Ethnobotanical study of homegarden plants in Sebeta-Awas District of the Oromia Region of Ethiopia to assess use, species diversity and management practices

Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine

Ensermu Kelbessa¹  Mirutse Giday³  Tefera Mekonen² 

[1] The National Herbarium, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia;Environmental Science Program, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia;Aklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

关键词: Ethiopia;    Sebeta-Awas;    Local knowledge;    Agrobiodiversity;    Homegarden;   

Others  :  1230074
DOI  :  10.1186/s13002-015-0049-8

 received in 2015-05-26, accepted in 2015-08-14,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Homegardens in Ethiopia are currently facing different threats mainly due genetic erosion, loss of traditional knowledge on their use and management and drought. On the other hand, research and documentation works on homegardens in the country are very limited. There is no previous report indicating conduct of ethnobotanical study on homegardens in selected study district. The present study thus attempted to document knowledge on uses and management practices of homegardens by people in study district.

Methods

The study was conducted in Sebeta-Awas District, Southwestern Shewa Zone of Oromia Region, Ethiopia, between March and September 2009 to assess use, species diversity and conservation status of homegardens in the District. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews as well as through homegarden visits, market surveys and different ranking exercises. For the semi-structured interviews, 42 homegarden owners were selected randomly from seven sampled kebeles (smallest administrative units in Ethiopia), six from each kebele. For different ranking exercises, 14 informants (10 males and 4 females) were sampled using convenient sampling method from among homegarden owners that already participated in semi-structured interviews.

Results

In total, 113 plant species belonging to 46 families were recorded from the study area, of which 45 (39.8 %) were herbs, 34 (30.1 %) were trees, 26 (23.0 %) were shrubs and 8 (7.1 %) were climbers. Fabaceae had the highest number of species, followed by the families Asteraceae, Lamiaceae and Solanaceae. The cash crops Catha edulis, Rhamnus prinoides and Ruta chalepensis were the most frequently encountered homegarden plants. Cupressus lusitanica, Eucalyptus camaldulensis and Faidherbia albida were the most abundant tree species that had the highest densities of occurrence. Of the recorded plant species, 25 % were used as sources of food, 13 % as medicine and 10 % as household tools.

