Inequalities in health status among rural residents: EQ-5D findings from household survey China

International Journal for Equity in Health

Roger Y Chung²  Aixia Ma¹  Xiaolin Wei²  Haitao Li² 

[1] School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China;School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

关键词: Health status;    Rural;    NRCMS;    EQ-5D;    Inequality;   

Others  :  802269
DOI  :  10.1186/1475-9276-13-41

 received in 2014-03-06, accepted in 2014-05-09,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Introduction

This study analyzed inequalities in health status among different socioeconomic and demographic rural residents covered by the New Rural Cooperative Medical System in China.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in Lian Yungang City, China. A total of 337 respondents, who were selected by using a multistage stratified systematic random sampling method, completed the surveys. A questionnaire consisting of EQ-5D and demographic and socioeconomic information was adopted for data collection, and was administered by face-to-face interviews. Multiple regression models were employed to examine the differences in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and the EQ-5D dimensions.

Results

Compared with those with lower education attainment, the respondents with higher education levels tended to report a higher VAS score (β = 2.666, 95% CI: 0.978 to 6.310), and were less likely to suffer from pain/discomfort (OR = 3.968; 95% CI: 1.447 to 10.880). The singles were more likely than the married to report moderate or extreme problems in usual activities (OR = 4.583; 95% CI: 1.188 to 17.676) and mobility (OR = 10.666; 95% CI: 2.464 to 6.171). However, no statistically significant differences were identified between the respondents with different income levels in the VAS score and EQ-5D dimensions.

