Evidence to inform intersectoral policies: a comparison of health and transport sector evidence in support of road traffic injury prevention

Health Research Policy and Systems

Sara Bennett¹  Kavi Bhalla¹  James Bao¹ 

[1] Health Systems Program, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA

关键词: Road traffic injury prevention;    Research evidence;    Intersectoral action;    Health in all policies;   

Others  :  1170916
DOI  :  10.1186/s12961-015-0008-9

 received in 2014-09-04, accepted in 2015-02-26,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Health is influenced by determinants beyond the traditional conception of the health sector. Increasingly, global actors are targeting policymakers at global and national levels to take an intersectoral approach to health issues. Multilateral organizations in the health and transport communities have published policy reports targeting policymakers to address the burden of road traffic injuries. However, these reports stem from sectors grounded in different disciplinary perspectives. We investigate whether sectors have differing evidentiary traditions by analyzing differences regarding author networks, type of evidence cited, recommendations, and indicators.

Methods

We selected global policy reports on road traffic injury prevention based upon expert opinion and categorized them by sector according to their institutional publisher. For each report, we i) conducted an authorship analysis by sectoral affiliation; ii) analyzed the types of research evidence cited and categorized the evidence type and institutional nature of the publisher; iii) analyzed key recommendations by extracting recommendations presented in the concluding sections of the documents; and iv) examined the use of indicators. Descriptive statistics were used to determine whether dimensions differed by the sectoral affiliation of the policy report.

Results

Authorship was dominated by the sector from which the report was published, while reports that involved both sectors often showed clustering of authors in one sector or another, depending on the subject addressed. Reports originating from different sectors preferentially cited different types of evidence; notably, health sector reports emphasized observational studies and reviews, while transport sector reports drew heavily on government agency reports. There were no differences in recommendations and indicators used.

