Journal of Translational Medicine | |
Generation of orthotopic patient-derived xenografts from gastrointestinal stromal tumor | |
Andrew M Lowy1  Richard Schwab2  Michael Peterson4  Carl K Hoh3  Dawn V Jaquish1  Randall P French1  Evangeline S Mose1  Chih-Min Tang1  Michele L Babicky1  Stephanie Y Leonard1  Jason K Sicklick1  | |
[1] Division of Surgical Oncology and Department of Surgery, Moores UCSD Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, Mail Code 0987, La Jolla, CA 92093-0987, USA;Division of Medical Oncology and Department of Internal Medicine, Moores UCSD Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA USA;Division of Nuclear Medicine, Moores Cancer Center, and the UCSD In Vivo Cancer & Molecular Imaging Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA USA;Department of Pathology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA USA | |
关键词: Targeted therapy; Sarcoma; PDX; NOD-scid gamma; NOD-scid; KIT; Imatinib; GIST; | |
Others : 817966 DOI : 10.1186/1479-5876-12-41 |
|
received in 2013-11-04, accepted in 2014-02-06, 发布年份 2014 | |
【 摘 要 】
Background
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common sarcoma and its treatment with imatinib has served as the paradigm for developing targeted anti-cancer therapies. Despite this success, imatinib-resistance has emerged as a major problem and therefore, the clinical efficacy of other drugs has been investigated. Unfortunately, most clinical trials have failed to identify efficacious drugs despite promising in vitro data and pathological responses in subcutaneous xenografts. We hypothesized that it was feasible to develop orthotopic patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) from resected GIST that could recapitulate the genetic heterogeneity and biology of the human disease.
Methods
Fresh tumor tissue from three patients with pathologically confirmed GISTs was obtained immediately following tumor resection. Tumor fragments (4.2-mm3) were surgically xenografted into the liver, gastric wall, renal capsule, and pancreas of immunodeficient mice. Tumor growth was serially assessed with ultrasonography (US) every 3-4 weeks. Tumors were also evaluated with positron emission tomography (PET). Animals were sacrificed when they became moribund or their tumors reached a threshold size of 2500-mm3. Tumors were subsequently passaged, as well as immunohistochemically and histologically analyzed.
Results
Herein, we describe the first model for generating orthotopic GIST PDXs. We have successfully xenografted three unique KIT-mutated tumors into a total of 25 mice with an overall success rate of 84% (21/25). We serially followed tumor growth with US to describe the natural history of PDX growth. Successful PDXs resulted in 12 primary xenografts in NOD-scid gamma or NOD-scid mice while subsequent successful passages resulted in 9 tumors. At a median of 7.9 weeks (range 2.9-33.1 weeks), tumor size averaged 473±695-mm3 (median 199-mm3, range 12.6-2682.5-mm3) by US. Furthermore, tumor size on US within 14 days of death correlated with gross tumor size on necropsy. We also demonstrated that these tumors are FDG-avid on PET imaging, while immunohistochemically and histologically the PDXs resembled the primary tumors.
Conclusions
We report the first orthotopic model of human GIST using patient-derived tumor tissue. This novel, reproducible in vivo model of human GIST may enhance the study of GIST biology, biomarkers, personalized cancer treatments, and provide a preclinical platform to evaluate new therapeutic agents for GIST.
【 授权许可】
2014 Sicklick et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
20140711025743611.pdf | 1655KB | download | |
Figure 6. | 43KB | Image | download |
Figure 5. | 40KB | Image | download |
Figure 4. | 42KB | Image | download |
Figure 3. | 31KB | Image | download |
Figure 2. | 33KB | Image | download |
Figure 1. | 121KB | Image | download |
【 图 表 】
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Reichardt P, et al.: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors I: pathology, pathobiology, primary therapy, and surgical issues. Semin Oncol 2009, 36:290-301.