Conclusions

This study suggests that the singles and the people with lower education levels are high-risk groups for poorer health status in the Chinese rural population. The findings from this study warrant further investigation.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Li et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Ministry of Health: Yearbook of Chinese Health Statistics. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Press; 2010.
• [2]Li X: Examining the equity of rural new cooperative medical and health system: health level, services utilization and fundraising. Chin J Popul Sci 2009, 3:96-112.
• [3]Yuan Z, Han B, Liao X: Four-year follow-up surveying the influence of New Rural Cooperative Medical System on the equity of health output. Chin Health Manage 2010, 27(6):401-404.
• [4]Chu J, Yu B, Meng Q: Study on the equity of health service of new rural cooperative medical scheme in Shandong and Ningxia. Chin Health Econ 2010, 29:28-30.
• [5]He L, Zheng J, Han Y: Analysis on fairness of the financial contribution in ner rural cooperative medical care in Shanxi province. Chin Rual Health Serv Adm 2006, 26:3-6.
• [6]Burstrom K, Johannesson M, Diderichsen F: Swedish population health-related quality of life results using the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res 2001, 10(7):621-635.
• [7]le Hoi V, Chuc NT, Lindholm L: Health-related quality of life, and its determinants, among older people in rural Vietnam. BMC Public Health 2010, 10:549. BioMed Central Full Text
• [8]Konig HH, Bernert S, Angermeyer MC, Matschinger H, Martinez M, Vilagut G, Haro JM, de Girolamo G, de Graaf R, Kovess V, Alonso J, ESEMeD/MHEDEA 2000 Investigators: Comparison of population health status in six european countries: results of a representative survey using the EQ-5D questionnaire. Med Care 2009, 47(2):255-261.
• [9]Luo N, Johnson JA, Shaw JW, Feeny D, Coons SJ: Self-reported health status of the general adult U.S. population as assessed by the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index. Med Care 2005, 43(11):1078-1086.
• [10]Shafie AA, Hassali MA, Liau SY: A cross-sectional validation study of EQ-5D among the Malaysian adult population. Qual Life Res 2011, 20(4):593-600.
• [11]Sorensen J, Davidsen M, Gudex C, Pedersen KM, Bronnum-Hansen H: Danish EQ-5D population norms. Scand J Public Health 2009, 37(5):467-474.
• [12]Wang H, Kindig DA, Mullahy J: Variation in Chinese population health related quality of life: results from a EuroQol study in Beijing. China Qual Life Res 2005, 14(1):119-132.
• [13]Sun S, Chen J, Johannesson M, Kind P, Xu L, Zhang Y, Burstrom K: Population health status in China: EQ-5D results, by age, sex and socio-economic status, from the National Health Services Survey 2008. Qual Life Res 2011, 20(3):309-320.
• [14]Sun S, Chen J, Johannesson M, Kind P, Xu L, Zhang Y, Burstrom K: Regional differences in health status in China: population health-related quality of life results from the National Health Services Survey 2008. Health Place 2011, 17(2):671-680.
• [15]Zhang L, Wang H, Wang L, Hsiao W: Health related quality of life in west rural population. Chin Health Econ 2005, 3:8-11.
• [16]Bureau of Statistics of Lian Yungang City: Lian Yungang Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: Beijing Liarary Press; 2010.
• [17]Monitoring report on migrants in China http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/201305/t20130527_12978.html webcite
• [18]Rabin R, de Charro F: EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 2001, 33(5):337-343.
• [19]Wang HM, Patrick DL, Edwards TC, Skalicky AM, Zeng HY, Gu WW: Validation of the EQ-5D in a general population sample in urban China. Qual Life Res 2012, 21(1):155-160.
• [20]Zhao FL, Yue M, Yang H, Wang T, Wu JH, Li SC: Validation and comparison of EuroQol and short form 6D in chronic prostatitis patients. Value Health 2010, 13(5):649-656.
• [21]Bharmal M, Thomas J 3rd: Comparing the EQ-5D and the SF-6D descriptive systems to assess their ceiling effects in the US general population. Value Health 2006, 9(4):262-271.
• [22]Simon J: How is Your Health in General? Qualitative and Quantitative Studies on Self-Assessed Health and Socioeconomic Differences Herein. Rotterdam: The Netherlands: Erasmus University Rotterda; 2002.
• [23]Alberts JF, Sanderman R, Eimers JM, van den Heuvel WJ: Socioeconomic inequity in health care: a study of services utilization in Curacao. Soc Sci Med 1997, 45(2):213-220.
• [24]McIsaac W, Goel V, Naylor D: Socio-economic status and visits to physicians by adults in Ontario. Canada J Health Serv Res Policy 1997, 2(2):94-102.
• [25]Habicht J, Kunst AE: Social inequalities in health care services utilisation after eight years of health care reforms: a cross-sectional study of Estonia, 1999. Soc Sci Med 2005, 60(4):777-787.
• [26]Ross CCW: The links between education and health. Am Sociol Rev 1995, 60(5):719-745.
• [27]Goldman DP, Smith JP: Can patient self-management help explain the SES health gradient? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99(16):10929-10934.
• [28]Wang Y: Development of the New Rural Cooperative Medical System in China. China World Econ 2007, 15(4):66-77.
• [29]Gao J, Yu B, Meng Q: Study on farmer’s cognition and appraisal on NRCMS after adjusting policy in Shandong. Chin J Health Policy 2010, 3(3):24-29.
• [30]Li W, Meng Q, Yu B, Tang S, Liu X: Cognition of pregnant and lying -in women to reimbursement policy of new rural cooperative medical scheme. Naternal Child Health Care China 2009, 33:4645-4647.
• [31]Cheung YB: Marital status and mortality in British women: a longitudinal study. Int J Epidemiol 2000, 29(1):93-99.
• [32]Johnson NJ, Backlund E, Sorlie PD, Loveless CA: Marital status and mortality: the national longitudinal mortality study. Ann Epidemiol 2000, 10(4):224-238.
• [33]Joung IM, Stronks K, van de Mheen H, Mackenbach JP: Health behaviours explain part of the differences in self reported health associated with partner/marital status in The Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health 1995, 49(5):482-488.
• [34]Li X, CY , Ding S: Health status and health inequality of farm household in poor areas China: an evidence of health inequality. Chinese Health Econ 2010, 29(5):60-62.
• [35]Li H, Xu L, Wang X: Study on equity in health status among different scioeconomic residents in Weihai. Chin Health Manage 2008, 11:776-779.
• [36]Groot W: Adaptation and scale of reference bias in self-assessments of quality of life. J Health Econ 2000, 19(3):403-420.
• [37]Sen A: Health in development. Bull World Health Organ 1999, 77(8):619-623.
• [38]World Health Organization: Global Health Declarations. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1998.