Acta Neurochir 2012, 154(7):1213-1217.
  • [13]Chan CW, Peng P: Failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Med 2011, 2(4):577-606.
  • [14]Gille O, Jolivet E, Dousset V, Degrise C, Obeid I, Vital JM, Skalli W: Erector spinae muscle changes on magnetic resonance imaging following lumbar surgery through a posterior approach. Spine 2007, 32(11):1236-1241.
  • [15]Radcliff K, Su BW, Kepler CK, Rubin T, Shimer AL, Rihn JA, Harrop JA, Albert TJ, Vaccaro AR: Correlation of posterior ligamentous complex injury and neurological injury to loss of vertebral body height, kyphosis, and canal compromise. Spine 2012, 37(13):1142-1150.
  • [16]Jiang XZ, Tian W, Liu B, Li Q, Zhang GL, Hu L, Li Z, He D: Comparison of a paraspinal approach with a percutaneous approach in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures with posterior ligamentous complex injury: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Int Med Res 2012, 40(4):1343-1356.
  • [17]Ni WF, Huang YX, Chi YL, Xu HZ, Lin Y, Wang XY, Huang QS, Mao FM: Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for neurologic intact thoracolumbar burst fractures. China Spinal Disord Tech 2010, 23(8):530-537.
  • [18]Mobbs RJ, Sivabalan P, Li J: Technique, challenges and indications for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. Clin Neurosci 2011, 18(6):741-749.
  • [19]Olivier E, Beldame J, Ould Slimane M, Defives T, Duparc F: Comparison between one midline cutaneous incision and two lateral incisions in the lumbar paraspinal approach by Wiltse: a cadaver study. Surg Radiol Anat 2006, 28(5):494-497.
  • [20]Vialle R, Wicart P, Drain O, Dubousset J, Court C: The Wiltse paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine revisited: an anatomic study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 445:175-180.
  • [21]Schmid R, Lindtner RA, Lill M, Blauth M, Krappinger D, Kammerlander C: Combined posteroanterior fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in thoracolumbar burst fractures. Injury 2012, 43(4):475-479.
  • [22]Hsiang J, Yu K, He Y: Minimally invasive one-level lumbar decompression and fusion surgery with posterior instrumentation using a combination of pedicle screw fixation and transpedicular facet screw construct. Surg Neurol Int 2013, 4:125.
  • [23]Mura PP, Costaglioli M, Piredda M, Caboni S, Casula S: TLIF for symptomatic disc degeneration: a retrospective study of 100 patients. Eur Spine J 2011, 20(Suppl 1):S57-S60.
  • [24]Schmid R, Krappinger D, Blauth M, Kathrein A: Mid-term results of PLIF/TLIF in trauma. Eur Spine J 2011, 20(3):395-402.
  • [25]Sharma M, Langrana NA, Rodriguez J: Role of ligaments and facets in lumbar spinal stability. Spine 1995, 20(8):887-900.
  • [26]McDonough PW, Davis R, Tribus C, Zdeblick TA: The management of acute thoracolumbar burst fractures with anterior corpectomy and Z-plate fixation. Spine 2004, 29(17):1901-1908.
  • [27]Alanay A, Acaroglu E, Yazici M, Oznur A, Surat A: Short-segment pedicle instrumentation of thoracolumbar burst fractures: does transpedicular intracorporeal grafting prevent early failure? Spine 2001, 26(2):213-217.
  • [28]Chen C, Lv G, Xu B, Zhang X, Ma X: Posterior short-segment instrumentation and limited segmental decompression supplemented with vertebroplasty with calcium sulphate and intermediate screws for thoracolumbar burst fractures. Eur Spine J 2014, 23(7):1548-1557.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:105次 浏览次数:15次