期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Biological Engineering
Essential validation methods for E. coli strains created by chromosome engineering
Nynke H. Dekker1  Anne S. Meyer1  Theo van Laar1  M. Charl Moolman1  Sriram Tiruvadi Krishnan1 
[1] Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Lorentzweg 1, Delft 2628 CJ, The Netherlands
关键词: Cell shape analysis;    Growth curve analysis;    EBU plate assay;    Strain validation;    P1 phage transduction;    Recombineering;    Escherichia coli;    Chromosome engineering;   
Others  :  1219593
DOI  :  10.1186/s13036-015-0008-x
 received in 2015-02-11, accepted in 2015-06-02,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Chromosome engineering encompasses a collection of homologous recombination-based techniques that are employed to modify the genome of a model organism in a controlled fashion. Such techniques are widely used in both fundamental and industrial research to introduce multiple insertions in the same Escherichia coli strain. To date, λ-Red recombination (also known as recombineering) and P1 phage transduction are the most successfully implemented chromosome engineering techniques in E. coli. However, due to errors that can occur during the strain creation process, reliable validation methods are essential upon alteration of a strain’s chromosome.

Results and discussion

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods and DNA sequence analysis are rapid and powerful methods to verify successful integration of DNA sequences into a chromosome. Even though these verification methods are necessary, they may not be sufficient in detecting all errors, imposing the requirement of additional validation methods. For example, as extraneous insertions may occur during recombineering, we highlight the use of Southern blotting to detect their presence. These unwanted mutations can be removed via transducing the region of interest into the wild type chromosome using P1 phages. However, in doing so one must verify that both the P1 lysate and the strains utilized are free from contamination with temperate phages, as these can lysogenize inside a cell as a large plasmid. Thus, we illustrate various methods to probe for temperate phage contamination, including cross-streak agar and Evans Blue-Uranine (EBU) plate assays, whereby the latter is a newly reported technique for this purpose in E. coli. Lastly, we discuss methodologies for detecting defects in cell growth and shape characteristics, which should be employed as an additional check.

Conclusion

The simple, yet crucial validation techniques discussed here can be used to reliably verify any chromosomally engineered E. coli strains for errors such as non-specific insertions in the chromosome, temperate phage contamination, and defects in growth and cell shape. While techniques such as PCR and DNA sequence verification should standardly be performed, we illustrate the necessity of performing these additional assays. The discussed techniques are highly generic and can be easily applied to any type of chromosome engineering.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Tiruvadi Krishnan et al.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150718091043223.pdf 3846KB PDF download
Fig. 4. 57KB Image download
Fig. 3. 45KB Image download
Fig. 2. 111KB Image download
Fig. 1. 91KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Lee EC, Yu D, Martinez de Velasco J, Tessarollo L, Swing DA, Court DL et al.. A Highly Efficient Escherichia coli-Based Chromosome Engineering System Adapted for Recombinogenic Targeting and Subcloning of BAC DNA. Genomics. 2001; 73(1):56-65.
  • [2]Blattner FR, Plunkett G, Bloch CA, Perna NT, Burland V, Riley M et al.. The Complete Genome Sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science. 1997; 277(5331):1453-62.
  • [3]Ellis HM, Yu D, DiTizio T, Court DL. High efficiency mutagenesis, repair, and engineering of chromosomal DNA using single-stranded oligonucleotides. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2001; 98(12):6742-6.
  • [4]Boyd D, Weiss DS, Chen JC, Beckwith J. Towards Single-Copy Gene Expression Systems Making Gene Cloning Physiologically Relevant: Lambda InCh, a Simple Escherichia coli Plasmid-Chromosome Shuttle System. Journal of Bacteriology. 2000; 182(3):842-7.
  • [5]Reyes-Lamothe R, Sherratt DJ, Leake MC. Stoichiometry and Architecture of Active DNA Replication Machinery in Escherichia coli. Science. 2010; 328(5977):498-501.
