期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Environmental Health Science Engineering
Estimation of flood environmental effects using flood zone mapping techniques in Halilrood Kerman, Iran
Zahra Bagheri1  Majid Bagheri2  Siamak Boudaghpour2 
[1]Department and Faculty of Basic Sciences, PUK University, Kermanshah, Iran
[2]Department of Civil Engineering, K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Vanak Square, Tehran, Iran
关键词: Jiroft dam;    GIS;    HEC-RAS;    HEC-HMS;    Environmental damages;    Catchment area;   
Others  :  1133704
DOI  :  10.1186/s40201-014-0153-z
 received in 2013-12-29, accepted in 2014-12-14,  发布年份 2014
【 摘 要 】

High flood occurrences with large environmental damages have a growing trend in Iran. Dynamic movements of water during a flood cause different environmental damages in geographical areas with different characteristics such as topographic conditions. In general, environmental effects and damages caused by a flood in an area can be investigated from different points of view. The current essay is aiming at detecting environmental effects of flood occurrences in Halilrood catchment area of Kerman province in Iran using flood zone mapping techniques. The intended flood zone map was introduced in four steps. Steps 1 to 3 pave the way to calculate and estimate flood zone map in the understudy area while step 4 determines the estimation of environmental effects of flood occurrence. Based on our studies, wide range of accuracy for estimating the environmental effects of flood occurrence was introduced by using of flood zone mapping techniques. Moreover, it was identified that the existence of Jiroft dam in the study area can decrease flood zone from 260 hectares to 225 hectares and also it can decrease 20% of flood peak intensity. As a result, 14% of flood zone in the study area can be saved environmentally.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Mirbagheri et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

附件列表
Files Size Format View
Figure 11. 79KB Image download
Figure 10. 32KB Image download
Figure 9. 109KB Image download
Figure 8. 50KB Image download
Figure 7. 19KB Image download
Figure 2. 176KB Image download
Figure 5. 57KB Image download
Figure 4. 19KB Image download
Figure 3. 30KB Image download
Figure 2. 14KB Image download
Figure 1. 68KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 2.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Sun D-P, Xue H, Wang P-T, Lu R-L, Liao X-L: 2-D numerical simulation of flooding effects caused by South-to-North water transfer project. J Hydrodyn Ser B 2008, 20(5):662-667.
  • [2]Amini A, Ali TM, Ghazali AHB, Aziz AA, Akib SM: Impacts of land-use change on streamflows in the Damansara Watershed, Malaysia. Arab J Sci Eng 2011, 36(5):713-720.
  • [3]Hinderer M: From gullies to mountain belts: a review of sediment budgets at various scales. Sediment Geol 2012, 280:21-59.
  • [4]Dikbas F, Firat M, Koc AC, Gungor M: Defining homogeneous regions for streamflow processes in Turkey using a K-means clustering method. Arab J Sci Eng 2013, 38(6):1313-1319.
  • [5]Alexandrov Y, Laronne JB, Reid I: Suspended sediment concentration and its variation with water discharge in a dryland ephemeral channel, northern Negev, Israel. J Arid Environ 2003, 53(1):73-84.
  • [6]Dunkerley D, Brown K: Flow behaviour, suspended sediment transport and transmission losses in a small (sub‐bank‐full) flow event in an Australian desert stream. Hydrol Process 1999, 13(11):1577-1588.
  • [7]Boardman J, Evans R, Ford J: Muddy floods on the South Downs, southern England: problem and responses. Environ Sci Policy 2003, 6(1):69-83.
  • [8]Svendsen J, Stollhofen H, Krapf CB, Stanistreet IG: Mass and hyperconcentrated flow deposits record dune damming and catastrophic breakthrough of ephemeral rivers, Skeleton Coast Erg, Namibia. Sediment Geol 2003, 160(1):7-31.
  • [9]Auynirundronkool K, Chen N, Peng C, Yang C, Gong J, Silapathong C: Flood detection and mapping of the Thailand Central plain using RADARSAT and MODIS under a sensor web environment. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 2012, 14(1):245-255.
  • [10]Xia C, Pahl-Wostl C: Understanding the development of flood management in the middle Yangtze River. Environ Innov Soc Transit 2012, 5:60-75.
  • [11]Feldman, AD: Hydrologic Modeling System HEC-HMS: Technical Reference Manual. US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, (2000).
  • [12]Halwatura D, Najim M: Application of the HEC-HMS model for runoff simulation in a tropical catchment. Environ Model Softw 2013, 46:155-162.
  • [13]Bajwa, H, Tim, U: Toward immersive virtual environments for GIS-based Floodplain modeling and Visualization. In: Proceedings of 22nd ESRI User Conference 2002.
  • [14]Horritt M, Bates P: Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation. J Hydrol 2002, 268(1):87-99.
  • [15]Fan C, Ko C-H, Wang W-S: An innovative modeling approach using Qual2K and HEC-RAS integration to assess the impact of tidal effect on River Water quality simulation. J Environ Manag 2009, 90(5):1824-1832.
