Prediction and assessment of drought effects on surface water quality using artificial neural networks: case study of Zayandehrud River, Iran

Journal of Environmental Health Science Engineering

Kian Malek Ahmadi¹  Hamid R. Safavi¹ 

[1] Department of Civil Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran

关键词: Radial basis function;    Multi layer perceptron;    Artificial neural networks;    Electrical conductivity;    Temperature;    Drought;    Discharge;   

Others  :  1229114
DOI  :  10.1186/s40201-015-0227-6

 received in 2014-12-21, accepted in 2015-10-04,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Although drought impacts on water quantity are widely recognized, the impacts on water quality are less known. The Zayandehrud River basin in the west-central part of Iran plateau witnessed an increased contamination during the recent droughts and low flows. The river has been receiving wastewater and effluents from the villages, a number of small and large industries, and irrigation drainage systems along its course. What makes the situation even worse is the drought period the river basin has been going through over the last decade. Therefore, a river quality management model is required to include the adverse effects of industrial development in the region and the destructive effects of droughts which affect the river’s water quality and its surrounding environment. Developing such a model naturally presupposes investigations into pollution effects in terms of both quality and quantity to be used in such management tools as mathematical models to predict the water quality of the river and to prevent pollution escalation in the environment.

The present study aims to investigate electrical conductivity of the Zayandehrud River as a water quality parameter and to evaluate the effect of this parameter under drought conditions. For this purpose, artificial neural networks are used as a modeling tool to derive the relationship between electrical conductivity and the hydrological parameters of the Zayandehrud River. The models used in this research include multi-layer perceptron and radial basis function. Finally, these two models are compared in terms of their performance using the time series of electrical conductivity at eight monitoring-hydrometric stations during drought periods between the years 1997–2012.

Results show that artificial neural networks can be used for modeling the relationship between electrical conductivity and hydrological parameters under drought conditions. It is further shown that radial basis function works better for the upstream stretches of the river while multi-layer perceptron is more efficient for the downstream stretches.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Safavi and Malek Ahmadi.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 11.

Fig. 12.

Fig. 13.

Fig. 14.

Fig. 15.

Fig. 16.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Department of Environment (DOE). Water quality management in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Federal Goverment Administrative Centre; 2003.
• [2]Najah A, El-Shafie A, Karim OA, El-Shafie Amr H. Application of artificial neural networks for water quality prediction. Neural Comput & Applic. 2013; 22(1):187-201.
• [3]Tallaksen LM, Madsen H, Clausen B. On the definition and modelling of stream flow drought duration and deficit volume. Hydrol Sci J. 1997; 42:15-33.
• [4]Bruce CC, Robinson DP. Some effects of the 1982–83 drought on water quality and macro-invertebrate fauna in the Loer La Trobe River, Victoria. Aust J Mar Fresh Wat Res. 1987; 38:289-99.
• [5]Attrill MJ, Power M. Modeling the effect of drought on estuarine water quality. Water Res. 2000; 34(5):1584-94.
• [6]Caruso BS. Temporal and spatial patterns of extreme low flows and effects on stream ecosystems in Otago, New Zealand. J Hydrology. 2002; 257:115-33.
• [7]Clair TA, Ehrman JM. Variations in discharge and dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen export from terrestrial basins with changes in climate: a neural network approach. Limnol Oceanogr. 1996; 41:921-7.
• [8]Hrdinka T, Novicky O, Hanslik E, Rieder M. Possible impacts of floods and droughts on water quality. J Hydro Environ Res. 2012; 6:145-50.
• [9]Murdoch PS, Baron JS, Miller TL. Potential effects of climate change on surface-water quality in North America. J Am Water Resour Assoc. 2000; 36:347-66.
• [10]Nouri J, Mirbagheri SA, Farrikhian F, Jaafarzadeh N, Alesheikh AA. Water quality variability and eutrophic state in wet and dry years in wetlands of the semiarid and arid regions. Environ Earth Sci. 2010; 59:1397-407.
• [11]Schindler DW. Widespread effects of climate warming on freshwater ecosystems in North America. Hydrologic Processes. 1997; 11:225-51.
• [12]Sprague LA. Drought effects on water quality in the South Platte River Basin, Colorado. J Am Water Resour Assoc. 2005; 41(1):11-24.
• [13]van Vliet MTH, Zwolsman JJG. Impact of summer droughts on the water quality of the Meuse River. J Hydrol. 2008; 353:1-17.
• [14]Zielinski P, Gorniak A, Krzysztof Piekarski M. The effect of hydrological drought on chemical quality of water and dissolved organic carbon concentrations in Lowland Rivers. Polish J Ecol. 2009; 57:373-84.
• [15]Nasir MFM, Abdul Zali M, Juahir H, Hussain H, Zain SM, Ramli M. Application of receptor models on water quality data in source apportionment in Kuantan River Basin. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2012; 9:18. BioMed Central Full Text
• [16]Zare AH. Evaluation of multivariate linear regression and artificial neural networks in prediction of water quality parameters. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2012; 12:40. BioMed Central Full Text
• [17]Fu Y, Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Guo T, He Z, Chen J. GIS and ANN-based spatial prediction of DOC in river networks: a case study in Dongjiang, Southern China. Environ Earth Sci. 2013; 68:1495-505.
• [18]Ha H, Stenstrom MK. Identification of land use with water quality data in stormwater using a neural network. Water Res. 2003; 37(17):4222-30.
• [19]Maier HR, Dandy GC. Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modelling issues and applications. Environ Model Softw. 2000; 15(1):101-24.
• [20]Ogleni N, Topal B. Water quality assessment of the Mudurnu River, Turkey. Using Biotic Indices. Water Resour Manag. 2011; 25(11):2487-508.
• [21]Rooki R, Doulati Ardejani F, Aryafar A, Bani AA. Prediction of heavy metals in acid mine drainage using artificial neural network from the Shur River of the Sarcheshmeh porphyry copper mine, Southeast Iran. Environ Earth Sci. 2011; 64:1303-16.
• [22]Verma AK, Singh TN. Prediction of water quality from simple field parameters. Environ Earth Sci. 2013; 69:821-9.
• [23]Zhang Y, Pulliainen J, Koponen S, Hallikainen M. Application of an empirical neural network to surface water quality estimation in the Gulf of Finland using combined optical data and microwave data. Remote Sens Environ. 2002; 81(2–3):327-36.
• [24]Safavi HR, Khoshoei Esfahani M, Zamani AR. Integrated index for assessment of vulnerability to drought, case study: Zayandehrud River basin, Iran. Water Resour Manag. 2014; 28(6):1671-88.
• [25]Safavi HR, Chakraei I, Kabiri-Samani A, Golmohammadi MH. Optimal reservoir operation based on conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater using neuro-fuzzy systems. Water Resour Manag. 2013; 27(12):4259-75.
• [26]Haykin S. Neural networks: Comprehensive foundation. Prentice-hall, Upper Saddle River; 1999.
• [27]Farmaki EG, Thomaidis NS, Constantinos EE. Artificial neural networks in water analysis; Theory and applications. Int J Environ An Ch. 2010; 90(2):85-105.
• [28]Hagan MT, Demuth HB, Beale MH. Neural network design, MA. PWS Publishing, Boston; 1996.
• [29]Broomhead DS, Lowe D. Multivariate functional interpolation and adaptive networks. Complex Systems. 1988; 2:321-55.
• [30]Bishop CM. Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford University Press. 1996
• [31]El-Shafie A, Jaafer O, Akrami SA. Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system based model for rainfall forecasting in Klang River, Malaysia. Int J Phys Sci. 2011; 6(12):2875-88.