Conclusion

It can be concluded that homegardens in the study area are rich in crops and, therefore, significantly contribute to the agrobiodiversity of the study District, in particular, and Ethiopia, in general.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Mekonen et al.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Christanty L. Homegardens in tropical Asia with special references to Indonesia. In: Tropical homegardens. Ladue K, Brazil M, editors. The United Nations University Press, Tokyo; 1990: p.9-20.
• [2]Fernandes ECM, Nair PKR. An evolution of the structure and function of tropical homegardens. Agric Syst. 1986; 21:279-310.
• [3]Hoogerbrugge ID, Fresco LO. Homegarden system: agricultural characteristics and challenges. Gatekeeper series no. 39. International Institute for Environment and Development, London; 1993.
• [4]Kumar BM, Nair PKR. The enigma of tropical homegardens. Agrofor Syst. 2004; 61:135-52.
• [5]Agbogidi OM, Adolor EB. Home gardens in the maintenance of biological diversity. Appl Sci Rep. 2013; 1:19-25.
• [6]Hodgkin T. Home gardens and the maintenance of genetic diversity. In: Proceedings of the second international home gardens workshop: contribution of home gardens to in situ conservation of plant genetic resources in farming systems: 17–19 July 2001. Watson JW, Eyzaguirre PB, editors. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome; 2002: p.14-8.
• [7]Brownrigg L. Homegardening in international development: What the literature shows. Washington, League for International Food Education; 1985.
• [8]Agize M, Demissew S, Asfaw Z. Indigenous knowledge on management of home gardens and plants in Loma and Gena Bosa districts (weredas) of Dawro Zone, Southern Ethiopia: plant biodiversity conservation, sustainable utilization and environmental protection. Int J Sci: Basic Appl Res (IJSBAR). 2013; 10:63-99.
• [9]Godbole A. Maintenance of biodiversity. In: Applied ethnobotany in natural resources management. Rastogi A, Godbole A, Shengii P, editors. International Center for Integrated Mountain Development, Nepal; 1998: p.9-12.
• [10]Okigbo NB. Homegardens in tropical Africa. In: Tropical homegardens. Landauer K, Brazil M, editors. UNU, Tokyo; 1990: p.21-40.
• [11]Padoch C, Jong W. The house gardens of Santa Rosa: diversity and variability in an Amazonian agricultural system. Econ Bot. 1991; 45:166-75.
• [12]Asfaw Z. Home gardens in Ethiopia: some observations and generalizations. In: Proceedings of the second international home gardens workshop: contribution of home gardens to in situ conservation of plant genetic resources in farming systems, 17–19 July 2001. Watson JW, Eyzaguirre PB, editors. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome; 2002: p.128139.
• [13]Ehret C. On the antiquity of agriculture in Ethiopia. J Afr Hist. 1979; 20:161-77.
• [14]Brandt SA. New perspectives on the origins of food production in Ethiopia. In: From hunters to farmers: the causes and consequences of food production in Africa. Clark JD, Brandt SA, editors. University of California Press, Berkeley; 1984: p.173-90.
• [15]Asfaw Z, Nigatu A. Homegardens in Ethiopia: characteristics and plant diversity. SINET: Ethiop J Sci. 1995; 18:235-66.
• [16]Asfaw Z. Survey of indigenous food plants, their preparations and home gardens in Ethiopia. Indigenous food crops and useful plants. 1997. UNU/INRA Assessment Series No. B6
• [17]Asfaw Z. The role of homegardens in the production and conservation of medicinal plants. In: Proceedings of the National workshop on biodiversity conservation and sustainable use of medicinal plants in Ethiopia: 28 April - 01 May 1998. Zewdu M, Demissie A, editors. Institute of Biodiversity Conservation and Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; 2001: p.76-91.
• [18]Asfaw Z. Origin and evolution of rural homegardens in Ethiopia. In: Proceedings of the third International symposium on the Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea: biodiversity research in the horn of Africa region, August 25–27, 1999. Friis I, Ryding O, editors. Carlsberg Academy, Copenhagen; 2001: p.273-86.
• [19]Vavilov NI. The origin, variation, immunity and breeding of cultivated plants: selected writings. Translated from the Russian by Chester S K. The Ronald Company, New York; 1951.
• [20]Asfaw Z. Homegarden and agrobiodiversity. In: The enset based homegardens of Ethiopia. Eyzaguirre PB, Linares OF, editors. Smithsonian Institution, Washington; 2004: p.123-147.
• [21]Asfaw Z, Woldu Z. Crop association of homegardens in Walayta and Gurage in Southern Ethiopia. SINET: Ethiop J Sci. 1997; 20:73-90.
• [22]Woldeyes F. A study on Biodiversity Management in Daddegoyo (Tradition Homegardens) by Kaficho People of Bonga area (Southwestern Ethiopia): an ethnobotanical approach. Addis Ababa University, MSc thesis; 2000.
