Attitudes and local ecological knowledge of experts fishermen in relation to conservation and bycatch of sea turtles (reptilia: testudines), Southern Bahia, Brazil

Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine

Alexandre Schiavetti¹  Heitor de Oliveira Braga² 

[1] Departamento de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais (DCAA), Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz – UESC, Rodovia Jorge Amado km16, Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil;Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz - UESC, Rodovia Jorge Amado km16, Ilhéus, Brazil

关键词: Taboos;    Marine conservation;    Marine turtle;   

Others  :  862540
DOI  :  10.1186/1746-4269-9-15

 received in 2012-10-12, accepted in 2013-02-26,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

The use of ethnoecological tools to evaluate possible damage and loss of biodiversity related to the populations of species under some degree of threat may represent a first step towards integrating the political management of natural resources and conservation strategies. From this perspective, this study investigates fishermen’s ecological knowledge about sea turtles and attitudes towards the conservation and bycatch in Ilhéus, Southern Bahia, Brazil.

Methods

Fishermen experts semi-structured interviews were performed using snowball sampling method. The interviews consisted of a series of questions relating to the fishermen’s profile, structure and work equipment, the local ecological knowledge of fishermen about sea turtles and bycatch, a projective test, attitudes towards turtle conservation and beliefs and taboos regarding turtles. Indicators for quantitative comparisons of respondents in terms of their broad knowledge and attitudes towards turtle conservation were created. Correlation analyses were made between indicators of knowledge and attitude as well as the relationship between education level and knowledge and attitudes.

Results

Thirty experts were interviewed for the study. The local ecological knowledge and attitudes of fishermen towards the conservation of sea turtles were respectively medium (0.43) and moderate (0.69) according to experts (based on Likert scale and Cronbach’s Alpha). Potential areas of spawning were reported from Barra Grande to Una covering the entire coast of Ilhéus. Methods for identifying the animal, behavior, and popular names were described by fishermen. The most recent captures of turtles were attributed to fishing line, but according to the respondents, lobster nets and shrimp traps are more likely to capture turtles. Knowledge and attitudes were weakly inversely correlated (r = −0.38, p = 0.04), and the education level of the respondent showed a positive correlation with positive attitudes towards turtle conservation (H = 8.33; p = 0.04). Life history, habitat, specific and exogenous taboos, beliefs and the use of hawksbill turtle to make glasses and other handcrafts are also reported in the study.

