Evaluation of the international forum on evidence informed health policymaking: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia – 27 to 31 August 2012

Health Research Policy and Systems

Markus Hultstrand Klint⁴  Ulysses Panisset²  John N Lavis³  Justin Neves¹ 

[1] McMaster University, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, 1280 Main St. West, MDCL-3107, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada;World Health Organization, 20 avenue Appia, Room E-173, Geneva CH-1211, Switzerland;McMaster University, PPD/CHEPA, 1280 Main St. West, CRL-209, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada;Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Gothenburg University, Box 414 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden

关键词: Questionnaires;    Meetings;    Evaluations;    Conferences;   

Others  :  802518
DOI  :  10.1186/1478-4505-12-14

 received in 2013-10-13, accepted in 2014-02-27,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Meetings and conferences are often used as a tool to disseminate information, network with colleagues, and/or set direction for a field of study, but there is little evidence to support whether such events achieve their objectives. This study evaluates the International Forum on Evidence Informed Health Policymaking (EIHP), a three-day meeting held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, in 2012, to determine the success of the meeting based on pre-determined objectives.

Methods

The evaluation strategy was developed based on a previously published conference evaluation framework and operationalized as an end-of-conference participant survey that incorporated both process (programme/organization) and outcome measures (potential changes in behaviour).

Results

Sixty seven of approximately 121 attendees filled out a questionnaire (a 55% response rate) and, overall, participants rated the programme components and plenary sessions very highly. The top three benefits reported by participants were: i) sharing experiences and lessons learned (75%); ii) new opportunities for future collaboration (69%); and iii) new knowledge (67%). Conversely, only 25% or less of meeting participants reported an intent to utilize any of the potential benefits highlighted in the questionnaire, with the notable exception of pursuing new opportunities for future collaboration.

Conclusions

The evaluation findings suggest that the International Forum achieved its objectives of sharing experiences with EIHP and providing opportunities for networking among EIHP initiatives, although there are limited prospects for direct improvements to efforts to support EIHP.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Neves et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]De Vries B, Pieters J: Knowledge sharing at conferences. Educ Res Eval 2007, 13:237-247.
• [2]Ioannidis JPA: Are medical conferences useful? And for whom? J Am Med Assoc 2012, 307:1257-1258.
• [3]Forsetlund L, Bjømdal A, Rashidian A, Jamtvedt G, O'Brien M, Wolf F, Davis D, Odgaard-Jensen J, Oxman AD: Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009, 2:CD003030.
• [4]Neves J, Lavis JN, Ranson MK: A scoping review about conference objectives and evaluative practices: how do we get more out of them? Health Res Policy Syst 2012, 10:26. BioMed Central Full Text
• [5]World Health Organization: Report on International Forum on Evidence Informed Health Policy in Low-and Middle-Income Countries. 2013. [ http://www.who.int/evidence/Addisreport2012.pdf webcite]
• [6]Evanoff DD, Bartholomew PF, DeYoung R, Lucaci C, Phillips RJ: Bank structure conference impact study. J Financ Serv Res 2008, 34:99-121.
• [7]Tepper SJ, Hinton S: The Measure of Meetings: Forums, Deliberation, and Cultural Policy. Princeton, USA: Princeton University; 2003.
• [8]Portnoy B, Miller J, Brown-Huamani K, DeVoto E: Impact of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on stimulating National Institutes of Health-funded research, 1998 to 2001. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2007, 23:343-348.