期刊论文详细信息
Emerging Themes in Epidemiology
Application of loop analysis for the qualitative assessment of surveillance and control in veterinary epidemiology
François Roger2  Sinel Holl1  Flavie Goutard2  Marisa Peyre4  Mathilde Paul5  Raphaël Duboz3  Lucie Collineau4 
[1] National Veterinary Research Institute, Phnom Penh, Cambodia;Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand;Asian Institute of Technology, Computer Sciences and Information Management, Pathumthani, Thailand;CIRAD, AGIRs (Animal and Integrated Risks Management Unit, UPR22), Montpellier, France;UMR 1225 IHAP INRA-ENVT, National Veterinary School, Toulouse, France
关键词: HPAI H5N1;    Interaction;    Loop analysis;    Mitigation system;    Efficiency;   
Others  :  803753
DOI  :  10.1186/1742-7622-10-7
 received in 2013-03-01, accepted in 2013-07-24,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Systems for animal disease mitigation involve both surveillance activities and interventions to control the disease. They are complex organizations that are described by partial or imprecise data, making it difficult to evaluate them or make decisions to improve them. A mathematical method, called loop analysis, can be used to model qualitatively the structure and the behavior of dynamic systems; it relies on the study of the sign of the interactions between the components of the system. This method, currently widely used by ecologists, has to our knowledge never been applied in the context of animal disease mitigation systems. The objective of the study was to assess whether loop analysis could be applied to this new context. We first developed a generic model that restricted the applicability of the method to event-based surveillance systems of endemic diseases, excluding the emergence and eradication phases. Then we chose the mitigation system of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 in Cambodia as an example of such system to study the application of loop analysis to a real disease mitigation system.

Results

Breaking down the generic model, we constructed a 6-variables model to represent the HPAI H5N1 mitigation system in Cambodia. This construction work improved our understanding of this system, highlighting the link between surveillance and control which is unclear in traditional representations of this system. Then we analyzed the effect of the perturbations to this HPAI H5N1 mitigation system that we interpreted in terms of investment in a given compartment. This study suggested that increasing intervention at a local level can optimize the system’s efficiency. Indeed, this perturbation both decreases surveillance and intervention costs and reduces the disease’s occurrence.

