IDEAS for a healthy baby - reducing disparities in use of publicly reported quality data: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials

Peter K Lindenauer²  Kathleen M Mazor⁴  Tara Lagu²  Katharine O White³  Penelope S Pekow¹  Sarah L Goff² 

[1] Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA;Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center Springfield, MA and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA;Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baystate Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA;University of Massachusetts Medical Center, and Meyers Primary Care Institute, Worcester, MA, USA

关键词: Randomized trials;    Intervention studies;    Pregnancy;    Patient navigator;    Pediatric;    Publicly reported quality data;   

Others  :  1093285
DOI  :  10.1186/1745-6215-14-244

 received in 2013-05-21, accepted in 2013-08-01,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Publicly reported performance on quality measures is intended to enable patients to make more informed choices. Despite the growing availability of these reports, patients’ use remains limited and disparities exist. Low health literacy and numeracy are two barriers that may contribute to these disparities. Patient navigators have helped patients overcome barriers such as these in other areas, such as cancer care and may prove useful for overcoming barriers to using publicly reported quality data.

Methods/Design

The goals of this study are: to determine the efficacy of a patient navigator intervention to assist low-income pregnant women in the use of publicly available information about quality of care when choosing a pediatrician; to evaluate the relative importance of factors influencing women’s choice of pediatric practices; to evaluate the effect of the intervention on patient engagement in management of their own and their child’s health care; and to assess variation in efficacy of the intervention for sub-groups based on parity, age, and race/ethnicity. English speaking women ages 16 to 50 attending a prenatal clinic at a large urban medical center will be randomized to receive an in-person navigator intervention or an informational pamphlet control between 20 to 34 weeks of gestation. The intervention will include in-person guided use of the Massachusetts Health Quality Partners website, which reports pediatric practices’ performance on quality measures and patient experience. The primary study outcomes will be the mean scores on a) clinical quality and b) patient experience measures.

Discussion

Successful completion of the study aims will yield important new knowledge about the value of guided website navigation as a strategy to increase the impact of publicly reported quality data and to reduce disparities in use of these data.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01784575

