Out-of-pocket payments in the Austrian healthcare system – a distributional analysis

International Journal for Equity in Health

Engelbert Theurl¹  Alice Sanwald¹ 

[1] Department of Economics and Statistics, University of Innsbruck, Universitaetsstrasse 15, Innsbruck, A-6020, Austria

关键词: Reranking;    Horizontal equity;    Vertical equity;    Kakwani index;    Healthcare financing inequalities;    Out-of-pocket health expenditure;   

Others  :  1231384
DOI  :  10.1186/s12939-015-0230-7

 received in 2015-04-02, accepted in 2015-10-02,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Out-of-pocket spending is an important source of healthcare financing even in countries with established prepaid financing of healthcare. However, out-of-pocket payments (OOPP) may have undesirable effects from an equity perspective. In this study, we analyse the distributive effects of OOPP in Austria based on cross-sectional information from the Austrian Household Budget Survey 2009/10.

Methods

We combine evidence from disaggregated measures (concentration curve and Lorenz curve) and summary indices (Gini coefficient, Kakwani index, and Reynolds–Smolensky index) to demonstrate the distributive effects of total OOPP and their subcomponents. Thereby, we use different specifications of household ability to pay. We follow the Aronson–Johnson–Lampert approach and split the distributive effect into its three components: progressivity, horizontal equity, and reranking.

Results

OOPP in Austria have regressive effects on income distribution. These regressive effects are especially pronounced for the OOPP category prescription fees and over-the-counter pharmaceuticals. Disaggregated evidence shows that the effects differ between income groups. The decomposition analysis reveals a high degree of reranking and horizontal inequity for total OOPP, and particularly, for therapeutic aids and physician services.

Conclusions

The results – especially those for prescription fees and therapeutic aids – are of high relevance for the recent and on-going discussion on the reform of benefit catalogues and cost-sharing schemes in the public health insurance system in Austria.