Conclusion

Loop analysis can be applied to disease mitigation systems. Its main strength is that it is easy to design, focusing on the signs of the interactions. It is a simple and flexible tool that could be used as a precursor to large-scale quantitative studies, to support reflection about disease mitigation systems structure and functioning.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Collineau et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140708045343611.pdf 610KB PDF download
Figure 4. 91KB Image download
Figure 3. 58KB Image download
Figure 2. 43KB Image download
Figure 1. 14KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Dufour B, Hendrikx P: Epidemiological surveillance in animal health 2nded. FAO, OIE and AEEMA: CIRAD; 2009.
  • [2]Thrusfield M: Surveillance. In: Veterinary Epidemiology. BlackWell Science; 2007:168-186.
  • [3]Häsler B, Howe K, Stärk K: Conceptualizing the technical relationship of animal disease surveillance to intervention and mitigation as a basis for economic analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2011, 11:225. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [4]McDermott J, Coleman P: Comparing apples and oranges – model-based assessment of different tsetse-transmitted trypanosomosis control strategies. Int J Parasitol 2001, 31:603-609.
  • [5]Groenendaal H, Nielen M, Hesselink JW: Development of the Dutch Johne’s disease control program supported by a simulation model. Prev Vet Med 2003, 60:69-90.
  • [6]Stansfield SK, Walsh J, Prata N, Evans T, et al.: Information to improve decision making for health. In Disease control priorities in developing countries. Edited by Jamison DT. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006:1017-30.
  • [7]Hendrikx P, Gay E, Chazel M, Moutou F, Danan C, Richomme C, Boue F, Souillard R, Gauchard F, Dufour B: OASIS: an assessment tool of epidemiological surveillance systems in animal health and food safety. Epidemiol Infect 2011, 139:1486-1496.
  • [8]Drewe JA, Hoinville LJ, Cook AJ, Floyd T, Stärk KD: Evaluation of animal and public health surveillance systems: a systematic review. Epidemiol Infect 2012, 140:575-90.
  • [9]OIE (World Organization for Animal Health): OIE Tool for the evaluation of performance of veterinary services (OIE PVS tool). Paris: OIE; 2010. http://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Support_to_OIE_Members/pdf/A_PVS_Tool_Final_Edition_2013.pdf webcite
  • [10]Drewe J, Hoinville L, Cook A, Floyd T, Gunn G, Stärk K: SERVAL: a new framework for the evaluation of animal health surveillance. Transbound Emerg Dis 2013.
  • [11]Goutard FL, Paul M, Tavornpanich S, Houisse I, Chanachai K, Thanapongtharm W, Cameron A, Stärk KDC, Roger F: Optimizing early detection of avian influenza H5N1 in backyard and free-range poultry production systems in Thailand. Prev Vet Med 2012.
  • [12]Vergne T, Grosbois V, Durand B, Goutard F, Bellet C, Holl D, Roger F, Dufour B: A capture–recapture analysis in a challenging environment: assessing the epidemiological situation of foot-and-mouth disease in Cambodia. Prev Vet Med 2012, 105:235-243.
  • [13]Redmond L, Beck H: Economics in animal health policy making in Northern Ireland. In The economics of animal health and production. Edited by Rushton J. Cambridge, MA: CAB International; 2009:269-273.
  • [14]Puccia CJ, Levins R: Qualitative modeling of complex systems: an introduction to loop analysis and time averaging. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1985.
  • [15]Arkoosh MR, Johnson L, Rossignol PA, Collier TK: Predicting the impact of perturbations on salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) communities: implications for monitoring. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 2004, 61:1166-1175.
  • [16]Ortiz M, Wolff M: Application of loop analysis to benthic systems in northern Chile for the elaboration of sustainable management strategies. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2002, 242:15-27.
  • [17]Mohtashemi M, Higgs BW, Levins R: Infection and atherosclerosis: is there an association? Complex Systems-Champaign 2006, 16:259-276.
  • [18]Zavaleta JO, Rossignol PA: Community-level analysis of risk of vector-borne disease. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2004, 98:610-618.
  • [19]Dambacher JM, Luh HK, Li HW, Rossignol PA: Qualitative stability and ambiguity in model ecosystems. Am Nat 2003, 161:876-888.
  • [20]Dambacher JM, Li HW, Rossignol PA: Qualitative predictions in model ecosystems. Ecological Modeling 2003, 161:79-93.
  • [21]Howe KS, Häsler B, Stärk KD: Economic principles for resource allocation decisions at national level to mitigate the effects of disease in farm animal populations. Epidemiol Infect 2012, 141:91-101.
  • [22]Diekmann O, Heesterbeek JAP: Mathematical epidemiology of infectious diseases: model building, analysis and interpretation. Chichester: Wiley; 2000. Volume 5
  • [23]Justus J: Loop analysis and qualitative modeling: limitations and merits. Biol Philos 2006, 21:647-666.
  • [24]The Loop analysis website. http://www.ent.orst.edu/loop/ webcite
  • [25]Sorn S, Sok T, Ly S, Rith S, Tung N, Viari A, Gavotte L, Holl D, Seng H, Asgari N, Richner B, Laurent D, Chea N, Duong V, Toyoda T, Yasuda CY, Kitsutani P, Zhou P, Bing S, Deubel V, Donis R, Frutos R, Buchy P: Dynamic of H5N1 virus in Cambodia and emergence of a novel endemic sub-clade. Infect Genet Evol 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2012.05.013 webcite
  • [26]Desvaux S, Sorn S, Holl D, Chavernac D, Goutard F, Thonnat J, Porphyre V, Ménard C, Cardinale E, Roger F: HPAI surveillance programme in Cambodia: results and perspectives. Dev Biol (Basel) 2006, 124:211-224.
  • [27]Ear S, Burgos Cáceres S: Livelihoods and highly pathogenic avian influenza in Cambodia. Worlds Poult Sci J 2009, 65:633.
  • [28]Burgos S, Hinrichs J, Otte J, Pfeiffer D, Roland-Holst D, Schwabenbauer K, Thieme O: Poultry, HPAI and livelihoods in Cambodia–a review. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome: A collaborative research project funded by DFID, BMELV, FAO, ICB, ILRI; 2008. Mekong Team Working Paper No. 3
  • [29]Van Kerkhove MD, et al.: Poultry movement and sustained HPAI risk in Cambodia. In Health and animal agriculture in developing countries. Edited by Zilberman D. New York: Springer; 2012:233-263.
  • [30]Elbers ARW, Fabri THF, De Vries TS, De Wit JJ, Pijpers A, Koch G: The highly pathogenic avian influenza a (H7N7) virus epidemic in the Netherlands in 2003—lessons learned from the first five outbreaks. Avian Dis 2004, 48:691-705.
  • [31]Ly S, Van Kerkhove MD, Holl D, Froehlich Y, Vong S: Interaction between humans and poultry, rural Cambodia. Emerg Infect Dis 2007, 13:130-132.
  • [32]Palmer S, Fozdar F, Sully M: The effect of trust on West Australian farmers’ responses to infectious livestock diseases. Sociol Rural 2009, 49:360-374.
  • [33]Ferrarini A: Fuzzy cognitive maps outmatch loop analysis in dynamic modeling of ecological systems. Computat Ecol Software 2011, 1:55-59.
  • [34]Gramig BM, Horan RD: Jointly determined livestock disease dynamics and decentralized economic behavior. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 2011, 55:393-410.
  • [35]Cohen NE, Van Asseldonk MAPM, Stassen EN: Social-ethical issues concerning the control strategy of animal diseases in the European Union: a survey. Agr Hum Values 2007, 24:499-510.
  • [36]Alders RG, Bagnol B, Brum E, Lubis AS, Young MP: Continuing education in the prevention and control of HPAI: a case study on Indonesia. Worlds Poult Sci J 2009, 65:529-531.
  • [37]Souza Monteiro DM, Carrasco LR, Moffitt LJ, Cook AJC: Robust surveillance of animal diseases: an application to the detection of bluetongue disease. Prev Vet Med 2012, 105:17-24.
  • [38]Salles P, Bredeweg B: A case study of collaborative modeling: building qualitative models in ecology. In Artificial intelligence in education: shaping the future of learning through intelligent technologies. Edited by Hoppe U, Verdejo F, Kay J. Japan, Osaka: IOS-Press/Ohmsha; 2003:245-252.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:33次 浏览次数:9次