Conclusions

Monitoring of spawning areas, preservation of traditional practices, strategies to moderate the use of fishery resources and the local ecological knowledge/attitudes can provide data to improve the conservation practices and management of sea turtles.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Braga and Schiavetti; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Plotkin PT, Spotila JR: Post-nesting migrations of loggerhead turtles caretta caretta from Georgia, USA: conservation implications for a genetically distinct subpopulation. Oryx 2002, 36:396-399.
• [2]Godley BJ, Lima EHSM, Åkesson S, Broderick AC, Glen F, Godfrey MH, Luschi P, Hays GC: Movement patterns of green turtles in Brazilian coastal waters described by satellite tracking and flipper tagging. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2003, 253:279-288.
• [3]IUCN: International Union for Conservation of nature: IUCN Red list of threatened species. http://www.iucn.org/about/work/programmes/species/our_work/the_iucn_red_list/ webcite
• [4]Almeida AP, Santos AJB, Thomé JCA, Belini C, Baptistotte C, Marcovaldi MA, Santos ASS, Lopez M: Avaliação do estado de conservação da tartaruga marinha chelonia mydas (linnaeus, 1758) no Brasil. Biodiversidade Brasileira 2011, 1:12-19.
• [5]Almeida AP, Thomé JCA, Baptistotte C, Marcovaldi MA, Santos AS, Lopez M: Avaliação do estado de conservação da tartaruga marinha dermochelys coriacea (vandelli, 1761) no Brasil. Biodiversidade Brasileira 2001, 1:37-44.
• [6]Marcovaldi MA, Lopez GG, Soares LS, Santos AJB, Bellini C, Santos AS, Lopez M: Avaliação do estado de conservação da tartaruga marinha eretmochelys imbricata (linnaeus, 1766) no Brasil. Biodiversidade Brasileira 2011, 1:20-27.
• [7]Castilhos JC, Coelho CA, Argolo JF, Santos EAP, Marcovaldi MA, Santos AS, Lopez M: Avaliação do estado de conservação da tartaruga marinha lepidochelys olivacea (eschscholtz, 1829) no Brasil. Biodiversidade Brasileira 2011, 1:28-36.
• [8]Santos AS, Soares LS, Marcovaldi MA, Monteiro DS, Giffoni B, Almeida AP: Avaliação do estado de conservação da tartaruga marinha caretta caretta (linnaeus, 1758) no brasil. Biodiversidade Brasileira 2011, 1:3-11.
• [9]Marcovaldi MA, Thomé JCA: Reducing threats to turtles. In Research and Manegement Techniques for the conservation of sea turtles. Edited by Eckert KL, Bjorndal KA, Abreu-Grobois FA, Donnelly M. Washington, D.C.: Blanchard; 1999:165-168.
• [10]Tisdell C, Wilson C: Do open-cycle hatcheries relying on tourism conserve sea turtles? Sri Lankan developments and economic-ecological considerations. Environ Manage 2005, 35:441-452.
• [11]National Research Council (US): Decline of the sea turtles: causes and prevention. Washington: National Academy Press; 1990.
• [12]Shanker K, Pilcher NJ: Marine turtle conservation in south and southeast Asia: hopeless cause or cause for hope? Mar Turt Newsl 2003, 100:43-51.
• [13]Mast RB, Hutchinson BJ, Howgate E, Pilcher NJ: MTSG update: IUCN/SSC marine turtle specialist group hosts the second burning issues assessment workshop. Mar Turt Newsl 2005, 110:13-15.
• [14]Coelho BB: Análise dos encalhes de tartarugas-marinhas (reptilia: testudines), ocorridos no litoral sul da bahia, brasil. Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz: Tese de mestrado da; 2009.
• [15]Epperly SP, Braun J, Chester AJ, Cross FA, Merriner JV, Tester PA, Churchill JH: Beach strandings as an indicator of at-sea mortality of sea turtles. Marine Science 1996, 59:289-297.
• [16]Cheng I-J, Chen T: The incidental capture of five species of sea turtles by coastal setnet fisheries in the eastern waters of Taiwan. Biol Conserv 1997, 82:235-239.
• [17]Casale P, Laurent L, De Metrio G: Incidental capture of marine turtles by the Italian trawl fishery in the north Adriatic Sea. Biol Conserv 2004, 119:287-295.
