期刊论文详细信息
Investigative Genetics | |
Response to: Use of prior odds for missing persons identifications - authors' reply | |
Harrell Gill-King2  Ranajit Chakraborty1  Jianye Ge1  Bruce Budowle1  | |
[1] Department of Forensic and Investigative Genetics, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA;Department of Biological Sciences, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA | |
关键词: subjectivity; prior odds; legal proceedings; human identity; Guidelines; | |
Others : 801879 DOI : 10.1186/2041-2223-3-3 |
|
received in 2012-01-09, accepted in 2012-02-01, 发布年份 2012 | |
【 摘 要 】
Please see related article: http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/3/1/2 webcite
【 授权许可】
2012 Budowle et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
20140708013451666.pdf | 202KB | download |
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Biedermann A, Taroni F, Margot P: Reply to Budowle, Ge, Chakraborty and Gill-King: Use of prior odds for missing persons identifcations. Investig Genet(submitted)
- [2]National Research Council Report: Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009.
- [3]Budowle B, Bottrell MC, Bunch SG, Fram R, Harrison D, Meagher S, Oien CT, Peterson PE, Seiger DP, Smith MB, Smrz MA, Solti GL, Stacey RB: A perspective on errors, bias, and interpretation in the forensic sciences and direction for continuing advancement. J Forens Sci 2009, 54:798-809.
- [4]Budowle B, Ge J, Chakraborty R, Gill-King H: Use of prior odds for missing persons identifications. Investig Genet 2011, 2:1-6. BioMed Central Full Text
- [5]People v Collins. 1968. 68 Cal. 2d 319, 438 P.2d 33, 66 Cal. Rptr. 497. http://www.law.berkeley.edu/faculty/sklansky/evidence/evidence/cases/Cases%20for%20TOA/People%20v.%20Collins.htm webcite
- [6]State of New Jersey v Spann. 1993. 617 A.2d 247
- [7]Jackson G, Jones S, Booth G, Champod C, Evett IW: The nature of forensic science opinion--a possible framework to guide thinking and practice in investigations and in court proceedings. Sci Justice 2006, 46(1):33-44.