Perceptions of government knowledge and control over contributions of aid organizations and INGOs to health in Nepal: a qualitative study

Globalization and Health

Radheshyam Khatri Chettri¹  Bikram Shrestha¹  Prashant Khatiwada¹  Aditi Giri¹ 

[1] Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Nepal

关键词: Sector-wide approach;    Paris declaration;    Nepal;    International aid;    Coordination;    Aid effectiveness;    Accra action agenda;   

Others  :  819392
DOI  :  10.1186/1744-8603-9-1

 received in 2012-06-14, accepted in 2013-01-15,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Almost 50% of the Nepali health budget is made up of international aid. International Non-Governmental Organizations working in the field of health are able to channel their funds directly to grass root level. During a 2010 conference, the Secretary of Population stated that the government has full knowledge and control over all funds and projects coming to Nepal. However, there are no documents to support this. The study aims to assess government and partner perceptions on whether Government of Nepal currently has full knowledge of contributions of international aid organizations and International Non-Governmental Organizations to health in Nepal and to assess if the government is able to control all foreign contributions to fit the objectives of Second Long Term Health Plan (1997–2017).

Methods

A qualitative study was performed along with available literature review. Judgmental and snowball sampling led to 26 in depth interviews with key informants from the government, External Development Partners and International Non-Governmental Organizations. Results were triangulated based on source of data. Representatives of the Department of Health Services declined to be interviewed. Data collection was done until researchers felt data saturation had been reached with each group of key informants.

Results

While Ministry of Health and Population leads the sector wide approach that aims to integrate all donor and International Non-Governmental Organization contributions to health and direct them to the government’s priority areas, questions were raised around its capacity to do so. Similarly, informants questioned the extent to which Social Welfare Council was able to control all International Non-Governmental Organizations contributions. Political tumult, corruption in the government, lack of human resources in the government, lack of coordination between government bodies, convoluted bureaucracy, and unreliability of donor and International Non-Governmental Organization contributions were identified as the main reasons for difficulties in aid integration.