Conclusions

Notions of knowledge validity and valuations of evidence vary depending on the field’s historical development. Such differences in valuing evidence within sectors may have the potential to undermine the application of evidence in intersectoral policymaking. Strategies to address this challenge include the identification of key individuals to connect separate sectors, knowledge translation activities that take account of sectoral differences, and the tailoring of messages to different audiences. Future analyses on other intersectoral issues may provide clarity on points of tension and differing types of evidence used in intersectoral work.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Bao et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]World Health Organization: Constitution of the World Health Organization. WHO, Geneva; 1946.
• [2]World Health Organization: Public Health Agency of Canada. Health equity through intersectoral action: an analysis of 18 country case studies. WHO, Geneva; 2008.
• [3]Marmot M, Friel S, Bell R, Houweling TA, Taylor S: Closing the gap in a generation – Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. WHO, Geneva; 2008.
• [4]United Nations General Assembly. Prevention and control of non-communicable diseases, report of the Secretary General. New York, UN: 2011.
• [5]Dye C, Reeder JC, Terry RF: The world health report 2013: research for universal health coverage. WHO, Geneva; 2013.
• [6]Banta DH: Considerations in defining evidence for public health. Int J of Technol Assess Health Care 2003, 19(3):559-72.
• [7]Lavis JN, Forest P, Lazar H: Introduction: learning from a time when healthcare was “high politics,” big-bang reforms the focus, and money scarce. McMaster University: Program in policy decision-making, Hamilton; 2009.
• [8]Oxman AD, Lavis JN, Lewin S, Fretheim A: SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed health policymaking (STP) 1: What is evidence-informed policymaking? Heal Res Policy Syst 2009, 7(Suppl 1):S1.
• [9]World Health Organization, Government of South Australia: The Adelaide statement on health in all policies: Moving towards a shared governance for health and well-being. WHO, Geneva; 2010.
• [10]Kuhn TS: The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago University Press, Chicago; 1996.
• [11]Lele S, Norgaard RB: Practicing interdisciplinarity. Bioscience 2005, 55(11):967-75.
• [12]McLaren L, Shiell A, Ghali L, Lorenzetti D, Rock M, Huculak S: Are integrated approaches working to promote healthy weights and prevent obesity and chronic disease?. Centre for Health & Policy Studies, Dept Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary; 2004.
• [13]Friel S, Chopra M, Satcher D: Unequal weight: equity oriented policy responses to the global obesity epidemic. BMJ 2007, 335(7632):1241-3.
• [14]Naylor P-J, Macdonald HM, Reed KE, McKay HA: Action Schools! BC: a socioecological approach to modifying chronic disease risk factors in elementary school children. Prev Chronic Dis 2006, 3(2):A60.
• [15]World Health Organization: Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases: Report of a joint WHO/FAO expert consultation. WHO, Geneva; 2003.
• [16]Bhalla K, Shotten M, Cohen A, Brauer M, Shahraz S, Burnett R, et al.: Transport for health: the global burden of disease due to injuries and air pollution from motorized road transport. World Bank Global Road Safety Facility, and Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Washington, DC; 2014.
• [17]Ault SK: Intersectoral approaches to neglected diseases. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008, 1136(1):64-9.
• [18]Seimenis A: Capacity building for zoonotic and foodborne diseases in the Mediterranean and Middle East regions (an intersectoral WHO/MZCP proposed strategy). Int J Antimicrob Agents 2010, 36:S75-9.
• [19]Zinsstag J, Schelling E, Wyss K, Mahamat MB: Potential of cooperation between human and animal health to strengthen health systems. Lancet 2006, 366(9503):2142-5.
• [20]Dixon J, Sindall C, Banwell C: Exploring the intersectoral partnerships guiding Australia’s dietary advice. Health Promot Int 2004, 19(1):5-13.
• [21]Hawkes C, Ruel M: The links between agriculture and health: an intersectoral opportunity to improve the health and livelihoods of the poor. Bull World Health Organ 2006, 84(12):984-90.
• [22]Puska P, Ståhl T: Health in all policies – the Finnish initiative: background, principles, and current issues. Annu Rev Public Health 2010, 31:315-28.
• [23]Guyon AB, Quinn VJ, Hainsworth M, Ravonimanantsoa P, Ravelojoana V, Rambeloson Z, et al.: Implementing an integrated nutrition package at large scale in Madagascar: the Essential Nutrition Actions framework. Food Nutr Bull 2009, 30(3):233-44.
• [24]Harris J, Drimie S: Toward an integrated approach for addressing malnutrition in Zambia: a literature review and institutional analysis. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC; 2012.
• [25]Peden M, Surfield R, Sleet D, Mohan D, Hyder AA, Jarawan E, et al.: World report on road traffic injury prevention. WHO, Geneva; 2004.
• [26]Haddon W: Advances in the epidemiology of injuries as a basis for public policy. Public Health Rep 1980, 95(5):411-21.
• [27]World Health Organization: Global status report on road safety 2013: Supporting a decade of action. WHO, Geneva; 2013.
• [28]Hyder AA, Allen KA, Peters DH, Chandran A, Bishai D: Large-scale road safety programmes in low- and middle-income countries: an opportunity to generate evidence. Global Public Health 2013, 8(5):504-18.
• [29]Partnership on Sustainable Low Carbon Transport. Creating universal access to safe, clean and affordable transport – status report. 2013. http://slocat.net/sites/default/files/u10/slocat_status_report_rio_20-_june_19_2013_1.pdf.
• [30]Bloomberg Philanthropies. Leading the worldwide movement to improve road safety. 2012. http://mikebloomberg.com/Bloomberg_Philanthropies_Leading_the_Worldwide_Movement_to_Improve_Road_Safety.pdf.
• [31]Hoffman SJ, Lavis JN, Bennett S: The use of research evidence in two international organizations’ recommendations about health systems. Health Policy 2009, 5(1):66-86.
• [32]Schintler L, McNeely CL, Galiazzo G: Exploring biomedical workforce development and productivity: gendered reflections and challenges. World Med Health Pol 2011, 3(2):1-12.
• [33]World Health Organization: Strengthening road safety legislation: a practice and resource manual for countries. WHO, Geneva; 2013.
• [34]Croft P, Job S, Khayesi M, Kobusingye O, Peden M: Pedestrian safety: a road safety manual for decision-makers and practitioners. WHO, Geneva; 2009.
• [35]Bliss A, Ward D, Krug E, McMahon K, Downing A: Seat belts and child restraints: a road safety manual for decision-makers and practitioners. WHO, Geneva; 2008.
• [36]Howard E, Mooren L, Nillson G, Quimby A, Vadeby A: Speed management: a road safety manual for decision-makers and practitioners. WHO, Geneva; 2008.
• [37]Global Road Safety Partnership: Drinking and driving: a road safety manual for decision-makers and practitioners. WHO, Geneva; 2007.
• [38]UN Road Safety Collaboration: Helmets: a road safety manual for decision-makers and practitioners. WHO, Geneva; 2006.
• [39]Breen J, Humphreys RM, Melibaeva S: Guidelines for mainstreaming road safety in regional trade road corridors. World Bank, Washington, DC; 2013.
• [40]Howard E, Johnston I, Langford J, Small M, Jonah B, Stipdonk H, et al.: Towards zero: Ambitious road safety targets and the safe system approach. International Transport Forum/OECD, Paris; 2008.
• [41]Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development: Safety on roads: what’s the vision?. OECD, Paris; 2002.
• [42]Bliss T, Breen J. Country guidelines for the conduct of road safety management capacity reviews and the specification of lead agency reforms, investment strategies and safe system projects: implementing the recommendations of the world report on road traffic injury prevention. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2004.
• [43]Haas PM: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. Int Organ 1992, 46(1):367-90.
• [44]Shiffman J, Smith S: Generation of political priority for global health initiatives: a framework and case study of maternal mortality. Lancet 2007, 370:1370-9.
• [45]Eyles J, Robinson K, Elliot S: An epistemic community comes and goes? Local and national expressions of heart health promotion in Canada. BMC Health Serv Res 2009, 9:35.
• [46]Evans D: Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions. J Clin Nurs 2003, 12(1):77-84.
• [47]Petticrew M, Roberts H: Evidence, hierarchies and typologies: horses for courses. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003, 57:527-9.
• [48]Burnham J: Accident prone: a history of technology, psychology, and misfits of the machine age. Chicago University Press, Chicago; 2009.
• [49]Bhalla K: Case study: institutionalizing road safety management in Argentina. World Bank, Washington, DC; 2014.
• [50]Dankwa-Mullan I, Rhee KB, Stoff DM, Pohlhaus JR, Sy FS, Stinson N Jr, et al.: Moving toward paradigm-shifting research in health disparities through translational, transformational, and transdisciplinary approaches. Am J Public Health 2010, 100(Suppl 1):S19-24.
• [51]Rashid JR, Spengler RF, Wagner RM, Melanson C, Skillen EL, Mays RA Jr, et al.: Eliminating health disparities through transdisciplinary research, cross-agency collaboration, and public participation. Am J Public Health 2009, 99(11):1955-61.
• [52]Long JC, Cunningham FC, Braithwaite J: Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2013, 13:158.
• [53]Lavis JN, Lomas J, Hamid M, Sewankambo NK: Assessing country-level efforts to link research to action. Bull World Health Organ 2006, 84:620-8.