Effect of a tDCS electrode montage on implicit motor sequence learning in healthy subjects

Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine

Nam-Jong Paik¹  Eun Kyoung Kang² 

[1] Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea;Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea

关键词: Implicit learning;    Cortical stimulation;    Motor learning;    TDCS;   

Others  :  862119
DOI  :  10.1186/2040-7378-3-4

 received in 2011-01-23, accepted in 2011-04-17,  发布年份 2011

【 摘 要 】

Background

This study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that a combination of excitatory anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to the contralateral motor cortex and inhibitory cathodal tDCS to the ipsilateral motor cortex of the motor performing hand (Bi-tDCS) would elicit more implicit motor sequence learning than anodal tDCS applied to the contralateral motor cortex alone (Uni-tDCS).

Methods

Eleven healthy right-handed adults underwent a randomized crossover experiment of Uni-tDCS, Bi-tDCS, or sham stimulation. Subjects performed a 12-digit finger sequence serial reaction time task with the right hand at baseline (Pre), at immediately (Post 1), and 24 hours after stimulation (Post 2). The ratios of reaction times of predetermined repeating sequence versus random sequence were subjected to statistical analysis.

Results

The paired t test showed that reaction time ratios were significant decreased by all stimulation types at Post 1 versus Pre (P < 0.01). However, mean reaction time ratios showed a significant decrease after Uni-tDCS (P < 0.01) and Bi-tDCS (P < 0.01), but only a marginal decreased after Sham (P = 0.05) at Post 2, which suggests that motor sequence learning is consolidated by Uni-tDCS and Bi-tDCS, but only partially consolidated by sham stimulation. No significant differences were observed between Uni-tDCS and Bi-tDCS in terms of in reaction time ratios at Post 1 or 2.

Conclusions

No significant difference was found between Uni-tDCS and Bi-tDCS in terms of induced implicit motor sequence learning, but tDCS led to greater consolidation of the learned motor sequence than sham stimulation. These findings need to be tested in the context of stroke hand motor rehabilitation.

