Dairy sheep production research at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA – a review

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology

Claire M Mikolayunas⁴  Brett C McKusick³  Yves M Berger²  David L Thomas¹ 

[1] University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Animal Sciences, Madison, Wisconsin, USA;Spooner Agricultural Research Station, Spooner, Wisconsin, USA;Current address: Merial Ltd, Duluth, Georgia, USA;Current address: Midwest Organic Services Association, Viroqua, Wisconsin, USA

关键词: Supplementation;    RUP;    RDP;    Nitrogen efficiency;    Lactation physiology;    Lacaune;    Grazing;    East Friesian;    Dairy sheep;   

Others  :  803471
DOI  :  10.1186/2049-1891-5-22

 received in 2013-06-26, accepted in 2014-04-08,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Commercial milking of sheep is a new agricultural industry in the United States starting approximately 30 yr ago. The industry is still small, but it is growing. The majority of the sheep milk is used in the production of specialty cheeses. The United States is the major importer of sheep milk cheeses with 50 to 60% of annual world exports coming to the United States during the past 20 yr. Therefore, there is considerable growth potential for the industry in the United States. The only dairy sheep research flock in North America is located at the Spooner Agricultural Research Station of the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The research program started in 1993 and has been multifaceted; dealing with several areas important to commercial dairy sheep farmers. The East Friesian and Lacaune dairy breeds were compared and introduced to the industry through the research program. Both dairy breeds produced significantly more milk than traditional meat-wool breeds found in the U.S., but the two breeds differed in their production traits. East Friesian-cross ewes produced more lambs and slightly more milk than Lacaune-cross ewes whereas Lacaune-cross ewes produced milk with a higher percentage of fat and protein than East Friesian-cross ewes. Lactation physiology studies have shown that ewes with active corpora lutea have increased milk yields, oxytocin release during milking is required to obtain normal fat percentages in the milk, large udder cisterns of dairy ewes can allow for increased milking intervals, and short daylengths during late pregnancy results in increased milk yield. In the nutrition area, legume-grass pastures and forages with a higher percentage of legume will result in increased milk production. Grazing ewes respond to additional supplementation with increased milk yield, but it is important to match the supplement to the quality of the grazing. Ewes on high quality legume-grass pastures that are high in rumen degradable protein respond with increased milk production to supplements high in energy and/or high in rumen undegraded protein.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Thomas et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Sakul H, Boylan WJ, Shrestha JNB: Animal model evaluation of dairy traits in US sheep breeds, their crosses and three synthetic populations. Small Ruminant Res 1999, 34:1-9.
• [2]Shrestha JNB, Heaney DP: Review of Canadian, Outaouais and Rideau Arcott breeds of sheep. 1. Development and characterization. Small Ruminant Res 2003, 49:79-96.
• [3]Thomas DL, Berger YM, McKusick BC: Milk and lamb production of East Friesian-cross ewes in northwestern Wisconsin. Proc. 4th Great lakes Dairy Sheep Symp. Spooner, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Dept. of Anim. Sci; 1998:11-17.
• [4]Othmane MH, De La Fuente LF, Carriedo JA, San Primitivo F: Heritability and genetic correlations of test day milk yield and composition, individual laboratory cheese yield, and somatic cell count for dairy ewes. J Dairy Sci 2002, 85:2692-2698.
• [5]Thomas DL, Berger YM, Gottfredson RG, Taylor TA: Comparison of East Friesian and Lacaune breeds for dairy sheep production in North America. Proc. 10th Great lakes Dairy Sheep Symp. Hudson, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Dept. of Anim. Sci; 2004:115-123.
• [6]ICAR (International Committee for Animal Recording): Sheep Milk Enquiry. 2014. Online: http://www.survey-icar.org/sheep_survey4/ webcite. Accessed March 28, 2014
• [7]Barillet F: Genetic improvement for dairy production in sheep and goats. Small Ruminant Res 2007, 70:60-75.
• [8]Ricordeau G, Flamant JC: Croisements entre les races ovines Prealpes du Sud et Frisonne (Ostfriesisches Milchschaf). II. Reproduction, viabilite, croissance, conformation. Ann Zootech 1969, 18:131-149.
• [9]Katsaounis N, Zygoyiannia D: The East Friesland sheep in Greece. Res Develop Agric 1986, 3:19-30.
• [10]Thomas DL, Berger YM, McKusick BC: Preliminary results: Survival of high-percentage East Friesian lambs. Proc. 5th Great lakes Dairy Sheep Symp. Brattleboro, Vermont: University of Wisconsin-Madison: Dept. of Anim. Sci. and University of Vermont, Center for Sustainable Agriculture; 1999:64-66.