• [18]MPA: Ministério da Pesca e Aqüicultura: O diagnóstico da pesca extrativa no Brasil. http://www.mpa.gov.br/index.php/101-apresentacao/250-o-diagnostico-da-pesca-extrativa-no-brasil webcite
• [19]Bertozzi CP: Interação com a pesca: implicações na conservação da toninha, pontoporia blainvillei (cetacea, pontoporiidae) no litoral do estado de São Paulo, SP. Universidade de São Paulo: Tese de doutorado da; 2009.
• [20]Souto FJB: O bosque de mangues e a pesca artesanal no distrito de acupe (Santo Amaro, Bahia): uma abordagem etnoecológica. Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences 2008, 30:275-282.
• [21]Pupo MM, Soto JMR, Hanazaki N: Captura incidental de tartarugas marinhas na pesca artesanal da Ilha de Santa Catarina, SC. Biotemas 2006, 4:63-72.
• [22]Alexander SE: Resident attitudes towards conservation and black howler monkeys in Belize: the community baboon sanctuary. Environ Conserv 2000, 27:341-350.
• [23]Begossi A, Hanazaki N, Silvano RAM: Ecologia humana, etnoecologia e conservação. In Métodos de coleta e análise de dados em etnobiologia, etnoecologia e disciplinas correlatas. Anais do I seminário de etnobiologia e etnoecologia do sudeste. Edited by Amorozo MCM, Ming LC, Silva SP. Rio Claro SP: Unesp/CNPq; 2002:92-128.
• [24]Stave J, Oba G, Nordal I, Stenseth NC: Traditional ecological knowledge of a riverine forest in Turkana, Kenya: implications for research and management. Biodivers Conserv 2007, 16:1471-1489.
• [25]Brook RK, McLachlan SM: Trends and prospects for local knowledge in ecological and conservation research and monitoring. Biodivers Conserv 2008, 17:3501-3512.
• [26]Marques JGW: Pescando pescadores. Ciência e etnociência em uma perspectiva ecológica. 2nd edition. São Paulo, Brazil: NUPAUB-USP; 2001.
• [27]Toledo VM, Barrera-Bassols N: Etnobiologia e etnoecologia - pessoas & natureza na américa latina. In A etnoecologia: uma ciência pós-normal que estuda as sabedorias tradicionais. Edited by Silva VA, Almeida ALSA. Albuquerque UP: Recife: Nupeea; 2010:13-36.
• [28]Davis A, Wagner J: Who knows? On the importance of identifying “experts” when researching local ecological knowledge. Hum Ecol 2003, 31:463-489.
• [29]IBGE: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística: Censo demográfico 2000–2010. http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/censo2010/tabelas_pdf/total_populacao_bahia.pdf webcite
• [30]Mori SA, Boom BB, Carvalho AM, Santos TS: Southern Bahia moist forests. Bot Rev 1983, 49:155-232.
• [31]França AMC: Geomorfologia da Margem Continental Leste Brasileira e das Bacias Oceânica Adjacentes. In Margem Continental Brasileira e das Áreas Oceânicas Adjacentes, vol. 7. Edited by Chaves H. Petrobras, Rio de Janeiro: A. F., Projeto REMAC; 1979:89-127.
• [32]Caló CFF, Schiavetti A, Cetra M: Local ecological and taxonomic knowledge of snapper fish (teleostei: actinopterygii) held by fishermen in Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil. Neotropical Ichthyology 2009, 7:403-414.
• [33]Bailey KD: Methods of social research. New York: The Free Press, Macmillan Publishers; 1982.
• [34]Biernacki P, Waldorf D: Snowball sampling: problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research 1981, 10(2):141-163.
• [35]Viertler RB: Métodos antropológicos como ferramenta para estudos em etnobiologia e etnoecologia. In Métodos de coleta e análise de dados em etnobiologia, etnoecologia e disciplinas correlatas anais do I encontro de etnobiologia e etnoecologia do sudeste. Edited by Amorozo MCM, Ming LC, Silva SMP. Rio Claro: CACB/Unesp-CNPq; 2002:11-29.
• [36]Huntington HP: Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: methods and applications. Ecol Appl 2000, 10:1270-1274.
