What are the non-food impacts of GM crop cultivation on farmers’ health?

Environmental Evidence

Decio Ripandelli²  Wendy Craig²  Dennis Ndolo Obonyo¹  Monica Racovita² 

[1] Biosafety Unit, ICGEB, Cape Town Component, UCT Campus, Anzio Rd Observatory, 7925 Cape Town, South Africa;Biosafety Unit, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), Trieste Component, Padriciano, 99, 34149 Trieste, Italy

关键词: Health expenditures;    Incomes;    Poisonings;    Pesticides;    Farmers;    GM Crops;   

Others  :  801121
DOI  :  10.1186/2047-2382-3-1

 received in 2013-08-19, accepted in 2013-12-11,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

With a steady increase in the area cultivated with genetically modified (GM) crops, the impacts of GM crop cultivation are coming under closer scrutiny around the world. The impacts on humans usually refer to possible risks to health occurring as a result of the GM food consumption. Other concerns, such as the claims of human health benefits arising from the cultivation of GM crops via reduced use of pesticides could be considered, if at all, under economic impacts of the technology. Similarly, other human health impacts could occur as a result of a modification of the amount of pesticides residues found in underground water, which could be considered under environmental impacts.

Yet many GM crops are not consumed on-farm, either because they require processing before becoming edible (such as soya bean, cottonseed and oilseed) or because the entire harvest is sold to maximise profits. It would be certainly difficult to demonstrate the importance of GM foods health effects versus the non-food health effects of GM crop cultivation on farmers. However, the non-food health effects, although apparently receiving less attention, deserve a closer look because of their potential economic and environmental links.

Methods/design

The primary research question is: What are the non-food impacts of GM crop cultivation on farmers’ health? To address specifically the main research question, the analysis focuses on two related secondary questions: 1) Does the cultivation of GM crops result in a lower number of pesticide-related poisonings? and 2) Does the cultivation of GM crops allow for higher financial resources to be used by farmers to improve their and their family’s health status? Further, the review will also evaluate the extent to which information relevant to the two secondary questions is freely-available. The abstracts of non-free articles, alongside their bibliographic details, will be included in a separate table, and if the information supplied would be detailed enough, a summary will be provided. The search and assessment methodologies (especially the search string, inclusion/exclusion criteria, data extraction table, data synthesis and presentation) were adapted following problems overcome, and experience gained, during a scoping search.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Racovita et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]James C: Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2012. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA; 2012. [ISAAA Brief No. 44. Executive Summary]
• [2]Brookes G, Barfoot P: The global income and production effects of genetically modified (GM) crops 1996–2011. GM Crops and Food: Biotechnology in Agriculture and the Food Chain 2013, 4(1):74-83.
• [3]Kleter G, Bhula R, Bodnaruk K, Carazo E, Felsot ES, Harris CA, Katayama A, Kuiper HA, Racke KD, Rubin B, Shevah Y, Stephenson GR, Tanaka K, Unsworth J, Wauchope RD, Wong S: Altered pesticide use on transgenic crops and the associated general impact from an environmental perspective. Pest Manag Sci 2007, 63:1107-1115.
• [4]Brookes G, Barfoot P: GM Crops: Global Socio-Economic and Environmental Impacts 1996-2008. Dorchester, UK: PG Economics Ltd; 2010.
• [5]Carpenter JE: Impact of GM crops on biodiversity. GM Crops 2011, 2(1):7-23.
• [6]Fawcett R, Towery D: Conservation Tillage and Plant Biotechnology: How New Technologies Can Improve the Environment By Reducing the Need to Plow. Indiana, USA: The Conservation Technology Information Center (CTIC); 2003.
• [7]Benbrook CM: Impacts of genetically engineered crops on pesticide use in the U.S. – the first sixteen years. Environ Sci Eur 2012, 24:1-24. BioMed Central Full Text
• [8]Gurian-Sherman D: Failure to yield. Evaluating the Performance of Genetically Engineered Crops. Cambridge, MA, USA: Union of Concerned Scientists; 2009.
• [9]Séralini G-E, Mesnage R, Clair E, Gress S, Spiroux De Vendômois J, Cellier D: Genetically modified crops safety assessments: present limits and possible improvements. Environ Sci Eur 2011, 23:1-10. BioMed Central Full Text
• [10]20 Questions on Genetically Modified (GM) Foods. World Health Organization; [http://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/biotech/20questions/en/ webcite]
• [11]Hossain F, Pray CE, Lu Y, Huang J, Fan C, Hu R: Genetically modified cotton and farmers’ health in China. Int J Occup Environ Health 2004, 10:296-303.
• [12]Hoddinott J: Agriculture, health, and nutrition: toward conceptualizing the linkages. In Reshaping Agriculture for Nutrition and Health. IFPRI 2020 Book. Edited by Shenggen F, Pandya-Lorch R. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute; 2012:13-20.
• [13]European Food Safety Authority: Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making. EFSA Journal 2010, 8(6):1637-1727.
• [14]Petticrew M, Roberts H: Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing; 2006.
• [15]Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation: Guidelines for Systematic Review in Environmental Management. Version 4.2. UK: Bangor University; 2013. [Environmental Evidence] Environmental Evidence: http://www.environmentalevidence.org/Documents/Guidelines.pdf webcite
• [16]The Cochrane Collaboration: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. In Edited by Higgins JPT, Green S. 2011. Available online at http://www.cochrane-handbook.org webcite
• [17]Masset E, Haddad L, Cornelius A, Isaza-Castro J: A Systematic Review of Agricultural Interventions That Aim to Improve Nutritional Status of Children. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London; 2011.
• [18]Hall C, Knight B, Ringrose S, Knox O: What have been the farm-level economic impacts of the global cultivation of GM crops?. 2013. [Collaboration for Environmental Evidence: CEE Review 11-002] http://www.environmentalevidence.org/SR11002.html webcite