- [2]Liegl-Atzwanger B, Fletcher JA, Fletcher CD: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Virchows Arch 2010, 456:111-127.
- [3]Agaram NP, et al.: Novel V600E BRAF mutations in Imatinib-naive and Imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Genes Chrom Cancer 2008, 47:853-859.
- [4]Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Meta-Analysis Group (MetaGIST): Comparison of two doses of Imatinib for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a meta-analysis of 1,640 patients. J Clin Oncol 2010, 28:1247-1253.
- [5]Buchdunger E, O’Reilly T, Wood J: Pharmacology of Imatinib (STI571). Eur J Cancer 2002, 38(Suppl 5):S28-S36.
- [6]Kingham TP, DeMatteo RP: Multidisciplinary treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Surg Clin North Am 2009, 89:217-233.
- [7]Dematteo RP, et al.: Adjuvant Imatinib mesylate after resection of localised, primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2009, 373:1097-1104.
- [8]Debiec-Rychter M, et al.: Use of c-KIT/PDGFRA mutational analysis to predict the clinical response to Imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours entered on phase I and II studies of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. Eur J Cancer 2004, 40:689-695.
- [9]Heinrich MC, et al.: Molecular correlates of Imatinib resistance in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Clin Oncol 2006, 24:4764-4774.
- [10]Agaram NP, et al.: Pathologic and molecular heterogeneity in Imatinib-stable or Imatinib-responsive gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2007, 13:170-181.
- [11]Prenen H, et al.: Efficacy of the kinase inhibitor SU11248 against gastrointestinal stromal tumor mutants refractory to Imatinib mesylate. Clin Cancer Res 2006, 12:2622-2627.
- [12]Wardelmann E, et al.: Polyclonal evolution of multiple secondary KIT mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors under treatment with Imatinib mesylate. Clin Cancer Res 2006, 12:1743-1749.
- [13]Demetri GD, et al.: Efficacy and safety of Sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after failure of Imatinib: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006, 368:1329-1338.
- [14]George S, et al.: Clinical evaluation of continuous daily dosing of Sunitinib malate in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after Imatinib failure. Eur J Cancer 2009, 45:1959-1968.
- [15]Trent JC, et al.: A Phase II study of dasatinib for patients with Imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). J Clin Oncol 2011, I:Abstract #10006.
- [16]George S, et al.: A multicenter phase II study of regorafenib in patients (pts) with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), after therapy with Imatinib (IM) and sunitinib (SU). J Clin Oncol 2011, I:Abstract #10007.
- [17]Demetri GD, et al.: Randomized phase III trial of regorafenib in patients (pts) with metastatic and/or unresectable gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) progressing despite prior treatment with at least Imatinib (IM) and sunitinib (SU): GRID trial. J Clin Oncol 2012, 30:Abstract #LBA10008.
- [18]Corless CL, Barnett CM, Heinrich MC: Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: origin and molecular oncology. Nat Rev Cancer 2011, 11:865-878.
- [19]Taguchi T, et al.: Conventional and molecular cytogenetic characterization of a new human cell line, GIST-T1, established from gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Lab Invest J Tech Methods Pathol 2002, 82:663-665.
- [20]Tuveson DA, et al.: STI571 inactivation of the gastrointestinal stromal tumor c-KIT oncoprotein: biological and clinical implications. Oncogene 2001, 20:5054-5058.
- [21]Prenen H, et al.: Establishment of a mouse gastrointestinal stromal tumour model and evaluation of response to Imatinib by small animal positron emission tomography. Anticancer Res 2006, 26:1247-1252.
- [22]Huynh H, et al.: Sorafenib induces growth suppression in mouse models of gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Mol Cancer Therap 2009, 8:152-159.
- [23]Wang TB, Huang WS, Lin WH, Shi HP, Dong WG: Inhibition of KIT RNAi mediated with adenovirus in gastrointestinal stromal tumor xenograft. World J Gastroenterol: WJG 2010, 16:5122-5129.