• [37]Brook RK: Elk–agriculture conflicts in the greater riding mountain ecosystem: building bridges between the natural and social sciences to promote sustainability. University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: Dissertation; 2007.
• [38]Marques JGW: Pescando pescadores: etnoecologia abrangente no baixo São Francisco. São Paulo, Brazil: NUPAUB-USP; 1995.
• [39]Alarcon DT: Interações entre cetáceos e atividades pesqueiras na área proposta para reserva extrativista marinha de itacaré (BA). Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz: Tese de mestrado da; 2006.
• [40]Costa-Neto EM, Santos-Fita D, Clavijo M: Manual de etnozoología: Una guía teórico-práctica para investigar la interconexión del ser humano con los animales. Valencia, Spain: Tundra Ediciones; 2009:285.
• [41]White PCL, Jennings NV, Renwick AR, Barker NHL: Review: questionnaires in ecology: a review of past use and recommendations for best practice. J Appl Ecol 2005, 42:421-430.
• [42]Posey DA: Etnobiologia: teoria e prática. In Suma etnológica brasileira. Edited by Ribeiro D. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes/FINEP; 1986:15-28.
• [43]Colding J, Folke C: Taboo system: lessons about informal institutions for nature management. The Georgetown International Environmental Review 2000, 12:413-445.
• [44]FAO: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Fisheries and aquaculture department nations - fishing gear type. http://www.fao.org/fishery/geartype/search/en webcite
• [45]Nazario N, Bittencourt MD: Atitudes e condutas de produtores rurais – perspectivas de conservação dos remanescentes de cerrado do assentamento reunidas, promissão – SP. OLAM – Ciência & Tecnologia 2003, 3:309-350.
• [46]Dencker AFM: Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa em turismo. São Paulo, Brazil: Futura; 1998:286.
• [47]Ditt EH: Fragmentos florestais no pontal do paranapanema. São Paulo, Brazil: Annablume; 2002:140.
• [48]Pereira JCR: Análise de dados qualitativos: estratégias metodológicas para as ciências da saúde, humanas e sociais. São Paulo, Brazil: USP; 1999:154.
• [49]Oviedo HC, Campo-Arias A: Metodología de investigación y lectura crítica de estudios: aproximación al uso del coeficiente alfa de cronbach. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria 2005, 34:572-580.
• [50]Rizopoulos D: ltm: an R package for latent variable modeling and item response theory analyses. J Stat Softw 2006, 17:1-25.
• [51]Bjorndal KA: Foraging ecology and nutrition of sea turtles. In The biology of Sea turtle. Edited by Lutz PL, Musick JA. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1997:199-231.
• [52]Sanches TM, Bellini C: Juvenile eretmochelys imbricata and chelonia mydas in the archipelago of Fernando de Noronha, brazil. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 1999, 3:308-311.
• [53]León YM, Bjorndal KA: Selective feeding in the hawksbill turtle, an important predator in coral reef ecosystems. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2002, 245:249-258.
• [54]Godley BJ, Richardson S, Broderick AC, Coyne MS, Glen F, Hays GC: Long-term satellite telemetry of the movements and habitat utilization by green turtles in the Mediterranean. Ecography 2002, 25:352-362.
• [55]Bentivegna F, Hochscheid S, Minucci C: Seasonal variability in voluntary dive duration of the Mediterranean loggerhead turtle, caretta caretta. Sci Mar 2003, 67:371-375.
• [56]Hays GC, Houghton JDR, Isaacs C, King RS, Lloyd C, Lovell P: First records of oceanic dive profiles for leatherback turtles, dermochelys coriacea, indicate behavioral plasticity associated with long-distance migration. Anim Behav 2004, 67:733-743.
• [57]Gabriel MLDS, Tritapepe PRS: Análise da motivação de compra do consumidor de instrumentos musicais da Rua teodoro sampaio. 1998. http://www.ead.fea.usp.br/semead/10semead/sistema/resultado/trabalhosPDF/199.pdf webcite