JEL Classification: H22, H23, H51, I14.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Sanwald and Theurl.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]WHO Global Health Observatory Data. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/gho/database/en/. Accessed 15 Feb 2014.
• [2]OECD Health Data 2014. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/health-data.htm. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.
• [3]Wagstaff A, Van Doorslaer E. Paying for health care – quantifying fairness, catastrophe, and impoverishement, with applications to Vietnam, 1993–98. The World Bank Development Research Group, Policy Research Working Paper 2715, 2001
• [4]Wagstaff A, Van Doorslaer E, Calonge S, Christiansen T, Gerfin M, Gottschalk P. The redistributive effect of health care finance in twelve OECD countries. J Health Econ. 1999; 18:291-314.
• [5]Wagstaff A, Van Doorslaer E. Progressivity, horizontal equity and reranking in health care finance: a decomposition analysis for the Netherlands. J Health Econ. 1997; 16:499-516.
• [6]Wagstaff A, Van Doorslaer E, Van der Berg H, Calonge S, Christiansen T, Gitoni G. Equity in the finance of health care: some further international comparisons. J Health Econ. 1999; 18:263-90.
• [7]Wagstaff A, Van Doorslaer E. Equity in health care finance and delivery. In: Handbook of Health Economics. Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP, editors. North Holland, Amsterdam; 2000: p.1803-62.
• [8]Gerdtham UG, Sundberg G. Redistributive effects of Swedish health care finance. Int J Health Plann Mgmt. 1998; 13:289-306.
• [9]Hajizadeh M, Conelly LB, Butler JRG. Health policy and equity of health care financing in Australia: 1973–2010. Rev Income Wealth. 2014; 60:298-322.
• [10]Newhouse J. and Insurance Experiment Group. Free for all? Lessons from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment. Harvard Universität Press, Cambridge, MA; 1993.
• [11]Culyer AJ, Wagstaff A. Equity and equality in health and health care. J Health Econ. 1993; 12:431-57.
• [12]Murray C, Knaul F, Musgrove P, Xu K, Kawabata K. Defining and measuring fairness in financial contribution to the health system. WHO-GPE Discussion Paper Series, 24, Geneva; 2000.
• [13]Statistik Austria. Konsumerhebung 2009/10: Codebuch für detaillierte Mikrodaten, 2011. http://www.statistik.at/web_de/statistiken/menschen_und_gesellschaft/soziales/verbrauchsausgaben/konsumerhebung_2009_2010/index.html. Accessed 15 July 2013.
• [14]Statistik Austria. Konsumerhebung 2009/10: Mikrodaten, 2011. Acessed 15 July 2013. http://www. statistik.at/web_de/statistiken/menschen_und_gesellschaft/soziales/verbrauchsausgaben/konsumerhebung_2009_2010/index.html webcite
• [15]Statistik Austria. Konsumerhebung 2009/10: Standard-Dokumentation, Metainformationen (Definitionen, Erläuterungen, Methoden, Qualität), http://www.statistik.at/web_de/statistiken/menschen_und_gesellschaft/soziales/verbrauchsausgaben/konsumerhebung_2009_2010/index.html. Accessed 15. July 2013.
• [16]Aronson JR, Johnson P, Lampert PJ. Redistributive effect and unequal income tax treatment. Econ J. 1994; 104:262-70.
• [17]Kakwani N. Measurement of tax progressivity: an international comparison. Econ J. 1977; 87:71-80.
• [18]Aronson JR, Lambert PJ. Decomposing the Gini coefficient to reveal the vertical, horizontal, and reranking effects of income taxation. Nat Tax J. 1994; 47:273-94.
• [19]Reynolds M, Smolensky E. Public expenditures, taxes, and the distribution of income: the United States, 1950, 1961, 1970. Academic, New York; 1977.
• [20]O’Donnel O, Van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, Lindelow M. Analyzing health equity using household survey data – a guide to techniques and their implementation. WBI Learning Resources Series, Washington DC; 2008.
• [21]Yu CP, Whynes DK, Sach TH. Assessing progressivity of out-of-pocket payment: with illustration to Malaysia. Int J Health Plann Mgmt. 2006; 21:193-210.
• [22]Baji P, Pavlova M, Gulácsi L, Groot W. Changes in equity in out-of-pocket payments during the period of health care reforms: evidence from Hungary. Inter J Equity Health. 2012; 11(1):1-11. BioMed Central Full Text
• [23]Abu-Zaineh M, Mataria A, Luchini S, Moatti JP. Equity in health care finance in Palestine: the value-added of the disaggregate approach. Soc Sci Med. 2008; 66:2308-20.
• [24]Smith S. Equity in Irish health care financing: measurement issues. Health Econ Pol Law. 2010; 5:149-69.
• [25]Wagstaff A. Decomposing changes in income inequality into vertical and horizontal redistribution and reranking, with applications to China and Vietnam. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3559, Washington; 2003.
• [26]Shorrocks AF. Income inequality and income mobility. J Econ Theory. 1978; 19:376-93.
• [27]Guger A, et al. Umverteilung durch den Staat in Österreich, Vienna; 2009. http://www.wifo.ac.at/jart/prj3/wifo/resources/person_dokument/person_dokument.jart?publikationsid=36801&mime_type=application/pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2015.
• [28]Leiter A, Theurl E. Soziale Krankenversicherung und Einkommensteuer. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. 2004; 3:363-91.
• [29]Danzinger S, Taussig M. The income unit and the anatomy of income distribution. Rev Income Wealth. 1979; 25:365-75.
• [30]Klavus J. Statistical inference of progressivity dominance: an application to health care financing distributions. J Health Econ. 2001; 20:363-77.
• [31]Statistik Austria, Gesundheitsausgaben in Österreich, https:/www.statistik.at/web_de/statistiken/gesundheit/gesundheitsausgaben. Accessed 15 Feb 2014.