• [23]Wassihun B, Asfaw Z, Demissew S. Ethnobotanical study of useful plants in Daniio Gade (homegardens) in southern Ethiopia. Ethiop J Biol Sci. 2003; 2:119-41.
• [24]Abebe T. Diversity in homegarden agroforestry systems of Southern Ethiopia. PhD dissertation. Wageningen University, Netherlands; 2005.
• [25]Seta T. Diversity in ensete-based homegardens and its significance to household supply in Welayta (Southern Ethiopia): an ethnobotanical approach. Addis Ababa University, MSc thesis; 2007.
• [26]Hailu H, Asfaw Z. Homegardens and agrobiodiversity conservation in Sabata town, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. SINET: Ethiop J Sci. 2011; 34:1-16.
• [27]Gutema T. Agricultural land use in Alamganaa Woreda. Addis Ababa University, BA Senior Essay; 1997.
• [28]Alexiades M. Collecting ethnobotanical data: an introduction to basic concepts and techniques. In: Selected guideline for ethnobotanical research: a field manual. Alexiades MN, editor. The New York Botanical Garden, New York; 1996: p.52-94.
• [29]Cotton CM. Ethnobotany: principle and applications. Chichester, John Wiley Sons Ltd; 1996.
• [30]Martin GJ. Ethnobotany: a method manual. Chapman and Hall, London; 1995.
• [31]ISE. International Society of Ethnobiology Code of Ethics. http://ethnobiology. net/code-of-ethics webcite
• [32]Kent M, Coker P. Vegetation description and analysis: a practical approach. John Wiley and Sons, New York; 1992.
• [33]Krebs C. Ecological methodology. Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers, Menlo Park, California; 1999.
• [34]Rugalema GH, Okting’ati A, Johnson FH. The homegarden agroforestry systems of Bukoba district, North-Western Tanzania. Agrofor Syst. 1994; 26:53-64.
• [35]Bennett-Lartey SO, Ayernor GS, Markwei CM, Asante IK, Abbiw DK, Boateng SK et al.. Aspects of home-garden cultivation in Ghana: regional differences in ecology and society. In: Homegardens and agrobiodiversity. Eyzaguirre PB, Linares OF, editors. Smithsonian Institution, Washington; 2004: p.148-67.
• [36]Trinh LN, Watson JM, Hue NN, De NN, Minh MV, Chu P et al.. Agrobiodiversity conservation and development in Vietnamese homegardens. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2003; 2033:1-28.
• [37]Alvarez-Buylla Roches ME, Lazos Chavero E, Garcia-Barrios JR. Homegardens of a humid tropical region in Southeast Mexico: an example of an agroforestry cropping system in a recently established community. Agrofor Syst. 1989; 8:133-56.
• [38]Niñez V. Working at half-potential: constructive analysis of home garden programmes in the Lima slums with suggestions for an alternative approach. Food Nutr Bull. 1985; 7:6-14.
• [39]Brookfield H. Exploring of agrobiodiverity. Columbia University, New York; 2001.
• [40]Amberber M, Argaw M, Asfaw Z. The role of homegardens for in situ conservation of plant biodiversity in Holeta Town, Oromia National Regional State, Ethiopia. Int J Biodivers Conserv. 2014; 6:8-16.
• [41]Mekonnen EL, Asfaw Z, Zewdie S. Plant species diversity of homegarden agroforestry in Jabithenan District, north-west Ethiopia. Int J Biodivers Conserv. 2014; 6:301-7.
• [42]Arnold JEM, Dewees PA. Tree management in farmer strategies: responses to agricultural intensification. Oxford University Press, Oxford; 1995.
• [43]Mergen F. Research opportunities to improve the production of homegardens. Agrofor Syst. 1987; 5:57-67.
• [44]Michon G, Bompard J, Ducatilion C. Tropical forest architectural analysis as applied to agroforests in the humid tropics: the example of traditional village agroforests in West Java. Agrofor Syst. 1983; 1:117-29.
• [45]Soemarwoto O. Homegardens: a traditional agroforestry system with promising future. In: Agroforestery: a decade of development. Steppler HA, Nair PKR, editors. ICRAF, Nairobi, Kenya; 1987: p.157-72.
• [46]Wiersum KF. Fuelwood in Indonesia: future prospects for a traditional energy source. Mimeograph. Institute of Ecology, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia; 1982.
• [47]Gautam R, Sthapit BR, Shrestha PK. Home gardens in Nepal: Proceeding of a workshop on enhancing the contribution of home garden to on-farm management of plant genetic resources and to improve the livelihoods of Nepalese farmers: lessons learned and policy implications, 6–7 August 2004. LI-BIRD, Biodiversity International and SDC, Pokhara, Nepal; 2006.
• [48]Marsh R. Building on traditional gardening to improve household food security. Food nutrition and agriculture no. 20. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome; 1998. [http://www. fao.org/docrep/x0051t/x0051t02.htm]
• [49]Vasey DE. Household gardens and their niche in Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea. Food Nutr Bull. 1985; 7:37-43.