期刊论文详细信息
Implementation Science
Protocol for the evaluation of a quality-based pay for performance scheme in Liberia
Rianna Mohammed2  Kenneth L Leonard3  Luke Bawo1 
[1] Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Monrovia, Liberia;The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA;Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland, College Park 20740, MD, USA
关键词: Health-care quality;    Pay for performance;    Results-based financing;    Performance-based financing;    Impact evaluation;    Liberia;   
Others  :  1137066
DOI  :  10.1186/s13012-014-0194-9
 received in 2014-09-12, accepted in 2014-12-16,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Improving the quality of care at hospitals is a key next step in rebuilding Liberia’s health system. In order to improve the efficiency, effectiveness, and quality of care at the secondary hospital level, the country is developing a system to upgrade health worker skills and competencies, and shifting towards improved provider accountability for results, including a Graduate Medical Residency Program (GMRP) and provider accountability for improvements in quality through performance-based financing (PBF) at the hospital level.

Methods/design

This document outlines the protocol for the impact evaluation of the hospital improvement program. The evaluation will provide an estimate of the impact of the project and investigate the mechanism for success in a way that can provide general lessons about the quality of health care in low-income countries. The evaluation aims 1) to provide the best possible estimate of program impact and 2) to quantitatively describe the changes that took place within facilities as a result of the program. In particular, the impact evaluation focuses on the changes in human resources within the hospitals. As such, we use a three-period intensive evaluation of treated and matched comparison hospitals to see how services change in treated hospitals as well as a continuous data collection effort to track the activities of individual health workers within treated hospitals.

Discussion

We are particularly interested in understanding how facilities met quality targets. Did they bring in new health workers with higher qualifications? Did they improve the knowledge or competence of their existing staff? Did they improve the availability of medicines and equipment so that the capacities of existing health workers were improved? Did they address the motivation of health workers so that individuals with the same competence and capacity were able to provide higher quality? And, if they did improve quality, did patients notice?

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Bawo et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150314090825917.pdf 1059KB PDF download
Figure 4. 27KB Image download
Figure 3. 32KB Image download
Figure 2. 35KB Image download
Figure 1. 77KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Government of Liberia, Health Systems 20/20 Project: Liberia National Health Accounts 2007/2008. Abt Associates Inc, Bethesda, MD; 2009.
  • [2]Liberia Institute of Statistics and Geo-Information Services (LISGIS) (Liberia), Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (Liberia), National AIDS Control Program (Liberia), Macro International Inc: Liberia demographic and health survey 2007. Liberia Institute of Statistics and Geo-Information Services (LISGIS) and Macro International Inc, Monrovia, Liberia; 2008.
  • [3]Liberia Institute of Statistics and Geo-Information Services: Human resources for health- 2009-v1.0. Liberia Institute of Statistics and Geo-Information Services, Monrovia, Liberia; 2009.
  • [4]Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (MOHSW): National Health Policy and Plan (NHPP). Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Monrovia, Liberia; 2007.
  • [5]Oxford Policy Management. Liberia health financing policy and strategic plan, 2011–2021: Draft paper for stakeholder consultation. 2011.
  • [6]Leonard KL, Masatu MC: Professionalism and the know-do gap: exploring intrinsic motivation among health workers in Tanzania. Health Econ 2010, 19(12):1461-77.
  • [7]Leonard KL, Masatu MC, Vialou A: Getting doctors to do their best. J Hum Resour 2007, 42(3):682-700.
  • [8]Das J, Hammer J: Location, location, location: residence, wealth and the quality of medical care in Delhi. India Health Aff 2007, 26(3):w338-51.
  • [9]Das J, Hammer J: Money for nothing, the dire straits of medical practice in Delhi. India J Dev Econ 2007, 83(1):1-36.
  • [10]Das J, Holla A, Das V, Mohanan M, Tabak D, Chan B: In urban and rural India, a standardized patient study showed low levels of provider training and huge quality gaps. Health Aff 2012, 31(12):2774-84.
  • [11]Rowe AK, de Savigny D, Lanata CF, Victoria CG: How can we achieve and maintain high-quality performance of health workers in low-resource settings? Lancet 2005, 366:1026-35.
  • [12]World Health Organization: Report WHO/EIP/KMS/2006.2: bridging the 'know-do' gap: meeting on knowledge translation in global health. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2005.
  • [13]Chandler CI, Chonya S, Mtei F, Reyburn H, Whitty CJ: Motivation, money and respect: a mixed-method study of Tanzanian non-physician clinicians. Soc Sci Med 2009, 68:2078-88.
  • [14]Prytherch H, Leshabari M, Wiskow C, Aninanya G, Kakoko D, Kagoné M, Burghardt J, Kynast-Wolf G, Marx M, Sauerborn R: The challenges of developing an instrument to assess health provider motivation at primary care level in rural Burkina Faso, Ghana and Tanzania. Global Health Action 2012, 5:1-18.
  • [15]Das J, Leonard KL: Using vignettes to measure the quality of health care. In Are you being served? New tools for measuring service delivery. Edited by Amin S, Das J, Goldstein M. The World Bank, Washington, D.C; 2008.
  • [16]Leonard KL, Masatu MC: The use of direct clinician observation and vignettes for health services quality evaluation in developing countries. Soc Sci Med 2005, 61(9):1944-51.
  • [17]Hanson JC, Leonard KL, Essam T: Listening while evaluating: examining the benefit of an NGO programme using season extenders (greenhouses) in Bosnia–Herzegovina. J Dev Effect 2013, 5(1):116-36.
  • [18]McKenzie D: Beyond baseline and follow-up: the case for more T in experiments. In BREAD working paper no. 291. Duke, Durham, NC; 2009.
  • [19]Wilson RM, Michel P, Olsen S, Gibberd RW, Vincent C, El-Assady R, Rasslan O, Qsous S, Macharia WM, Sahel A, Whittaker S, Abdo-Ali M, Letaief M, Ahmed NA, Abdellatif A, Larizgoitia I: Patient safety in developing countries: retrospective estimation of scale and nature of harm to patients in hospital. BMJ 2012, 344:e832.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:53次 浏览次数:19次