  • [6]Reyes-Lamothe R, Possoz C, Danilova O, Sherratt DJ. Independent Positioning and Action of Escherichia coli Replisomes in Live Cells. Cell. 2008; 133(1):90-102.
  • [7]Bakshi S, Siryaporn A, Goulian M, Weisshaar JC. Superresolution imaging of ribosomes and RNA polymerase in live Escherichia coli cells. Molecular Microbiology. 2012; 85(1):21-38.
  • [8]Kitagawa M, Ara T, Arifuzzaman M, Ioka-Nakamichi T, Inamoto E, Toyonaga H et al.. Complete set of ORF clones of Escherichia coli ASKA library (A Complete Set of E. coli K-12 ORF Archive): Unique Resources for Biological Research. DNA Research. 2006; 12(5):291-9.
  • [9]Lau IF, Filipe SR, Søballe B, Økstad O-A, Barre F-X, Sherratt DJ. Spatial and temporal organization of replicating Escherichia coli chromosomes. Molecular Microbiology. 2003; 49(3):731-43.
  • [10]Greenfield D, McEvoy AL, Shroff H, Crooks GE, Wingreen NS, Betzig E et al.. Self-Organization of the Escherichia coli Chemotaxis Network Imaged with Super-Resolution Light Microscopy. PLoS Biol. 2009; 7(6):e1000137.
  • [11]Delalez NJ, Berry RM, Armitage JP. Stoichiometry and Turnover of the Bacterial Flagellar Switch Protein FliN. mBio. 2014;5(4). doi:10.1128/mBio.01216-14
  • [12]Baba T, Ara T, Hasegawa M, Takai Y, Okumura Y, Baba M et al. Construction of Escherichia coli K‐12 in‐frame, single‐gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Molecular Systems Biology. 2006;2(1). doi:10.1038/msb4100050
  • [13]Juhas M, Reuß D, Zhu B, Commichau FM. Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli essential genes and minimal cell factories after one decade of genome engineering. Microbiology. 2014.
  • [14]Jarboe LR, Zhang X, Wang X, Moore JC, Shanmugam KT, Ingram LO. Metabolic Engineering for Production of Biorenewable Fuels and Chemicals: Contributions of Synthetic Biology. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology. 2010; 2010:18.
  • [15]Koma D, Yamanaka H, Moriyoshi K, Ohmoto T, Sakai K. A convenient method for multiple insertions of desired genes into target loci on the Escherichia coli chromosome. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012; 93(2):815-29.
  • [16]Maeda T, Sanchez-Torres V, Wood TK. Hydrogen production by recombinant Escherichia coli strains. Microbial Biotechnology. 2012; 5(2):214-25.
  • [17]Datsenko KA, Wanner BL. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2000; 97(12):6640-5.
  • [18]Zhang Y, Buchholz F, Muyrers JPP, Stewart AF. A new logic for DNA engineering using recombination in Escherichia coli. Nat Genet. 1998; 20(2):123-8.
  • [19]Martinez-Morales F, Borges AC, Martinez A, Shanmugam KT, Ingram LO. Chromosomal Integration of Heterologous DNA in Escherichia coli with Precise Removal of Markers and Replicons Used during Construction. Journal of Bacteriology. 1999; 181(22):7143-8.
  • [20]Kuhlman TE, Cox EC. Site-specific chromosomal integration of large synthetic constructs. Nucleic Acids Research. 2010; 38(6):e92.
  • [21]Chen D, Yan Z, Cole DL, Srivatsa GS. Analysis of internal (n-1)mer deletion sequences in synthetic oligodeoxyribonucleotides by hybridization to an immobilized probe array. Nucleic Acids Research. 1999; 27(2):389-95.
  • [22]Hobman JL, Patel MD, Hidalgo-Arroyo GA, Cariss SJL, Avison MB, Penn CW et al.. Comparative Genomic Hybridization Detects Secondary Chromosomal Deletions in Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 Mutants and Highlights Instability in the flhDC Region. Journal of Bacteriology. 2007; 189(24):8786-92.
