Measuring total health inequality: adding individual variation to group-level differences

International Journal for Equity in Health

Gary King¹  Emmanuela Gakidou² 

[1] Professor, Department of Government, Harvard University and Senior Science Adviser, Evidence and Information for Policy, World Health Organization (Center for Basic Research in the Social Sciences, 34 Kirkland Street, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA;Health Economist, Global Programme on Evidence for Health Policy, World Health Organization (20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland

关键词: extended beta-binomial model;    child mortality;    risk of death;    Health inequality;   

Others  :  1147983
DOI  :  10.1186/1475-9276-1-3

 received in 2002-02-02, accepted in 2002-08-12,  发布年份 2002

【 摘 要 】

Background

Studies have revealed large variations in average health status across social, economic, and other groups. No study exists on the distribution of the risk of ill-health across individuals, either within groups or across all people in a society, and as such a crucial piece of total health inequality has been overlooked. Some of the reason for this neglect has been that the risk of death, which forms the basis for most measures, is impossible to observe directly and difficult to estimate.

Methods

We develop a measure of total health inequality – encompassing all inequalities among people in a society, including variation between and within groups – by adapting a beta-binomial regression model. We apply it to children under age two in 50 low- and middle-income countries. Our method has been adopted by the World Health Organization and is being implemented in surveys around the world; preliminary estimates have appeared in the World Health Report (2000).

Results

Countries with similar average child mortality differ considerably in total health inequality. Liberia and Mozambique have the largest inequalities in child survival, while Colombia, the Philippines and Kazakhstan have the lowest levels among the countries measured.

Conclusions

Total health inequality estimates should be routinely reported alongside average levels of health in populations and groups, as they reveal important policy-related information not otherwise knowable. This approach enables meaningful comparisons of inequality across countries and future analyses of the determinants of inequality.