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Goff et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ: National vital statistics reports. Births: preliminary data for 2009. The Centers for Disease Control 2010., 59(3) http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr59/nvsr59_03.pdf webcite
• [2]Child trends data bank Well-Child Visits 2010. http://www.childtrendsdatabank.org/?q=node/85 webcite
• [3]Brown B, Weitzman M, Bzostek S, Kavanaugh M, Aufseeser D, Bagley S, Berry D, Auinger P: Early child development in social context: a chartbook. The Commonwealth Fundhttp://www.commonwealthfund.org/usr_doc/ChildDevChartbk.pdf webcite
• [4]National institutes of health Medline plus Well-child Visits 2011. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/001928.htm webcite
• [5]Chung PJ, Lee TC, Morrison MA, Schuster MA: Preventive care for children in the United States: quality and barriers. Annu Rev Public Health 2006, 27:491-551.
• [6]Hakim RB, Ronsaville DS: Effect of compliance with health supervision guidelines among U.S. infants on emergency department visits. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002, 156:1015-1020.
• [7]Rosenberg SA, Zhang D, Robinson CC: Prevalence of developmental delays and participation in early intervention services for young children. Pediatrics 2008, 121:e1503-e1509.
• [8]Sice L: Developmental screening in primary care: the effectiveness of current practice and recommendations for improvement. The Commonwealth Fund 2007. http://www.commonwealthfund.org/usr_doc/1082_sices_developmental_screening_primary_care.pdf?section=4039 webcite
• [9]Rising to the challenge: results from a scorecard on local health system performance Commonwealth Fund 2012. http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Publications/Fund-Reports/2012/Mar/Local-Scorecard.aspx webcite
• [10]National committee for quality assurance report: health care quality improves but varies across different regions of the country. http://www.ncqa.org/tabid/847/Default.aspx webcite
• [11]Collins MM, O’Sullivan T, Harkins V, Perry IJ: Quality of life and quality of care in patients with diabetes experiencing different models of care. Diabetes Care 2009, 32(4):603-605.
• [12]Henry J Kaiser Family Foundation: 2008 Update on Consumers’ views of patient safety and quality information. 2400 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025; 2008. Publication #7819
• [13]Berwick DM, James B, Coye MJ: Connections between quality measurement and improvement. Med Care 2003, 41(Suppl 1):130-138.
• [14]Ketelaar NA, Faber MJ, Flottorp S, Rygh LH, Deane KH, Eccles MP: Public release of performance data in changing the behaviour of healthcare consumers, professionals or organisations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011., 11CD004538
• [15]Hibbard J, Sofaer S, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Best practices in public reporting No. 3: How to maximize public awareness and Use of comparative quality reports through effective promotion and dissemination strategies. In AHRQ publication No. 10-0082-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2010. http://www.ahrq.gov/legacy/qual/pubrptguide3.htm webcite
• [16]Hibbard J, Sofaer S, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Best practices in public reporting No. 1: How to effectively present health care performance data to consumers. AHRQ publication No. 10-0082-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2010. http://www.ahrq.gov/legacy/qual/pubrptguide1.htm webcite
• [17]Hibbard JH, Peters E, Dixon A, Tusler M: Consumer competencies and the use of comparative quality information: it isn’t just about literacy. Med Care Res Rev 2007, 64:379-394.
• [18]Hibbard JH, Jewett JJ: Will quality report cards help consumers? Health Aff (Millwood) 1997, 16:218-228.
• [19]Hibbard JH, Greene J, Daniel D: What is quality anyway? performance reports that clearly communicate to consumers the meaning of quality of care. Med Care Res Rev 2010, 67:275-293.
• [20]Bardach NS, Hibbard HJ, Dudley RA, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Users of public reports of hospital quality: who, what, why, and how? an aggregate analysis of 16 online public reporting Web sites and users’ and experts’ suggestions for improvement. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011. AHRQ Publication No. 12-0016-EF
• [21]Massachusetts health quality partners, quality insights. http://www.mhqp.org/default.asp?nav=010000 webcite
• [22]Phillips CE, Rothstein JD, Beaver K, Sherman BJ, Freund KM, Battaglia TA: Patient navigation to increase mammography screening among inner city women. J Gen Intern Med 2011, 26:123-129.
• [23]Battaglia TA, Roloff K, Posner MA, Freund KM: Improving follow-up to abnormal breast cancer screening in an urban population. A patient navigation intervention. Cancer 2007, 109(Suppl 2):359-367.
• [24]Hunnibell LS, Rose MG, Connery DM, Gren CE, Hampel JM, Rosa M, Vogel DC: Using nurse navigation to improve timeliness of lung cancer care at a veterans’ hospital. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2012, 16:29-36.
• [25]Lopez L, Grant RW: Closing the gap: eliminating health care disparities among Latinos with diabetes using health information technology tools and patient navigators. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2012, 6:169-176.
• [26]Hendren S, Chin N, Fisher S, Winters P, Griggs J, Mohile S, Fiscella K: Patients’ barriers to receipt of cancer care, and factors associated with needing more assistance from a patient navigator. J Natl Med Assoc 2011, 103:701-710.
• [27]Natale-Pereira A, Enard KR, Nevarez L, Jones LA: The role of patient navigators in eliminating health disparities. Cancer 2011, 117(Suppl 15):3543-3552.
• [28]Chasan-Taber L, Silveira M, Marcus BH, Braun B, Stanek E, Markenson G: Feasibility and efficacy of a physical activity intervention among pregnant women: the behaviors affecting baby and you (B.A.B.Y.) study. J Phys Act Health 2011, 8(Suppl 2):S228-S238.
• [29]Yudkowsky BK, Tang SS, Siston AM, American Academy of Pediatrics: Division of Health Policy Research. Pediatrician Participation in Medicaid/SCHIP. Survey of the Fellows of the American Academy of Pediatrics. 2000. Health http://www2.aap.org/research/med-schip/dpc/ma.pdf webcite
• [30]Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Mahoney ER, Tusler M: Development of the patient activation measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv Res 2004, 39:1005-1026.
• [31]Pennarola BW, Rodday AM, Mayer DK, Ratichek SJ, Davies SM, Syrjala KL, Patel S, Bingen K, Kupst MJ, Schwartz L, Guinan EC, Hibbard JH, Parsons SK: Factors associated with parental activation in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Med Care Res Rev 2011, 69:194-214.
• [32]McDonald EM, Frattaroli S, Edsall Kromm E, Ma X, Pike M, Holtgrave D: Improvements in health behaviors and health status among newly insured members of an innovative health access plan. J Community Health 2013, 38:301-309.
• [33]Den D, Lu WH, Weintraub MR, Maranda MJ, Elshafey S, Gold MR: The impact of different modalities for activating patients in a community health center setting. Patient Educ Couns 2012, 89:178-183.
• [34]US Department of Commerce: United States Census Bureau: QuickFacts. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html webcite
• [35]Heppner WL, Ji L, Reitzel LR, Castro Y, Correa-Fernandez V, Vidrine JI, Li Y, Dolan-Mullen P, Velasquez MM, Cinciripini PM, Cofta-Woerpel L, Greisinger A, Wetter D: The role of prepartum motivation in the maintenance of postpartum smoking abstinence. Health Psychol 2011, 30:736-745.
• [36]Blumenthal DM, Song Z, Jena AB, Ferris TG: Guidance for structuring team-based incentives in healthcare. Am J Manag Care 2013, 19:e64-e70.