  • [16]Knebl M, Yang Z-L, Hutchison K, Maidment D: Regional scale flood modeling using NEXRAD rainfall, GIS, and HEC-HMS/RAS: a case study for the San Antonio River Basin Summer 2002 storm event. J Environ Manag 2005, 75(4):325-336.
  • [17]Anderson M, Chen Z-Q, Kavvas M, Feldman A: Coupling HEC-HMS with atmospheric models for prediction of watershed runoff. J Hydrol Eng 2002, 7(4):312-318.
  • [18]Hadadin N, Tarawneh Z, Shatanawi K, Banihani Q, Hamdi MR: Hydrological analysis for floodplain hazard of Jeddah’s drainage Basin, Saudi Arabia. Arab J Sci Eng 2013, 38(12):3275-3287.
  • [19]Siddiqui QTM, Hashmi HN, Ghumman AR: Flood inundation modeling for a watershed in the pothowar region of Pakistan. Arab J Sci Eng 2011, 36(7):1203-1220.
  • [20]Liu X, Zhao X: The research on flood character grid base on GIS. Energy Procedia 2012, 16:1225-1229.
  • [21]Smith PN: Hydrologic data development system. Trans Res Record: J Trans Res Board 1997, 1599(1):118-127.
  • [22]Naeem UA, Nisar H, Ejaz N: Development of empirical equations for the peak flood of the Chenab river using GIS. Arab J Sci Eng 2012, 37(4):945-954.
  • [23]Marston RA, Mills JD, Wrazien DR, Bassett B, Splinter DK: Effects of Jackson Lake Dam on the Snake River and its floodplain, Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming, USA. Geomorphol 2005, 71(1):79-98.
  • [24]Lianqing X, Zhenchun H, Xiaoqun L, Yongkun L: Numerical simulation and optimal system scheduling on flood diversion and storage in Dongting Basin, China. Procedia Environ Sci 2012, 12:1089-1096.
  • [25]Charrier R, Li Y: Assessing resolution and source effects of digital elevation models on automated floodplain delineation: a case study from the Camp Creek Watershed, Missouri. Appl Geogr 2012, 34:38-46.
  • [26]Vazquez R, Feyen J: Assessment of the effects of DEM gridding on the predictions of basin runoff using MIKE SHE and a modelling resolution of 600m. J Hydrol 2007, 334(1):73-87.
  • [27]Sanders BF: Evaluation of on-line DEMs for flood inundation modeling. Adv Water Res 2007, 30(8):1831-1843.
  • [28]Khazaei, MR, Zahabiyoun, B, Saghafian, B, Ahmadi, S: Development of an Automatic Calibration Tool Using Genetic Algorithm for the ARNO Conceptual Rainfall-Runoff Model Arab J Sci Eng 1-15 (2013).
  • [29]Scanlon BR, Healy RW, Cook PG: Choosing appropriate techniques for quantifying groundwater recharge. Hydrogeol J 2002, 10(1):18-39.
  • [30]Aronica GT, Candela A, Fabio P, Santoro M: Estimation of flood inundation probabilities using global hazard indexes based on hydrodynamic variables. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C 2012, 42:119-129.
  • [31]Metcalf I: Wastewater engineering; treatment and reuse. McGraw-Hill, (2003)
  • [32]Andrew, D: Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater none, (2005).
  • [33]Elmolla ES, Chaudhuri M: Combined photo-Fenton–SBR process for antibiotic wastewater treatment. J Hazard Mater 2011, 192(3):1418-1426.
  • [34]Haque CE, Kolba M, Morton P, Quinn NP: Public involvement in the Red River Basin management decisions and preparedness for the next flood. Glob Environ Chang Part B: Environ Hazard 2002, 4(4):87-104.
  • [35]Lind N, Hartford D, Assaf H: Hydrodynamic models of human stability in a flood 1. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 2004, 40(1):89-96.
  • [36]Erdlenbruch K, Thoyer S, Grelot F, Kast R, Enjolras G: Risk-sharing policies in the context of the French Flood Prevention Action Programmes. J Environ Manag 2009, 91(2):363-369.
  • [37]Mauclaire L, Gibert J: Effects of pumping and floods on groundwater quality: a case study of the Grand Gravier well field (Rhône, France). Hydrobiol 1998, 389(1–3):141-151.
  • [38]Claret C, Fontvieille D: Characteristics of biofilm assemblages in two contrasted hydrodynamic and trophic contexts. Microb Ecol 1997, 34(1):49-57.
  • [39]Baky A, Zaman A, Khan A: Managing flood flows for crop production risk management with hydraulic and gis modeling: case study of agricultural areas in Shariatpur. APCBEE Procedia 2012, 1:318-324.
  • [40]Howitt JA, Baldwin DS, Rees GN, Williams JL: Modelling blackwater: predicting water quality during flooding of lowland river forests. Ecol Model 2007, 203(3):229-242.
  • [41]Tariq MAUR, van de Giesen N: Floods and flood management in Pakistan. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C 2012, 47:11-20.
  • [42]De-Campos AB, Mamedov AI, Huang C-H: Short-Term reducing conditions decrease soil aggregation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 2009, 73(2):550-559.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:84次 浏览次数:69次