【 授权许可】

   
2011 Kang and Paik; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Boggio PS, Castro LO, Savagim EA, Braite R, Cruz VC, Rocha RR, Rigonatti SP, Silva MT, Fregni F: Enhancement of non-dominant hand motor function by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. Neurosci Lett 2006, 404(1-2):232-236.
• [2]Hunter T, Sacco P, Nitsche MA, Turner DL: Modulation of internal model formation during force field-induced motor learning by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex. J Physiol 2009, 587(Pt 12):2949-2961.
• [3]Nitsche MA, Schauenburg A, Lang N, Liebetanz D, Exner C, Paulus W, Tergau F: Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human. J Cogn Neurosci 2003, 15(4):619-626.
• [4]Reis J, Schambra HM, Cohen LG, Buch ER, Fritsch B, Zarahn E, Celnik PA, Krakauer JW: Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106(5):1590-1595.
• [5]Nitsche MA, Paulus W: Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol 2000, 527(Pt 3):633-639.
• [6]Wassermann EM, Grafman J: Recharging cognition with DC brain polarization. Trends Cogn Sci 2005, 9(11):503-505.
• [7]Vines BW, Nair D, Schlaug G: Modulating activity in the motor cortex affects performance for the two hands differently depending upon which hemisphere is stimulated. Eur J Neurosci 2008, 28(8):1667-1673.
• [8]Vines BW, Nair DG, Schlaug G: Contralateral and ipsilateral motor effects after transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroreport 2006, 17(6):671-674.
• [9]Hummel F, Celnik P, Giraux P, Floel A, Wu WH, Gerloff C, Cohen LG: Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain 2005, 128(Pt 3):490-499.
• [10]Fregni F, Boggio PS, Mansur CG, Wagner T, Ferreira MJ, Lima MC, Rigonatti SP, Marcolin MA, Freedman SD, Nitsche MA, et al.: Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neuroreport 2005, 16(14):1551-1555.
• [11]Boggio PS, Nunes A, Rigonatti SP, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F: Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2007, 25(2):123-129.
• [12]Hummel FC, Cohen LG: Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? Lancet Neurol 2006, 5(8):708-712.
• [13]Dennis NA, Howard JH, Howard DV: Implicit sequence learning without motor sequencing in young and old adults. Exp Brain Res 2006, 175(1):153-164.
• [14]Hikosaka O, Nakamura K, Sakai K, Nakahara H: Central mechanisms of motor skill learning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2002, 12(2):217-222.
• [15]Krakauer JW: Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol 2006, 19(1):84-90.
• [16]Oldfield RC: The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9(1):97-113.
• [17]Miranda PC, Faria P, Hallett M: What does the ratio of injected current to electrode area tell us about current density in the brain during tDCS? Clin Neurophysiol 2009, 120(6):1183-1187.
• [18]Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG: Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2006, 117(4):845-850.
• [19]Wilkinson L, Teo JT, Obeso I, Rothwell JC, Jahanshahi M: The Contribution of Primary Motor Cortex is Essential for Probabilistic Implicit Sequence Learning: Evidence from Theta Burst Magnetic Stimulation. J Cogn Neurosci 2009.
• [20]Okamoto M, Dan H, Sakamoto K, Takeo K, Shimizu K, Kohno S, Oda I, Isobe S, Suzuki T, Kohyama K, et al.: Three-dimensional probabilistic anatomical cranio-cerebral correlation via the international 10-20 system oriented for transcranial functional brain mapping. Neuroimage 2004, 21(1):99-111.
• [21]Robertson EM: The serial reaction time task: implicit motor skill learning? J Neurosci 2007, 27(38):10073-10075.
• [22]Vines BW, Cerruti C, Schlaug G: Dual-hemisphere tDCS facilitates greater improvements for healthy subjects' non-dominant hand compared to uni-hemisphere stimulation. BMC Neurosci 2008, 9:103. BioMed Central Full Text
• [23]Netz J, Ziemann U, Homberg V: Hemispheric asymmetry of transcallosal inhibition in man. Exp Brain Res 1995, 104(3):527-533.
• [24]Lindenberg R, Renga V, Zhu L, Nair D, Schlaug G: Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Neurology 2010, 75(24):2176.
• [25]Datta A, Bansal V, Diaz J, Patel J, Reato D, Bikson M: Gyri-precise head model of transcranial DC stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad. Brain stimulation 2009, 2(4):201.
• [26]Bikson M, Datta A, Rahman A, Scaturro J: Electrode montages for tDCS and weak transcranial electrical stimulation: Role of "return" electrode's position and size. Clinical Neurophysiology 2010.
• [27]Lang N, Siebner HR, Ward NS, Lee L, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Rothwell JC, Lemon RN, Frackowiak RS: How does transcranial DC stimulation of the primary motor cortex alter regional neuronal activity in the human brain? European Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 22(2):495-504.
• [28]Moliadze V, Antal A, Paulus W: Electrode-distance dependent after-effects of transcranial direct and random noise stimulation with extracephalic reference electrodes. Clin Neurophysiol 2010, 121(12):2165-2171.
• [29]Lindenberg R, Renga V, Zhu LL, Nair D, Schlaug G: Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Neurology 2010, 75(24):2176-2184.
• [30]Priori A, Mameli F, Cogiamanian F, Marceglia S, Tiriticco M, Mrakic-Sposta S, Ferrucci R, Zago S, Polezzi D, Sartori G: Lie-specific involvement of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in deception. Cereb Cortex 2008, 18(2):451-455.
• [31]Kansaku K, Muraki S, Umeyama S, Nishimori Y, Kochiyama T, Yamane S, Kitazawa S: Cortical activity in multiple motor areas during sequential finger movements: an application of independent component analysis. Neuroimage 2005, 28(3):669-681.