• [58]Projeto Tamar – ICMBio: National Sea turtle conservation in brazil. http://www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/images/stories/docs-plano-de-acao/pan-tartarugas/livro_tartarugas.pdf webcite
• [59]Bjorndal KA, Bolten AB: From ghosts to key species: restoring sea turtle populations to fulfi ll their ecological roles. Mar Turt Newsl 2003, 100:16-21.
• [60]Marcovaldi MA, Thomé JCA, Sales G, Coelho CA, Gallo BMG, Bellini C: Brazilian plan for reduction of incidental sea turtle capture in fisheries. Mar Turt Newsl 2002, 96:24-25.
• [61]Marcovaldi MA, Marcovaldi GG: Marine turtles of brazil: the history and structure of projeto TAMAR-IBAMA. Biol Conserv 1999, 91:35-41.
• [62]Cammilo CS, Romero RM, Leone LG, Batista RLG, Velozo RS, Nogueira-Filho SLG: Características da reprodução de tartarugas marinhas (Testudines, Cheloniidae) no litoral Sul da Bahia, Brasil. Biota Neotropica 2009, 9:1-7.
• [63]Hughes GR: The survival situation of the hawksbill sea-turtle (eretmochelys imbricata) in Madagascar. Biol Conserv 1973, 5:114-118.
• [64]Meylan AB, Donnelly M: Status justification for listining the hawksbill turtle (eretmochelys imbricata) as critically endangered on the 1996 IUCN Red list of threatened animals. Chelonian Conservation Biology 1999, 3:200-224.
• [65]Marcovaldi MA, Sales G, Thomé JCA, Silva ACCD, Gallo BMG, Lima EHSM, Lima EP, Bellini C: Sea turtles and fishery interactions in brazil: identifying and mitigating potential conflicts. Mar Turt Newsl 2006, 112:4-8.
• [66]Soto JMR, Beheregaray RCP, Rebello RARP: Range extension: nesting by dermochelys and caretta in southern brazil. Mar Turt Newsl 1997, 77:6-7.
• [67]Vargas SM, Araújo FCF, Monteiro DS, Estima SC, Almeida AP, Soares LS, Santos FR: Genetic diversity and origin of leatherback turtles (dermochelys coriacea) from the Brazilian coast. J Hered 2008, 99:215-220.
• [68]Poiner IR, Harris ANM: Incidental capture, direct mortality and delayed mortality of sea turtles in Australia’s northern prawn fishery. Mar Biol 1996, 125:813-825.
• [69]Wallace BP, DiMatteo AD, Bolten AB, Chaloupka MY, Hutchinson BJ, Abreu-Grobois FA, Mortimer JA, Seminoff JA, Amorocho D, Bjorndal KA, Bourjea J, Bowen BWV, Briseño Dueñas R, Casale P, Choudhury BC, Costa A, Dutton PH, Fallabrino A, Finkbeiner EM, Girard A, Girondot M, Hamann M, Hurley BJ, López-Mendilaharsu M, Marcovaldi MA, Musick JA, Nel R, Pilcher NJ, Troëng S, Witherington B, Mast R: Global conservation priorities for marine turtles. PLoS One 2011, 6:1-14.
• [70]Reichel-Dolmatoff G: Cosmology as ecological analysis: a view from the rain forest. New series 1976, 11:307-318.
• [71]Lutcavage ME, Lutz PL: Diving physiology. In The biology of Sea turtles. Edited by Lutz PL, Musick JA. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1990:277-296.
• [72]Drews C: Attitude, knowledge and wild animals as pets in Costa Rica. Society 2002, 15:119-138.
• [73]Rajakaruna RS, Dissanayake DMNJ, Ekanayake EML, Ranawana KB: Sea turtle conservation in Sri Lanka: assessment of knowledge, attitude and prevalence of consumptive use of turtle products among coastal communities. Indian Ocean Turtle newsletter 2009, 10:1.
• [74]Hill CM: Conflicting attitudes towards elephants around the budongo forest reserve Uganda. Environmental Conservation 1998, 25:244-250.
• [75]Allendorf T, Swe KK, Oo T, Htut Y, Aung M, Allendorf K, Hayek L, Leimgruber P, Wemmer C: Community attitudes toward three protected areas in upper Myanmar (Burma). Environ Conserv 2006, 33:344-352.
• [76]Boer WF, Baquete DS: Natural resource use, crop damage and attitudes of rural people in the vicinity of the Maputo elephant reserve Mozambique. Environ Conserv 1998, 25:208-218.
• [77]Baral N, Heinen JT: Resources use, conservation attitudes, management intervention and park-people relations in the Western Terai landscape of Nepal. Environ Conserv 2007, 34:1-9.
