期刊论文详细信息
Globalization and Health
Does investment in the health sector promote or inhibit economic growth?
David Stuckler3  Christopher Meissner1  Martin McKee3  Sanjay Basu3  Aaron Reeves2 
[1] Department of Economics, University of California Davis, Davis, USA;Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, Manor Road Building, Manor Road, Oxford OX1 3UQ, England;London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Department of Public Health and Policy, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK
关键词: Economic growth;    Government spending;    Health spending;   
Others  :  805417
DOI  :  10.1186/1744-8603-9-43
 received in 2013-06-14, accepted in 2013-08-20,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Is existing provision of health services in Europe affordable during the recession or could cuts damage economic growth? This debate centres on whether government spending has positive or negative effects on economic growth. In this study, we evaluate the economic effects of alternative types of government spending by estimating “fiscal multipliers” (the return on investment for each $1 dollar of government spending).

Methods

Using cross-national fixed effects models covering 25 EU countries from 1995 to 2010, we quantified fiscal multipliers both before and during the recession that began in 2008.

Results

We found that the multiplier for total government spending was 1.61 (95% CI: 1.37 to 1.86), but there was marked heterogeneity across types of spending. The fiscal multipliers ranged from −9.8 for defence (95% CI: -16.7 to −3.0) to 4.3 for health (95% CI: 2.5 to 6.1). These differences appear to be explained by varying degrees of absorption of government spending into the domestic economy. Defence was linked to significantly greater trade deficits (β = −7.58, p=0.017), whereas health and education had no effect on trade deficits (peducation=0.62; phealth= 0.33).

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that government spending on health may have short-term effects that make recovery more likely.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Reeves et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140708075558388.pdf 1333KB PDF download
Figure 4. 85KB Image download
Figure 3. 141KB Image download
Figure 2. 104KB Image download
Figure 1. 44KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Gali J, Lopez-Salido J, Valles J: Understanding the effects of government spending on consumption. J Eur Econ Assoc 2010, 5:227-270.
  • [2]Brown C: Fiscal policy in the thirties: a reappraisal. Am Econ Rev 1956, 46:857-859.
  • [3]Romer C, Bernstein J: The job impact of the American recovery and reinvestment plan, Report from the Council of Economic Advisers, January. 2009.
  • [4]Giavazzi F, Pagano M: Can severe fiscal contractions be expansionary? Tales of two small European countries. NBER Working Paper No 3372. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1990.
  • [5]Taylor J: Macroeconomic policy in a world economy: from econometric design to practical operation. New York: WW Norton; 1993.
  • [6]Correia-Nunes J, Stemitsiotis L: Budget deficit and interest rates: is there a link? International evidence. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 1995, 57:425-449.
  • [7]Laubach T: New evidence on the interest rate effects of budget deficits and debt. J Eur Econ Assoc 2009, 7:858-885.
  • [8]A B: How the Austerity Class Rules Washington. 2011. [The Nation] http://www.thenation.com/article/164073/how-austerity-class-rules-washington# webcite
  • [9]Mundell RA: The appropriate use of monetary and fiscal policy for internal and external stability. Staff Papers - International Monetary Fund 1962, 9:70-79.
  • [10]Evans P: Do budget deficits raise nominal interest rates?: Evidence from six countries. J Monetary Econ 1987, 20:281-300.
  • [11]Evans P: Interest rates and expected future budget deficits in the United States. J Pol Econ 1987, 95:34-58.
  • [12]Hoelscher GP: Federal borrowing and short term interest rates. South Econ J 1983, 50:319-333.
  • [13]Aschaeur D: Does public capital crowd out private capital? J Monetary Econ 1989, 24:171-188.
  • [14]Canning D: Infrastructure’s Contribution to Aggregate Output, Policy Research Working Paper, no. 2246. Washington DC: World Bank; 1999.
  • [15]Spilimbergo A, Symansky S, Blanchard O, Cottarelli C: Fiscal Policy for the Crisis. IMF: City; 2008. [Book Fiscal Policy for the Crisis]
  • [16]Spilimbergo A, Symansky S, Schindler M: Fiscal Multipliers, IMF Staff Positions, SPN/09/11. Washington, D.C: IMF; 2009.
  • [17]International Monetary Fund: World Economic Outlook: Coping with High Debt and Sluggish Growth. Washington, D.C.: IMF; 2012.
  • [18]Ramey VA: Identifying Government Spending Shocks: It's all in the Timing. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 2011, 126(1):1-50.
  • [19]Ramey VA: Defense News Shocks, 1939–2008: An Analysis Based on News Sources, UCSD Working Paper. San Diego, CA: UCSD; 2009.
  • [20]Blanchard O, Leigh D: Growth Forecast Errors and Fiscal Multipliers. Washington DC: IMF; 2013.
  • [21]Scott A, Barnett S, De Broeck M, Ivanova A, Kim D, Kumhof M, Laxton D, Leigh D, Stehn SJ, Symansky S: Fiscal Policy as Countercyclical Tool. In World Economic Outlook: Financial Stress, Downturns, and Recoveries. Edited by Blanchard O. Washington, D.C., USA: IMF; 2008.
  • [22]McKee M, Karanikolos M, Belcher P, Stuckler D: Austerity: a failed experiment on the people of Europe. Clinical Medicine 2012, 12:346-350.
  • [23]Stuckler D, Basu S, Mckee M: Equitable distribution of pepfar-supported HIV/Aids services in South Africa respond. Am J Public Health 2011, 101:1351-1351.
  • [24]EUROSTAT: General government expenditure by function. Luxembourg City, Luxembourg: EUROSTAT; 2012.
  • [25]Auerbach AJ: The fall and rise of keynesian fiscal policy. Asian Econ Policy Rev 2012, 7:157-175.
  • [26]Auerbach AJ, Gorodnichenko Y: Measuring the output responses to fiscal policy. Am Econ J: Econ Pol 2012, 4:1-27.
  • [27]Stock JH, Watson MW: Vector autoregressions. J Econ Perspect 2001, 15:101-115.
  • [28]Blanchard O, Perotti R: An empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of changes in government spending and taxes on output. Q J Econ 2002, 117:1329-1368.
  • [29]Stuckler D, Basu S: The Body Economic: why austerity kills?. London: Penguin; 2013.
  • [30]Uhlig H: "Some Fiscal Calculus.". American Economic Review 2010, 100(2):30-34.
  • [31]Ilzetzki E, Mendoza EG, Végh CA: How big (small?) are fiscal multipliers? J Monetary Econ 2012, 60(2):239-254.
  • [32]Favero C, Giavazzi F, Perego J: Country Heterogeneity and the International: Evidence on the Effects of Fiscal Policy. NBER Working Paper 17272. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2011.
  • [33]Devarajan S, Swaroop V, Zou H: The composition of public expenditure and economic growth. Am Econ Rev 1996, 37:313-344.
  • [34]Blyth M: Austerity: the history of a dangerous idea. Oxford: OUP; 2013.
  • [35]Knight EKS: Analysis: Aid recipients welcome IMF's shift on austerity. City; 2012. [Book Analysis: Aid recipients welcome IMF's shift on austerity] http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/10/14/us-imf-aid-admission-idUSBRE89D0GQ20121014 webcite
  • [36]Suhrcke M, McKee M, Stuckler D, Sauto Arce R, Tsolova S, Mortensen J: The contribution of health to the economy in the European Union. Public health 2006, 120:994-1001.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:136次 浏览次数:65次