【 授权许可】

   
2002 Gakidou and King; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]World Health Organization: Health Systems: improving performance. World Health Report 2000. Geneva, Switzerland 2000.
• [2]Acheson D: Independent inquiry into inequalities in health. 1998. London, UK, The Stationery Office. 1998.
• [3]World Bank: Country Reports on Health, Nutrition, Population, and Poverty. [http://www.worldbank.org/poverty/health/data/intro.htm] webciteWashington, DC, USA 2002.
• [4]Wagstaff A: Socioeconomic inequalities in child mortality: comparisons across nine developing countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2000, 78:19-29.
• [5]Marmot MG, Smith GD, Stansfeld S, Patel C, North F, Head J, White I, Brunner E, Feeney A: Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study [see comments]. Lancet 1991, 337:1387-1393.
• [6]Kawachi I, Marshall S, Pearce N: Social class inequalities in the decline of coronary heart disease among New Zealand men, 1975–1977 to 1985–1987. Int J Epidemiol 1991, 20:393-398.
• [7]Navarro V: Health and equity in the world in the era of "globalization". Int J Health Serv 1999, 29:215-225.
• [8]Kunst AE, Geurts JJ, van den Berg J: International variation in socioeconomic inequalities in self reported health. J Epidemiol Community Health 1995, 49:117-123.
• [9]Kunst AE, Groenhof F, Mackenbach JP, Health EW: Occupational class and cause specific mortality in middle aged men in 11 European countries: comparison of population based studies. EU Working Group on Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health [see comments]. BMJ 1998, 316:1636-1642.
• [10]Mackenbach JP, Kunst AE: Measuring the magnitude of socio-economic inequalities in health: an overview of available measures illustrated with two examples from Europe. Soc Sci Med 1997, 44:757-771.
• [11]Preston SH, Haines MR: Fatal years: child mortality in late nineteenth-century America. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press 1991., 266
• [12]Caldwell JC, McDonald P: Influence of maternal education on infant and child mortality: levels and causes. In: International Population Conference, Manila 1981, 2:79-96.
• [13]Bicego G, Ahmad O: Infant and Child Mortality #20. Calverton, Macro International, Inc. 1996.
• [14]Hill K, Pande R, Mahy M, Jones G: Trends in child mortality in the developing world: 1960 to 1996. New York, NY: UNICEF 1999.
• [15]Hill K, Pande R: The recent evolution of child mortality in the developing world. Arlington, VA, Partnership for Child Health Care, Basic Support for Institutionalizing Child Survival [BASICS]. Current Issues in Child Survival Series. 1997.
• [16]Brockerhoff M, Hewett P: Inequality of child mortality among ethnic groups in sub-Saharan Africa. [Review] [36 refs]. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2000, 78:30-41.
• [17]Gakidou E, Murray CJL, Frenk J: Defining and measuring health inequality: an approach based on the distribution of health expectancy. Bulletin of WHO 2000, 78:42-54.
• [18]Zaba B, David P: Fertility and the distribution of child mortality risk among women: an illustrative analysis. Popul Stud 1996, 50:263-278.
• [19]Gakidou E, Murray CJL, Frenk J: Measuring preferences for health systems performance assessment. GPE Discussion Paper 20. 2000. Geneva, World Health Organization. 2000.
• [20]USAID & Macro International: Demographic and Health Surveys. [http://www.measuredhs.com] webcite 1984.
• [21]Stanton C, Abderrahim N, Hill K: An assessment of DHS maternal mortality indicators. Studies in Family Planning 2000, 31:111-123.
• [22]Sullivan J, Rutstein S, Bicego G: Infant and Child Mortality #15. Calverton, Macro International, Inc. 1994.
• [23]Curtis SL: Assessment of the quality of data used for direct estimation of infant and child mortality in DHS-II surveys. Calverton, Maryland, Macro International. Demographic and Health Surveys. 1995.
• [24]Boerma JT, Sommerfelt AE: Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS): contributions and limitations. World Health Statistics Quarterly 1993, 46:222-226.
• [25]Hill K, Pande R, Mahy M, Jones G: Trends in child mortality in the developing world: 1960–1996. New York: UNICEF; 1999.
• [26]Rutstein S: Factors associated with trends in infant and child mortality in developing countries during the 1990s. Bull World Health Organ 2000, 78:1256-1270.
• [27]Macro International Inc.: An assessment of the quality of health data in DHS surveys #2. Calverton, Maryland, Macro International Inc. 1993.
• [28]Fundacion Mexicana para la Salud, Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e Informática. Deaths and population by municipality in Mexico. 1998.
• [29]Instituto Brasilero de Geografía e Estadística (IBGE). Sistema de Informacao sobre Mortalidade. 1994. http://www.datasus.gov.br webcite, http://www.ibge.gov.br webcite
• [30]World Health Organization: GPE Socio-economic database. WHO 2000.
• [31]Gurr TR, Jaggers K: Polity III: Regime Change and Political Authority, 1800–1994. Computer file, Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI. 1996.
• [32]Prentice RL: Binary regression using an extended beta-binomial distribution, with discussion of correlation induced by covariate measurement errors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1986, 81:321-327.
• [33]King G: Unifying political methodology: the likelihood theory of statistical inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1989.
• [34]Palmquist B: Analysis of proportions data. College Station, Texas.
• [35]Brooks SP, Morgan BJ, Ridout MS, Pack SE: Finite mixture models for proportions. Biometrics 1997, 53:1097-1115.
• [36]Yamamoto E, Yanagimoto T: Statistical methods for the beta-binomial model in teratology. Environmental Health Perspective 1994, 102S:25-31.
• [37]Liang KY, McCullagh P: Case studies in binary dispersion. Biometrics 1993, 49:623-630.
• [38]Griffiths D: Maximum likelihood estimation for the beta-binomial distribution application to the household distribution of the total number of cases of a disease. Biometrics 1973, 29:637-648.
• [39]Preston SH, Keyfitz N, Schoen R: Causes of death: Life tables for national populations. New York and London: Seminar Press 1972.
• [40]King G, Tomz M, Wittenberg J: Making the most of statistical analyses: improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science 2000, 44:341-355.