  • [23]Yamamoto N, Nakahigashi K, Nakamichi T, Yoshino M, Takai Y, Touda Y et al. Update on the Keio collection of Escherichia coli single‐gene deletion mutants. vol 1. 2009.
  • [24]Sharan SK, Thomason LC, Kuznetsov SG, Court DL. Recombineering: a homologous recombination-based method of genetic engineering. Nat Protocols. 2009; 4(2):206-23.
  • [25]Moore SD. Assembling New Escherichia coli Strains by Transduction Using Phage P1. In: Strain Engineering. Methods in Molecular Biology. Williams JA, editor. Humana Press, New York (USA); 2011: p.155-69.
  • [26]Lennox ES. Transduction of linked genetic characters of the host by bacteriophage P1. Virology. 1955; 1(2):190-206.
  • [27]Ikeda H, Tomizawa JI. Transducing fragments in generalized transduction by phage P1. 3. Studies with small phage particles. J Mol Biol. 1965; 14(1):120-9.
  • [28]Tyler BM, Goldberg RB. Transduction of chromosomal genes between enteric bacteria by bacteriophage P1. J Bacteriol. 1976; 125(3):1105-11.
  • [29]Sternberg N, Hoess R. The molecular genetics of bacteriophage P1. Annu Rev Genet. 1983; 17:123-54.
  • [30]Satta G, Debbia E, Pruzzo C, Calegari L. The peculiar behaviour of coliphage P1vir mutants on restricting hosts. Microbios. 1978; 22(88):93-102.
  • [31]Thomason LC, Costantino N, Court DL. E. coli Genome Manipulation by P1 Transduction. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (USA); 2001.
  • [32]Manson MD. Dynamic motors for bacterial flagella. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010; 107(25):11151-2.
  • [33]Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1977; 74(12):5463-7.
  • [34]Southern EM. Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. Journal of Molecular Biology. 1975; 98(3):503-17.
  • [35]Zinder ND, Lederberg J. Genetic exchange in Salmonella. J Bacteriol. 1952; 64(5):679-99.
  • [36]Bochner BR. Curing bacterial cells of lysogenic viruses by using UCB indicator plates. Biotechniques. 1984:234-40
  • [37]Zwietering MH, Jongenburger I, Rombouts FM, van't Riet K. Modeling of the Bacterial Growth Curve. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1990; 56(6):1875-81.
  • [38]Hall BG, Acar H, Nandipati A, Barlow M. Growth Rates Made Easy. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2014; 31(1):232-8.
  • [39]McDonald JH. Handbook of Biological statistics. Sparky House Publishing, Baltimore; 2008.
  • [40]Konokhova AI, Gelash AA, Yurkin MA, Chernyshev AV, Maltsev VP. High-precision characterization of individual E. coli cell morphology by scanning flow cytometry. Cytometry Part A. 2013; 83A(6):568-75.
  • [41]Osiro D, Bernardes Filho R, Assis OBG, Jorge LAC, Colnago LA. Measuring bacterial cells size with AFM. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 2012; 43:341-7.
  • [42]Sliusarenko O, Heinritz J, Emonet T, Jacobs-Wagner C. High-throughput, subpixel precision analysis of bacterial morphogenesis and intracellular spatio-temporal dynamics. Molecular Microbiology. 2011; 80(3):612-27.
  • [43]DeWitt SK, Adelberg EA. The occurrence of a genetic transposition in a strain of Escherichia coli. Genetics. 1962; 47(5):577-85.
  • [44]Woodall CA. Electroporation of E. coli. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2003. p. 55-9.
  • [45]Kamps-Hughes N, Quimby A, Zhu Z, Johnson EA. Massively parallel characterization of restriction endonucleases. Nucleic Acids Research. 2013; 41(11):e119-e.
  • [46]Maloy SR, Stewart VJ, Taylor RK. Genetic analysis of pathogenic bacteria. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY; 1996.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:24次 浏览次数:11次