Health worker perspectives on user fee removal in Zambia

Human Resources for Health

Natasha Palmer³  Collins Chansa¹  Caesar Cheelo²  Mylene Lagarde³  Barbara S Carasso³ 

[1] Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia;University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia;London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK

关键词: Zambia;    Free care;    Health financing;    Human resources;    Motivation;    User fees;   

Others  :  822643
DOI  :  10.1186/1478-4491-10-40

 received in 2012-02-07, accepted in 2012-10-08,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

User fees for primary care services were removed in rural districts in Zambia in 2006. Experience from other countries has suggested that health workers play a key role in determining the success of a fee removal policy, but also find the implementation of such a policy challenging. The policy was introduced against a backdrop of a major shortage in qualified health staff.

Methods

As part of a larger study on the experience and effect of user fee removal in Zambia, a number of case studies at the facility level were conducted. As part of these, quantitative and qualitative data were collected to evaluate health workers’ satisfaction and experiences in charging and non-charging facilities.

Results

Our findings show that health-care workers have mixed feelings about the policy change and its consequences. We found some evidence that personnel motivation was higher in non-charging facilities compared to facilities still charging. Yet it is unclear whether this effect was due to differences in the user fee policy or to the fact that a lot of staff interviewed in non-charging facilities were working in mission facilities, where we found a significantly higher motivation. Health workers expressed satisfaction with an apparent increase in the number of patients visiting the facilities and the removal of a deterring factor for many needy patients, but also complained about an increased workload. Furthermore, working conditions were said to have worsened, which staff felt was linked to the absence of additional resources to deal with the increased demand or replace the loss of revenue generated by fees.

Conclusion

These findings highlight the need to pay attention to supply-side measures when removing demand-side barriers such as user fees and in particular to be concerned about the burden that increased demand can place on already over-stretched health workers.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Carasso et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]World Bank, T: Financing the Health Sector: an Agenda for Reform. The World Bank, Washington DC; 1987.
• [2]Xu K, et al.: Household catastrophic health expenditure: a multicountry analysis. Lancet 2003, 362(9378):111-117.
• [3]WHO, World Health Report: Health systems financing: the path to universal coverage, 2010. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2010.
• [4]Gilson L, McIntyre D: Removing user fees for primary care in Africa: the need for careful action. BMJ 2005, 331(7519):762-765.
• [5]Lagarde M, Palmer N: The impact of user fees on health service utilization in low- and middle-income countries: how strong is the evidence? Bull World Health Organ 2008, 86(11):839-848.
• [6]Burnham G, et al.: Discontinuation of cost sharing in Uganda. Bull World Health Organ 2004, 82(3):187-195.
• [7]Wilkinson D, et al.: Effect of removing user fees on attendance for curative and preventive primary health care services in rural South Africa. Bull World Health Organ 2001, 79(7):665-671.
• [8]Tashobya C, Ssengooba F, Oliveira-Cruz V: Health systems reforms in Uganda: processes and outputs. Health Systems Development Programme, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; 2006.
• [9]Miller Franco L, Bennett S, Kanfer R: Health sector reform and public sector health worker motivation: a conceptual framework. Soc Sci Med 2002, 54(8):1255-1266.
• [10]Dolea C, Adams O: Motivation of health care workers–review of theories and empirical evidence. Cah Sociol Demogr Med 2005, 45(1):135-161.
• [11]Chopra M, et al.: Evidence from Systematic Reviews of Effects to Inform Policy-Making About Optimizing the Supply, Improving the Distribution, Increasing the Efficiency and Enhancing the Performance of Health Workers in A policy brief prepared for the International Dialogue on Evidence-Informed Action to Achieve Health Goals in Developing Countries (IDEAHealth). Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, Geneva; 2006.
• [12]Henderson L, Tulloch J: Incentives for retaining and motivating health workers in Pacific and Asian countries. Human Resources for Health 2008, 6(1):18. BioMed Central Full Text
• [13]Willis-Shattuck M, et al.: Improving motivation and retention of health professionals in developing countries: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2008, 8:247. BioMed Central Full Text
• [14]Lu H, While AE, Louise K: Barriball, Job satisfaction among nurses: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud 2005, 42(2):211-227.
• [15]Carasso B, et al.: Evaluating the impact of abolishing user fees – Evidence from case studies in five districts in Zambia. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London; 2010.
• [16]Lagarde M: Analysis of the impact of user fee removal on health seeking behaviours using a difference-in-differences approach. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London; 2010.
• [17]Lagarde M, Palmer N: Removal of user fees in Zambia: was the impact sustained over time?. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; London, London;
• [18]Ferrinho P, et al.: The human resource for health situation in Zambia: deficit and maldistribution. Human Resources for Health 2011, 9(1):30. BioMed Central Full Text
• [19]Government of the Republic of Zambia: Human Resources for Health Strategic Plan 2006–2010. Ministry of Health Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia; 2006.
• [20]Government of Zambia: Guidelines Removal of User Fees in Public Health Facilities in Zambia: Lusaka. Ministry of Health, Zambia; 2006.
• [21]Nabyonga-Orem J, et al.: Maintaining quality of health services after abolition of user fees: a Uganda case study. BMC Health Serv Res 2008, 8:102. BioMed Central Full Text
• [22]Walker L, Gilson L: ‘We are bitter but we are satisfied’: nurses as street-level bureaucrats in South Africa. Soc Sci Med 2004, 59(6):1251-1261.
• [23]Witter S, Kusi A, Aikins M: Working practices and incomes of health workers: evidence from an evaluation of a delivery fee exemption scheme in Ghana. Hum Resour Health 2007, 5:2. BioMed Central Full Text
• [24]UNDP: Human Development Index Statistics. 2012. http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/ webcite. 2012 Accessed 5 Oct 2012
• [25]WHO: Annual Report for Zambia Country Office. WHO, Lusaka, Zambia; 2011.
• [26]Herzberg F, Mausner B, Snyderman BB: The motivation to work. John Wiley & Sons, New York; 1953.
• [27]Cheelo C: Do User Fee Revenues Matter? Assessing the Influences of the Removal of User Fees on Health Financial Resources in Zambia. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London; 2010.
• [28]Carasso B, et al.: Drug availability around the time of user fee removal in Zambia. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London; 2010.
• [29]Government of the Republic of Zambia: Health Sector Joint Annual Review Report, 2006. Ministry of Health, Lusaka; 2007.
• [30]Government of the Republic of Zambia: Zambia Public Expenditure Tracking and Quality of Service Delivery Survey in the Health Sector–findings and implications. Swedish International Development Agency, Government of the Republic of Zambia, World Bank, University of Zambia; 2007.
• [31]Witter S, et al.: The experience of Ghana in implementing a user fee exemption policy to provide free delivery care. Reprod Health Matters 2007, 15(30):61-71.
• [32]Chuma J, et al.: Reducing user fees for primary health care in Kenya: Policy on paper or policy in practice? Int J Equity Health 2009, 8:15. BioMed Central Full Text
• [33]Walsh A, et al.: Task sharing in Zambia: HIV service scale-up compounds the human resource crisis. BMC Health Serv Res 2010, 10:272. BioMed Central Full Text
• [34]NHSP IV MTR Team: Mid-Term Review of the Zambia National Health Strategic Plan NHSP IV, 2006–2010. 2008.