• [11]Thomas DL, Berger YM, McKusick BC: 2000. East Friesian germplasm: effects on milk production, lamb growth, and lamb survival. Proc. American Soc. Anim. Sci. J Anim Sci 1999, 77:1-6. http://journalofanimalscience.org/content/77/E-Suppl/1.7 webcite
• [12]Ferreira VC, Thomas DL, Rosa GJ: Survival in crossbred lambs: individual, maternal, heterosis, and breed effects. J Anim Sci 2012, 90(3):3. and J. Dairy Sci. Vol. 95, Suppl. 2. Abstr. No. M42:20. (Online: http://www.jtmtg.org/2012/abstracts/15.pdf webcite)
• [13]McKusick BC, Thomas DL, Berger YM: Effects of weaning systems on commercial milk production and lamb growth of East Friesian dairy sheep. J Dairy Sci 2001, 84:1660-1668.
• [14]McKusick BC, Thomas DL, Romero JE, Marnet PG: Effect of weaning system on milk composition and distribution of milk fat within the udder of East Friesian dairy ewes. J Dairy Sci 2002, 85:2521-2528.
• [15]Hernandez MP, Robinson JJ, Aitken RP, Fraser C: The effect of dietary supplementation of protected fat on the yield and fat concentration of ewe’s milk and on lamb growth. Anim Prod 1986, 42:455.
• [16]Sklan D: A note on production responses of lactating ewes to calcium soaps of fatty acids. Anim Prod 1992, 55:288-291.
• [17]Caja G, Bocquier F: Effects of nutrition on ewe’s milk quality. Cooperative FAO – CIHEAM Network on Sheep and Goats. Grignon, France: Nutrition Subnetwork; 1998:3-5. September. 1-16
• [18]Casals R, Caja G, Such X, Torre C, Calsamiglia S: Effects of calcium soaps and level of protein supplementation on lactational performance of dairy ewes. J Dairy Res 1999, 66:177-191.
• [19]McKusick BC, Berger YM, Thomas DL: Rumen-protected bypass fat for dairy ewe commercial milk production. Proc. 5th Great lakes Dairy Sheep Symp. Brattleboro, Vermont: University of Wisconsin-Madison: Dept. of Anim. Sci. and University of Vermont, Center for Sustainable Agriculture; 1999:69-80.
• [20]De Bie LY, Berge M, Thomas DL: The effect of three times a day milking at the beginning of lactation on the milk production of East Friesian crossbred ewes. Proc. 6th Great lakes Dairy Sheep Symp. Guelph, Ontario, Canada: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Dept. of Anim. Sci; 2000:1-9.
• [21]McKusick BC, Thomas DL, Berger YM, Marnet PG: Effect of milking interval on alveolar versus cisternal milk accumulation, and milk production and composition in dairy ewes. J Dairy Sci 2002, 85:2197-2206.
• [22]Marnet PG, McKusick BC: Regulation of milk ejection and milkability in small ruminants. Livest Prod Sci 2001, 70:125-133.
• [23]Pfeilsticker HU, Bruckmaier RM, Blum JW: Cisternal milk in the dairy cow during lactation and after preceding teat stimulation. J Dairy Res 1996, 63:509-515.
• [24]Caja G, Such X, Rovai M: Udder morphology and machine milking ability in dairy sheep. Proc. 6th Great lakes Dairy Sheep Symp. Guelph, Ontario, Canada: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Dept. of Anim. Sci; 2000:17-40.
• [25]McKusick BC, Thomas DL, Berger YM: Effect of omission of machine stripping on milk production and parlor throughput in East Friesian dairy ewes. J Dairy Sci 2003, 86:680-687.
• [26]McKusick BC, Wiltbank MC, Sartori R, Marnet PG, Thomas DL: Effect of presence or absence of corpora lutea on milk production and composition of mid-lactation dairy ewes. J Dairy Sci 2002, 85:790-796.
• [27]Smith LW, Inskeep EK: Effect of progestins on lactation in the ewe. J Anim Sci 1970, 30:957-959.
• [28]Marnet PG, Negrão JA, Labussie’re J: Oxytocin release and milk ejection parameters during milking of dairy ewes in and out of natural season of lactation. Small Ruminant Res 1998, 28:183-191.
• [29]Dahl GE, Buchanan BA, Tucker HA: Photoperiodic effects on dairy cattle: a review. J Dairy Sci 2000, 83:885-893.
• [30]Bocquier F, Ligios S, Molle G, Casu S: Effect of photoperiod on milk, milk composition and voluntary food intake in lactating dairy ewes. Ann Zootech (Paris) 1997, 46:427-438.
• [31]Auchtung TL, Rius AG, Kendall PE, McFadden TB, Dahl GE: Effects of photoperiod during the dry period on prolactin, prolactin receptor, and milk production of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2005, 88:121-127.
• [32]Mabjeesh SJ, Gal-Garber O, Shamay A: Effect of photoperiod in the third trimester of gestation on milk production and circulating hormones in dairy goats. J Dairy Sci 2007, 90:699-705.
• [33]Mikolayunas CM, Thomas DL, Dahl GE, Gressley TF, Berger YM: Effect of prepartum photoperiod on milk production and prolactin concentration of dairy ewes. J Dairy Sci 2008, 91:85-90.
• [34]Mikolayunas CM, Thomas DL, Albrecht KA, Combs DK, Berger YM, Eckerman SR: Effects of supplementation and stage of lactation on performance of grazing dairy ewes. J Dairy Sci 2008, 91:1477-1485.
• [35]Cannas A: Feeding of lactating ewes. In Pages 123–166 in Dairy Sheep Feeding and Nutrition. Edited by Pulina G. Avenue Media, Bologna, Italy; 2002.
• [36]Mikolayunas-Sandrock C, Armentano LE, Thomas DL, Berger YM: Effect of protein degradability on milk production of dairy ewes. J Dairy Sci 2009, 92:4507-4513.
• [37]Mikolayunas C, Thomas DL, Armentano LE, Berger YM: Effect of rumen undegradable protein supplementation and fresh forage composition on nitrogen utilization of dairy ewes. J Dairy Sci 2011, 94:416-425.