Evaluating the QUIT-PRIMO clinical practice ePortal to increase smoker engagement with online cessation interventions: a national hybrid type 2 implementation study

Implementation Science

Daniel E. Ford¹  Timothy P. Hogan²  Thomas M. English²  Midge N. Ray¹  Arlene S. Ash²  Jeroan J. Allison²  Rajani S. Sadasivam²  Thomas K. Houston² 

[1] Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA;Department of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA

关键词: Medical practice;    Public health informatics;    E-referrals;    Implementation science;    Web-assisted tobacco intervention;    Smoking cessation;   

Others  :  1230927
DOI  :  10.1186/s13012-015-0336-8

 received in 2015-01-15, accepted in 2015-10-12,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Effective web-assisted tobacco interventions (WATIs) have been underutilized by smokers; moreover, despite practice guideline recommendations, clinical teams do not routinely refer smokers to WATIs. Our goal was to test a clinical practice innovation, an ePortal designed to change practice and patient behavior. Our hypotheses were that the integrated system would result in increased smoker referrals, with an automated follow-up system resulting in more smoker registrations and finally augmentations of the WATI would result in more smokers quitting at 6 months.

Methods

Practice ePortal Implementation Trial: Practices (n = 174) were randomized to an online practice ePortal with an “e-referral tool” to the WATI (e-referred smokers received automated email reminders from the practice) and with practice feedback reports with patient tracking and practice-to-patient secure messaging versus comparison (a paper “referral prescription”). Implementation success was measured by the number of smokers referred and smokers registering.

Clinical Effectiveness Trial: To estimate the effectiveness of the WATI components on 6-month smoking cessation, registered smokers were randomized into three groups: a state-of-the-art tailored WATI control [control], the WATI enhanced with proactive, pushed tailored email motivational messaging (messaging), and the WATI with messaging further enhanced with personal secure messaging with a tobacco treatment specialist and an online support group (personalized).

Results

Practice ePortal Trial results: A total of 4789 smokers were referred. The mean smokers referred per practice was not statistically different by group (ePortal 24.89 (SD 22.29) versus comparison 30.15 (SD 25.45), p = 0.15). The e-referral portal implementation program resulted in nearly triple the rate of smoker registration (31 % of all smokers referred registered online) versus comparison (11 %, p < 0.001).

Clinical Effectiveness Trial results: Active smokers randomized to the personalized group had a 6-month cessation rate of 25.2 %, compared with the messaging group (26.7 %) and the control (17 %). Next, when using an inverse probability weighted selection model to account for attrition, those randomized to the two groups that received motivational messaging (messaging or personalized) were more likely to quit than those in the control (p = 0.04).

Conclusions

Among all smokers referred, the e-referral resulted in nearly threefold greater registrants (31 %) than paper (11 %). The practice ePortal smokers received multiple reminders (increasing registration opportunities), and the practices could track patient progress. The result was more smokers registering and, thus, more cessation opportunities. Combining the proactive referral and the WATI resulted in higher rates of smoking cessation.