• [78]Mehta JN, Kellert SR: Local attitudes toward community-based conservation policy and programmes in Nepal: a case study in the makalu-barun conservation area. Environ Conserv 1998, 25:320-333.
• [79]Bright AD, Tarrant MA: Effect of environment-based coursework on the nature of attitudes toward the endangered species Act. J Environ Educ 2002, 33:10-19.
• [80]Fiallo EA, Jacobson SK: Local communities and protected areas: attitudes of rural residents towards conservation and machalilla national park, Ecuador. Environ Conserv 1995, 22:241-249.
• [81]Sah JP, Heinen JT: Wetland resource use and conservation attitudes among indigenous and migrant peoples in Ghodaghodi Lake are Nepal. Environ Conserv 2002, 28:345-356.
• [82]Bright AD, Barro SC: Integrative complexity and attitudes: a case study of plant and wildlife species protection. Hum Dimens Wildl 2000, 5:30-47.
• [83]Colding J, Folke C: 1997: The relations among threatened species, their protection, and taboos. Conserv Ecol 1997, 1:6.
• [84]Pinto EPP, Amorozo MCM, Furlan A: Conhecimento popular sobre plantas medicinais em comunidades rurais de mata atlântica-itacaré, BA, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 2006, 20:751-762.
• [85]Begossi A: Food taboos at búzios island (brazil): their significance and relation to folk medicine. J Ethnobiol 1992, 12:117-139.
• [86]Begossi A, Braga FM: Food taboos and folk medicine among fishermen from the Tocantins river (Brazil). Amazoniana 1992, 12:101-118.
• [87]Costa-Neto EM: Restrições e preferências alimentares em comunidades de pescadores do município de conde, estado da bahia, brasil. Rev Nutr 2000, 13:117-126.
• [88]Alves RRN, Vieira WLS, Santana GG: Reptiles used in traditional folk medicine: conservation implications. Biodivers Conserv 2008, 17:2037-2049.
• [89]Ferreira FS, Brito SV, Ribeiro SC, Saraiva AF, Almeida WO, Alves RRN: Animal-based folk remedies sold in public markets in crato and Juazeiro do Norte, Ceará Brazil. BMC complementary and alternative medicine 2009, 9:17. BioMed Central Full Text
• [90]Begossi A, Hanazaki N, Ramos RM: Food chain and the reasons for fish food taboos among Amazonian and Atlantic forest fishers (Brazil). Ecol Appl 2004, 14:1334-1343.
• [91]Alinõ PM, Cajipe GJB, Ganzon-Fortes ET, Licuanan WRH, Montano NE, Tupas LM: The use of marine organisms in folk medicine and horticulture: a preliminary study. In SICEN Leaflet 1: Supplement of SICEN Newsletter University of the Philippines. Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines: Seaweed Information Centre (SICEN); 1990:298.
• [92]Seixas CS, Begossi A: Ethnozoology of fishing communities from Ilha Grande (Atlantic forest coast, Brazil). J Ethnobiol 2001, 21:107-135.
• [93]Marcovaldi MA, Giffoni BB, Becker JH, Fiedler FN: Sea turtle interactions in coastal Net fisheries in Brazil. In Proceedings of the technical workshop on mitigating Sea turtle bycatch in coastal Net fisheries. IUCN: Regional Fishery Management Council; 2009:28.
• [94]Mclellan E, Arps E, Donnelly M: WWF Global Marine Turtle Strategy 2009-2020. Gland, Switzerland: WWF; 2009:44.
• [95]Turner NJ, Ignace MB, Ignace R: Traditional ecological knowledge and wisdom of aboriginal peoples in British Columbia. Ecol Appl 2000, 10:1275-1287.
• [96]Buhlmann KA, Akre TSB, Iverson JB, Karapatakis D, Mittermeier RA, Georges A, Rhodin AGJ, Vand Dijik PP, Gibbons JW: A global analysis of tortoise and freshwater turtle distributions with identification of priority conservation areas. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 2009, 8:116-149.
• [97]Brewer C: Outreach and partnerships programs for conservation education where endangered species conservation and research occur. Conserv Biol 2002, 16:4-6.