Are population abundances and biomasses of soil invertebrates changed by Bt crops compared with conventional crops? A systematic review protocol

Environmental Evidence

Paul Henning Krogh²  Jeremy B Sweet¹  Niels Bohse Hendriksen⁴  Christian Frølund Damgaard²  Kaloyan Kostov³ 

[1] Sweet Environmental Consultants, 6 Green Street, Willingham, Cambridge CB24 5JA, UK;Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, P.O. Box 314, Vejlsøvej 25, 8600 Silkeborg, Denmark;Agrobioinstitute, 8 Dragan Tzankov Blvd, BG-1164 Sofia, Bulgaria;Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark

关键词: Meta-analysis;    Systematic review;    Population changes;    Soil invertebrates;    Non-target organisms;    Bt crops;   

Others  :  800821
DOI  :  10.1186/2047-2382-3-10

 received in 2014-02-08, accepted in 2014-05-07,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Bt crops modified by inserting and expressing the Cry toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis have raised environmental concerns over consequences for sustainability of soil biodiversity and ecosystems services in agricultural land. Part of this concern is related to the possible effects of the exposure to Cry toxins of non-target soil invertebrates as a result of Bt crops cultivation. Soil invertebrate members of microfauna, mesofauna and macrofauna play significant roles in nutrient cycling and energy flow and thus are crucial for soil ecological functions. In recent years, a number of studies have compared the population abundance and biomass of different members of soil biota in fields planted with genetically modified Bt crops and their conventional counterparts. In the present systematic review protocol, we describe the methodology and quality standards to perform a rigorous literature search and a quantitative synthesis of the evidence provided by these studies as required for conducting a Systematic Review.

Methods

The question that the systematic review will ask is whether populations of soil invertebrates differ under Bt crops and conventional crops. Relevant research literature will be collected systematically through a comprehensive search strategy. A scoping exercise was performed to identify search terms likely to capture appropriate studies and the results were verified using a list of relevant publications as references. The criteria against which studies will be included in the review are present, as well as the methodology for the quality assessment. To be included the study must contain relevant population abundances or biomass data on soil invertebrates exposed to characterised Bt proteins from field studies. The Review Protocol outlines the type of analyses that will be performed to assess bias of the selected studies and if covariables describing the heterogeneity of the studies introduce bias. Comparative effect sizes irrespective of statistical significance of effects will be calculated for individual studies and stored in publicly available databases ready for synthesis of all the studies. These treatment effects on population data will be compared across the studies in a meta-analysis using Hedges’ g.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Kostov et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Gatehouse JA: Biotechnological prospects for engineering insect-resistant plants. Plant Physiol 2008, 146:881-887.
• [2]Marshall A: Existing agbiotech traits continue global march. Nat Biotechnol 2012, 30:207-207.
• [3]Romeis J, Bartsch D, Bigler F, Candolfi MP, Gielkens MMC, Hartley SE, Hellmich RL, Huesing JE, Jepson PC, Layton R, Quemada H, Raybould A, Rose RI, Schiemann J, Sears MK, Shelton AM, Sweet J, Vaituzis Z, Wolt JD: Assessment of risk of insect-resistant transgenic crops to nontarget arthropods. Nat Biotechnol 2008, 26:203-208.
• [4]Lavelle P, Decäens T, Aubert M, Barot S, Blouin M, Bureau F, Margerie P, Mora P, Rossi JP: Soil invertebrates and ecosystem services. Eur J Soil Biol 2006, 42(Supplement 1):S3-S15.
• [5]De Vries FT, Thébault E, Liiri M, Birkhofer K, Tsiafouli MA, Bjørnlund L, Bracht Jørgensen H, Brady MV, Christensen S, de Ruiter PC, d’ Hertefeldt T, Frouz J, Hedlund K, Hemerik L, Hol WHG, Hotes S, Mortimer SR, Setälä H, Sgardelis SP, Uteseny K, van der Putten WH, Wolters V, Bardgett RD: Soil food web properties explain ecosystem services across European land use systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2013, 110:14296-14301.
• [6]Krogh PH, Griffiths B, Demšar D, Bohanec M, Debeljak M, Andersen MN, Sausse C, Birch ANE, Caul S, Holmstrup M, Heckmann LH, Cortet J: Responses by earthworms to reduced tillage in herbicide tolerant maize and Bt maize cropping systems. Pedobiologia 2007, 51:219-227.
• [7]Marvier M: Using meta-analysis to inform risk assessment and risk management. J Verbr Lebensm 2011, 6:113-118.
• [8]Duan JJ, Lundgren JG, Naranjo S, Marvier M: Extrapolating non-target risk of Bt crops from laboratory to field. Biol Lett 2010, 6:74-77.
• [9]Duan JJ, Marvier M, Huesing J, Dively G, Huang ZY: A meta-analysis of effects of Bt crops on honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). PLoS One 2008, 3:e1415.
• [10]Marvier M, McCreedy C, Regetz J, Kareiva P: A meta-analysis of effects of Bt cotton and maize on nontarget invertebrates. Science 2007, 316:1475-1477.
• [11]Naranjo SE: Impacts of Bt crops on non-target invertebrates and insecticide use patterns. CAB Rev: Perspect Agric, Vet Sci, Nutr Nat Resour 2009, 4:1-11.
• [12]Wolfenbarger LL, Naranjo SE, Lundgren JG, Bitzer RJ, Watrud LS: Bt crop effects on functional guilds of non-target arthropods: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e2118.
• [13]Carpenter JE: Impact of GM crops on biodiversity. GM Crops 2011, 2:7-23.
• [14]Icoz I, Stotzky G: Fate and effects of insect-resistant Bt crops in soil ecosystems. Soil Biol Biochem 2008, 40:559-586.
• [15]O’Callaghan M, Glare TR, Burgess EPJ, Malone LA: Effects of plants genetically modified for insect resistance on nontarget organisms. Annu Rev Entomol 2005, 50:271-292.
• [16]A programming environment for data analysis and graphics version 3.0.1 (2013-05-16) http://www.r-project.org/ webcite
• [17]SAS Institute Inc: SAS/STAT® 9.3 User’s Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 2011.
• [18]Walker E, Hernandez AV, Kattan MW: Meta-analysis: its strengths and limitations. Cleve Clin J Med 2008, 75:431-439.
• [19]Sterne JAC, Egger M: Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol 2001, 54:1046-1055.