Trial Registration

Web-delivered Provider Intervention for Tobacco Control (QUIT-PRIMO) - a randomized controlled trial: NCT00797628.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Houston et al.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Stead LF, Lancaster T. Combined pharmacotherapy and behavioural interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 10:CD008286.
• [2]Swan GE, McClure JB, Jack LM, Zbikowski SM, Javitz HS, Catz SL et al.. Behavioral counseling and varenicline treatment for smoking cessation. Am J Prev Med. 2010; 38(5):482-90.
• [3]Coleman T. ABC of smoking cessation. Use of simple advice and behavioural support. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2004; 328(7436):397-9.
• [4]Stead LF, Bergson G, Lancaster T. Physician advice for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008(2):CD000165. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000165.pub3.
• [5]The Clinical Practice Guideline Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence 2008 Update Panel L, and Staff. A clinical practice guideline for treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update: A U.S. Public Health Service Report. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 35(2):158–176. http://dx. doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.009 webcite
• [6]Bennett GG, Glasgow RE. The delivery of public health interventions via the Internet: actualizing their potential. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009; 30:273-92.
• [7]Fiore MC, Jaen CR. A clinical blueprint to accelerate the elimination of tobacco use. JAMA. 2008; 299(17):2083-5.
• [8]Godfrey MM, Nelson EC, Wasson JH, Mohr JJ, Batalden PB. Microsystems in health care: part 3. Planning patient-centered services. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003; 29(4):159-70.
• [9]Sadasivam RS, Delaughter K, Crenshaw K, Sobko HJ, Williams JH, Coley HL et al.. Development of an interactive, Web-delivered system to increase provider-patient engagement in smoking cessation. J Med Internet Res. 2011; 13(4):e87.
• [10]Bentz CJ, Bayley KB, Bonin KE, Fleming L, Hollis JF, McAfee T. The feasibility of connecting physician offices to a state-level tobacco quit line. Am J Prev Med. 2006; 30(1):31-7.
• [11]Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012; 50(3):217-26.
• [12]Siegel ER, Logan RA, Harnsberger RL, Cravedi K, Krause JA, Lyon B et al.. Information Rx: evaluation of a new informatics tool for physicians, patients, and libraries. Inf Serv Use. 2006; 26(1):1-10.
• [13]Ray MN, Funkhouser E, Williams JH, Sadasivam RS, Gilbert GH, Coley HL et al.. Smoking-cessation e-referrals: a national dental practice-based research network randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2014; 46(2):158-65.
• [14]Sadasivam R, Hogan T, Volkman J, Smith B, Coley H, Williams J, DeLaughter K, Ray M, Gilbert G, Ford D et al. Implementing point of care “e-referrals” in 137 clinics to increase access to a quit smoking internet system: the Quit-Primo and National Dental PBRN HI-QUIT Studies. Transl Behav Med. 2013:1–9. doi:10.1007/s13142-013-0230-3.
• [15]Stoddard JL, Augustson EM. Smokers who use internet and smokers who don’t: data from the Health Information and National Trends Survey (HINTS). Nicotine Tob Res. 2006; 8 Suppl 1:S77-85.
• [16]Houston TK, Sadasivam RS, Ford DE, Richman J, Ray MN, Allison JJ. The QUIT-PRIMO provider-patient Internet-delivered smoking cessation referral intervention: a cluster-randomized comparative effectiveness trial: study protocol. Implement Sci. 2010; 5:87. BioMed Central Full Text
• [17]Civljak M, Sheikh A, Stead LF, Car J. Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; 9:CD007078.
• [18]Houston TK, Ford DE. A tailored Internet-delivered intervention for smoking cessation designed to encourage social support and treatment seeking: usability testing and user tracing. Inform Health Soc Care. 2008; 33(1):5-19.
• [19]Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M, Oxman AD, Treweek S, Furberg CD, Altman DG et al.. A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. Can Med Assoc J. 2009; 180(10):E47-57.
• [20]Chakraborty B, Collins LM, Strecher VJ, Murphy SA. Developing multicomponent interventions using fractional factorial designs. Stat Med. 2009; 28(21):2687-708.
• [21]Collins LM, Murphy SA, Nair VN, Strecher VJ. A strategy for optimizing and evaluating behavioral interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2005; 30(1):65-73.
• [22]Danaher BG, Seeley JR. Methodological issues in research on web-based behavioral interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2009; 38(1):28-39.
• [23]Coley HL, Sadasivam RS, Williams JH, Volkman JE, Schoenberger YM, Kohler CL et al.. Crowdsourced peer- versus expert-written smoking-cessation messages. Am J Prev Med. 2013; 45(5):543-50.
• [24]Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: preparing people to change addictive behavior. Guilford Press, New York; 1991.
• [25]Hall SM, Delucchi KL, Velicer WF, Kahler CW, Ranger-Moore J, Hedeker D et al.. Statistical analysis of randomized trials in tobacco treatment: longitudinal designs with dichotomous outcome. Nicotine Tob Res. 2001; 3(3):193-202.
• [26]Nelson DB, Partin MR, Fu SS, Joseph AM, An LC. Why assigning ongoing tobacco use is not necessarily a conservative approach to handling missing tobacco cessation outcomes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009; 11(1):77-83.
• [27]Smolkowski K, Danaher BG, Seeley JR, Kosty DB, Severson HH. Modeling missing binary outcome data in a successful web-based smokeless tobacco cessation program. Addiction. 2010; 105(6):1005-15.
• [28]Seaman SR, White IR. Review of inverse probability weighting for dealing with missing data. Stat Methods Med Res. 2013; 22(3):278-95.
• [29]Perry RJ, Keller PA, Fraser D, Fiore MC. Fax to quit: a model for delivery of tobacco cessation services to Wisconsin residents. Wmj. 2005; 104(4):37-40.
• [30]Willett JG, Hood NE, Burns EK, Swetlick JL, Wilson SM, Lang DA et al.. Clinical faxed referrals to a tobacco quitline: reach, enrollment, and participant characteristics. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 36(4):337-40.
• [31]Sadasivam RS, Kinney RL, Delaughter K, Rao SR, Williams JH, Coley HL et al.. Who participates in Web-assisted tobacco interventions? The QUIT-PRIMO and National Dental Practice-Based Research Network Hi-Quit studies. J Med Internet Res. 2013; 15(5):e77.
• [32]Free C, Knight R, Robertson S, Whittaker R, Edwards P, Zhou W et al.. Smoking cessation support delivered via mobile phone text messaging (txt2stop): a single-blind, randomised trial. Lancet. 2011; 378(9785):49-55.
• [33]Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A, Pickles A. Reliable estimation of generalized linear mixed models using adaptive quadrature. Stata J. 2002; 2(1):1-21.
• [34]Velicer WF, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS, Snow MG. Assessing outcome in smoking cessation studies. Psychol Bull. 1992; 111(1):23-41.