Conclusions

Despite its commitment to coordinate and control development assistance to the health sector, and its leadership position of the Sector Wide Approach, complete knowledge and effective coordination of all international contributions remains a challenge and is hampered by issues within the government as well as among External Development Partners and International Non-Governmental Organizations.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Giri et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]The Economist: The Maoists triumph. The Economist Newspaper Limited. 2008 April 17 [Citation 2012 August 20]. http://www.economist.com/node/11057207 webcite
• [2]Shiffman J: HIV/AIDS and the rest of the global health agenda [Editorial]. Bull World Health Organ 2006, 84:923.
• [3]Sharma SP: Politics and corruption mar health care in Nepal. The Lancet 2010, 375:2064-2068. http://download.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140673610609452.pdf webcite
• [4]Shiffman J: Generating political priority for maternal mortality reduction in 5 developing countries. Am J Public Health 2007, 97:796-803.
• [5]Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD): Development aid at a glance statistics by region – Asia. 2012. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/39/51/42139371.pdf webcite
• [6]Gautam MS, Pokhrel B: Foreign Aid and Public Policy Process in Nepal A Case of Forestry and Local Governance. http://asd.org.np/en/policy-discussions/finish/3-policy-discussions/5-foreign-aid-and-public-policy-process-in-nepal webcite
• [7]Development Gateway: Foreign Aid in Nepal FY 2010–11: Development Gateway: Foreign Aid in Nepal FY 2010–11. Nepal Development Gateway and Government, Nepal; 2010. http://www.developmentgateway.org/dg_uploads/pdfs/publication3.pdf webcite
• [8]Chaulagain YP, Official Development Assistance in Nepal: A Development Perspective. E-International Relations. 2012. http://www.e-ir.info/2012/08/28/official-development-assistance-in-nepal-a-development-perspective/ webcite
• [9]Department of Health Services: Description of Task. Department of Health Services, Nepal Government; 2010. http://dohs.gov.np/?q=node/19 webcite
• [10]Social Welfare Council Nepal: The Social Welfare Act, 2049 (1992). The Social Welfare Act, 2049 (1992), The Social Welfare Act, 2049 (1992); 1992. http://www.swc.org.np/swc_act.php webcite
• [11]Barker C, Ghimire K, Pandey N, Hepworth S: Capacity Assessment for Health Systems Strengthening. Nepal Health Sector Support Program; 2010. http://www.nhssp.org.np/health_policy/HPP%20Capacity%20Assessment.pdf webcite
• [12]Nepal Government: Second Long Term Health Plan 1997–2017. Ministry of Health and Population. Government of Nepal, Kathmandu; 2012. http://mohp.gov.np/english/publication/second_long_term_health_plan_1997_2017.php webcite
• [13]Nepal Government: Nepal Health Sector Programme – Implementation Plan(NHSP-IP). Ministry of Health, Kathmandu; 2004:1-4.
• [14]Nepal Government: Nepal Health Sector Programme – Implementation Plan(NHSP-IP). Ministry of Health, Kathmandu; 2004:5-7.
• [15]Dodd R, Huntington D, Hill PS: Programme alignment in higher level planning processes: a four country case-study for reproductive health. Int J Health Plann Manage 2009, 24b:193-204.
• [16]Montegut AJ: To achieve “Health for All” we must shift the world’s paradigm to “Primary Care Access for All”. J Am Board Fam Med 2007, 20:514-517.
• [17]Swanson RC, Mosley H, Sanders D, Egilman D, Maeseneer JD, Chowdhury D, Lanata CF, Dearden K, Bryant M: Call for global health-systems impact assessments. Lancet 2009, 374:433-435.
• [18]Cueto M: The origins of primary health care and selective primary health care. Am J Public Health 2004, 94:1864-1873.
• [19]OECD: Paris Declaration and Accra Agenda for Action. OECD, Paris; 2005. http://www.oecd.org/…/0,2340,en_2649_3236398_35401554_1_1_1_1,00.html webcite
• [20]Shiffman J: HIV/AIDS and the rest of the global health agenda. Bull World Health Organ [Editorial] 2006, 84:923.
• [21]Piller C, Smith D: Unintended victims of Gates Foundation generosity. Times, Los Angeles; 2006. http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-gates16dec16,0,3743924.story webcite
• [22]Maeseneer JD, Weel CV, Egilman D, Mfenyana K, Kaufman A, Sewankambo N: Strengthening primary care: addressing the disparity between vertical and horizontal investment. Br J Gen Pract 2008, 58:3-4.
• [23]Nepal Government: Second Long Term Health Plan 1997–2017. Ministry of Health and Population Government of Nepal, Kathmandu; 2007:111-112.
• [24]Cassels A, Janovsky K: Sectoral Investment in Health: Prescription or Principles? Soc Sci Med 1997, 44:1073-1076.
• [25]Walt G, Pavignani E, Gilson L, Buse K: Health sector development: from aid coordination to resource management. Health Policy Plan 1999, 14:207-218.
• [26]Marasini BR: Health sector reforms and sector wide approach in health sector in Nepal: Sharing experience. Ministry of Health and Population, Kahtmandu; 2008. http://www.mwrhd.gov.np/download/SWAP.pdf webcite
• [27]Vaillancourt D: Do Health Sector Wide Approaches Achieve Results ?. World Bank; 2009. [Emerging Evidence and Lessons from Six Countries: Independent Evaluation Group]
• [28]Schmidt A: Health aid effectiveness in Nepal - Paris, Accra, civil society and the poor. Action for Global Health, Kathmandu; 2009.
• [29]Nepal Government: 2011 Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration. Ministry of Finance, Government of Nepal; 2011:16. http://www.mof.gov.np/facd/pdf/paris.pdf webcite
• [30]Tiwari S, Lekhak SC, Baral P, Adhikari R, Poudel LR, Thapa MB, Lievens T: Reviewing Health Budget 2011/12. Nepal Health Sector Support Programme and Ministry of Health and Population, Kathmandu, Nepal; 2011.
• [31]Poverty Reduction in Nepal: South Asia: One World Group. 2011. http://uk.oneworld.net/guides/nepal/poverty webcite
• [32]Nepal Government: Foreign Aid Policy, 2009. A Draft for Discussion at the Nepal Development Forum Stakeholders’ Consultation Meeting 2009. http://www.mof.gov.np/ndf2009/pdf/paper/Foreign_Aid_Policy_Eng.pdf webcite
• [33]Atun R, Jongh T, Secci F, Ohiri K, Adeyl O: A systemic review of the evidence on integration of targeted health interventions into health systems. Health Policy Plann 2010, 25:1-14.
• [34]Hutton G, Tanner M: The sector wide approach: a blessing for public health. Bull World Health Organ 2004, 82:891-970.
• [35]Pokharel S: Monitoring MDGs Progress – Health sector and beyond. Ministry of Health and Population. 2010. http://www.ain.org.np/documents/MDG_wshop_final.pdf webcite
• [36]Powell-Jackson T, Mills A: A review of health resource tracking in developing countries. Health Policy Plann 2007, 22:353-362.
• [37]Tragard A, Shrestha IB: System-wide effects of global fund investments in Nepal. Health Policy Plann 2010, 25:158-162.
• [38]Piva P, Dodd R: Where did all the aid go? An in-depth analysis of increases health aid flow over the past 10 years. Bull World Health Organ 2009, 87:930-939.
• [39]Transparency International: Corruption Perception Index 2010 Results: Transparency International. 2011. http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2010/results webcite