- [24]Rubin BP, et al.: A knock-in mouse model of gastrointestinal stromal tumor harboring kit K641E. Cancer Res 2005, 65:6631-6639.
- [25]Sommer G, et al.: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in a mouse model by targeted mutation of the Kit receptor tyrosine kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100:6706-6711.
- [26]Shultz LD, Ishikawa F, Greiner DL: Humanized mice in translational biomedical research. Nat Rev Immunol 2007, 7:118-130.
- [27]Ishikawa F, et al.: Development of functional human blood and immune systems in NOD/SCID/IL2 receptor gamma chain(null) mice. Blood 2005, 106:1565-1573.
- [28]Shultz LD, et al.: Human lymphoid and myeloid cell development in NOD/LtSz-scid IL2R gamma null mice engrafted with mobilized human hemopoietic stem cells. J Immunol 2005, 174:6477-6489.
- [29]Quintana E, et al.: Efficient tumour formation by single human melanoma cells. Nature 2008, 456:593-598.
- [30]King M, et al.: A new Hu-PBL model for the study of human islet alloreactivity based on NOD-scid mice bearing a targeted mutation in the IL-2 receptor gamma chain gene. Clin Immunol 2008, 126:303-314.
- [31]Simpson-Abelson MR, et al.: Long-term engraftment and expansion of tumor-derived memory T cells following the implantation of non-disrupted pieces of human lung tumor into NOD-scid IL2Rgamma(null) mice. J Immunol 2008, 180:7009-7018.
- [32]Feldman J, Goldwasser R, Mark S, Schwartz J, Orion I: A mathematical model for tumor volume evaluation using two-dimensions. J Appl Quant Methods 2009, 4:455-461.
- [33]Edris B, et al.: Anti-KIT monoclonal antibody inhibits Imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013, 110:3501-3506.
- [34]Reynolds CP, Sun BC, DeClerck YA, Moats RA: Assessing growth and response to therapy in murine tumor models. Methods Mol Med 2005, 111:335-350.
- [35]Huynh AS, et al.: Development of an orthotopic human pancreatic cancer xenograft model using ultrasound guided injection of cells. PloS one 2011, 6:e20330.
- [36]Killion JJ, Radinsky R, Fidler IJ: Orthotopic models are necessary to predict therapy of transplantable tumors in mice. Cancer Metast Rev 1998, 17:279-284.
- [37]Revheim ME, et al.: Intermittent and continuous Imatinib in a human GIST xenograft model carrying KIT exon 17 resistance mutation D816H. Acta Oncol 2013, 52:776-782.
- [38]Moriyama M, et al.: Establishment and characterization of a novel xenograft model of human gastrointestinal stromal tumor in mice. Anticancer Res 2013, 33:175-181.
- [39]Richmond A, Su Y: Mouse xenograft models vs GEM models for human cancer therapeutics. Dis Models Mechan 2008, 1:78-82.
- [40]Morioka CY, Saito S, Ohzawa K, Watanabe A: Homologous orthotopic implantation models of pancreatic ductal cancer in Syrian golden hamsters: which is better for metastasis research–cell implantation or tissue implantation? Pancreas 2000, 20:152-157.
- [41]Sicklick JK, Lopez NE: Optimizing surgical and Imatinib therapy for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Gastroint Surg 2013, 17(11):1997-2006.
- [42]Hidalgo M, et al.: A pilot clinical study of treatment guided by personalized tumorgrafts in patients with advanced cancer. Mol Cancer Therap 2011, 10:1311-1316.
- [43]Moro M, et al.: Patient-derived xenografts of non small cell lung cancer: resurgence of an old model for investigation of modern concepts of tailored therapy and cancer stem cells. J Biomed Biotechnol 2012, 2012:568567.
- [44]Revheim ME, et al.: Establishment and characterization of a human gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) xenograft in athymic nude mice. Anticancer Res 2009, 29:4331-4336.